PreprintCited by 575SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

The N501Y spike substitution enhances SARS-CoV-2 transmission

Open access
Liu, Yang, Liu, Jianying, Plante, Kenneth S., Plante, Jessica A., Xie, Xuping, Zhang, Xianwen, Ku, Zhiqiang, An, Zhiqiang +5 more·2021·Nature

Abstract

Summary: Beginning in the summer of 2020, a variant of SARS-CoV-2, the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic, emerged in the United Kingdom (UK). This B.1.1.7 variant increased rapidly in prevalence among sequenced strains, attributed to an increase in infection and/or transmission efficiency. The UK variant has 19 nonsynonymous mutations across its viral genome including 8 substitutions or deletions in the spike protein, which interacts with cellular receptors to mediate infection and tropism. Here, using a reverse genetics approach, we show that, of the 8 individual spike protein substitutions, only N501Y exhibited consistent fitness gains for replication in the upper airway in the hamster model as well as primary human airway epithelial cells. The N501Y substitution recapitulated the phenotype of enhanced viral transmission seen with the combined 8 UK spike mutations, suggesting it is a major determinant responsible for increased transmission of this variant. Mechanistically, the N501Y substitution improved the affinity of the viral spike protein for cellular receptors. As suggested by its convergent evolution in Brazil and South Africa, our results indicate that N501Y substitution is a major adaptive spike mutation of major concern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.03.08.434499

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • N501Y increases ACE2 affinity and increases virus replication in human upper-airway cells and in the upper respiratory tracts of hamsters.

    “N501Y increases ACE2 affinity 128,146,147 and increases virus replication in human upper-airway cells and in the upper respiratory tracts of hamsters 127”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harcourt, J. et al. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with 455 Coronavirus Disease, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 26, 1266-1273, doi:10.3201/eid2606.200516 (2020). · DOI
  2. Chan, J. F. et al. Simulation of the clinical and pathological manifestations of 475 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in golden Syrian hamster model: implications for disease pathogenesis and transmissibility. Clin. Infect. Dis., doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa325 (2020). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Y., Liu, J., Plante, K. S., Plante, J. A., Xie, X., Zhang, X., Ku, Z., An, Z., Scharton, D., Schindewolf, C., Menachery, V. D., Shi, P.-Y., & Weaver, S. C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine for the Prevention of Human Diseases (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shi, Pei-Yong
  • Weaver, Scott C.
Venue
Nature
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-03-09
Volume
602
Issue
7896
Pages
294-299
ISSN
0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3216019834
Cited by
574
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 181 · 2021: 87
FWCI
37.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP150551, RP150551 and RP190561, RP190561, AI153602)
  • University of Texas System
  • National Institutes of Health (AG049042, UL1TR001439)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG049042)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R24AI120942, R01AI134907, R01AI153602, AI153602, AG049042, AI134907, T32AI007526)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, N501Y mutation, spike protein, B.1.1.7 Alpha variant, virus transmission, viral fitness, receptor binding affinity, airway epithelial cells, hamster model, convergent evolution, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review