Cited by 37Schizophrenia research and treatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health and Psychiatry

Rumination and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia

Halari, Rozmin, Premkumar, Preethi, Farquharson, Lorna, Fannon, Dominic, Kuipers, Elizabeth, Kumari, Veena·2009·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Rumination is thought to be an important maintaining factor in depression. Depressive symptomatology is also a prominent feature in schizophrenia. However, little is known about the relationship between rumination and symptoms, such as depression and negative symptoms, in schizophrenia. The present study examined associations between rumination and symptoms in a group of 37 stable medicated patients with schizophrenia. All participants were clinically assessed on their symptoms and completed self-reported measures of depression and rumination. The findings showed that negative symptoms, especially emotional withdrawal and stereotyped thinking, but not depressive symptomatology, were associated with rumination in the present sample of patients with schizophrenia. If the findings are replicated, interventions that reduce rumination and rigid thinking might be helpful to reduce some negative symptoms of psychosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181b3af20

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halari, R., Premkumar, P., Farquharson, L., Fannon, D., Kuipers, E., & Kumari, V.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Halari, Rozmin
  • Premkumar, Preethi
  • Fannon, Dominic
  • Kuipers, Elizabeth
  • Kumari, Veena
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2009-09
Volume
197
Issue
9
Pages
703-706
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086613518
Cited by
37
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
rumination, schizophrenia, negative symptoms, depression, emotional withdrawal, rigid thinking, psychosis, depressive symptoms
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review