Variant-to-function mapping of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease GWAS signals in human microglial cell models implicates RTFDC1 at the CASS4 locus
Open accessAbstract
Late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) research has principally focused on neurons over the years due to their known role in the production of amyloid beta plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. In contrast, recent genomic studies of LOAD have implicated microglia as culprits of the prolonged inflammation exacerbating the neurodegeneration observed in patient brains. Indeed, recent LOAD genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have reported multiple loci near genes related to microglial function, including TREM2 , ABI3 , and CR1 . However, GWAS alone cannot pinpoint underlying causal variants or effector genes at such loci, as most signals reside in non-coding regions of the genome and could presumably confer their influence frequently via long-range regulatory interactions. We elected to carry out a combination of ATAC-seq and high-resolution promoter-focused Capture-C in two human microglial cell models (iPSC-derived microglia and HMC3) in order to physically map interactions between LOAD GWAS-implicated candidate causal variants and their corresponding putative effector genes. Notably, we observed consistent evidence that rs6024870 at the GWAS CASS4 locus contacted the promoter of nearby gene, RTFDC1 . We subsequently observed a directionallly consistent decrease in RTFDC1 expression with the the protective minor A allele of rs6024870 via both luciferase assays in HMC3 cells and expression studies in primary human microglia. Through CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion of the putative regulatory region harboring rs6024870 in HMC3 cells, we observed increased pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and decreased DNA double strand break repair related, at least in part, to RTFDC1 expression levels. Our variant-to-function approach therefore reveals that the rs6024870-harboring regulatory element at the LOAD ‘ CASS4’ GWAS locus influences both microglial inflammatory capacity and DNA damage resolution, along with cumulative evidence implicating RTFDC1 as a novel candidate effector gene.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Using ATAC-seq and promoter-focused Capture-C in iPSC-derived microglia and HMC3 cells, this study maps LOAD GWAS variants to putative effector genes and identifies rs6024870 at the CASS4 locus as contacting the RTFDC1 promoter. Functional dissection in HMC3 cells indicates that the rs6024870-harboring microglial enhancer influences inflammatory cytokine secretion and DNA double-strand break resolution, with cumulative evidence implicating RTFDC1.
Key findings
- From 111 sentinel SNPs (101 after LD pruning) and 2,835 proxy SNPs, ATAC-seq prioritized 156 open proxies in iMg and 29 in HMC3 (42 shared); Capture-C identified 36 contacts linking 34 open SNP-containing regions to 34 gene promoters, with 21/36 (58%) distal-only, 7 (19%) nearest-gene, and 8 (22%) both; 26 SNPs contacted one effector gene and 7 contacted more than one.
- rs6024870 at the CASS4 locus is in strong LD with sentinel rs6069737 (r² = 0.97), lies in open chromatin in both microglial models and ex vivo microglia, contacts the RTFDC1 promoter, and shows microglia-specific H3K27ac enrichment; it is 19 bp upstream of ENCODE cCRE E2123559.
- CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of the ~400 bp rs6024870-harboring enhancer in HMC3 cells yielded 75 differentially expressed genes (47 upregulated, 28 downregulated); RTFDC1 was downregulated by fold change 0.82 (not significant) and protein fold change 0.72, while IL-6 and IL-8 secretion increased significantly (P < 0.01 for both); RTFDC1 overexpression increased IL-8 (P < 0.001) but not IL-6 (P = 0.198).
- Enhancer-KO cells cleared only 20.5% of γH2AX fluorescence from hour 0 to 24 versus 41.2% in mock cells (P < 2.2×10⁻¹⁶); RTFDC1 siRNA knockdown (95% decrease) cleared 18.5%, and RTFDC1 overexpression restored clearance to 41.6%; luciferase assays showed the major G allele increased expression 2.3-fold (P < 0.001) while the minor A allele showed a non-significant 2.0-fold change; microglial RNA-seq showed GG individuals averaged 93.40 TPM versus 85.30 TPM in GA (P = 0.0385), and 18 of 19 TF motifs were strengthened by the minor allele.
Methods
- Variant-to-gene mapping used two human microglial models: iPSC-derived microglia (iMg) and HMC3. ATAC-seq (three replicate libraries per cell type) and high-resolution promoter-focused Capture-C (three replicate libraries per cell type, DpnII, CHiCAGO) were combined with LOAD GWAS sentinel SNPs from Bellenguez et al. and Wightman et al., LD expansion (r² > 0.7) via SNiPA/1000 Genomes European panel, and partitioned heritability LD score regression.
- Functional validation in HMC3 cells included dual-luciferase assays with a 1,031 bp enhancer region and the RTFDC1 promoter, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion of the ~400 bp rs6024870-harboring region, bulk RNA-seq, immunoblotting, IL-6/IL-8 ELISA, γH2AX immunofluorescence after etoposide-induced double-strand breaks, RTFDC1 siRNA knockdown, and lentiviral RTFDC1 overexpression.
- Public data analyses included GTEx eQTL lookup and microglia RNA-seq from fresh human brain tissue to test rs6024870 effects on RTFDC1 expression.
Limitations
- The paper states that HMC3 is an immortalized cell line that does not secrete LOAD-relevant TNF-α or IL-1β, limiting the cytokines that could be assayed; it also states that RTFDC1 levels were not significantly changed in enhancer-KO cells at RNA or protein level, so other effector genes at the locus may contribute, and that the enhancer may regulate multiple genes including CASS4, CSTF1, AURKA, FAM210B, and TFAP2C.
- The paper states that future work is needed to validate the enhancer deletion in iMg and to generate iMg lines with a single base-pair change at rs6024870 to characterize allele-specific effects in a model closer to in vivo human microglia.
- Evident from the text: the microglial eQTL analysis included only 2 individuals homozygous for the minor allele, so only GG and GA individuals were compared; the minor-allele luciferase decrease did not reach significance; RTFDC1 overexpression did not rescue IL-6 and unexpectedly increased IL-8; and several protein-level trends were not statistically significant.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
36 of 45 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A meta-analysis of GWAS colocalized genes showed strong enrichment in genes active in immune-related tissues, including microglia.
“However, a meta-analysis of GWAS colocalized genes showed strong enrichment in genes active in immune-related tissues, including the microglia5, the resident macrophages of the central nervous system (CNS).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
The Results section ('Gene-sets implicated in AD and AD-by-proxy'; page not provided) reports associations with immune-related tissues and microglia, but calls the tissue associations suggestive and says none survived correction across all gene-sets. The Methods describe gene-based association and gene-set analyses, not an analysis of GWAS-colocalized genes. Thus 'strong enrichment' and 'colocalized genes' overstate or misdescribe the reported analysis. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
LD score regression of LOAD GWAS-associated variants showed greatest enrichment in microglia compared to all other brain cell types.
“Additionally, linkage disequilibrium (LD) score regression of LOAD GWAS-associated variants showed greatest enrichment in microglia compared to all other brain cell types, further suggesting that this cell type plays a central role in LOAD pathogenesis12.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
The Results section on common-variant heritability reports LD-score regression of AD heritability using macrophage or microglia motif sets, and the microglia Results section reports enrichment of AD risk variants at microglial open-chromatin sites. Neither passage reports an LD-score regression comparison across brain cell types or establishes that microglia had the greatest enrichment among them. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
In a publicly available patient RNA-seq dataset of microglia from fresh human brain tissue, rs6024870 genotypes were 70 GG, 21 GA, and 2 AA.
“We identified from the dataset 70 individuals homozygous for the major allele (GG), 21 heterozygous individuals (GA), and only 2 individuals homozygous for the minor allele (AA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
The Materials and Methods (section 2.2, page unavailable) describe experiments with the CHME3 human microglial cell line, not a patient RNA-seq dataset. Searches for rs6024870, the genotype counts, and RNA-seq of fresh human brain tissue found no passage reporting the claimed data. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The TFs whose motifs overlay rs6024870 are reported to act as transcriptional repressors, such as TGIF2, HBP1, and NR1D1.
“and are reported to act as transcriptional repressors, such as TGIF262, HBP163, and NR1D164”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The causal SNP at the LOAD GWAS-implicated BIN1 locus resides within an enhancer that is only active in microglia, and not other CNS cell types.
“Indeed, the causal SNP at the LOAD GWAS-implicated BIN1 locus resides within an enhancer that is only active in the microglia, and not other CNS cell types22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
- Premisecitation
A recent proteome-wide association study in LOAD showed that brains of LOAD patients from the ROS-MAP cohort had increased levels of RTFDC1 compared to unaffected controls.
“This direction of effect is consistent with a recent proteome-wide association study in LOAD showing that the brains of LOAD patients from the ROS-MAP cohort presented with increased levels of RTFDC1 when compared to unaffected controls71.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] source
The introductory results and Methods describe a proteome-wide association study using ROS/MAP brain samples and identify RTFDC1 among proteins implicated in Alzheimer’s disease. They do not report that ROS/MAP patients with late-onset Alzheimer’s had higher measured RTFDC1 levels than unaffected controls; the reported association concerns genetically regulated protein abundance, not a direct patient–control comparison. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
GSEA identified five upregulated and 105 downregulated pathways in enhancer-KO cells.
“We performed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis52,53 with GSEA using the Reactome pathways (leveraging all 21,051 genes used in the differential expression analysis ranked by log2FC*-log10 P-value) and identified five upregulated (Table 2) and 105 downregulated pathways (Table 3 and Suppl. Table 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The activity-by-contact model predicts that rs6024870 also contacts multiple other genes within the same TAD, including CASS4, CSTF1, AURKA, FAM210B, and TFAP2C in THP1 cells.
“the activity-by-contact model predicts that this SNP also contacts multiple other genes within the same TAD, including CASS4, CSTF1, AURKA, FAM210B, and TFAP2C in THP1 cells (an immortalized human monocyte cell line derived from an acute monocytic leukemia patient)72,73.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [72] source
The Methods section, “Activity-by-Contact model predictions” (page unavailable), describes how the model predicts enhancer–gene connections, and the Extended Data discuss its use in THP1 cells. Neither passage reports a prediction for rs6024870 or its contacts with the five named genes within a TAD. Searches for the SNP, the gene names, and the claimed TAD contacts found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [73] source
The paper describes the activity-by-contact model as a predictor of enhancer–gene connections (Methods, “Activity by Contact (ABC) model”). But its Data Availability Statement lists predictions for six cell types, not THP1, and our copy does not report a prediction linking rs6024870 to CASS4, CSTF1, AURKA, FAM210B, or TFAP2C within a TAD. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: The activity-by-contact model predictions in THP1 cells are informative for microglial enhancer-promoter contacts.
- Findingcitation
rs6024870 is in strong LD with the sentinel SNP at the CASS4 locus (rs6069737, r2 = 0.97).
“We prioritized this variant as it is in strong LD with the sentinel SNP at this locus (rs6069737, r2 = 0.97), and lies within open chromatin in both of our microglial cell models, as well as in ex vivo human microglia 22.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
The paper’s section on AD-risk variants and microglial enhancers discusses linkage disequilibrium generally, but does not report the claimed relationship at the CASS4 locus. Searches for rs6024870, rs6069737, and the stated r² of 0.97 found no passage establishing that these SNPs are in strong LD. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductcitation
Our study improves on prior studies by utilizing the relatively frequent 4-cutter restriction enzyme DpnII, which generates smaller fragments with higher resolution across the entire genome.
“Our study improves on prior studies by utilizing a relatively frequent 4-cutter restriction enzyme, DpnII, which generates smaller fragments with higher resolution across the entire genome46.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] source
- Premisecitation
rs6024870 is located 19bp upstream of an ENCODE candidate cis-regulatory element (ID E2123559).
“Additionally, rs6024870 is located 19bp upstream of an ENCODE candidate cis-regulatory element (ID E2123559)49, further supporting its role as a microglia-specific enhancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
The registry section describes ENCODE candidate cis-regulatory elements, but our copy does not identify element E2123559 or place rs6024870 relative to it. Searches for both identifiers and the claimed 19-bp upstream relationship found no passage establishing that location. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The putative enhancer region harboring the major (G) risk allele of rs6024870 increased luciferase expression by approximately 2.3-fold when normalized to RTFDC1-promoter-only controls (P<0.001, N=7 assays).
“Luciferase experiments showed that the putative enhancer region harboring the major (G) risk allele increased luciferase expression by approximately 2.3-fold when normalized to RTFDC1-promoter-only controls (P<0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD, N = 7 assays).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RTFDC1 overexpression in enhancer-KO cells exhibited increased secretion of cytokine IL-8.
“This is also consistent with RTFDC1 overexpression in enhancer-KO cells exhibiting increased secretion of cytokine IL-8”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancer-KO cells showed little difference in γH2AX staining from mock controls at baseline or hour 0 post-DSB induction.
“Enhancer-KO cells showed little difference in γH2AX staining from mock controls at either baseline (control) or hour 0 post-DSB induction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Differential gene expression analysis between enhancer-KO and mock conditions yielded 75 differentially expressed genes (47 upregulated and 28 downregulated).
“We therefore merged the replicates and performed differential gene expression analysis between the enhancer-KO and mock conditions using FDR < 0.05 and abs(logFC) < 0.58 cutoffs, which yielded 75 differentially expressed genes (47 upregulated and 28 downregulated; Figure 3A and Suppl. Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of the TFs whose motifs overlay rs6024870 are expressed in the microglial models.
“The majority of these TFs are expressed in our microglial models (Figure 6F)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
HMC3 cells cluster close to other microglial-like cell types, supporting their utility as a tractable microglial model.
“HMC3 also clustered close to other microglial-like cell types, supporting the utility of this cell type as a tractable microglial model in our functional follow-up experiments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Capture-C data in both HMC3 cells and iMg show a physical contact between the region harboring rs6024870 and the promoter of the neighboring gene RTFDC1.
“Despite residing within the first intron of CASS4, our Capture-C data in both HMC3 cells and iMg show a physical contact between the region harboring rs6024870 and the promoter of the neighboring gene, RTFDC1 (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A total of 32 open baited regions corresponding to 34 gene promoters contacted 34 open chromatin regions harboring one or more LOAD proxy SNPs through 36 distinct contacts.
“A total of 32 open baited regions corresponding to 34 gene promoters (25 coding and 9 non-coding) contacted 34 open chromatin regions harboring one or more LOAD proxy SNPs (34 total) through 36 distinct contacts (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The genomic region harboring rs6024870 in HMC3 cells acts as a microglial-specific enhancer.
“Our characterization of the genomic region harboring rs6024870 in HMC3 cells indicated that this region acts as a microglial specific enhancer”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Secretion of IL-6 was not affected by RTFDC1 overexpression.
“In contrast, secrection of IL-6 was not affected by RTFDC1 overexpression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the two microglial cell models, 16 LOAD loci revealed at least one or more proxy SNPs in open chromatin interacting with an open gene promoter.
“In the two microglial cell models, 16 LOAD loci revealed at least one or more proxy SNPs in open chromatin (and not residing in a baited promoter region) interacting with an open gene promoter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Binding affinity analysis with motifBreakR showed that 18 of 19 TF motifs overlaying rs6024870 were strengthened in the presence of the minor allele.
“Binding affinity analysis with motifBreakR showed that 18 of 19 of these motifs were strengthened in the presence of the minor allele (Figure 6E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: TF motif binding affinity predictions reflect actual TF binding and regulatory effects in microglia.
- Findingown data
Five genes (SLC8B1, RTFDC1, MS4A6A, BLNK, and PTK2B) were contacted by more than one LOAD SNP-containing region.
“Five genes (SLC8B1, RTFDC1, MS4A6A, BLNK, and PTK2B) were contacted by more than one LOAD SNP-containing region (multiple putative enhancers).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CASS4 protein expression was slightly upregulated in enhancer-KO clones with an average fold change of 1.11, not achieving statistical significance.
“We also blotted for CASS4 in the same samples; CASS4 expression was slightly upregulated with an average fold change of 1.11, again albeit not achieving statistical significance (Figures 3D and E, Suppl. Figure 3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We were unable to detect a significant difference in RTFDC1 levels in enhancer-KO HMC3 cells at either RNA or protein level.
“we were unable to detect a significant difference in RTFDC1 levels in our enhancer-KO HMC3 cells, both at the RNA or the protein level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TF motif analysis identified 19 different TF motifs overlaying rs6024870.
“We identified 19 different TF motifs overlaying rs6024870 (Figure 6D, Suppl. Figure 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The rs6024870-harboring region contacted the promoter of RTFDC1 in both cellular settings.
“This region contacted the promoter of RTFDC1 in both cellular settings”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In HMC3 cells, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated KO of the rs6024870-harboring enhancer region resulted in a DNA double strand break defect.
“In HMC3 cells, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated KO of the rs6024870-harboring enhancer region resulted in a DNA double strand break defect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of the approximately 400bp region surrounding rs6024870 specifically ablates the rs6024870-harboring enhancer without affecting other regulatory elements.
- Findingown data
A candidate regulatory genomic region at the CASS4 GWAS locus, harboring rs6024870 (r2=0.97 with sentinel rs6069737), exhibits enhancer epigenetic signatures specifically in microglial cells.
“From this list we observed consistent evidence of a candidate regulatory genomic region exhibiting enhancer epigenetic signatures specifically in microglial cells at the CASS4 GWAS locus, harboring the LOAD-associated variant, rs6024870 (r2 = 0.97 with its sentinel variant, rs6069737).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ELISA showed significantly higher levels of secreted IL-6 and IL-8 (P < 0.01 for both) in enhancer-KO cells compared to mock transduced cells.
“ELISA for secreted IL-6 and IL-8 showed significantly higher levels of both cytokines (P < 0.01 for both cytokines, Student’s 2-tailed T-test) in enhancer-KO cells when compared to mock transduced cells (Figure 4A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The transcriptome of iMg closely resembles that of ex-vivo microglia, more so than other related innate immune cell types such as macrophages and monocytes.
“The transcriptome of iMg closely resembled that of ex-vivo microglia, and more so than other related innate immune cell types such as macrophages and monocytes (Figure 1 A, B, C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancer-KO cells had significantly higher levels of γH2AX fluorescence, and thus less resolution of DSBs, at the 24 hour time point than mock controls (P<2.2×10−16).
“However, enhancer-KO cells had significantly higher levels of γH2AX fluorescence, and thus less resolution of DSBs, at the 24 hour time point than did the mock controls (P<2.2×10−16, two-way ANOVA (genotype by condition) with Tukey’s HSD, Figure 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancer-KO clones showed a directional trend of reduced RTFDC1 protein expression, with an average fold change of 0.72 compared to mock clones, not achieving statistical significance.
“Enhancer-KO clones showed a directional trend of reduced RTFDC1 expression, with an average fold change of 0.72 (normalized to whole protein stain) compared to mock clones, albeit not achieving statistical significance (Figures 3B and C, Suppl. Figure 3A), consistent with the direction-of-effect and size-of-effect identified by RNA-seq.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Lentivirally overexpressing RTFDC1 in KO cells recapitulated the DNA double strand break defect phenotype.
“and by lentivirally overexpressing RTFDC1 in the KO cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Knocking down RTFDC1 expression in WT cells via siRNA recapitulated the DNA double strand break defect phenotype.
“While we could recapitulate this phenotype by knocking down RTFDC1 expression in WT cells via siRNA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Taken together, these observations implicate microglia as a major contributing cell type to LOAD pathology.
“Taken together, these observations implicate microglia as a major contributing cell type to LOAD pathology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The DNA double strand break defect in enhancer-KO cells is at least in part mediated by RTFDC1.
“which strongly suggest that this effect is, at least in part, mediated by RTFDC1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Our approach enabled generation of unbiased, hypothesis-free interaction maps of LOAD GWAS-associated variants with putative effector gene promoters in microglial cell model systems.
“This in turn enabled us to generate unbiased, hypothesis-free interaction maps of LOAD GWAS-associated variants with putative effector gene promoters in our microglial cell model systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Our 3D genomic-informed approach is not constrained by the detection differences between GWAS-signal genes and eQTL genes.
“in contrast to eQTL-driven methods, our 3D genomic-informed approach is not constrained by these detection differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cumulative evidence implicates RTFDC1 as a novel candidate effector gene at the CASS4 locus.
“Our variant-to-function approach therefore reveals that the rs6024870-harboring regulatory element at the LOAD ‘CASS4’ GWAS locus influences both microglial inflammatory capacity and DNA damage resolution, along with cumulative evidence implicating RTFDC1 as a novel candidate effector gene.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
RTFDC1 knockdown cells exhibited a 95% decrease in RTFDC1 protein expression.
“RTFDC1 knockdown cells exhibited a 95% decrease in RTFDC1 protein expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The pool of siRNAs targeting RTFDC1 did not have off-target effects that confound the γH2AX results.
- Premisecitation
Most Hi-C-based techniques are at too low a resolution to detect specific GWAS variant-promoter contacts because they use a relatively infrequent 6-cutter enzyme (HindIII).
“However most Hi-C-based techniques are at too low a resolution to detect specific GWAS variant-promoter contacts due to their utilization of a relatively infrequent 6-cutter enzyme (HindIII)66.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] source
- Interpretationown data
RTFDC1 has a novel role in DNA double strand break repair.
“including a novel role for RTFDC1 in DNA double strand break repair.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The minor protective A allele of rs6024870 reduces RTFDC1 expression.
“We subsequently observed a directionallly consistent decrease in RTFDC1 expression with the the protective minor A allele of rs6024870 via both luciferase assays in HMC3 cells and expression studies in primary human microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The enrichment of repressor TF motifs strengthened by the minor allele is consistent with decreased RTFDC1 expression in the presence of the minor protective A allele.
“which is consistent with the observed trend of decreased expression of RTFDC1 in the presence of the minor protective A allele.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The minor A allele at rs6024870 is protective against LOAD.
- Interpretationown data
The study provides cumulative evidence for a role of rs6024870 and RTFDC1 in LOAD pathogenesis.
“provided cumulative evidence for a role of rs6024870 and RTFDC1 in LOAD pathogenesis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The minor A allele at rs6024870 is protective against LOAD.
- Interpretationown data
These results suggest a potentially complex regulatory role where the enhancer harboring rs6024870 may influence the expression of RTFDC1 as well as neighboring genes.
“These results suggest a potentially complex regulatory role where the enhancer harboring rs6024870 may influence the expression of RTFDC1 as well as neighboring genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
HMC3 cells maintain much of the characteristic antigenic profile of primary human microglia, including IBA1 at rest and CD68 in activated conditions.
“While these cells maintain much of the characteristic antigenic profile of primary human microglia, including IBA1 at rest and CD68 in activated conditions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] source
- Study design and conductown data
The difference in quantity of both secreted cytokines was not driven by the lentiviral overexpression system itself.
“We noted that the difference in quantity of both secreted cytokines was not driven by the lentiviral overexpression system itself (Suppl. Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The dysregulation in DNA damage response in the enhancer-KO HMC3 cells is mediated, at least in part, by RTFDC1.
“This data suggests that the dysregulation in DNA damage response in the enhancer-KO HMC3 cells is mediated, at least in part, by RTFDC1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cumulative evidence supports that the protective allele at rs6024870 reduces expression of RTFDC1 in microglial cells.
“Collectively, we observed cumulative evidence of consistent directionality that the protective allele at rs6024870 reduces expression of RTFDC1 in microglial cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The minor A allele at rs6024870 is protective against LOAD.
- Interpretationown data
The IL-6 secretion phenotype is independent of RTFDC1.
“suggesting that this phenotype is independent of RTFDC1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
rs6024870 may function to restrain enhancer activity.
“these suggest that rs6024870 may function to restrain enhancer activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The γH2AX fluorescence differences in both siRNA RTFDC1-depleted and lentiviral RTFDC1-overexpression cells was not driven by either the siRNA transfection or lentiviral overexpression systems.
“The γH2AX fluorescence differences in both siRNA RTFDC1-depleted and lentiviral RTFDC1-overexpression cells was not driven by either the siRNA transfection or lentiviral overexpression systems (Suppl. Figure 8B and C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 33
- May combine two claims. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn S. Pombe, removal of RTFDC1 (RTF2) from stalled replication forks during S phase DNA replication is essential to maintain replication stress and genome integrity.
“What is known to date is that in S. Pombe the removal of RTFDC1 (also known as RTF2) from stalled replication forks during S phase DNA replication is essential to maintain replication stress and genome integrity69.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] source
The Abstract and Discussion identify removal of RTF2 from stalled forks as a protective process in mammalian or human cells, not S. pombe. The Results section on DDI1/2 instead says S. pombe Rtf2 is required to maintain fork stalling at a specific replication termination site. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA limitation of GWAS is that it only reports the sentinel SNP, which serves as a tag for all other variants in LD; any one could be causal.
“A limitation of GWAS is that the approach only reports the sentinel single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at a given locus, which serves as a tag for all other variants in LD; as such, among this entire LD series of proxy SNPs, any one (or more) could be causal15.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] source
In “Cataloging SNPs and linkage disequilibrium” (page unavailable), the paper explains that tag SNPs can act as proxies for nearby variants. In “Genome-Wide Associations: Lessons” (page unavailable), it says association signals often do not identify the causal mutation, which may even be a non-SNP variant. It does not support the absolute claim that GWAS reports only one sentinel SNP per locus or that the sentinel tags all other variants in LD. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe most recent large-scale LOAD GWAS identified over 70 independent signals associated with LOAD, including variants near MAPT and APP.
“The most recent large-scale genome wide association study (GWAS), a method which which offers unbiased identification of susceptibility loci, identified over 70 independent signals associated with LOAD4, including variants near the MAPT (encoding tau) and APP (encoding the amyloid precursor protein) genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
The Discussion reports 75 independent loci associated with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADD), and the GWAS meta-analysis identifies loci at MAPT and APP. The claim describes these as signals specifically associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD), whereas the reported association analysis is for ADD. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe strongest associated obesity GWAS signal lies within an intron of FTO but principally influences expression of distal genes IRX3 and IRX5.
“One such example comes from the strongest associated obesity GWAS signal that lies within an intron of the FTO gene, but principally influences the expression of distal genes IRX3 and IRX517–19.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] source
The paper’s main text (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) reports that obesity-associated variants in an FTO intron are associated with IRX3 expression in human brain, but not FTO expression. The passages do not establish an effect on IRX5 expression or that this is the strongest obesity GWAS signal. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [18] source
- cites [19] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBoth rare and common variants have been identified in core microglial genes, such as TREM2.
“Consistent with these enrichment analyses, both rare and common variants have been identified in core microglial genes, such as TREM213,14.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] source
- cites [14] source
The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies TREM2 as a gene expressed in brain microglia and reports rare TREM2 coding variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease risk. It does not identify common variants in TREM2 or other microglial genes, so this source supports only the rare-variant part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe majority of sentinel SNPs and their proxies lie within non-coding regions of the genome, and may not necessarily influence the expression of the nearest gene; instead, they likely modulate distal regulatory elements such as enhancers, which regulate distal gene expression.
“Furthermore, the majority of these sentinel SNPs and their associated proxies lie within non-coding regions of the genome, and may not necessarily influence the expression of the nearest gene. Instead, these variants likely modulate the activity of distal regulatory elements, such as enhancers, which in turn regulate distal gene expression16, which is frequently not the nearest gene.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenes near GWAS signals are enriched for key functional annotations and are under strong selective constraint, while genes near eQTLs lack most functional annotations and show relaxed constraint.
“it has been recently shown that genes near GWAS signals are enriched for key functional annotations and are under strong selective constraint, while genes near eQTLs lack most functional annotations and show relaxed constraint68”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIndividuals homozygous for the APOEε2 allele have poorer cancer outcomes.
“as well as poorer cancer outcomes77”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] source
The paper’s melanoma survival passage reports shorter median survival for APOE2 carriers than for APOE3 homozygotes or APOE4 carriers. It does not establish the result specifically for people homozygous for APOEε2, and its human outcome findings concern melanoma rather than cancer generally. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationH3K27ac was only enriched in microglia among four major brain cell types at the region harboring rs6024870, suggesting this region acts specifically as an enhancer in microglia.
“Of the four cell types, H3K27ac was only enriched in microglia, suggesting that this region acts specifically as an enhancer in microglia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
The paper’s main text (page unavailable in our copy) reports H3K27ac profiling across four brain cell populations and identifies microglia-specific enhancers. It does not establish that H3K27ac was enriched only in microglia at the region harboring rs6024870; a search for that variant found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe authors previously identified ING3 and EPDR1 as long-range effector genes regulated by osteoblast enhancers harboring bone mineral density GWAS SNPs at the WNT16-CPED1 and STARD3NL loci.
“Additionally, we identified ING3 and EPDR1 as the long-range effector genes regulated by osteoblast enhancers harboring bone mineral density GWAS SNPs at the WNT16-CPED1 and STARD3NL loci, respectively20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
The Results (Functional studies; page unavailable) identify ING3 at the WNT16-CPED1 locus and EPDR1 at the STARD3NL locus, and report interactions between their promoters and regions containing BMD GWAS proxy SNPs in osteoblasts. The Discussion also describes both as implicated genes involved in osteoblast differentiation. The paper does not establish that the interacting regions are enhancers that regulate these genes, so that causal part of the claim is stronger than the evidence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTwo studies using proximity-ligation assays in human primary or iPSC-derived microglia have reported 3D genomic interactions between GWAS-associated variants and gene promoters in LOAD.
“Recently, two studies using proximity-ligation assays in either human primary or iPSC-derived microglia have reported 3D genomic interactions between GWAS-associated variants and gene promoters in LOAD22,65.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn microglia from human brains, rs6024870 acts as an eQTL on RTFDC1 expression, with the minor A allele associated with reduced expression (GG average 93.40 TPM vs GA 85.30 TPM, P=0.0385).
“and found that GG individuals had on average 93.40 TPM of RTFDC1, significantly higher than GA individuals, which had on average 85.30 TPM (P=0.0385, Student’s 1-tailed T-test, Figure 6C).”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“our observation that rs6024870 acts as a modest eQTL on RTFDC1 expression in microglia from human brains, with the minor A allele (protective against LOAD) associated with reduced expression levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
The Materials and Methods section (2.9, page unavailable) describes analyses of amyloid-β uptake and cellular markers, not genotype-dependent gene expression. Searches for rs6024870, RTFDC1, eQTL, and the reported TPM values found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: The publicly available patient RNA-seq dataset of microglia from fresh human brain tissue is representative of microglial RTFDC1 expression in vivo.
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA single enhancer may contact and regulate several promoters, a phenomenon previously seen in macrophages.
“This is consistent with the observation that a single enhancer may contact and regulate several promoters, a phenomenon previously seen in macrophages74.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] source
The Results section (‘Dynamic re-wiring of chromatin architecture’) describes a macrophage activation hub connecting distal enhancers to the promoters of both TPRG1 and BCL6, with increased expression of both genes. It does not establish that one individual enhancer contacts and regulates both promoters; elsewhere, the paper characterizes hubs chiefly as multiple enhancers connected to a promoter. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationChIP-based proximity ligation assays, such as PLAC-seq, rely on antibodies to pull down pre-specified regions associated with histone marks that demarcate putative enhancer or promoter regions.
“Additionally, ChIP-based proximity ligation assays, such as PLAC-seq67, rely on the use of antibodies to pull down pre-specified regions associated with certain histone marks that can demarcate putative enhancer (H3K27ac) or promoter (H3K4me3) regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the GWAS, both the minor alleles of the sentinel SNP (T) and rs6024870 (A) are protective against LOAD.
“In the GWAS, both the minor alleles of the sentinel SNP (T) and rs6024870 (A) are protective against LOAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [4] source
The GWAS meta-analysis tables report minor-allele odds ratios for many variants, but the passages in our copy do not identify the claimed sentinel SNP or report an association for rs6024870. Searches for “rs6024870” and “sentinel SNP (T) protective against LOAD” returned no passage establishing that either specified allele is protective. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [31] source
The Discussion reports a GWAS of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, and Table 1 lists lead variants and tested alleles. Our copy does not identify rs6024870 or establish that its A allele and the unspecified sentinel SNP’s T allele are protective (searched: rs6024870, protective alleles, sentinel variant). (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPIRs were significantly enriched for open chromatin regions detected in ATAC-seq and for active chromatin marks from ex-vivo microglia.
“PIRs were significantly enriched for open chromatin regions detected in our ATAC-seq experiments and for active chromatin marks from ex-vivo microglia22, suggesting a potential regulatory role (Suppl. Fig 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
The paper’s interactome passage (page unavailable) reports that a subset of chromatin interactions colocalized with increased ATAC-seq and active chromatin-mark signals. Its microglia profiling passage says those signals were highly correlated with profiles previously defined in ex-vivo microglia. It does not report that PIRs were significantly enriched for the citing authors’ ATAC-seq regions or for marks from ex-vivo microglia. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIndividuals homozygous for the APOEε2 allele have an increased risk of reduced fertility.
“individuals homozygous for the APOEε2 allele also have an increased risk of reduced fertility76”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] source
The Fertility section (page unavailable) says the ε2 allele appears to have the worst reproductive efficiency across the populations discussed, but cautions that offspring counts have confounding factors. It does not establish an increased risk specifically for people homozygous for APOEε2. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn humans, RTFDC1 is required for appropriate localization of RNAseH2 to the replication fork to remove ribonucleotides from nascent DNA via ribonucleotide excision repair.
“However, more recent work has also shown that in humans, RTFDC1 is required for appropriate localization of RNAseH2 to the replication fork to remove ribonucleotides from nascent DNA via the ribonucleotide excision repair pathway70.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] source
The Results section (page not provided) shows that RTF2 loss reduces RNase H2 at replication forks and increases DNA-embedded ribonucleotides; the Introduction says this localization is necessary for proper ribonucleotide excision repair. However, the decisive RTF2-loss experiments used mouse embryonic fibroblasts. The passages do not establish the claim specifically for human RTFDC1. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe strongest protective allele against LOAD, APOEε2, has the lowest frequency of the three alleles at the APOE locus.
“In fact, the strongest protective allele against LOAD, APOEε2, has the lowest frequency of the three alleles at the APOE locus75.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies apoE3 as the most common of the three isoforms, but does not establish whether apoE2 is less frequent than apoE4. The Aβ-dependent effects section reports that apoE2 and apoE3 cleared more Aβ than apoE4 in transgenic mice; it does not establish that APOEε2 is the strongest protective allele against late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCRISPR-Cas9-induced ~400bp deletion of the rs6024870-harboring enhancer provided variant-to-function evidence for its role in regulating DNA damage response, including downregulation of DNA repair pathways and loss of ability to resolve DNA DSBs as assayed by γH2AX accumulation.
“and DNA damage response (downregulation of DNA repair pathways, loss in ability to resolve DNA DSBs as assayed by fluorescent γH2AX accumulation).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of the approximately 400bp region surrounding rs6024870 specifically ablates the rs6024870-harboring enhancer without affecting other regulatory elements.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRTFDC1 overexpression in enhancer-KO cells led to significantly more IL-8 secretion than in enhancer-KO counterparts (P<0.001), while IL-6 secretion did not significantly differ (P=0.198).
“Unexpectedly, RTFDC1 overexpression enhancer-KO cells secreted significantly more IL-8 than their enhancer-KO counterparts (P<0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test, Figure 4D), while the same cells did not significantly differ in secretion of IL-6 (P=0.198, Figure 4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf these contacts, 7 (19%) were to the nearest gene, 8 (22%) to both nearest and more distal genes, and 21 (58%) to distal genes only.
“Of these contacts, 7 (19%) were to the nearest gene, 8 (22%) to both nearest and more distal genes, and 21 (58%) to distal genes only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe enhancer region containing the minor (A) protective allele showed a nominal decrease in luciferase expression (2.0-fold compared to promoter-only controls) but did not reach significance.
“While the enhancer region containing the minor (A) protective allele did show a nominal decrease in luciferase expression, with a 2.0-fold expression change compared to promoter-only controls, it did not reach the threshold of significance (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPromoter-focused Capture-C and ATAC-seq identified 33 LOAD GWAS-associated variants contacting the promoters of 32 putative effector genes, 24 protein-coding, with 5 targets overlapping in both cellular models (AURKA, CSTF1, MIR4487, RTFDC1, and TCONS_00028450).
“Our combination of promoter-focused Capture-C and ATAC-seq data identified 33 LOAD GWAS-associated variants contacting the promoters of 32 putative effector genes, 24 of which code for a protein, with 5 targets overlapping in both cellular models (AURKA, CSTF1, MIR4487, RTFDC1, and TCONS_00028450).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data26 (79%) of the SNPs contacted one effector gene and 7 (21%) more than one.
“26 (79%) of the SNPs contacted one effector gene and 7 (21%) more than one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCRISPR-Cas9-induced ~400bp deletion of the rs6024870-harboring enhancer provided variant-to-function evidence for its role in regulating microglial inflammation, including upregulation of inflammatory pathways and increased secretion of IL-8 and IL-6.
“our CRISPR-Cas9 induced ~400bp deletion of this enhancer provided variant-to-function evidence for its role in regulating both microglial inflammation (upregulation of inflammatory pathways, increased secretion of IL-8 and IL-6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of the approximately 400bp region surrounding rs6024870 specifically ablates the rs6024870-harboring enhancer without affecting other regulatory elements.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataRTFDC1 knockdown cells yielded significantly elevated levels of γH2AX at the 24 hour time point compared to mock transduced controls (P<2.2×10−16), and did not differ significantly from enhancer-deletion cells, resolving 18.5% of γH2AX fluorescence.
“Indeed, these RTFDC1 knockdown cells also yielded significantly elevated levels of γH2AX at the 24 hour time point when compared to mock transduced controls (P<2.2×10−16, two-way ANOVA (genotype by condition) with Tukey’s HSD), and did not differ significantly from enhancer-deletion cells, resolving 18.5% of γH2AX fluorescence (Figure 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The pool of siRNAs targeting RTFDC1 did not have off-target effects that confound the γH2AX results.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataHMC3 clones heterozygous for the CRISPR deletion had both WT and deletion bands present on PCR.
“Clones heterozygous for the deletion had both WT and deletion bands present on the PCR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPCR products from mock transduced (WT) HMC3 cells were 889 bp and from CRISPR deletion cells were 495 bp, matching the predicted sizes.
“PCR products for both mock transduced and knockout cells were the predicted sizes: mock transduced (WT) PCR product was 889bp, and the CRISPR deletion product was 495bp.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataIn HMC3 cells, PIRs were similarly enriched for active chromatin markers.
“PIRs in HMC3 were similarly enriched for active chromatin markers (Suppl. Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRTFDC1 did not reach the threshold for significance but was downregulated by a fold change of 0.82 in enhancer-KO cells.
“While RTFDC1 did not reach the threshold for significance, it was downregulated by a fold change of 0.82.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLOAD GWAS signals were significantly enriched in iMg Capture-C-prioritized regions (P=0.04, enrichment 47.2), while schizophrenia signals were not (P=0.81, enrichment 1.5).
“The LOAD GWAS signals were significantly enriched in iMg (P=0.04, enrichment 47.2), while schizophrenia signals were not (P=0.81, enrichment 1.5), which is in line with expectation given that schizophrenia loci are widely hypothesized to confer their effects principally via neuronal cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMock transduced cells cleared 41.2% of γH2AX fluorescence from hour 0 to hour 24, whereas enhancer-KO cells only cleared 20.5%.
“Quantification of γH2AX clearance from hour 0 to hour 24, normalized to control fluorescence levels, showed that mock transduced cells cleared 41.2% of γH2AX fluorescence, whereas enhancer-KO cells only cleared 20.5%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingcitationrs6024870 lies within open chromatin in both HMC3 and iMg, as well as in ex vivo human microglia.
“Notably, in both HMC3 cells and iMg, this variant lies within a region of open chromatin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverexpression of RTFDC1 in enhancer-KO cells increased clearance of γH2AX fluorescence from hour 0 to hour 24 to 41.6%, and mean fluorescence at hour 24 was lower than even mock transduced controls (P<2.2X10−16).
“Indeed, overexpression of RTFDC1 increased the clearance of γH2AX fluorescence from hour 0 to hour 24 to 41.6%, and the mean fluorescence at hour 24 was in fact lower than even mock transduced controls (P<2.2X10−16, two-way ANOVA (genotype by condition) with Tukey’s HSD, Figure 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe observed rs6024870 genotype counts are consistent with Hardy-Weinberg proportions given a minor A allele frequency of 0.058 in European ancestry.
“This is consistent with expected Hardy Weinberg genotype proportions, as the minor A allele frequency (MAF) of rs6024870 is 0.058 in European ancestry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLOAD risk is substantially explained by heritable factors, with approximately 60-80% of risk attributed to genetic factors.
“Population studies have shown that approximately 60–80% of LOAD risk is explained by heritable factors3, suggesting a strong polygenic component.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOur Capture-C library assessed a comprehensive set of primary and alternative human gene promoters for both coding and non-coding genes, allowing probing of all known promoters' interactions without prior knowledge of histone acetylation status.
“Additionally, our Capture-C library assessed a comprehensive set of primary and alternative human gene promoters for both coding and non-coding genes, allowing us to probe all known promoters’ interactions without any prior knowledge of histone acetylation status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHMC3 cells do not secrete LOAD-relevant tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) or IL1-β.
“they do not secrete LOAD-relevant tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) or IL1-β78”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductown dataFinal plasmid constructs were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and Oxford Nanopore sequencing.
“resulting plasmids were Sanger sequenced at both the 5’ and 3’ ends of the inserted sequences to confirm successful insertion.”
- Also stated in: § Luciferase Assays · plain
“The final successful plasmid was sent for Oxford Nanopore sequencing by Plasmidsaurus to confirm fidelity of the entire sequence”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Luciferase Assays · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDigestion efficiencies of 3C libraries were assessed using undigested and digested controls by gel electrophoresis and quantitative PCR.
“Digestion efficiencies of 3C libraries were assessed using control 1 (undigested) and control 2 (digested) by gel electrophoresis on a 0.9% agarose gel and quantitative PCR (SYBR green, Thermo Fisher).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA new standard curve was performed on each ELISA plate.
“A new standard curve was performed on each plate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataPCA and heatmap clustering showed that technical replicates clustered together with no batch effects.
“PCA and heatmap clustering showed that technical replicates clustered together with no batch effects (Suppl. Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe rs6024870-harboring regulatory element at the LOAD 'CASS4' GWAS locus influences both microglial inflammatory capacity and DNA damage resolution.
“Our variant-to-function approach therefore reveals that the rs6024870-harboring regulatory element at the LOAD ‘CASS4’ GWAS locus influences both microglial inflammatory capacity and DNA damage resolution, along with cumulative evidence implicating RTFDC1 as a novel candidate effector gene.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenEach γH2AX timepoint and genotype was plated in duplicate on two separate days, and each well was imaged in 3 separate locations, for a total of 6 images per genotype/timepoint combination.
“Each timepoint and genotype was plated in duplicate (2 wells) on two separate days, and each well imaged in 3 separate locations, for a total of 6 images per genotype/timepoint combination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHMC3 cells were originally immortalized by transfecting human embryonic microglial cells with a plasmid encoding the cDNA of the viral SV40 large T antigen.
“HMC3 cells were originally immortalized by transfecting human embryonic microglial cells with a plasmid encoding the cDNA of the viral SV40 large T antigen78.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataELISA for pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 were performed in technical triplicate.
“ELISA for pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 were performed in technical triplicate according to manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher KHC0061 and Thermo Fisher KHC0081, respectively), and resulting assay plate was read for optical density on the ID5 SpectraMax plate reader at a 450nm wavelength.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese data suggest that overexpression of RTFDC1 did not rescue the pro-inflammatory phenotype, and may itself lead to increased IL-8 secretion, and that increased secretion of IL-6 in enhancer-deleted clones is independent of RTFDC1 expression.
“These data suggest that overexpression of RTFDC1 did not rescue the pro-inflammatory phenotype, and may itself lead to increased IL-8 secretion, and that increased secretion of IL-6 in enhancer-deleted clones is independent of RTFDC1 expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataCapture-C libraries from each cell type yielded high coverage (average ~2.6 billion reads per library) with >70% capture efficiency.
“Libraries from each cell type yielded high coverage (an average of ~2.6 billion reads per library) with >70% capture efficiency (% of unique valid reads captured; Suppl. Table 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningRegulation of additional genes by the enhancer may contribute to the pro-inflammatory and DNA-repair phenotypes observed in enhancer-deleted cells.
“where the regulation of these additional genes may contribute to the pro-inflammatory and the DNA-repair phenotypes we observe in our enhancer-deleted cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenTransductions were conducted in duplicate (2 wells at a time) to obtain 2 separate replicates of each transduction.
“Transductions were conducted in duplicate (2 wells at a time) to obtain 2 separate repliactes of each transduction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe region harboring rs6024870 acts as an enhancer on RTFDC1 expression in HMC3 cells, and the minor protective A allele trends towards decreased activity.
“These results revealed that the region harboring rs6024870 acts as an enhancer on RTFDC1 expression in HMC3 cells, and that the minor protective A allele trends towards decreased activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe rs6024870-harboring enhancer is necessary to suppress secretion of cytokines in the HMC3 cell line, but does not solely function through RTFDC1 in this process.
“These results, together, indicate that the rs6024870-harboring enhancer is necessary to suppress secretion of cytokines in the HMC3 cell line, but does not solely function through RTFDC1 in this process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCell culture supernatants were tested for mycoplasma contamination using the InvivoGen MycoStrip Detection kit.
“Supernatants were tested for the presence of mycoplasma using the InvivoGen MycoStrip™ Detection kit according to manufacturer’s protocol with no alterations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany enhancers operate via binding with transcription factors to facilitate contact with promoters.
“Many enhancers operate via binding with transcription factors (TFs) to facilitate contact with promoters61.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenRNA quality was assessed on an RNA 6000 Nano chip on the Agilent BioAnalyzer.
“Resulting RNA quality was assessed on an RNA 6000 Nano chip on the Agilent BioAnalyzer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAccurate insertion of sgRNAs into the lentiCRISPR v2-mCherry plasmid was checked via Sanger sequencing.
“Accurate insertion of sgRNAs into the plasmid was checked via Sanger sequencing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThree individual enhancer-deleted clones were validated for the desired enhancer deletion, as well as three mock clones.
“We then isolated three individual enhancer-deleted clones that were validated for the desired enhancer deletion, as well as three mock clones transduced with lentivirus containing the tracrRNA scaffold and Cas9 gene, but no targeting gRNA sequence (Figure 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion of the ~400bp region harboring rs6024870 did not have off-target effects that confound the observed phenotypes.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataInflammation and DNA damage repair are relevant microglial-specific pathways to the pathology of LOAD.
“we implicate both inflammation and DNA damage repair as relevant microglial-specific pathways to the pathology of LOAD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenIn lieu of a loading control, whole-protein staining was performed for downstream quantification.
“In lieu of a loading control, we performed whole-protein staining for downstream quantification by incubating membranes for 25 minutes in No-Stain Protein Labeling Reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific), prepared according to manufacturer’s protocol.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe genomic region harboring rs6024870 acts as a microglial enhancer and influences LOAD risk through regulation of both inflammatory and DNA damage related pathways.
“Altogether, we present variant-to-function evidence that the genomic region harboring rs6024870 acts as a microglial enhancer and influences LOAD risk through regulation of both inflammatory and DNA damage related pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe inability of HMC3 cells to secrete TNF-α or IL1-β limited the cytokines and chemokines that could be assayed in this study.
“which limited the cytokines and chemokines we could assay in our study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The CRISPR-Cas9-mediated deletion of the ~400bp region harboring rs6024870 did not have off-target effects that confound the observed phenotypes.
“We targeted an approximately 400bp region harboring rs6024870 with two guide RNAs (gRNAs) flanking both ends of the putative enhancer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Thyroid tissue is a valid proxy for macrophage-rich tissue to interpret the rs6024870 eQTL in the context of microglia.
“we did observe that rs6024870 acts as an eQTL on RTFDC1 in thyroid tissue, a tissue rich in macrophages”
The paper relies on this without support.
The pool of siRNAs targeting RTFDC1 did not have off-target effects that confound the γH2AX results.
“We transfected WT HMC3 cells with a pool of siRNAs targeting RTFDC1, and evaluated knockdown efficiency 72 hours post-transduction via immunoblot (Figure 5C, Suppl. Figure 7).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The minor A allele at rs6024870 is protective against LOAD.
“the minor protective A allele”
“the minor A allele (protective against LOAD)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The publicly available patient RNA-seq dataset of microglia from fresh human brain tissue is representative of microglial RTFDC1 expression in vivo.
“publicly available patient RNA-seq data of microglia isolated from fresh human brain tissue58”
The paper relies on this without support.
TF motif binding affinity predictions reflect actual TF binding and regulatory effects in microglia.
“Binding affinity analysis with motifBreakR showed that 18 of 19 of these motifs were strengthened in the presence of the minor allele (Figure 6E).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The activity-by-contact model predictions in THP1 cells are informative for microglial enhancer-promoter contacts.
“the activity-by-contact model predicts that this SNP also contacts multiple other genes within the same TAD, including CASS4, CSTF1, AURKA, FAM210B, and TFAP2C in THP1 cells (an immortalized human monocyte cell line derived from an acute monocytic leukemia patient)72,73.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CRISPR-Cas9 deletion of the approximately 400bp region surrounding rs6024870 specifically ablates the rs6024870-harboring enhancer without affecting other regulatory elements.
“CRISPR-Cas9 mediated deletion of the approximately 400bp region surrounding the proxy SNP (rs6024870) at the CASS4 GWAS locus”
The paper relies on this without support.
HMC3 cells are a valid model for human microglia for the studied pathways.
“we utilized a genomics-based variant-to-gene mapping approach in two different model systems of human microglia, iPSC-derived microglia (iMg) and the HMC3 cell line”
The paper relies on this without support.
The eQTL analysis excluding AA individuals does not bias the effect estimate.
“We therefore elected to focus our analysis only on GG and GA individuals.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Shared SNP count exceeds the HMC3 count
MajorThe paper reports 29 prioritized proxy SNPs in HMC3, but says 42 were shared between HMC3 and iMg. A shared set cannot contain more SNPs than either individual set.
“29 in HMC3”
“42 were shared between the two cell types”
Differential-expression cutoff reverses between Results and Methods
MinorThe Results say the 75 differentially expressed genes were selected using absolute logFC below 0.58, whereas the Methods specify absolute logFC above 0.58. These are opposite selection criteria for a conclusion-bearing analysis.
“using FDR < 0.05 and abs(logFC) < 0.58 cutoffs, which yielded 75 differentially expressed genes”
“The differential expression genes (DEGs) between KO and mock cells were identified with cut-off FDR < 0.05 and absolute logFC > 0.58.”
Effector-gene SNP categories account for only 33 of 34 SNPs
MinorThe paper reports 34 LOAD proxy SNPs in these contacts, but its counts of SNPs contacting one versus multiple effector genes sum to 33.
Reported 34 · recomputed 33
“26 (79%) of the SNPs contacted one effector gene and 7 (21%) more than one.”
DNA-damage assay timing conflicts with its stated method
MinorThe Results describe washing out etoposide and measuring again 24 hours later to assess damage resolution. The Methods instead say cells assigned to both timepoints received etoposide and were fixed after a one-hour incubation, with no 24-hour recovery described.
“We induced DSBs with etoposide, washed out the etoposide, and then stained fixed cells for γH2AX accumulation immediately (hour 0) and 24 hours after DSB-induction”
“Cells for the hour 0 and hour 24 timepoints were treated with 200μL of normal growth media containing a 1:200 dilution of etoposide, as indicated by kit instructions. All cells were incubated for 1 hour at normal growth conditions before being fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde for 10 minutes.”
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638 · see citing works
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364 · see citing works
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464 · see citing works
Mootha, V. K., Lindgren, C. M., Eriksson, K.-F., Subramanian, A., Sihag, S., Lehar, J., Puigserver, P., Carlsson, E., Ridderstråle, M., Laurila, E., et al. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1180 · Cited by 10,197 · see citing works
Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13595 · Cited by 7,577 · see citing works
The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues
The GTEx Consortium, Aguet, F., Anand, S., Ardlie, K. G., Gabriel, S., Getz, G. A., Graubert, A., Hadley, K., Handsaker, R. E., Huang, K. H., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz1776 · Cited by 5,547 · see citing works
Self-citationFate Mapping Analysis Reveals That Adult Microglia Derive from Primitive Macrophages
Ginhoux, F., Greter, M., Leboeuf, M., Nandi, S., See, P., Gokhan, S., Mehler, M. F., Conway, S. J., Ng, L. G., Stanley, E. R., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194637 · Cited by 5,175 · see citing works
Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), Kunkle, B. W., The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (EADI), Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium (CHARGE), Genetic and Environmental Risk in AD/Defining Genetic, P. A. E. R. F. A. D. C. (., Grenier-Boley, B., Sims, R., Bis, J. C., Damotte, V., Naj, A. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2 · Cited by 2,946 · see citing works
Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics
ReproGen Consortium, Finucane, H. K., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, The RACI Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Gusev, A., Trynka, G., Reshef, Y., Loh, P.-R., Anttila, V., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3404 · Cited by 2,604 · see citing works
An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues
The FANTOM Consortium, Andersson, R., Gebhard, C., Miguel-Escalada, I., Hoof, I., Bornholdt, J., Boyd, M., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Schmidl, C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12787 · Cited by 2,550 · see citing works
New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias
Bellenguez, C., Küçükali, F., Jansen, I. E., Kleineidam, L., Moreno-Grau, S., Amin, N., Naj, A. C., Campos-Martin, R., Grenier-Boley, B., Andrade, V., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z · Cited by 2,498 · see citing works
A One Pot, One Step, Precision Cloning Method with High Throughput Capability
Engler, C., Kandzia, R., & Marillonnet, S. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003647 · Cited by 2,398 · see citing works
Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes
The ENCODE Project Consortium, Abascal, F., Acosta, R., Addleman, N. J., Adrian, J., Afzal, V., Ai, R., Aken, B., Akiyama, J. A., Jammal, O. A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2493-4 · Cited by 2,378 · see citing works
Self-citationCRISPOR: intuitive guide selection for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing experiments and screens
Concordet, J., & Haeussler, M. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky354 · Cited by 2,354 · see citing works
Jansen, I. E., Savage, J. E., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., Williams, D. M., Steinberg, S., Sealock, J., Karlsson, I. K., Hägg, S., Athanasiu, L., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0311-9 · Cited by 2,277 · see citing works
Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control
Spitz, F., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3207 · Cited by 2,227 · see citing works
Role of Genes and Environments for Explaining Alzheimer Disease
Gatz, M., Reynolds, C. A., Fratiglioni, L., Johansson, B., Mortimer, J. A., Berg, S., Fiske, A., & Pedersen, N. L. (2006) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.2.168 · Cited by 1,798 · see citing works
Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease
Reitz, C., Brayne, C., & Mayeux, R. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2011.2 · Cited by 1,675 · see citing works
Local self-renewal can sustain CNS microglia maintenance and function throughout adult life
Ajami, B., Bennett, J. L., Krieger, C., Tetzlaff, W., & Rossi, F. M. V. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn2014 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways
Kierdorf, K., Erny, D., Goldmann, T., Sander, V., Schulz, C., Perdiguero, E. G., Wieghofer, P., Heinrich, A., Riemke, P., Hölscher, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3318 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Genetic Mapping in Human Disease
Altshuler, D., Daly, M. J., & Lander, E. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1156409 · Cited by 1,452 · see citing works
<i>FTO</i> Obesity Variant Circuitry and Adipocyte Browning in Humans
Claussnitzer, M., Dankel, S. N., Kim, K.-H., Quon, G., Meuleman, W., Haugen, C., Glunk, V., Sousa, I. S., Beaudry, J. L., Puviindran, V., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1502214 · Cited by 1,332 · see citing works
Obesity-associated variants within FTO form long-range functional connections with IRX3
Smemo, S., Tena, J. J., Kim, K.-H., Gamazon, E. R., Sakabe, N. J., Gómez-Marín, C., Aneas, I., Credidio, F. L., Sobreira, D. R., Wasserman, N. F., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13138 · Cited by 1,219 · see citing works
ARUK Consortium, Sims, R., GERAD/PERADES, C., van der Lee, S. J., Naj, A. C., Bellenguez, C., Badarinarayan, N., Jakobsdottir, J., Kunkle, B. W., Boland, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3916 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Activity-by-contact model of enhancer–promoter regulation from thousands of CRISPR perturbations
Fulco, C. P., Nasser, J., Jones, T. R., Munson, G., Bergman, D. T., Subramanian, V., Grossman, S. R., Anyoha, R., Doughty, B. R., Patwardhan, T. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0538-0 · Cited by 1,111 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis of Cytokines in Alzheimer's Disease
Swardfager, W., Lanctôt, K., Rothenburg, L., Wong, A., Cappell, J., & Herrmann, N. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.012 · Cited by 1,108 · see citing works
Regulation of circadian behaviour and metabolism by REV-ERB-α and REV-ERB-β
Cho, H., Zhao, X., Hatori, M., Yu, R. T., Barish, G. D., Lam, M. T., Chong, L.-W., DiTacchio, L., Atkins, A. R., Glass, C. K., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11048 · Cited by 1,037 · see citing works
Golden Gate Shuffling: A One-Pot DNA Shuffling Method Based on Type IIs Restriction Enzymes
Engler, C., Gruetzner, R., Kandzia, R., & Marillonnet, S. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005553 · Cited by 1,028 · see citing works
Wightman, D. P., Jansen, I. E., Savage, J. E., Shadrin, A. A., Bahrami, S., Holland, D., Rongve, A., Børte, S., Winsvold, B. S., Drange, O. K., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00921-z · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Microglia-derived ASC specks cross-seed amyloid-β in Alzheimer’s disease
Venegas, C., Kumar, S., Franklin, B. S., Dierkes, T., Brinkschulte, R., Tejera, D., Vieira-Saecker, A., Schwartz, S., Santarelli, F., Kummer, M. P., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25158 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Microglia in Alzheimer's disease
Sarlus, H., & Heneka, M. T. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci90606 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
Apolipoprotein E: Structure and function in lipid metabolism, neurobiology, and Alzheimer’s diseases
Huang, Y., & Mahley, R. W. (2014) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2014.08.025 · Cited by 829 · see citing works
Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease <b>-</b> risk association
Nott, A., Holtman, I. R., Coufal, N. G., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Yu, M., Hu, R., Han, C. Z., Pena, M., Xiao, J., Wu, Y., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay0793 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Scavenger receptor-mediated adhesion of microglia to β-amyloid fibrils
Khoury, J. E., Hickman, S. E., Thomas, C. A., Cao, L., Silverstein, S. C., & Loike, J. D. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382716a0 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
HiCUP: pipeline for mapping and processing Hi-C data
Wingett, S., Ewels, P., Furlan-Magaril, M., Nagano, T., Schoenfelder, S., Fraser, P., & Andrews, S. (2015) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.7334.1 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Genome-wide enhancer maps link risk variants to disease genes
Nasser, J., Bergman, D. T., Fulco, C. P., Guckelberger, P., Doughty, B. R., Patwardhan, T. A., Jones, T. R., Nguyen, T. H., Ulirsch, J. C., Lekschas, F., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03446-x · Cited by 669 · see citing works
CD36 Mediates the Innate Host Response to β-Amyloid
El Khoury, J. B., Moore, K. J., Means, T. K., Leung, J., Terada, K., Toft, M., Freeman, M. W., & Luster, A. D. (2003) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20021546 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Hughes, J. R., Roberts, N., McGowan, S., Hay, D., Giannoulatou, E., Lynch, M., De Gobbi, M., Taylor, S., Gibbons, R., & Higgs, D. R. (2014) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2871 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
CHiCAGO: robust detection of DNA looping interactions in Capture Hi-C data
Cairns, J., Freire-Pritchett, P., Wingett, S. W., Várnai, C., Dimond, A., Plagnol, V., Zerbino, D., Schoenfelder, S., Javierre, B.-M., Osborne, C., et al. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0992-2 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Embryonic origin of the adult hematopoietic system: advances and questions
Medvinsky, A., Александрович, Р. С., & Taoudi, S. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.040998 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
Ontogeny and homeostasis of CNS myeloid cells
Prinz, M., Erny, D., & Hagemeyer, N. (2017) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3703 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Wingo, A. P., Liu, Y., Gerasimov, E. S., Gockley, J., Logsdon, B. A., Duong, D. M., Dammer, E. B., Robins, C., Beach, T. G., Reiman, E. M., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00773-z · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Mapping of long-range chromatin interactions by proximity ligation-assisted ChIP-seq
Fang, R., Yu, M., Li, G., Chee, S., Liu, T., Schmitt, A. D., & Ren, B. (2016) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2016.137 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Systematic differences in discovery of genetic effects on gene expression and complex traits
Mostafavi, H., Spence, J. P., Naqvi, S., & Pritchard, J. K. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01529-1 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Coding variants in TREM2 increase risk for Alzheimer's disease
Jin, S. C., Benitez, B. A., Karch, C. M., Cooper, B., Skorupa, T., Carrell, D., Norton, J. B., Hsu, S., Harari, O., Cai, Y., et al. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu277 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
SNiPA: an interactive, genetic variant-centered annotation browser
Arnold, M., Raffler, J., Pfeufer, A., Suhre, K., & Kastenmüller, G. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu779 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Static and Dynamic DNA Loops form AP-1-Bound Activation Hubs during Macrophage Development
Phanstiel, D. H., Van Bortle, K., Spacek, D., Hess, G. T., Shamim, M. S., Machol, I., Love, M. I., Aiden, E. L., Bassik, M. C., & Snyder, M. P. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.006 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Janabi, N., Peudenier, S., Héron, B., Ng, K. H., & Tardieu, M. (1995) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(94)11792-h · Cited by 280 · see citing works
CSF Multianalyte Profile Distinguishes Alzheimer and Parkinson Diseases
Zhang, J., Sokal, I., Peskind, E. R., Quinn, J. F., Jankovic, J. J., Kenney, C., Chung, K. A., Millard, S. P., Nutt, J. G., & Montine, T. J. (2008) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/w01y0b808emeh12l · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Enhancer variants: evaluating functions in common disease
Corradin, O., & Scacheri, P. C. (2014) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0085-3 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Frenkel, D., Wilkinson, K., Zhao, L., Hickman, S. E., Means, T. K., Puckett, L., Farfara, D., Kingery, N. D., Weiner, H. L., & El Khoury, J. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3030 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
β-amyloid, microglia, and the inflammasome in Alzheimer’s disease
Gold, M., & El Khoury, J. (2015) · Seminars in Immunopathology · doi:10.1007/s00281-015-0518-0 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Genetics of the human microglia regulome refines Alzheimer’s disease risk loci
Kosoy, R., Fullard, J. F., Zeng, B., Bendl, J., Dong, P., Rahman, S., Kleopoulos, S. P., Shao, Z., Girdhar, K., Humphrey, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01149-1 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Kalman, J. L., Juhász, A., Laird, G., Dickens, P., Járdánházy, T., Rimanóczy, Á., Boncz, I., Parry-Jones, W. L., & Janka, Z. (2009) · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1997.tb00275.x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Chesi, A., Wagley, Y., Johnson, M. E., Manduchi, E., Su, C., Lu, S., Leonard, M. E., Hodge, K. M., Pippin, J. A., Hankenson, K. D., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09302-x · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyond the CNS: The many peripheral roles of APOE
Martínez-Martínez, A. B., Torres-Perez, E., Devanney, N., Del Moral, R., Johnson, L. A., & Arbones-Mainar, J. M. (2020) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104809 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Cousminer, D. L., Wagley, Y., Pippin, J. A., Elhakeem, A., Way, G. P., Pahl, M. C., McCormack, S. E., Chesi, A., Mitchell, J. A., Kindler, J. M., et al. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02207-9 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationTGIF2 Interacts with Histone Deacetylase 1 and Represses Transcription
Melhuish, T. A., Gallo, C. M., & Wotton, D. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m103377200 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Dourlen, P., Fernandez-Gomez, F. J., Dupont, C., Grenier-Boley, B., Bellenguez, C., Obriot, H., Caillierez, R., Sottejeau, Y., Chapuis, J., Bretteville, A., et al. (2017) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.59 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Tansey, K. E., Cameron, D., & Hill, M. J. (2018) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-018-0523-8 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Common germline variants of the human APOE gene modulate melanoma progression and survival
Ostendorf, B. N., Bilanovic, J., Adaku, N., Tafreshian, K. N., Tavora, B., Vaughan, R. D., & Tavazoie, S. F. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0879-3 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Song, R., Gao, Y., Dozmorov, I. M., Malladi, V. S., Saha, I., McDaniel, M. M., Parameswaran, S., Liang, C., Arana, C., Zhang, B., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108891 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Mapping effector genes at lupus GWAS loci using promoter Capture-C in follicular helper T cells
Su, C., Johnson, M. E., Torres, A., Thomas, R. M., Manduchi, E., Sharma, P. K., Mehra, P., Coz, C. L., Leonard, M. E., Lu, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17089-5 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationHistone Deacetylases Enzyme, Copper, and IL-8 Levels in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease
Alsadany, M. A., Shehata, H. H., Mohamad, M. I., & Mahfouz, R. (2012) · American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/1533317512467680 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
3D chromatin maps of the human pancreas reveal lineage-specific regulatory architecture of T2D risk
Su, C., Gao, L., May, C. L., Pippin, J. A., Boehm, K. D., Lee, M., Liu, C., Pahl, M. C., Golson, M. L., Naji, A., et al. (2022) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2022.08.014 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, B., Bedard, K., Sorce, S., Hinz, B., Dubois‐Dauphin, M., & Krause, K. (2009) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000235563 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Generation of Families of Construct Variants Using Golden Gate Shuffling
Engler, C., & Marillonnet, S. (2011) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-065-2_11 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Functional characterization of Alzheimer’s disease genetic variants in microglia
Yang, X., Wen, J., Yang, H., Jones, I. R., Zhu, X., Liu, W., Li, B., Clelland, C. D., Luo, W., Wong, M. Y., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01506-8 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Genetic Determinants of Disease Progression in Alzheimer's Disease
Wang, X., López, O. L., Sweet, R. A., Becker, J. T., DeKosky, S. T., Barmada, M. M., Demirci, F. Y., & Kamboh, M. I. (2014) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-140729 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Huang, X., Tanaka, T., Kurose, A., Traganos, F., & Darżynkiewicz, Z. (2006) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.29.2.495 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Ryan, S. K., Gonzalez, M. V., Garifallou, J. P., Bennett, F. C., Williams, K. S., Sotuyo, N. P., Mironets, E., Cook, K., Hakonarson, H. H., Anderson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.02.010 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationPaluru, P. C., Hudock, K. M., Cheng, X., Mills, J. A., Ying, L., Galvão, A. M., Lü, L., Tiyaboonchai, A., Sim, X., Sullivan, S. K., et al. (2013) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2013.12.003 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Removal of RTF2 from Stalled Replisomes Promotes Maintenance of Genome Integrity
Kottemann, M. C., Conti, B. A., Lach, F. P., & Smogorzewska, A. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.035 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Pahl, M. C., Doege, C. A., Hodge, K. M., Littleton, S. H., Leonard, M. E., Lu, S., Rausch, R., Pippin, J. A., Rosa, M. C. D., Basak, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27001-4 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationPahl, M. C., Coz, C. L., Su, C., Sharma, P. K., Thomas, R. M., Pippin, J. A., Cabrera, E. C., Johnson, M. E., Leonard, M. E., Lu, S., et al. (2022) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02691-1 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationSu, C., Argenziano, M., Lu, S., Pippin, J. A., Pahl, M. C., Leonard, M. E., Cousminer, D. L., Johnson, M. E., Lasconi, C., Wells, A. D., et al. (2021) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102000 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationRajalakshmy, A. R., Malathi, J., & Madhavan, H. N. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125419 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Lasconi, C., Pahl, M. C., Cousminer, D. L., Doege, C. A., Chesi, A., Hodge, K. M., Leonard, M. E., Lu, S., Johnson, M. E., Su, C., et al. (2020) · Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.10.004 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Immunomodulatory Substances on Phagocytosis of A by Human Microglia
Hjorth, E., Frenkel, D., Weiner, H., & Schultzberg, M. (2010) · International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.4061/2010/798424 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Maguire, J. A., Gagne, A. L., Jobaliya, C., Gandre-Babbe, S., Gadue, P. J., & French, D. L. (2016) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2016.02.017 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Su, C., Pahl, M. C., Grant, S. F. A., & Wells, A. D. (2021) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-021-02326-8 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationLittleton, S. H., Trang, B. K., Volpe, C. M., Cook, K., DeBruyne, N., Maguire, J. A., Weidekamp, M. A., Hodge, K. M., Boehm, K. D., Lu, S., et al. (2024) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100556 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationShi, L., Song, L., Maurer, K., Dou, Y., Patel, V. R., Su, C., Leonard, M. E., Lu, S., Hodge, K. M., Torres, A., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1900650 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationBollaert, E., Johanns, M., Herinckx, G., de Rocca Serra, A., Vandewalle, V. A., Havelange, V., Rider, M. H., Vertommen, D., & Demoulin, J.-B. (2018) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.01.014 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Unraveling the Function of <i>FTO</i> Variants
Rosen, C. J., & Ingelfinger, J. R. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme1508683 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
RTF2 controls replication repriming and ribonucleotide excision at the replisome
Conti, B. A., Ruiz, P. D., Broton, C., Blobel, N. J., Kottemann, M. C., Sridhar, S., Lach, F. P., Wiley, T. F., Sasi, N. K., Carroll, T., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45947-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
He, C., Chen, B., Yang, H., & Zhou, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1554398 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Integrated genomic analysis and CRISPRi implicates EGFR in Alzheimer’s disease risk
Leung, Y. Y., Kuksa, P. P., Carter, L., Cifello, J., Greenfest‐Allen, E., Valladares, O., Boateng, L., Laub, S., Tulina, N. M., Moura, S., et al. (2025) · npj Dementia · doi:10.1038/s44400-025-00049-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationLaub, S., Tulina, N. M., Hoffman, M., Faryean, J., Ramachandran, S., Trang, B. K., Lewkiewicz, S. M., & Chesi, A. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.04.01.646442 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Burton, E. A., Argenziano, M., Cook, K., Ridler, M., Lu, S., Su, C., Manduchi, E., Littleton, S. H., Leonard, M. E., Hodge, K. M., Wang, L.-S., Schellenberg, G. D., Johnson, M. E., Pahl, M. C., Pippin, J. A., Wells, A. D., Anderson, S. A., Brown, C. D., Grant, S. F. A., & Chesi, A.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Emory University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grant, Struan F.A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-08-22
- PMC
- PMC11370593
- OpenAlex
- W4401829681
- Semantic Scholar
- fc252d1d840491fb84c8e9a138fbf16658fb3c00
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1f31ag074532-01)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG057516)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R35HG011959)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008216)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- late-onset Alzheimer's disease, microglia, iPSC-derived microglia, HMC3 cells, microglial inflammation, DNA double-strand break repair, inflammatory cytokines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-02.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-02.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review