Cited by 104Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Providing a sense of touch to prosthetic hands

Nghiem, Bao Tram, Sando, Ian C., Gillespie, R. Brent, McLaughlin, Bryan L., Gerling, Gregory J., Langhals, Nicholas B., Urbanchek, Melanie G., Cederna, Paul S.·2015·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

Each year, approximately 185,000 Americans suffer the devastating loss of a limb. The effects of upper limb amputations are profound because a person's hands are tools for everyday functioning, expressive communication, and other uniquely human attributes. Despite the advancements in prosthetic technology, current upper limb prostheses are still limited in terms of complex motor control and sensory feedback. Sensory feedback is critical to restoring full functionality to amputated patients because it would relieve the cognitive burden of relying solely on visual input to monitor motor commands and provide tremendous psychological benefits. This article reviews the latest innovations in sensory feedback and argues in favor of peripheral nerve interfaces. First, the authors examine the structure of the peripheral nerve and its importance in the development of a sensory interface. Second, the authors discuss advancements in targeted muscle reinnervation and direct neural stimulation by means of intraneural electrodes. The authors then explore the future of prosthetic sensory feedback using innovative technologies for neural signaling, specifically, the sensory regenerative peripheral nerve interface and optogenetics. These breakthroughs pave the way for the development of a prosthetic limb with the ability to feel.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000001289

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nghiem et al. (2015) proposed a method using an insulated electrode on muscle surface to stimulate muscle, which then depolarizes afferent nerve within the muscle to provide sensory feedback.

    “Another methodology to attain feedback has been proposed by Nghiem et al. (2015), which can be used for transferring sensory signals from a prosthetic sensor to the residual nerve. In this method, an insulated electrode placed on the surface of a muscle was used to stimulate the muscle, which then depolarized the afferent nerve within the muscle to provide sensory feedback.”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Nghiem et al. (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nghiem, B. T., Sando, I. C., Gillespie, R. B., McLaughlin, B. L., Gerling, G. J., Langhals, N. B., Urbanchek, M. G., & Cederna, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Draper Laboratory (US)
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2015-06
Volume
135
Issue
6
Pages
1652-1663
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W432310612
Cited by
104
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
prosthetic hand, sensory feedback, upper limb amputation, peripheral nerve interfaces, targeted muscle reinnervation, optogenetics, neuronal signaling, prosthesis development
MeSH terms
Amputation, Traumatic, Artificial Limbs, Female, Forecasting, Hand, Humans, Male, Prosthesis Design, Psychomotor Performance, Sensory Thresholds, Touch, Treatment Outcome, Prosthesis Fitting, Touch Perception, Feedback, Sensory, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review