PreprintCited by 11Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVisual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Rules governing perception of multiple phosphenes by human observers

Open access
Bosking, William, Foster, Brett, Sun, Ping, Beauchamp, Mike, Yoshor, Daniel·2018·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Abstract Stimulation of single sites in primary visual cortex results in the perception of a small flash of light known as a phosphene. Little is known about how phosphenes from multiple electrodes can be combined to form perception of coherent patterns. Here we examine the percepts reported by human observers as various spatial configurations of 2 to 5 electrodes in visual cortex were stimulated simultaneously. When two electrodes were stimulated simultaneously, subjects reliably perceived either one or two phosphenes depending on the physical distance separating the electrodes. In cases where two phosphenes were perceived, they were located in the same visual field location as when the two electrodes were stimulated separately. Adding a third electrode produced similar results. In several subjects, we obtained combination of 4 to 5 electrodes that generated individual phosphenes when stimulated concurrently. Subjects were able to reliably discriminate between different multiple electrode stimulation patterns that were presented in random order. These results demonstrate that simple pattern information can be conveyed to subjects with surface electrodes spaced at millimeters apart on the cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/302547

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When multiple electrodes are stimulated simultaneously, phosphenes tend to merge together in complex ways.

    “However, it is not typically that simple: when multiple electrodes are stimulated simultaneously, phosphenes tend to merge together in complex ways (Bosking et al. 2018; Rizzo et al. 2003; Horsager et al. 2011; Horsager, Greenberg, and Fine 2010; Wilke et al. 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosking, W., Foster, B., Sun, P., Beauchamp, M., & Yoshor, D.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2018-04-17
OpenAlex
W2796900346
Cited by
11
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH103479)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
phosphenes, primary visual cortex, visual perception, pattern perception, electrode spacing, visual cortex mapping, perceptual discrimination, non-invasive brain stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review