Cited by 571Bone Metabolism and DiseasesSignaling Pathways in DiseaseNuclear Receptors and Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulation of NFATc1 in Osteoclast Differentiation

Open access
Kim, Jung Ha, Kim, Nacksung·2014·Journal of Bone Metabolism

Abstract

Osteoclasts are unique cells that degrade the bone matrix. These large multinucleated cells differentiate from the monocyte/macrophage lineage upon stimulation by two essential cytokines, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) ligand (RANKL). Activation of transcription factors such as microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF), c-Fos, NF-κB, and nuclear factor-activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) is required for sufficient osteoclast differentiation. In particular, NFATc1 plays the role of a master transcription regulator of osteoclast differentiation. To date, several mechanisms, including transcription, methylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, and non-coding RNAs, have been shown to regulate expression and activation of NFATc1. In this review, we have summarized the various mechanisms that control NFATc1 regulation during osteoclast differentiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11005/jbm.2014.21.4.233

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 69 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 571

Metadata

Authors
Kim, J. H., & Kim, N.
Affiliations
Chonnam National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Nacksung
Venue
Journal of Bone Metabolism
Published
2014
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
233
ISSN
  • 2287-6375 (ISSN-L)
  • 2287-7029
OpenAlex
W2132541910
Cited by
570
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 17
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Bone Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
NFATc1, osteoclastogenesis, transcriptional regulation, epigenetic regulation, DNA methylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, non-coding RNA, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, RANKL, MITF, c-fos, NF-κB, bone resorption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review