Brain cell type–specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease - risk association
Open accessAbstract
Linking enhancers to disease: Enhancers are genomic regions that regulate gene expression, sometimes in a cell-dependent manner. However, most of our knowledge of human brain cell–type enhancers derives from studies of bulk human brain tissue. Nott et al. examined chromatin and promoter activity in cell nuclei isolated from human brains. Genetic variants associated with brain traits and disease showed cell-specific patterns of enhancer enrichment. These data indicate that Alzheimer's disease is regulated by genetic variants within microglial cells, whereas psychiatric diseases tend to affect neurons. Science , this issue p. 1134
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
24 of 27 cited sources checked · 8 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Fine mapping produced 261 variants in credible sets.
“To better understand AD genetics and the microglia interactome, we distinguished likely causal variants from those in linkage disequilibrium by applying fine mapping and identified 261 credible set variants (18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Kunkle BW, Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nature Genetics 51, 414– 430 (2019). 30820047 PMC6463297 source
The Results section, under “Functional interpretation of genetic variants” (page unavailable), confirms that the authors used fine mapping to identify credible sets. But it reports 345 plausible causal SNPs in the HLA-DRB1 locus alone, which contradicts a total of 261 credible-set variants. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Promoters of genes that mark a given cell type tended to show the matching H3K27ac profile.
“Promoters associated with cell type signature genes preferentially exhibited corresponding H3K27ac profiles”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Wang D, Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science (New York, NY) 362, eaat8464 (2018). PMC6413328 30545857 source
The Transcriptome analysis: Bulk and single cell section describes cell-type expression signatures and marker genes, while the Enhancers section describes H3K27ac profiles. Neither passage reports whether promoters of those marker genes preferentially exhibit H3K27ac profiles corresponding to the same cell type. I searched for the stated promoter–signature-gene relationship and cell-type-specific promoter acetylation; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
In each cell type, a single promoter can connect to multiple enhancers.
“We identified putative active promoters and enhancers in each cell type and found a one-to many relationship between promoters and enhancers (8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Mumbach MR, HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture. Nature methods 13, 919 (2016). 27643841 PMC5501173 source
The Main Text (page not provided) associates some HiChIP loops with active enhancers and promoters, but does not report how many enhancers connect to a promoter in each cell type. Searches for a one-to-many promoter–enhancer relationship and for multiple enhancers per promoter found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
H3K27ac at promoters tracked gene expression in the matching cell type better than ATAC-seq or H3K4me3 ChIP-seq did.
“Promoter H3K27ac signal correlated with gene expression of the corresponding cell type more closely than ATAC-seq and H3K4me3 ChIP-seq”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Zhang Y, Purification and Characterization of Progenitor and Mature Human Astrocytes Reveals Transcriptional and Functional Differences with Mouse. Neuron 89, 37– 53 (2016). 26687838 PMC4707064 source
The Results section on cell-type transcriptomes reports RNA-seq expression profiles and correlations between samples, not correlations between promoter marks and expression. Searches for H3K27ac, ATAC-seq, H3K4me3, and chromatin accessibility found no passage in our copy comparing those signals. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
ATAC-seq and H3K27ac profiles from PU.1 nuclei matched closely with profiles previously reported for ex vivo microglia.
“ATAC-seq and H3K27ac ChIP-seq profiles generated from PU.1 nuclei were highly correlated with those previously defined in ex vivo microglia”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Gosselin D, An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science (New York, NY) 356, eaal3222 (2017). PMC5858585 28546318 source
The “Enhancer landscape of human microglia” section reports that ATAC-seq and ChIP-seq data, including H3K27ac, were highly correlated across human individuals and mouse biological replicates. It does not report a comparison between profiles generated from PU.1 nuclei and previously defined ex vivo microglia profiles; its PU.1 ChIP-seq experiments used microglia isolated from six individuals. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The vast majority of disease-risk genetic variants are located in non-coding regions of the genome.
“The vast majority of these disease-risk genetic variants are located in non-coding regions of the genome (5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Maurano MT, Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190– 1195 (2012). 22955828 PMC3771521 source
- Findingown data
Across cell types, 41 genes were connected to AD-risk credible-set variants.
“Next, we determined PLAC-interactions between active promoters and AD-risk credible set variants (19) and identified forty-one genes that were linked to these variants across cell types (fig. S8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Jansen IE, Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nature Genetics 51, 404– 413 (2019). 30617256 PMC6836675 source
- Findingcitation
Chromatin loops connecting active promoters to distal regulatory regions were found in microglia, neurons, and oligodendrocytes.
“Chromatin loops were identified between active promoters and distal regulatory regions in microglia, neurons and oligodendrocytes (26).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Juric I, MAPS: Model-based analysis of long-range chromatin interactions from PLAC-seq and HiChIP experiments. PLoS Comput Biol 15, e1006982 (2019). 30986246 PMC6483256 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says distal enhancers frequently form chromatin loops with target-gene promoters, supporting the general type of interaction. The Results and Methods passages describe analyses in mouse embryonic stem cells and GM12878 cells, not microglia, neurons, or oligodendrocytes. Our copy therefore does not support the claim that these loops were identified in the three named cell types. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Ninety-four percent of bulk brain enhancers from PsychENCODE overlapped with enhancers found in the sorted nuclei.
“Most bulk brain enhancer regions identified by PsychENCODE overlapped with the nuclei cell type enhancers (94%) (13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Wang D, Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science (New York, NY) 362, eaat8464 (2018). PMC6413328 30545857 source
The Enhancers section describes a reference set of 79,056 brain enhancers, but it does not report their overlap with enhancers from sorted nuclei. Searches for “94%,” “sorted nuclei enhancers,” and “cell type enhancers overlap bulk” found no passage establishing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
AD SNP heritability showed its strongest enrichment in microglial regulatory elements, especially microglial enhancers.
“In contrast, AD SNP heritability was most highly enriched in microglia regulatory elements (Fig. 1D), specifically microglia enhancers (18-23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 6 sources checked- cites [18] Kunkle BW, Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nature Genetics 51, 414– 430 (2019). 30820047 PMC6463297 source
The Results section on functional interpretation (page unavailable) reports AD SNP-heritability enrichment in H3K27ac marks and super enhancers, but does not identify these as microglial elements or say microglial enhancers had the strongest enrichment. The separate gene-set Results (page unavailable) report a suggestive microglia association, not microglial enhancer heritability enrichment. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [19] Jansen IE, Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nature Genetics 51, 404– 413 (2019). 30617256 PMC6836675 source
The Results, under “Functional interpretation of genetic variants” (page unavailable), report AD SNP-heritability enrichment in H3K27ac marks and super enhancers, but do not identify these as microglial elements or say microglial enhancers had the strongest enrichment. The separate “Gene-sets implicated in AD and AD-by-proxy” section reports a microglial gene-expression association, not enrichment of SNP heritability in microglial regulatory elements. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [20] Huang KL, A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci 20, 1052– 1061 (2017). 28628103 PMC5759334 source
The Results section (page not available) reports enrichment of AD heritability in myeloid and B-lymphoid cells, including monocyte enhancers. It does not report that microglial regulatory elements were tested or that microglial enhancers showed the strongest enrichment; the Discussion instead calls myeloid cells the top candidate cell types. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [21] Novikova G, Integration of Alzheimer’s disease genetics and myeloid cell genomics identifies novel causal variants, regulatory elements, genes and pathways. bioRxiv, 694281 (2019). source
The section “AD risk alleles are specifically enriched in active enhancers of monocytes, macrophages and microglia” (page not available) reports enrichment in microglial active enhancers. It also reports enrichment in monocytes and macrophages; it does not establish that microglial regulatory elements had the strongest enrichment. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Tansey KE, Hill MJ, Enrichment of schizophrenia heritability in both neuronal and glia cell regulatory elements. Transl Psychiatry 8, 7 (2018). 29317610 PMC5802526 source
The Results report enrichment of schizophrenia heritability at neuronal and non-neuronal H3K4me3 sites, not AD heritability. The Discussion mentions microglia only as one possible component of the NeuN-negative population. A search for AD and microglial enhancers found no passage assessing the claimed enrichment. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Tansey KE, Cameron D, Hill MJ, Genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease is concentrated in specific macrophage and microglial transcriptional networks. Genome Med 10, 14 (2018). 29482603 PMC5828245 source
The Results section on common-variant heritability reports significant enrichment in microglial open-chromatin regions containing SPI1 or Spdef motifs. It does not identify microglial enhancers as the most highly enriched regulatory elements; its heritability analysis groups regions by transcription-factor motif, not enhancer status. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Applying the same approach to all genome-wide significant variants from two AD GWASs yielded a larger set of 134 candidate risk genes.
“A broader set of 134 putative risk genes were identified by applying the same analysis to all genome-wide significant variants found in two AD GWASs (fig. S8, S9A, B and Table S7) (18, 19).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Kunkle BW, Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nature Genetics 51, 414– 430 (2019). 30820047 PMC6463297 source
- cites [19] Jansen IE, Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nature Genetics 51, 404– 413 (2019). 30617256 PMC6836675 source
- Findingown data
Sporadic AD risk variants were mostly restricted to enhancers in microglia.
“sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (AD) variants were largely confined to microglia enhancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Maps linking disease-risk variants in cell-type-specific enhancers to promoters uncovered a broader microglial gene network in AD.
“Interactome maps connecting disease-risk variants in cell type-specific enhancers to promoters revealed an extended microglia gene network in AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
H3K27ac at promoters was higher for microglial signature genes than for genes marking other myeloid cells.
“Promoter H3K27ac signal was increased at microglia signature genes compared to genes associated with other myeloid populations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Jordao MJC, Single-cell profiling identifies myeloid cell subsets with distinct fates during neuroinflammation. Science 363, (2019). 30679343 source
- Findingown data
They mapped non-coding regulatory elements across principal human brain cell types.
“we defined non-coding regulatory regions for major cell types of the human brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For psychiatric conditions, risk variants were mainly found in neuronal enhancers and promoters.
“Whereas psychiatric disorders were primarily associated with variants in transcriptional enhancers and promoters in neurons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using cell-specific nuclei increased the count of candidate brain enhancers by 87%.
“However, analysis of cell-specific nuclei expanded the total number of putative brain enhancers by 87%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The SALL1 locus interacts with cell-type-specific enhancers, including loops to a super-enhancer specific to microglia.
“An example is the SALL1 locus, which has interactions to cell type-specific enhancers, including chromatin loops to a microglia-specific super-enhancer (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some chromatin interactions were more active in a given cell type and coincided with higher ATAC-seq, H3K27ac, and H3K4me3 signals specific to that cell type.
“A subset of chromatin interactions was significantly more active in each cell type and colocalized with increased ATAC-seq, H3K27ac and H3K4me3 ChIP-seq signal in a cell type-specific manner (Figs. 2B; S6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cell-type-specific enhancers with AD-risk variants connected to genes expressed in several cell types, suggesting cell-type-specific disease susceptibility.
“Last, we identified cell type-specific enhancers harboring AD-risk variants that were linked to genes expressed in multiple cell types, implicating cell type-specific disease susceptibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At loci including BIN1, PICALM, and SORL1, fine-mapped variants often fell within microglial enhancers that PLAC linked to the genes' promoters.
“In many instances, such as the BIN1, PICALM, and SORL1 loci, the fine mapped variants overlapped with microglia-specific enhancers that were PLAC-linked to corresponding gene promoters (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Motif analysis of open chromatin in enhancers found transcription factor binding motifs characteristic of each cell type.
“De novo motif analyses at open chromatin within enhancers identified transcription factor binding motifs associated with each cell type (fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Enhancers carrying AD-risk variants were PLAC-linked to promoters of both GWAS-assigned genes and additional genes outside the assigned loci.
“Second, we observed enhancers harboring AD-risk variants that were PLAC-linked to active promoters of both GWAS-assigned genes and an extended subset of genes not assigned to GWAS loci.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Western blotting detected BIN1 protein in control PSCs and in derived microglia, neurons, and astrocytes.
“Western blot confirmed BIN1 protein in BIN1control PSCs and PSC-derived microglia, neurons and astrocytes (Figs. 4D, E; S12F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Some AD-risk variants connected to active promoters farther away rather than to the nearest gene's promoter.
“First, we found AD-risk variants that were linked to more distal active promoters and not the closest gene promoter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Risk variants found outside coding regions by GWAS can influence traits by disrupting gene promoters and enhancers.
“GWAS-identified risk variants in non-coding regions of the genome can exert phenotypic effects through perturbation of transcriptional gene promoters and enhancers (4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Gallagher MD, Chen-Plotkin AS, The Post-GWAS Era: From Association to Function. Am J Hum Genet 102, 717– 730 (2018). 29727686 PMC5986732 source
- Interpretationown data
PLAC interactions changed how AD-risk variants were interpreted in three ways.
“PLAC-interactions altered interpretation of AD-risk variants according to three features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
CRISPR/Cas9 deletion of a 363 bp region in two human pluripotent stem cell lines validated the function of the microglial BIN1 enhancer.
“Functionality of this microglia-specific enhancer was validated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of a 363 bp region in two human pluripotent stem cell (PSC) lines (fig. S10A-C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Combining cell-type-specific transcription factors with matching enhancer motifs points to key regulators of cell development.
“Integrating cell type-specific transcription factors with enhancer motifs of the corresponding cell type identifies major drivers of cell ontogeny.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
- May combine two claims. 25
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEnhancer function requires physical contacts between enhancers and promoters in three dimensions.
“The activity of enhancers depends on three-dimensional enhancer-promoter interactions (8)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Mumbach MR, HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture. Nature methods 13, 919 (2016). 27643841 PMC5501173 source
The Main Text reports that certain Oct4–Smc1a chromatin loops are associated with active enhancers and promoters. It does not establish that enhancer activity depends on, or requires, those physical interactions. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDistinct sets of enhancers underlie specific gene expression patterns and allow responses unique to a cell type.
“Unique enhancer repertoires underly particular patterns of gene expression and enable cell type-specific responses (7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Heinz S, Romanoski CE, Benner C, Glass CK, The selection and function of cell type-specific enhancers. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 16, 144 (2015). 25650801 PMC4517609 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSuper-enhancers, which are clusters of several enhancers, play a key role in activating genes that define cell identity.
“Clusters of multiple enhancers, referred to as super enhancers, are particularly important in driving the expression of cell identity genes (6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Hnisz D, Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934– 947 (2013). 24119843 PMC3841062 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHeritability for all psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits was strongly enriched in neuronal enhancers and promoters, and much less so in PsychENCODE bulk brain enhancers.
“We found a strong enrichment of heritability for variants within neuronal enhancers and promoters for all psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits (Fig. 1D), which was substantially lower in PsychENCODE bulk brain enhancers (Fig. 1D) (13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Wang D, Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science (New York, NY) 362, eaat8464 (2018). PMC6413328 30545857 source
- cites [17] S. m. a. methods. source
The Methods section (‘Regulatory variant and eQTL analysis’; page unavailable) describes annotation of Alzheimer’s disease risk variants, not heritability enrichment across psychiatric disorders and behavioral traits. Searches for neuronal enhancers and promoters and PsychENCODE bulk-brain enhancers found no passage reporting the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe microglial enhancer at BIN1 is PLAC-linked to the BIN1 promoter, binds PU.1, and carries rs6733839, an AD-risk variant with the second-highest score after APOE that fine mapping marked as causal.
“The BIN1 microglia-specific enhancer is PLAC-linked to the BIN1 promoter (Fig. 4A), binds to PU.1 (14) and contains the AD-risk variant rs6733839, which has the second highest AD-risk score after APOE and was fine-mapped as a casual variant (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Gosselin D, An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science (New York, NY) 356, eaal3222 (2017). PMC5858585 28546318 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationBecause the strongest GWAS risk allele for BIN1 lies in a microglial enhancer, further study of its function in microglia is warranted.
“This finding that the most significant GWAS risk allele associated with BIN1 resides in a microglia-specific enhancer provides a rational for further investigation of its function in these cells (27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Crotti A, BIN1 favors the spreading of Tau via extracellular vesicles. Sci Rep 9, 9477 (2019). 31263146 PMC6603165 source
The Results identify rs6733839 as the more statistically significant of two BIN1-associated AD risk alleles reported there. The Discussion says it lies near a PU.1 peak in human microglia and that the mouse Bin1 locus contains a microglia-specific super-enhancer; it does not establish that the human risk allele resides in a microglia-specific enhancer. The paper does point to microglia as a relevant cell type for further investigation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe datasets grouped by the cell type they came from and showed patterns specific to each cell type.
“These datasets clustered according to cell type of origin and exhibited cell type-specific patterns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRemoving a microglial enhancer that carries AD-risk variants eliminated BIN1 expression in microglia, while neurons and astrocytes were unaffected.
“Deletion of a microglia-specific enhancer harboring AD-risk variants ablated BIN1 expression in microglia but not in neurons or astrocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOligodendrocyte nuclei included few precursor cells, and neuronal nuclei were a mix of excitatory and inhibitory subtypes.
“Oligodendrocyte nuclei contain a low number of oligodendrocyte precursor cells, while neuronal nuclei represent a mixture of excitatory and inhibitory subtypes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross cell types, 219,509 significant unique interactions were detected, and replicates grouped by their source.
“There were 219,509 significant unique interactions across cell types, and replicates clustered according to origin (fig. S6A, B; Table S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn microglia, neurons, and oligodendrocytes, 2,954 super-enhancers were found; 83% had PLAC interactions and connected to promoters with higher H3K27ac than promoters linked to ordinary enhancers.
“We identified 2,954 super-enhancers in microglia, neurons and oligodendrocytes, of which 83% had PLAC-interactions and were linked to promoters with elevated H3K27ac levels compared to promoters linked to regular enhancers (fig. S7A, B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPromoters linked to cell-type-enriched interactions in microglia, neurons, and oligodendrocytes matched ontologies typical of those cells, supporting PLAC maps as annotations of cell-type-specific promoter-enhancer links.
“Active promoters linked to microglia, neuronal and oligodendrocyte enriched interactions were associated with gene ontology terms representative of each cell type, supporting the ability of the PLAC interactome to annotate cell type-specific promoter-enhancer interactions (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationActive promoters marked by H3K27ac revealed 288 human transcription factors with cell-type-specific activity, some linked to disease.
“In addition, H3K27ac-defined active promoters identified 288 human transcription factors that were active in a cell type-specific manner (fig. S4, Table S2) (24), several of which have been associated with disease (fig. S5; Table S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Lambert SA, The Human Transcription Factors. Cell 175, 598– 599 (2018). 30290144 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn deletion lines, BIN1 expression was almost absent in PSC-derived microglia, but in PSCs, neurons, and astrocytes it matched control levels.
“However, gene expression of BIN1 was nearly absent in the BIN1enh_del PSC-derived microglia, whereas BIN1 expression in BIN1enh_del PSCs and PSC-derived neurons and astrocytes were equivalent to BIN1control cells (Figs. 4C; S12E; Table S8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany super-enhancers contained GWAS risk variants and linked to cell-type-specific genes, implying that some GWAS variants influence expression through super-enhancers.
“Many super-enhancers harbored GWAS disease-risk variants and were connected to cell type-specific genes, suggesting that a subset of GWAS variants act on super-enhancers to affect gene expression (fig. S7A, Table S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the PLAC-linked AD-risk genes, 25 were found in microglia, and 14 of those were absent from the other cell types.
“Twenty-five of the PLAC-linked AD-risk genes were identified in microglia, of which 14 were not detected in the other cell types (Figs. 3B; S8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost active promoters are common across cell types, but only a small share of active enhancers are shared, suggesting that cell-type specificity resides mainly in enhancers.
“Whereas active promoters are largely shared between cell types (Fig. 1B), a relatively small fraction of active enhancers overlap between cell types (Fig. 1C), indicating that cell type specificity is mainly captured within the enhancer repertoire.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn deletion lines, BIN1 expression was unchanged in hematopoietic stem cell precursors of microglia, indicating that microglial differentiation was not disrupted.
“BIN1 expression was unchanged in BIN1enh_del PSC-derived microglia precursor hematopoietic stem cells, indicating that microglia derivation was unaffected (fig S12F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProtein interaction networks showed that microglial AD-risk genes from PLAC-seq were densely connected to GWAS-assigned genes and centered on APOE, while neuronal and oligodendrocyte networks were smaller.
“Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis showed that microglia AD-risk genes identified by PLAC-seq were highly connected with GWAS-assigned genes and centered around APOE, whereas PPI networks for neurons and oligodendrocytes were smaller in scope (fig. S9C-E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBIN1 was sharply reduced in deletion microglia but not in neurons or astrocytes.
“However, BIN1 was dramatically reduced in BIN1enh_del microglia and not neurons and astrocytes (Fig. 4D, E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAD-assigned genes in microglia linked to immune ontologies, while amyloid-beta processing ontologies appeared in neurons, microglia, and oligodendrocytes.
“Microglia AD-assigned genes were associated with gene ontology terms for immune function, whereas gene ontology terms for amyloid-beta processing were associated with neurons, microglia and oligodendrocytes (fig. S9F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHigh H3K4me3 signal did not guarantee an interaction, which suggests PLAC-seq measures a distinct aspect of chromatin conformation.
“A strong H3K4me3 signal did not dictate that an interaction will occur (fig. S6C), suggesting that PLAC-seq captures a unique dimension of the chromatin conformation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenVariation in non-coding DNA substantially contributes to phenotypic differences, yet interpreting its function is difficult.
“Non-coding genetic variation is a major driver of phenotypic diversity, but functional interpretation is challenging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results change and broaden the set of genes probably affected by non-coding AD variants and point to the cell types where those effects occur.
“These findings revise and expand the genes likely to be influenced by non-coding variants in AD and suggest the probable cell types in which they function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGenetic variation probably affects disease-specific regulatory elements, and limited sample size may partly account for why some risk alleles did not overlap current regulatory atlases.
“Disease-specific regulatory elements are likely to be influenced by genetic variation, which due to our limited sample size may partly explain the lack of overlap of a subset of risk alleles with the current regulatory atlases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCell-type-specific promoter-enhancer interactome maps allow major progress in interpreting GWAS risk alleles for neurological and psychiatric diseases and provide a new resource for that task.
“The present studies provide evidence that identification of cell type-specific promoter-enhancer interactomes enables substantial advances in interpretation of GWAS risk alleles associated with neurological and psychiatric diseases and establish a new resource for this purpose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataExpression profiling of control and deletion lines across PSCs and derived microglia, neurons, and astrocytes showed strong sample correlation and grouping by cell type.
“Gene expression analysis of BIN1control and BIN1enh_del lines in PSC and PSC-derived microglia, neurons and astrocytes showed high correlation between samples, with clustering according to cell type (fig. S12C, D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataControl and BIN1 enhancer-deletion PSC lines had normal karyotypes and were differentiated into microglia, neurons, and astrocytes.
“PSC control (BIN1control) and BIN1 enhancer deletion (BIN1enh_del) lines had normal karyotypes (fig. S10D) and were differentiated into microglia, neurons and astrocytes (Figs. 4B, S11A-D, S12A, B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Variation in non-coding DNA substantially contributes to phenotypic differences, yet interpreting its function is difficult.
“Non-coding genetic variation is a major driver of phenotypic diversity, but functional interpretation is challenging.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is often not known which variants are causal or in which cell types disease-risk variants act.
“The causal variants and the specific cell type(s) in which the disease-risk variants may be active is often unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The enhancer-promoter interactome and the relationship between promoters and distal regulatory regions in different brain cell types are largely unknown.
“the enhancer-promoter interactome of different brain cell types in vivo remain largely unknown.”
“The relationship between promoters and distal regulatory regions for different cell types in the brain is largely unknown.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The functional linkage between rs6733839 and BIN1 has been well established.
“including the two loci with the strongest associations with LOAD: the BIN1 locus for which the functional linkage between rs6733839 and BIN1 has been well established7,23”
From PICALM Alzheimer’s risk allele causes aberrant lipid droplets in microglia (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
The paper’s BIN1 enhancer discussion (indexed under Abstract; no page supplied) places rs6733839 in a microglia-specific enhancer linked to the BIN1 promoter and reports that deleting the enhancer sharply reduced BIN1 expression in microglia. That establishes a functional link between the enhancer and BIN1, but the paper does not test the effect of rs6733839 itself; it calls for further investigation of the risk allele’s function. Thus, saying the variant’s functional linkage is well established overstates this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMicroglia gene expression patterns are strongly correlated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease.
“Genome -wide association meta -analysis studies (GWASs) 1,2 and interactome investigation 3 identified microglia gene expression patterns as strongly correlated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD).”
From APOE4 impairs the microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease by inducing TGFβ-mediated checkpoints (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
The indexed passage on AD genetics and the microglia interactome (page unavailable) links AD-risk variants to microglia-specific enhancers and identifies 25 microglial genes linked to those variants. This supports an association between microglial gene regulation and AD risk, but it does not report that microglial gene-expression patterns are strongly correlated with late-onset AD. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPIRs were significantly enriched for open chromatin regions detected in ATAC-seq and for active chromatin marks from ex-vivo microglia.
“PIRs were significantly enriched for open chromatin regions detected in our ATAC-seq experiments and for active chromatin marks from ex-vivo microglia22, suggesting a potential regulatory role (Suppl. Fig 1).”
From Variant-to-function mapping of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease GWAS signals in human microglial cell models implicates <i>RTFDC1</i> at the <i>CASS4</i> locus (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The paper’s interactome passage (page unavailable) reports that a subset of chromatin interactions colocalized with increased ATAC-seq and active chromatin-mark signals. Its microglia profiling passage says those signals were highly correlated with profiles previously defined in ex-vivo microglia. It does not report that PIRs were significantly enriched for the citing authors’ ATAC-seq regions or for marks from ex-vivo microglia. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredH3K27ac was only enriched in microglia among four major brain cell types at the region harboring rs6024870, suggesting this region acts specifically as an enhancer in microglia.
“Of the four cell types, H3K27ac was only enriched in microglia, suggesting that this region acts specifically as an enhancer in microglia.”
From Variant-to-function mapping of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease GWAS signals in human microglial cell models implicates <i>RTFDC1</i> at the <i>CASS4</i> locus (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The paper’s main text (page unavailable in our copy) reports H3K27ac profiling across four brain cell populations and identifies microglia-specific enhancers. It does not establish that H3K27ac was enriched only in microglia at the region harboring rs6024870; a search for that variant found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMultiple sporadic AD risk variants were identified in microglial transcriptional enhancer regions in humans.
“multiple sporadic AD risk variants were identified in microglial transcriptional enhancer regions in humans11”
From Amyloid-β induces lipid droplet-mediated microglial dysfunction via the enzyme DGAT2 in Alzheimer’s disease (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
A significant proportion of AD-linked genes are associated with microglia and the immune response.
“A significant proportion of these AD‐linked genes are associated with microglia and the immune response, reinforcing the necessity to understand the intersection of immunity and AD pathogenesis in the development of novel AD therapeutics.”
From PLCG2 modulates TREM2 expression and signaling in response to Alzheimer's disease pathology (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
GWAS have implicated functional alterations of microglia as a major driver of Alzheimer's disease risk.
“Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have implicated functional alterations of microglia (MG), the macrophage-like hematopoietic cells in the brain, as a major driver of AD risk13.”
From Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with protection from Alzheimer’s disease (2023) · cites this paper as [13]
Using techniques with antibodies to enhancer- and promoter-associated histone modifications or RNA polymerase has revealed large numbers of 3D enhancer-promoter contacts.
“Using these techniques with antibodies to enhancer- and promoter-associated histone modifications or those to RNA polymerase has also revealed large numbers of 3D enhancer–promoter contacts [244, 295–301].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [297]
The causal SNP at the LOAD GWAS-implicated BIN1 locus resides within an enhancer that is only active in microglia, and not other CNS cell types.
“Indeed, the causal SNP at the LOAD GWAS-implicated BIN1 locus resides within an enhancer that is only active in the microglia, and not other CNS cell types22.”
Two studies using proximity-ligation assays in human primary or iPSC-derived microglia have reported 3D genomic interactions between GWAS-associated variants and gene promoters in LOAD.
“Recently, two studies using proximity-ligation assays in either human primary or iPSC-derived microglia have reported 3D genomic interactions between GWAS-associated variants and gene promoters in LOAD22,65.”
rs6024870 is in strong LD with the sentinel SNP at the CASS4 locus (rs6069737, r2 = 0.97).
“We prioritized this variant as it is in strong LD with the sentinel SNP at this locus (rs6069737, r2 = 0.97), and lies within open chromatin in both of our microglial cell models, as well as in ex vivo human microglia 22.”
From Variant-to-function mapping of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease GWAS signals in human microglial cell models implicates <i>RTFDC1</i> at the <i>CASS4</i> locus (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The paper’s section on AD-risk variants and microglial enhancers discusses linkage disequilibrium generally, but does not report the claimed relationship at the CASS4 locus. Searches for rs6024870, rs6069737, and the stated r² of 0.97 found no passage establishing that these SNPs are in strong LD. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredExpression levels of miRs in the human brain are influenced by specific genetic variants termed quantitative trait loci (miR-QTLs).
“Expression levels of miRs in the human brain were recently reported to be influenced by specific genetic variants, termed quantitative trait loci (miR-QTLs) 60 .”
From Human brain microRNAs exhibit cell-type specificity and age dependence (2026) · cites this paper as [60]
The Abstract (page unavailable) discusses genetic variants affecting brain-cell regulatory regions and BIN1 expression, but does not address microRNA expression or miR-QTLs. Searches for miR-QTLs and for genetic variants affecting microRNA expression in the human brain found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredVariants in enhancers can have cell-type-specific effects on gene expression, as shown by Alzheimer's disease variants that affect BIN1 expression specifically in microglia but not in neurons or astrocytes.
“Intriguingly, variants in enhancers can exert cell-type specific effects on gene expression, as exemplified by Alzheimer’s Disease variants that affect BIN1 expression specifically in microglia, but not neurons or astrocytes5.”
From CRISPR-based functional genomics for neurological disease (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
Genes expressed in other CNS cell types have microglia-specific enhancers with risk polymorphisms that selectively affect myeloid expression.
“genes expressed in other CNS cell types (e.g. neurons and astrocytes) have microglia-specific enhancers with risk polymorphisms that selectively affect myeloid expression (i.e. Bin1) [6].”
From Microglia facilitate loss of perineuronal nets in the Alzheimer's disease brain (2020) · cites this paper as [6]
Based on data from peripheral cells and select microglia-specific datasets, it is likely the regulation of gene expression in microglia will emerge as critical to disease pathogenesis.
“Based on data from peripheral cells and select microglia-specific datasets [184, 192], it is likely the regulation of gene expression in microglia will emerge as critical to disease pathogenesis.”
From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [192]
There is a recent identification of the enrichment of AD-associated variants in enhancers active in primary human microglia.
“This is supported by a recent identification of the enrichment of AD-associated variants in enhancers active in primary human microglia [192].”
From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [192]
Disease-associated SNPs in non-coding areas of the genome influence genes associated with diseases including Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
“disease-associated SNPs in non-coding areas of the genome influence genes associated with diseases including Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)”
From Neuronal DNA double-strand breaks lead to genome structural variations and 3D genome disruption in neurodegeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [48]
Promoter interaction profiles have been inferred from neurons, oligodendrocytes, and microglia obtained from the postnatal human cerebral cortex.
“Recently, promoter interaction profiles were inferred from three types of brain cells (neurons, oligodendrocytes, and microglia) obtained from the postnatal human cerebral cortex16.”
From Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
AD risk genes are highly expressed in postnatal brain samples and microglia.
“Consistent with previous studies16,42,49, these genes were highly expressed in the postnatal brain samples (Fig. 4d) and microglia (Fig. 4e).”
From Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Nott et al. found that rs6733839 is causally implicated in the regulation of BIN1 in a microglia-specific manner, as predicted by our analysis.
“Nott et al. found that this SNP is causally implicated in the regulation of an AD risk gene, BIN1, in a microglia-specific manner16 as predicted by our analysis.”
From Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Enhancers often regulate distal genes.
“We and others have shown that enhancers often regulate distal genes4,15,16”
From Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Many risk genes associated with AD mediate their effects through microglia.
“Indeed, many of the risk genes associated with AD mediate their effects through microglia, the brain‐resident macrophages (Glass et al, 2010; Heneka et al, 2015; Nott et al, 2019).”
From Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease (2022) · cites this paper as Nott et al, 2019
PLAC-seq revealed long-range connections between the enhancer and the P2RY12 promoter but not to MED12L.
“PLAC-seq56 revealed long-range connections between the enhancer and the P2RY12 promoter but not to MED12L (Fig. 6g).”
From Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
The overlapping microglia enhancer region has extensive long-range connections to regions overlapping the USP6NL promoter and gene body.
“Using proximity ligation-assisted ChIP-seq (PLAC-seq) data56, we observed that the overlapping microglia enhancer region has extensive long-range connections to regions overlapping the USP6NL promoter and gene body.”
From Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
miR-QTLs were enriched in oligodendrocyte enhancers.
“Considering enhancers for each cell type separately, miR-QTLs were enriched in enhancers in oligodendrocytes and neurons but not astrocytes; on the other hand, miR-QTLs were depleted in microglia enhancers (Figure 3).”
From Mapping the microRNA landscape in the older adult brain and its genetic contribution to neuropsychiatric conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
miR-QTLs were not enriched in astrocyte enhancers.
“Considering enhancers for each cell type separately, miR-QTLs were enriched in enhancers in oligodendrocytes and neurons but not astrocytes; on the other hand, miR-QTLs were depleted in microglia enhancers (Figure 3).”
From Mapping the microRNA landscape in the older adult brain and its genetic contribution to neuropsychiatric conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
miR-QTLs were depleted in microglia enhancers.
“Considering enhancers for each cell type separately, miR-QTLs were enriched in enhancers in oligodendrocytes and neurons but not astrocytes; on the other hand, miR-QTLs were depleted in microglia enhancers (Figure 3).”
From Mapping the microRNA landscape in the older adult brain and its genetic contribution to neuropsychiatric conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
miR-QTLs were enriched in neuron enhancers.
“Considering enhancers for each cell type separately, miR-QTLs were enriched in enhancers in oligodendrocytes and neurons but not astrocytes; on the other hand, miR-QTLs were depleted in microglia enhancers (Figure 3).”
From Mapping the microRNA landscape in the older adult brain and its genetic contribution to neuropsychiatric conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
miR-QTLs are significantly enriched in promoters active in human brain.
“We observed significant enrichment of miR-QTLs in promoters active in human brain31.”
From Mapping the microRNA landscape in the older adult brain and its genetic contribution to neuropsychiatric conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
The promoter and enhancer detection was done using pooled sorted single nuclei, so the relative proportions of the cell type in bulk tissue does not create a bias in the promoter and enhancer distributions across cell types.
“The promoter and enhancer detection was done using pooled sorted single nuclei31, so the relative proportions of the cell type in bulk tissue does not create a bias in the promoter and enhancer distributions across cell types.”
From Mapping the microRNA landscape in the older adult brain and its genetic contribution to neuropsychiatric conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
The promoter and enhancer annotations were made using data from only 10 individuals and may have missed regulatory regions whose activity varies across individuals.
“Also, the promoter and enhancer annotations were made using data from only 10 individuals and may have missed regulatory regions whose activity varies across individuals31.”
From Mapping the microRNA landscape in the older adult brain and its genetic contribution to neuropsychiatric conditions (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies
Ritchie, M. E., Phipson, B., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Law, C. W., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007 · Cited by 40,458 · see citing works
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849 · see citing works
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386 · see citing works
Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts
Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz‐Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S., Waknitz, M. A., Swiergiel, J. J., Marshall, V. S., & Jones, J. M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5391.1145 · Cited by 15,947 · see citing works
Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets
Zhou, Y., Zhou, B., Pache, L., Chang, M., Khodabakhshi, A. H., Tanaseichuk, O., Benner, C., & Chanda, S. K. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6 · Cited by 14,611 · see citing works
Heinz, S., Benner, C., Spann, N., Bertolino, E., Lin, Y. C., Laslo, P., Cheng, J. X., Murre, C., Singh, H., & Glass, C. K. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 · Cited by 13,382 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Human Genome Browser at UCSC
Kent, W. J., Sugnet, C. W., Furey, T. S., Roskin, K. M., Pringle, T. H., Zahler, A. M., & Haussler, A. D. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229102 · Cited by 10,400 · see citing works
Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease
Heneka, M. T., Carson, M. J., Khoury, J. E., Landreth, G. E., Brosseron, F., Feinstein, D. L., Jacobs, A. H., Wyss-Coray, T., Vitorica, J., Ransohoff, R. M., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)70016-5 · Cited by 6,226 · see citing works
voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts
Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29 · Cited by 6,155 · see citing works
A Unique Microglia Type Associated with Restricting Development of Alzheimer’s Disease
Keren-Shaul, H., Spinrad, A., Weiner, A., Matcovitch-Natan, O., Dvir-Szternfeld, R., Ulland, T. K., David, E., Baruch, K., Lara-Astaiso, D., Toth, B., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018 · Cited by 5,493 · see citing works
Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state
Creyghton, M. P., Cheng, A. W., Welstead, G. G., Kooistra, T., Carey, B. W., Steine, E. J., Hanna, J., Lodato, M. A., Frampton, G. M., Sharp, P. A., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016071107 · Cited by 4,302 · see citing works
An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits
ReproGen Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3, Finucane, H. K., Anttila, V., Gusev, A., Day, F. R., Loh, P.-R., Duncan, L., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3406 · Cited by 4,255 · see citing works
Systematic Localization of Common Disease-Associated Variation in Regulatory DNA
Maurano, M. T., Humbert, R., Rynes, E., Thurman, R. E., Haugen, E., Wang, H., Reynolds, A. P., Sandstrom, R., Qu, H., Brody, J., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1222794 · Cited by 3,716 · see citing works
Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease
Hnisz, D., Abraham, B. J., Lee, T. I., Lau, A., Saint-André, V., Sigova, A. A., Hoke, H. A., & Young, R. A. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.053 · Cited by 3,662 · see citing works
The Human Transcription Factors
Lambert, S. A., Jolma, A., Campitelli, L. F., Das, P. K., Yin, Y., Albu, M., Chen, X., Taipale, J., Hughes, T. R., & Weirauch, M. T. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029 · Cited by 3,399 · see citing works
Heintzman, N. D., Stuart, R. K., Hon, G., Fu, Y., Ching, C. W., Hawkins, R. D., Barrera, L. O., Van Calcar, S., Qu, C., Ching, K. A., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1966 · Cited by 3,398 · see citing works
Self-citationComplement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models
Hong, S., Beja-Glasser, V. F., Nfonoyim, B. M., Frouin, A., Li, S., Ramakrishnan, S., Merry, K. M., Shi, Q., Rosenthal, A., Barres, B. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8373 · Cited by 3,343 · see citing works
<i>TREM2</i> Variants in Alzheimer's Disease
Guerreiro, R., Wojtas, A., Bras, J., Carrasquillo, M., Rogaeva, E., Majounie, E., Cruchaga, C., Sassi, C., Kauwe, J. S. K., Younkin, S., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1211851 · Cited by 3,020 · see citing works
eQTLGen, Wray, N. R., 23andMe, the Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Ripke, S., Mattheisen, M., Trzaskowski, M., Byrne, E. M., Abdellaoui, A., Adams, M. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0090-3 · Cited by 3,005 · see citing works
Alzheimer Disease Genetics Consortium (ADGC), Kunkle, B. W., The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (EADI), Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium (CHARGE), Genetic and Environmental Risk in AD/Defining Genetic, P. A. E. R. F. A. D. C. (., Grenier-Boley, B., Sims, R., Bis, J. C., Damotte, V., Naj, A. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2 · Cited by 2,946 · see citing works
Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics
ReproGen Consortium, Finucane, H. K., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, The RACI Consortium, Bulik-Sullivan, B., Gusev, A., Trynka, G., Reshef, Y., Loh, P.-R., Anttila, V., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3404 · Cited by 2,604 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease
Mathys, H., Davila-Velderrain, J., Peng, Z., Gao, F., Mohammadi, S., Young, J. Z., Menon, M., He, L., Abdurrob, F., Jiang, X., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1195-2 · Cited by 2,568 · see citing works
An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues
The FANTOM Consortium, Andersson, R., Gebhard, C., Miguel-Escalada, I., Hoof, I., Bornholdt, J., Boyd, M., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Schmidl, C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12787 · Cited by 2,550 · see citing works
STRING 8--a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms
Jensen, L. J., Kuhn, M., Stark, M., Chaffron, S., Creevey, C. J., Muller, J., Doerks, T., Julien, P., Roth, A. C., Simonovic, M., et al. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn760 · Cited by 2,475 · see citing works
Nalls, M. A., Blauwendraat, C., Vallerga, C. L., Heilbron, K., Bandres-Ciga, S., Chang, D., Tan, M., Kia, D. A., Noyce, A. J., Xue, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30320-5 · Cited by 2,454 · see citing works
Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder
Autism Spectrum Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Grove, J., BUPGEN, Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 23andMe Research Team, Ripke, S., Als, T. D., Mattheisen, M., Walters, R. K., Won, H., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8 · Cited by 2,421 · see citing works
Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation
Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Litzenburger, U. M., Ruff, D., Gonzales, M. L., Snyder, M. P., Chang, H. Y., & Greenleaf, W. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14590 · Cited by 2,308 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Sloan, S. A., Clarke, L. E., Caneda, C., Plaza, C. A., Blumenthal, P. D., Vogel, H., Steinberg, G. K., Edwards, M. S. B., Li, G., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.013 · Cited by 2,295 · see citing works
BEDTools: The Swiss‐Army Tool for Genome Feature Analysis
Quinlan, A. R. (2014) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi1112s47 · Cited by 2,286 · see citing works
Jansen, I. E., Savage, J. E., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., Williams, D. M., Steinberg, S., Sealock, J., Karlsson, I. K., Hägg, S., Athanasiu, L., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0311-9 · Cited by 2,277 · see citing works
ADHD Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC), Demontis, D., Early Lifecourse & Genetic Epidemiology (EAGLE) Consortium, 23andMe Research Team, Walters, R. K., Martin, J., Mattheisen, M., Als, T. D., Agerbo, E., Baldursson, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0269-7 · Cited by 2,203 · see citing works
The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease
Kim, J., Basak, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.026 · Cited by 1,661 · see citing works
GERAD1 Consortium, Pardiñas, A. F., CRESTAR Consortium, Holmans, P., Pocklington, A. J., Escott-Price, V., Ripke, S., Carrera, N., Legge, S. E., Bishop, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0059-2 · Cited by 1,552 · see citing works
Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways
Kierdorf, K., Erny, D., Goldmann, T., Sander, V., Schulz, C., Perdiguero, E. G., Wieghofer, P., Heinrich, A., Riemke, P., Hölscher, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3318 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Savage, J. E., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., Bryois, J., de Leeuw, C. A., Nagel, M., Awasthi, S., Barr, P. B., Coleman, J. R. I., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6 · Cited by 1,443 · see citing works
A survey of human brain transcriptome diversity at the single cell level
Darmanis, S., Sloan, S. A., Zhang, Y., Enge, M., Caneda, C., Shuer, L. M., Hayden Gephart, M. G., Barres, B. A., & Quake, S. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507125112 · Cited by 1,401 · see citing works
Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis
International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium (IMSGC) (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2770 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions
Shlyueva, D., Stampfel, G., & Stark, A. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3682 · Cited by 1,356 · see citing works
Gosselin, D., Link, V. M., Romanoski, C. E., Fonseca, G. J., Eichenfield, D. Z., Spann, N. J., Stender, J. D., Chun, H. B., Garner, H., Geissmann, F., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.023 · Cited by 1,307 · see citing works
Self-citationBigWig and BigBed: enabling browsing of large distributed datasets
Kent, W. J., Zweig, A. S., Barber, G. P., Hinrichs, A. S., & Karolchik, D. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq351 · Cited by 1,268 · see citing works
An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity
Gosselin, D., Skola, D., Coufal, N. G., Holtman, I. R., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Sajti, E., Jaeger, B. N., O’Connor, C., Fitzpatrick, C., Pasillas, M. P., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal3222 · Cited by 1,220 · see citing works
Self-citationiPSC-derived human microglia-like cells to study neurological diseases
Abud, E. M., Ramirez, R. N., Martinez, E. S., Healy, L. M., Nguyen, C. H. H., Newman, S. A., Yeromin, A. V., Scarfone, V. M., Marsh, S. E., Fimbres, C., et al. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.042 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture
Mumbach, M. R., Rubin, A. J., Flynn, R. A., Dai, C., Khavari, P. A., Greenleaf, W. J., & Chang, H. Y. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3999 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 17 new Parkinson's disease risk loci
Chang, D., Nalls, M. A., Hallgrímsdóttir, I. B., Hunkapiller, J., van der Brug, M., Cai, F., International Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium, 23andMe Research Team, Kerchner, G. A., Ayalon, G., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3955 · Cited by 1,112 · see citing works
The selection and function of cell type-specific enhancers
Heinz, S., Romanoski, C. E., Benner, C., & Glass, C. K. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3949 · Cited by 1,010 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments
Li, Q., Brown, J. B., Huang, H., & Bickel, P. J. (2011) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/11-aoas466 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain
Lake, B. B., Chen, S., Sos, B. C., Fan, J., Kaeser, G. E., Yung, Y. C., Duong, T. E., Gao, D., Chun, J., Kharchenko, P. V., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4038 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain
Wang, D., Liu, S., Warrell, J., Won, H., Shi, X., Navarro, F. C. P., Clarke, D., Gu, M., Emani, P., Yang, Y. T., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8464 · Cited by 965 · see citing works
Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain
Lake, B. B., Ai, R., Kaeser, G. E., Salathia, N. S., Yung, Y. C., Liu, R., Wildberg, A., Gao, D., Fung, H.-L., Chen, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1204 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Alzheimer's disease: early alterations in brain DNA methylation at ANK1, BIN1, RHBDF2 and other loci
De Jager, P. L., Srivastava, G., Lunnon, K., Burgess, J., Schalkwyk, L. C., Yu, L., Eaton, M. L., Keenan, B. T., Ernst, J., McCabe, C., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3786 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments
Li, Q., Brown, J. B., Huang, H., & Bickel, P. J. (2010) · UC Berkeley · Cited by 915 · see citing works
CHOPCHOP v2: a web tool for the next generation of CRISPR genome engineering
Labun, K., Montague, T. G., Gagnon, J. A., Thyme, S. B., & Valen, E. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw398 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
Single-cell profiling identifies myeloid cell subsets with distinct fates during neuroinflammation
Jordão, M. J. C., Sankowski, R., Brendecke, S. M., Sagar, Locatelli, G., Tai, Y.-H., Tay, T. L., Schramm, E., Armbruster, S., Hagemeyer, N., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat7554 · Cited by 843 · see citing works
Jansen, P. R., Watanabe, K., Stringer, S., Skene, N., Bryois, J., Hammerschlag, A. R., de Leeuw, C., Benjamins, J. S., Muñoz‐Manchado, A. B., Nagel, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0333-3 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Molecular diversity of midbrain development in mouse, human, and stem cells
La Manno, G., Gyllborg, D., Codeluppi, S., Nishimura, K., Salto, C., Zeisel, A., Borm, L. E., Stott, S. R. W., Toledo, E. M., Villaescusa, J. C., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.027 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
The Post-GWAS Era: From Association to Function
Gallagher, M. D., & Chen-Plotkin, A. S. (2018) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.04.002 · Cited by 822 · see citing works
Integrative functional genomic analysis of human brain development and neuropsychiatric risks
Li, M., Santpere, G., Imamura Kawasawa, Y., Evgrafov, O. V., Gulden, F. O., Pochareddy, S., Sunkin, S. M., Li, Z., Shin, Y., Zhu, Y., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat7615 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Nagel, M., Jansen, P. R., Stringer, S., Watanabe, K., de Leeuw, C., Bryois, J., Savage, J. E., Hammerschlag, A. R., Skene, N., Muñoz‐Manchado, A. B., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0151-7 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
23and Me Research Team, Karlsson Linnér, R., eQTLgen Consortium, International Cannabis Consortium, Social Science Genetic Association Consortium, Biroli, P., Kong, E., Meddens, S. F. W., Wedow, R., Fontana, M. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0309-3 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Self-citationDavies, G., Lam, M., Harris, S. E., Trampush, J. W., Luciano, M., Hill, W. D., Hagenaars, S. P., Ritchie, S. J., Marioni, R. E., Fawns‐Ritchie, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04362-x · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Conserved epigenomic signals in mice and humans reveal immune basis of Alzheimer's disease
Gjoneska, E., Pfenning, A. R., Mathys, H., Quon, G., Kundaje, A., Tsai, L.-H., & Kellis, M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14252 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
PARALS Registry, van Rheenen, W., SLALOM Group, SLAP Registry, NNIPPS Study Group, Shatunov, A., Dekker, A. M., McLaughlin, R. L., Diekstra, F. P., Pulit, S. L., et al. (2016) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3622 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
The Human Transcription Factors
Lambert, S. A., Jolma, A., Campitelli, L. F., Das, P. K., Yin, Y., Albu, M., Chen, X., Taipale, J., Hughes, T. R., & Weirauch, M. T. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.045 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
The International League Against Epilepsy Consortium on Complex Epilepsies, Abou-Khalil, B., Auce, P., Avbersek, A., Bahlo, M., Balding, D. J., Bast, T., Baum, L., Becker, A. J., Becker, F., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07524-z · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Integrating Functional Data to Prioritize Causal Variants in Statistical Fine-Mapping Studies
Kichaev, G., Yang, W.-Y., Lindström, S., Hormozdiari, F., Eskin, E., Price, A. L., Kraft, P. L., & Paşaniuc, B. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004722 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Identifying Causal Variants at Loci with Multiple Signals of Association
Hormozdiari, F., Kostem, E., Kang, E. Y., Pasaniuc, B., & Eskin, E. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.114.167908 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
McQuade, A., Coburn, M., Tu, C. H., Hasselmann, J., Davtyan, H., & Blurton-Jones, M. (2018) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-018-0297-x · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Transcriptional Enhancers in Animal Development and Evolution
Levine, M. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.070 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
A common haplotype lowers PU.1 expression in myeloid cells and delays onset of Alzheimer's disease
The International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project, Huang, K.-L., Initiative, T. A. D. N., Marcora, E., Pimenova, A. A., Di Narzo, A. F., Kapoor, M., Jin, S. C., Harari, O., Bertelsen, S., et al. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4587 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Increased expression of BIN1 mediates Alzheimer genetic risk by modulating tau pathology
GERAD consortium, Chapuis, J., Hansmannel, F., Gistelinck, M., Mounier, A., Van Cauwenberghe, C., Kolen, K. V., Geller, F., Sottejeau, Y., Harold, D., et al. (2013) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2013.1 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Dysregulation of the epigenetic landscape of normal aging in Alzheimer’s disease
Nativio, R., Donahue, G., Berson, A., Lan, Y., Amlie-Wolf, A., Tuzer, F., Toledo, J. B., Gosai, S. J., Gregory, B. D., Torres, C., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0101-9 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Mapping of long-range chromatin interactions by proximity ligation-assisted ChIP-seq
Fang, R., Yu, M., Li, G., Chee, S., Liu, T., Schmitt, A. D., & Ren, B. (2016) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2016.137 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Self-citationTak, Y. G., & Farnham, P. (2015) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-015-0050-4 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
IRF8 Is a Critical Transcription Factor for Transforming Microglia into a Reactive Phenotype
Masuda, T., Tsuda, M., Yoshinaga, R., Tozaki-Saitoh, H., Ozato, K., Tamura, T., & Inoue, K. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.02.014 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Tbr1 regulates regional and laminar identity of postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex
Bedogni, F., Hodge, R. D., Elsen, G. E., Nelson, B. R., Daza, R. A. M., Beyer, R. P., Bammler, T. K., Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Hevner, R. F. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1002285107 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Stolt, C. C., Schlierf, A., Lommes, P., Hillgärtner, S., Werner, T., Kosian, T., Sock, E., Kessaris, N., Richardson, W. D., Lefebvre, V., et al. (2006) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.011 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Stem-cell-derived human microglia transplanted in mouse brain to study human disease
Mancuso, R., Van Den Daele, J., Fattorelli, N., Wolfs, L., Balusu, S., Burton, O., Liston, A., Sierksma, A., Fourne, Y., Poovathingal, S., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0525-x · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Schafer, S. T., Paquola, A. C. M., Stern, S., Gosselin, D., Ku, M., Pena, M., Kuret, T. J. M., Liyanage, M., Mansour, A. A., Jaeger, B. N., et al. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0295-x · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Self-citationDeczkowska, A., Matcovitch-Natan, O., Tsitsou-Kampeli, A., Ben-Hamo, S., Dvir-Szternfeld, R., Spinrad, A., Singer, O., David, E., Winter, D. R., Smith, L. K., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00769-0 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
ATAC-see reveals the accessible genome by transposase-mediated imaging and sequencing
Chen, X., Shen, Y., Draper, W. E., Buenrostro, J. D., Litzenburger, U. M., Cho, S. W., Satpathy, A. T., Carter, A. C., Ghosh, R. P., East-Seletsky, A., et al. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4031 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Ascl1 Converts Dorsal Midbrain Astrocytes into Functional Neurons In Vivo
Liu, Y., Miao, Q., Yuan, J., Han, S., Zhang, P., Li, S., Rao, Z., Zhao, W., Ye, Q., Geng, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3975-14.2015 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Firth, A. L., Dargitz, C., Qualls, S. J., Menon, T., Wright, R., Singer, O., Gage, F. H., Khanna, A., & Verma, I. M. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1403470111 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Self-citationMarzi, S. J., Leung, S. K., Ribarska, T., Hannon, E., Smith, A. R., Pishva, E., Poschmann, J., Moore, K., Troakes, C., Al-Sarraj, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0253-7 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Neuron-specific signatures in the chromosomal connectome associated with schizophrenia risk
Rajarajan, P., Borrman, T., Liao, W., Schrode, N., Flaherty, E., Casiño, C., Powell, S., Yashaswini, C., LaMarca, E. A., Kassim, B., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat4311 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Direct Conversion of Fibroblasts into Functional Astrocytes by Defined Transcription Factors
Caiazzo, M., Giannelli, S. G., Valente, P., Lignani, G., Carissimo, A., Sessa, A., Colasante, G., Bartolomeo, R., Massimino, L., Ferroni, S., et al. (2014) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.12.002 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Rapid and efficient induction of functional astrocytes from human pluripotent stem cells
Canals, I., Ginisty, A., Quist, E., Timmerman, R., Fritze, J., Miskinyte, G., Monni, E., Hansen, M. G., Hidalgo, I., Bryder, D., et al. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0103-2 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Chd7 cooperates with Sox10 and regulates the onset of CNS myelination and remyelination
He, D., Marie, C., Zhao, C., Kim, B., Wang, J., Deng, Y., Clavairoly, A., Frah, M., Wang, H., He, X., et al. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4258 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Link, V. M., Duttke, S. H., Chun, H. B., Holtman, I. R., Westin, E., Hoeksema, M. A., Abe, Y., Skola, D., Romanoski, C. E., Tao, J., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.018 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationThe transcription factor Nfixis essential for normal brain development
Campbell, C. E., Piper, M., Plachez, C., Yeh, Y.-T., Baizer, J. S., Osinski, J. M., Litwack, E. D., Richards, L. J., & Gronostajski, R. M. (2008) · BMC Developmental Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-213x-8-52 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
BIN1 favors the spreading of Tau via extracellular vesicles
Crotti, A., Sait, H. R., McAvoy, K. M., Estrada, K., Ergun, A., Szak, S., Marsh, G., Jandreski, L., Peterson, M., Reynolds, T. L., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45676-0 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Differential Requirement for irf8 in Formation of Embryonic and Adult Macrophages in Zebrafish
Shiau, C. E., Kaufman, Z., Meireles, A. M., & Talbot, W. S. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117513 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
De Rossi, P., Buggia-Prévot, V., Clayton, B. L. L., Vasquez, J. B., van Sanford, C., Andrew, R. J., Lesnick, R., Botté, A., Deyts, C., Salem, S., et al. (2016) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-016-0124-1 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Nalls, M., Blauwendraat, C., Vallerga, C., et al. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/388165 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Cui, Y., Chen, X., Luo, H., Fan, Z., Luo, J., He, S., Yue, H., Zhang, P., & Chen, R. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw041 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Girdhar, K., Hoffman, G. E., Jiang, Y., Brown, L., Kundakovic, M., Hauberg, M. E., Francoeur, N. J., Wang, Y.-C., Shah, H., Kavanagh, D. H., et al. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0187-0 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Santos, R., Vadodaria, K. C., Jaeger, B. N., Mei, A., Lefcochilos-Fogelquist, S., Mendes, A. P. D., Erikson, G. A., Shokhirev, M. N., Randolph‐Moore, L., Fredlender, C., et al. (2017) · Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.05.011 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Self-citationMAPS: Model-based analysis of long-range chromatin interactions from PLAC-seq and HiChIP experiments
Juric, I., Yu, M., Abnousi, A., Raviram, R., Fang, R., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Qiu, Y., Yang, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2019) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006982 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationYeh, T., Lee, D. Y., Gianino, S. M., & Gutmann, D. H. (2009) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.20845 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Tansey, K. E., Cameron, D., & Hill, M. J. (2018) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-018-0523-8 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Stem cell factor Sox2 and its close relative Sox3 have differentiation functions in oligodendrocytes
Hoffmann, S., Hos, D., Küspert, M., Lang, R. A., Lovell-Badge, R. H., Wegner, M., & Reiprich, S. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.098418 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Minten, C., Terry, R., Deffrasnes, C., King, N. J. C., & Campbell, I. L. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049851 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Ari, N., & Ustazhanov, M. (2014) · International Conference on Electronics, Computer and Computation · doi:10.1109/icecco.2014.6997585 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Involvement of Ngn2, Tbr and NeuroD proteins during postnatal olfactory bulb neurogenesis
Roybon, L., Deierborg, T., Brundin, P., & Li, J. (2009) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06595.x · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Genomics implicates adaptive and innate immunity in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases
Gagliano, S. A., Pouget, J. G., Hardy, J., Knight, J., Barnes, M. R., Ryten, M., & Weale, M. E. (2016) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.369 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Taga, M., Petyuk, V. A., White, C., Marsh, G., Ma, Y., Klein, H.-U., Connor, S. M., Kroshilina, A., Yung, C. J., Khairallah, A., et al. (2020) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-020-00387-3 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
All (animal) models (of neurodegeneration) are wrong. Are they also useful?
Ransohoff, R. M. (2018) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20182042 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Sox8 and Sox10 jointly maintain myelin gene expression in oligodendrocytes
Turnescu, T., Arter, J., Reiprich, S., Tamm, E. R., Waisman, A., & Wegner, M. (2017) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.23242 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Three-dimensional genome architecture and emerging technologies: looping in disease
Mishra, A., & Hawkins, R. (2017) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0477-2 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
IRF8 is a transcriptional determinant for microglial motility
Masuda, T., Nishimoto, N., Tomiyama, D., Matsuda, T., Tozaki‐Saitoh, H., Tamura, T., Kohsaka, S., Tsuda, M., & Inoue, K. (2014) · Purinergic Signalling · doi:10.1007/s11302-014-9413-8 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Diella, F., Chabanis, S., Luck, K., Chica, C., Ramu, C., Nerlov, C., & Gibson, T. J. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn594 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Novikova, G., Kapoor, M., TCW, J., Abud, E. M., Efthymiou, A. G., Cheng, H., Fullard, J. F., Bendl, J., Roussos, P., Poon, W. W., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1101/694281 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Novikova, G., Marcora, E. M., Kapoor, M., Julia, T. C. W., Renton, A. E., Efthymiou, A. G., Abud, E. M., Bendl, J. M., Cheng, H. M., Fullard, J. F., et al. (2020) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.043897 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Enrichment of schizophrenia heritability in both neuronal and glia cell regulatory elements
Tansey, K. E., & Hill, M. J. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-017-0053-y · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Disrupted SOX10 function causes spongiform neurodegeneration in gray tremor mice
Anderson, S., Lee, I., Ebeling, C., Stephenson, D. A., Schweitzer, K. M., Baxter, D. H., Moon, T. M., LaPierre, S., Jaques, B., Silvius, D., et al. (2014) · Mammalian Genome · doi:10.1007/s00335-014-9548-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bin1 and CD2AP polarize Aβ generation in neurons
Sannerud, R., & Annaert, W. G. (2016) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201643634 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inflammation in obesity, diabetes, and related disorders
Rohm, T. V., Meier, D. T., Olefsky, J. M., & Donath, M. Y. (2022) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.12.013 · Cited by 2,066 · see citing works
Astrocyte Crosstalk in CNS Inflammation
Linnerbauer, M., Wheeler, M. A., & Quintana, F. J. (2020) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.012 · Cited by 989 · see citing works
A human brain vascular atlas reveals diverse mediators of Alzheimer’s risk
Yang, A. C., Vest, R. T., Kern, F., Lee, D. P., Agam, M., Maat, C. A., Losada, P. M., Chen, M. B., Schaum, N., Khoury, N., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04369-3 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and transcriptomic characterization of Alzheimer’s disease
Morabito, S., Miyoshi, E., Michael, N., Shahin, S., Martini, A. C., Head, E., Silva, J., Leavy, K., Perez-Rosendahl, M., & Swarup, V. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00894-z · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer disease
Heneka, M. T., van der Flier, W. M., Jessen, F., Hoozemanns, J., Thal, D. R., Boche, D., Brosseron, F., Teunissen, C., Zetterberg, H., Jacobs, A. H., et al. (2025) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-024-01104-7 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Self-citationDysregulation of brain and choroid plexus cell types in severe COVID-19
Yang, A. C., Kern, F., Losada, P. M., Agam, M. R., Maat, C. A., Schmartz, G. P., Fehlmann, T., Stein, J. A., Schaum, N., Lee, D. P., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03710-0 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Chromatin accessibility profiling by ATAC-seq
Grandi, F. C., Modi, H., Kampman, L., & Corces, M. R. (2022) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-022-00692-9 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Physiology and diseases of tissue-resident macrophages
Lazarov, T., Juarez-Carreño, S., Cox, N., & Geissmann, F. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06002-x · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Schwartzentruber, J., Cooper, S., Liu, J. Z., Barrio-Hernandez, I., Bello, E., Kumasaka, N., Young, A. M. H., Franklin, R. J. M., Johnson, T., Estrada, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00776-w · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition)
Cossarizza, A., Chang, H., Radbruch, A., Abrignani, S., Addo, R., Akdis, M., Andrä, I., Andreata, F., Annunziato, F., Arranz, E., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.202170126 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
A single-cell atlas of chromatin accessibility in the human genome
Zhang, K., Hocker, J. D., Miller, M., Hou, X., Chiou, J., Poirion, O. B., Qiu, Y., Li, Y. E., Gaulton, K. J., Wang, A., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.024 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Self-citationReversing a model of Parkinson's disease with in situ converted nigral neurons
Qian, H., Kang, X., Hu, J., Zhang, D., Liang, Z., Meng, F., Zhang, X., Xue, Y., Maimon, R., Dowdy, S. F., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2388-4 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Sadick, J. S., O’Dea, M. R., Hasel, P., Dykstra, T., Faustin, A., & Liddelow, S. A. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.03.008 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Microglia modulate neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases
Bartels, T., De Schepper, S., & Hong, S. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb8587 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Corces, M. R., Shcherbina, A., Kundu, S., Gloudemans, M. J., Frésard, L., Granja, J. M., Louie, B. H., Eulalio, T., Shams, S., Bagdatli, S. T., et al. (2020) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00721-x · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Microglia in Alzheimer's disease at single-cell level. Are there common patterns in humans and mice?
Chen, Y., & Colonna, M. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20202717 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Interpretation of risk loci from genome-wide association studies of Alzheimer's disease
Andrews, S. J., Fulton-Howard, B., & Goate, A. (2020) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30435-1 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Bryois, J., Calini, D., Macnair, W., Foo, L., Urich, E., Ortmann, W., Iglesias, V. A., Selvaraj, S., Nutma, E., Marzin, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01128-z · Cited by 311 · see citing works
A new era in functional genomics screens
Przybyla, L., & Gilbert, L. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00409-w · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Microglia facilitate loss of perineuronal nets in the Alzheimer's disease brain
Crapser, J. D., Spangenberg, E. E., Barahona, R. A., Arreola, M. A., Hohsfield, L. A., & Green, K. N. (2020) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102919 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Enhancer RNA m6A methylation facilitates transcriptional condensate formation and gene activation
Lee, J.-H., Wang, R., Xiong, F., Krakowiak, J., Liao, Z., Nguyen, P. T.-M., Moroz, E., Shao, J., Zhu, X., Bolt, M. J., et al. (2021) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.024 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Lopes, K. D. P., Snijders, G. J. L., Humphrey, J., Allan, A., Sneeboer, M. A. M., Navarro, E., Schilder, B. M., Vialle, R. A., Parks, M., Missall, R., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00976-y · Cited by 273 · see citing works
To Kill a Microglia: A Case for CSF1R Inhibitors
Green, K. N., Crapser, J. D., & Hohsfield, L. A. (2020) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2020.07.001 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Molecular and cellular evolution of the primate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Ma, S., Škarica, M., Li, Q., Xu, C., Risgaard, R. D., Tebbenkamp, A. T. N., Mato-Blanco, X., Kovner, R., Krsnik, Ž., de Martin, X., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abo7257 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Human brain organogenesis: Toward a cellular understanding of development and disease
Kelley, K. W., & Pașca, S. P. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.003 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Novikova, G., Kapoor, M., TCW, J., Abud, E. M., Efthymiou, A. G., Chen, S. X., Cheng, H., Fullard, J. F., Bendl, J., Liu, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21823-y · Cited by 214 · see citing works
A Map of Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Regulatory Variation in Human Microglia
Young, A. M. H., Kumasaka, N., Calvert, F., Hammond, T. R., Knights, A., Panousis, N., Park, J. S., Schwartzentruber, J., Liu, J., Kundu, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00875-2 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Microglial Phagocytosis: A Disease-Associated Process Emerging from Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics
Podleśny-Drabiniok, A., Marcora, E., & Goate, A. M. (2020) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.002 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Diverse human astrocyte and microglial transcriptional responses to Alzheimer’s pathology
Smith, A. M., Davey, K., Tsartsalis, S., Khozoie, C., Fancy, N., Tang, S. S., Liaptsi, E., Weinert, M., McGarry, A., Muirhead, R. C. J., et al. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-021-02372-6 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Comparative transcriptomics reveals human-specific cortical features
Jorstad, N. L., Song, J. H. T., Exposito-Alonso, D., Suresh, H., Castro-Pacheco, N., Krienen, F. M., Yanny, A. M., Close, J., Gelfand, E., Long, B., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ade9516 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Chromatin accessibility profiling methods
Minnoye, L., Marinov, G. K., Krausgruber, T., Pan, L., Marand, A. P., Secchia, S., Greenleaf, W. J., Furlong, E. E. M., Zhao, K., Schmitz, R. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-020-00008-9 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Epigenomic dissection of Alzheimer’s disease pinpoints causal variants and reveals epigenome erosion
Xiong, X., James, B. T., Boix, C. A., Park, Y. P., Galani, K., Victor, M. B., Sun, N., Hou, L., Ho, L.-L., Mantero, J., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.040 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
APOE4 impairs the microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease by inducing TGFβ-mediated checkpoints
Yin, Z., Rosenzweig, N., Kleemann, K. L., Zhang, X., Brandão, W., Margeta, M. A., Schroeder, C., Sivanathan, K. N., Silveira, S., Gauthier, C., et al. (2023) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-023-01627-6 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Functional enhancer elements drive subclass-selective expression from mouse to primate neocortex
Mich, J. K., Graybuck, L. T., Hess, E. E., Mahoney, J. T., Kojima, Y., Ding, Y., Somasundaram, S., Miller, J. A., Kalmbach, B. E., Radaelli, C., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108754 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
TREM2 dependent and independent functions of microglia in Alzheimer’s disease
Hou, J., Chen, Y., Grajales-Reyes, G., & Colonna, M. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00588-y · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Cell subtype-specific effects of genetic variation in the Alzheimer’s disease brain
Fujita, M., Gao, Z., Zeng, L., Aubin, C., White, C. C., Ng, B., Green, G. S., Rozenblatt–Rosen, O., Phillips, D., Amir-Zilberstein, L., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01685-y · Cited by 189 · see citing works
A comparative atlas of single-cell chromatin accessibility in the human brain
Li, Y. E., Preissl, S., Miller, M., Johnson, N. D., Wang, Z., Jiao, H., Zhu, C., Wang, Z., Xie, Y., Poirion, O., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf7044 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationMolecular and cellular dynamics of the developing human neocortex
Wang, L., Wang, C., Moriano, J., Chen, S., Zuo, G., Cebrián‐Silla, A., Zhang, S., Mukhtar, T., Wang, S., Song, M., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08351-7 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Clonal hematopoiesis is associated with protection from Alzheimer’s disease
Bouzid, H., Belk, J. A., Jan, M., Qi, Y., Sarnowski, C., Wirth, S., Ma, L., Chrostek, M. R., Ahmad, H., Nachun, D., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02397-2 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Genetics of the human microglia regulome refines Alzheimer’s disease risk loci
Kosoy, R., Fullard, J. F., Zeng, B., Bendl, J., Dong, P., Rahman, S., Kleopoulos, S. P., Shao, Z., Girdhar, K., Humphrey, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01149-1 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Insights into the genetic architecture of the human face
White, J. D., Indencleef, K., Naqvi, S., Eller, R. J., Hoskens, H., Roosenboom, J., Lee, M. K., Li, J., Mohammed, J., Richmond, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00741-7 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Human Microglia Show Unique Transcriptional Changes in Alzheimer's Disease
Prater, K. E., Green, K. J., Mamde, S., Sun, W., Cochoit, A., Smith, C. L., Chiou, K. L., Heath, L., Rose, S. E., Wiley, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00424-y · Cited by 164 · see citing works
CRISPR-based functional genomics for neurological disease
Kampmann, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0373-z · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Origins, Biology, and Diseases of Tissue Macrophages
Cox, N., Pokrovskii, M. V., Vicario, R., & Geissmann, F. (2021) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-093019-111748 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Ubiquitin Ligase COP1 Suppresses Neuroinflammation by Degrading c/EBPβ in Microglia
Ndoja, A., Reja, R., Lee, S.-H., Webster, J. D., Ngu, H., Rose, C. M., Kirkpatrick, D. S., Modrusan, Z. D., Chen, Y.-J. J., Dugger, D. L., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.011 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Galectin-3, a rising star in modulating microglia activation under conditions of neurodegeneration
García-Revilla, J., Boza-Serrano, A., Espinosa-Oliva, A. M., Soto, M. S., Deierborg, T., Ruiz, R., de Pablos, R. M., Burguillos, M. A., & Venero, J. L. (2022) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-022-05058-3 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Single-cell DNA methylation and 3D genome architecture in the human brain
Tian, W., Zhou, J., Bartlett, A., Zeng, Q., Liu, H., Castanon, R. G., Kenworthy, M., Altshul, J., Valadon, C., Aldridge, A., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adf5357 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh-Throughput Discovery and Characterization of Human Transcriptional Effectors
Tycko, J., DelRosso, N. V., Hess, G. T., Aradhana, Banerjee, A., Mukund, A. X., Van, M. V., Ego, B. K., Yao, D., Spees, K., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.024 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Turner, A. W., Hu, S. S., Mosquera, J. V., Feng, W., Hodonsky, C. J., Wong, D., Auguste, G. E., Song, Y., Sol‐Church, K., Farber, E., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01069-0 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Analyzing microglial phenotypes across neuropathologies: a practical guide
Schwabenland, M., Brück, W., Priller, J., Stadelmann, C., Lassmann, H., & Prinz, M. (2021) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-021-02370-8 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Translating genetic risk of Alzheimer’s disease into mechanistic insight and drug targets
Sierksma, A. S. R., Escott‐Price, V., & Strooper, B. D. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb8575 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Plasma proteomics links brain and immune system aging with healthspan and longevity
Oh, H. S., Guen, Y. L., Rappoport, N., Urey, D. Y., Farinas, A., Rutledge, J., Channappa, D., Wagner, A. D., Mormino, E. C., Brunet, A., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03798-1 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Cardiac cell type–specific gene regulatory programs and disease risk association
Hocker, J. D., Poirion, O., Zhu, F., Buchanan, J., Zhang, K., Chiou, J., Wang, T., Zhang, Q., Hou, X., Li, Y. E., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf1444 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationDileep, V., Boix, C. A., Mathys, H., Marco, A., Welch, G. M., Meharena, H. S., Loon, A., Jeloka, R., Peng, Z., Bennett, D. A., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.038 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease
Welch, G., & Tsai, L. (2022) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202154217 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Carullo, N. V. N., Phillips, R. A., III, Simon, R. C., Soto, S. A. R., Hinds, J. E., Salisbury, A. J., Revanna, J. S., Bunner, K. D., Ianov, L., Sultan, F. A., et al. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa671 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease
Neuner, S. M., TCW, J., & Goate, A. M. (2020) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104976 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“This is supported by a recent identification of the enrichment of AD-associated variants in enhancers active in primary human microglia [192].”
Incorporation of a nucleoside analog maps genome repair sites in postmitotic human neurons
Reid, D. A., Reed, P. J., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Nitulescu, I. I., Chou, G., Tsui, E. C., Jones, J. R., Chandran, S., Lu, A. T., McClain, C. A., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb9032 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional regulatory variants implicate distinct transcriptional networks in dementia
Cooper, Y. A., Teyssier, N., Dräger, N. M., Guo, Q., Davis, J. E., Sattler, S. M., Yang, Z., Patel, A. M., Wu, S. J., Kosuri, S., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abi8654 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
TREM2 inhibition triggers antitumor cell activity of myeloid cells in glioblastoma
Sun, R., Han, R., McCornack, C., Khan, S., Tabor, G. T., Chen, Y., Hou, J., Jiang, H., Schoch, K. M., Mao, D. D., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade3559 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Xu, J., Mao, C., Hou, Y., Luo, Y., Binder, J. L., Zhou, Y., Bekris, L. M., Shin, J., Hu, M., Wang, F., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111717 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Epigenetic regulation of innate immune memory in microglia
Zhang, X., Kracht, L., Lerário, A. M., Dubbelaar, M. L., Brouwer, N., Wesseling, E. M., Boddeke, E., Eggen, B. J. L., & Kooistra, S. M. (2022) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02463-5 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Microglial efferocytosis: Diving into the Alzheimer’s disease gene pool
Romero-Molina, C., Garretti, F., Andrews, S. J., Marcora, E., & Goate, A. M. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.015 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Large-scale chromatin reorganization reactivates placenta-specific genes that drive cellular aging
Liu, Z., Ji, Q., Ren, J., Yan, P., Wu, Z., Wang, S., Sun, L., Wang, Z., Li, J., Sun, G., et al. (2022) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2022.05.004 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Luquette, L. J., Miller, M. B., Zhou, Z., Bohrson, C. L., Zhao, Y., Jin, H., Gulhan, D., Ganz, J., Bizzotto, S., Kirkham, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01180-2 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
BIN1 is a key regulator of proinflammatory and neurodegeneration-related activation in microglia
Sudwarts, A., Ramesha, S., Gao, T., Ponnusamy, M., Wang, S., Hansen, M. T., Kozlova, A., Bitarafan, S., Kumar, P., Beaulieu‐Abdelahad, D., et al. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00535-x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Prakash, P., Manchanda, P., Paouri, E., Bisht, K., Sharma, K., Rajpoot, J., Wendt, V., Hossain, A., Wijewardhane, P. R., Randolph, C. E., et al. (2025) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2025.04.029 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Neuronal and glial 3D chromatin architecture informs the cellular etiology of brain disorders
Hu, B., Won, H., Mah, W., Park, R. B., Kassim, B., Spiess, K., Kozlenkov, A., Crowley, C. A., Pochareddy, S., The PsychENCODE Consortium, et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24243-0 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Matsudaira, T., Nakano, S., Konishi, Y., Kawamoto, S., Uemura, K., Kondo, T., Sakurai, K., Ozawa, T., Hikida, T., Komine, O., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05027-2 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
A neurodegenerative cellular stress response linked to dark microglia and toxic lipid secretion
Flury, A. G., Aljayousi, L., Park, H.-J., Khakpour, M., Mechler, J., Aziz, S., McGrath, J. D., Deme, P., Sandberg, C., Ibáñez, F. G., et al. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.11.018 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Genomics of Alzheimer’s disease implicates the innate and adaptive immune systems
Li, Y., Laws, S. M., Miles, L. A., Wiley, J. S., Huang, X., Masters, C. L., & Gu, B. J. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03986-5 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
SnapHiC: a computational pipeline to identify chromatin loops from single-cell Hi-C data
Yu, M., Abnousi, A., Zhang, Y., Li, G., Lee, L., Chen, Z., Fang, R., Lagler, T. M., Yang, Y., Wen, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01231-2 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationLinking environmental risk factors with epigenetic mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease
Tsalenchuk, M., Gentleman, S., & Marzi, S. J. (2023) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-023-00568-z · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Carling, G. K., Fan, L., Foxe, N. R., Norman, K., Wong, M. Y., Zhu, D., Corona, C., Razzoli, A., Yu, F., Yarahmady, A., et al. (2024) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2024.09.006 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Paternal age affects offspring via an epigenetic mechanism involving REST/NRSF
Yoshizaki, K., Kimura, R., Kobayashi, H., Oki, S., Kikkawa, T., Mai, L., Koike, K., Mochizuki, K., Inada, H., Matsui, Y., et al. (2021) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202051524 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Zeng, B., Bendl, J. M., Kosoy, R., Fullard, J. F., Hoffman, G. E., & Roussos, P. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00987-9 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Lee, A., Kim, C., Park, S.-W., Joo, J., Choi, B., Yang, D., Jun, K., Eom, J., Lee, S., Chung, S. J., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo2467 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Self-citationSALL1 enforces microglia-specific DNA binding and function of SMADs to establish microglia identity
Fixsen, B. R., Han, C. Z., Zhou, Y., Spann, N. J., Saisan, P., Shen, Z., Balak, C., Sakai, M., Cobo, I., Holtman, I. R., et al. (2023) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-023-01528-8 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationStep by step: towards a better understanding of the genetic architecture of Alzheimer’s disease
Lambert, J.-C., Ramirez, A., Grenier-Boley, B., & Bellenguez, C. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02076-1 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Warrier, V., Stauffer, E.-M., Huang, Q. Q., Wigdor, E. M., Slob, E. A. W., Seidlitz, J., Ronan, L., Valk, S. L., Mallard, T. T., Grotzinger, A. D., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01475-y · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Welch, G. M., Boix, C. A., Schmauch, E., Davila-Velderrain, J., Victor, M. B., Dileep, V., Bozzelli, P. L., Su, Q., Cheng, J. D., Lee, A., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo4662 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Gamache, J., Yun, Y., & Chiba-Falek, O. (2020) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.045211 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Anderson, A. G., Rogers, B. B., Loupe, J. M., Rodriguez-Nunez, I., Roberts, S. C., White, L. M., Brazell, J. N., Bunney, W. E., Bunney, B. G., Watson, S. J., et al. (2023) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100263 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“As these annotations were not generated in our particular cell types and tissue, we also intersected these linked peaks with regions of H3K27ac previously identified within cell types isolated from prefrontal cortex tissues.(11,36) We found that on average, 57.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialTranscriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters
Ray-Jones, H., & Spivakov, M. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03903-w · Cited by 81 · see citing works
The threat of programmed DNA damage to neuronal genome integrity and plasticity
Caldecott, K. W., Ward, M. E., & Nussenzweig, A. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-01001-y · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Alsema, A. M., Jiang, Q., Kracht, L., Gerrits, E., Dubbelaar, M. L., Miedema, A., Brouwer, N., Hol, E. M., Middeldorp, J., van Dijk, R. E., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2020.00134 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Nuclei isolation of multiple brain cell types for omics interrogation
Nott, A., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Fixsen, B. R., & Glass, C. K. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-00472-3 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationInterpreting non-coding disease-associated human variants using single-cell epigenomics
Gaulton, K. J., Preißl, S., & Ren, B. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00598-6 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationIdentification of Conserved Proteomic Networks in Neurodegenerative Dementia
Swarup, V., Chang, T. S., Duong, D. M., Dammer, E. B., Dai, J., Lah, J. J., Johnson, E. C. B., Seyfried, N. T., Levey, A. I., & Geschwind, D. H. (2020) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107807 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Identification of conserved proteomic networks in neurodegenerative dementia
Swarup, V., Chang, T. S., Duong, D. M., Dammer, E. B., Lah, J. J., Johnson, E. E. C. B., Seyfried, N. T., Levey, A. I., & Geschwind, D. H. (2019) · doi:10.1101/825802 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
A single-cell massively parallel reporter assay detects cell-type-specific gene regulation
Zhao, S., Hong, C. K., Myers, C. A., Granas, D. M., White, M. A., Corbo, J. C., & Cohen, B. A. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01278-7 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Human microglia maturation is underpinned by specific gene regulatory networks
Han, C. Z., Li, R. Z., Hansen, E. A., Trescott, S., Fixsen, B. R., Nguyen, C. T., Mora, C., Spann, N. J., Bennett, H. R., Poirion, O., et al. (2023) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2023.07.016 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationMcManus, R. M., Komes, M. P., Griep, A., Santarelli, F., Schwartz, S., Perea, J. R., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Bouvier, D. S., Khalil, M., Lauterbach, M., et al. (2025) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2025.01.007 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationHauberg, M. E., Creus‐Muncunill, J., Bendl, J. M., Kozlenkov, A., Zeng, B., Corwin, C., Chowdhury, S., Kranz, H. D., Hurd, Y. L., Wegner, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19319-2 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Genomics and Functional Genomics of Alzheimer's Disease
Kamboh, M. I. (2022) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-021-01152-0 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
APOE4 confers transcriptomic and functional alterations to primary mouse microglia
Machlovi, S. I., Neuner, S. M., Hemmer, B. M., Khan, R., Liu, Y., Huang, M., Zhu, J. D., Castellano, J. M., Cai, D., Marcora, E., et al. (2022) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2022.105615 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Modeling epigenetic lesions that cause gliomas
Rahme, G. J., Javed, N. M., Puorro, K. L., Xin, S., Hovestadt, V., Johnstone, S. E., & Bernstein, B. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.06.022 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Contrasting somatic mutation patterns in aging human neurons and oligodendrocytes
Ganz, J., Luquette, L. J., Bizzotto, S., Miller, M. B., Zhou, Z., Bohrson, C. L., Jin, H., Tran, A. V., Viswanadham, V., McDonough, G. A., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.025 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Massively parallel characterization of regulatory elements in the developing human cortex
Deng, C., Whalen, S., Steyert, M., Ziffra, R., Przytycki, P. F., Inoue, F., Pereira, D. A., Capauto, D., Norton, S., Vaccarino, F. M., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh0559 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Functional characterization of Alzheimer’s disease genetic variants in microglia
Yang, X., Wen, J., Yang, H., Jones, I. R., Zhu, X., Liu, W., Li, B., Clelland, C. D., Luo, W., Wong, M. Y., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01506-8 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nott, A., Holtman, I. R., Coufal, N. G., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., Yu, M., Hu, R., Han, C. Z., Pena, M., Xiao, J., Wu, Y., Keulen, Z., Pasillas, M. P., O’Connor, C., Nickl, C. K., Schafer, S. T., Shen, Z., Rissman, R. A., Brewer, J. B., Gosselin, D., Gonda, D. D., Levy, M. L., Rosenfeld, M. G., McVicker, G., Gage, F. H., Ren, B., & Glass, C. K.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
- Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
- Ludwig Cancer Research (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nott, Alexi
- Holtman, Inge R.
- Coufal, Nicole G.
- Glass, Christopher K.
- ORCID
- Nott, Alexi
- Holtman, Inge R.
- Coufal, Nicole G.
- Schlachetzki, Johannes C. M.
- Yu, Miao
- Hu, Rong
- Han, Claudia Z.
- Pena, Monique
- Xiao, Jiayang
- Wu, Yin
- Pasillas, Martina P.
- O’Connor, Carolyn
- Schafer, Simon T.
- Shen, Zeyang
- Rissman, Robert A.
- Gosselin, David
- Gonda, David D.
- Levy, Michael L.
- Rosenfeld, Michael G.
- McVicker, Graham
- Gage, Fred H.
- Ren, Bing
- Glass, Christopher K.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2019-11-29
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 6469
- Pages
- 1134-1139
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC7028213
- OpenAlex
- W2988958689
- Semantic Scholar
- 7a5a15720dccbd1ffaefb1a3e7b92e9e1219a946
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 32.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.rug.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (NS109200-01, KL2TR001444, P30 014195, S10-OD023689)
- National Institute on Aging (AG057706-01, AG056511-01, AG062429-01, AG061060-01)
- National Cancer Institute (P30-CA014195)
- Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VENI research program)
- Engman Foundation
- American Heart Association / Allen Initiative in Brain Health and Cognitive Impairment
- JPB Foundation
- Cure Alzheimer's Fund
- Alzheimer's Association (AARF-18-531498)
- Cancer Research Institute (Irvington Postdoctoral Fellowship Program)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- cell type-specific enhancers, human brain, microglia, neurons, Alzheimer's disease, mental illness, genetic variants, disease risk association
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cells, Cultured, Chromatin, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Genetic Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review