Cited by 484Liver physiology and pathologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationCongenital heart defects research

Robust cellular reprogramming occurs spontaneously during liver regeneration

Open access
Yanger, Kilangsungla, Zong, Yiwei, Maggs, Lara R., Shapira, Suzanne N., Maddipati, Ravi, Aiello, Nicole M., Thung, Swan N., Wells, Rebecca G. +2 more·2013·Genes & Development

Abstract

Cellular reprogramming—the ability to interconvert distinct cell types with defined factors—is transforming the field of regenerative medicine. However, this phenomenon has rarely been observed in vivo without exogenous factors. Here, we report that activation of Notch, a signaling pathway that mediates lineage segregation during liver development, is sufficient to reprogram hepatocytes into biliary epithelial cells (BECs). Moreover, using lineage tracing, we show that hepatocytes undergo widespread hepatocyte-to-BEC reprogramming following injuries that provoke a biliary response, a process requiring Notch. These results provide direct evidence that mammalian regeneration prompts extensive and dramatic changes in cellular identity under injury conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.207803.112

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During injury, mouse hepatocytes can be reprogrammed to proliferative biliary-like progenitor cells (HepPDs).

    “Specifically, during injury, mouse hepatocytes can be reprogrammed to proliferative biliary-like progenitor cells (HepPDs) (Tarlow et al., 2014; Yanger et al., 2013”

    From In Vitro Expansion of Primary Human Hepatocytes with Efficient Liver Repopulation Capacity (2018) · cites this paper as Yanger et al., 2013

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) show that, after DDC-induced injury in mice, lineage-labeled hepatocytes acquired biliary markers and morphology. The paper describes conversion toward biliary epithelial cells, but does not identify the resulting cells as HepPDs or establish that they are proliferative progenitors; it says whether proliferation is required for reprogramming remains unknown. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In periportal injury, LPLCs are mainly generated in the region 1-5 layers away from injured bile ducts.

    “In periportal injury, LPLCs are mainly generated in the region 1-5 layers away from injured bile ducts.[7][8][9]12,13”

    From Kupffer-cell-derived IL-6 is repurposed for hepatocyte dedifferentiation via activating progenitor genes from injury-specific enhancers (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results and Discussion report that biphenotypic intermediate cells were most abundant in periportal regions after DDC-induced injury. Our copy does not specify that they were generated one to five cell layers from injured bile ducts. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LPLCs formed specifically around periportal regions are parenchymal cells showing hepatocyte morphology and expressing both HNF4a and SOX9.

    “LPLCs, formed specifically around periportal regions, were determined as parenchymal cells both showing a hepatocyte morphology and expressing both the hepatic marker HNF4a, and the progenitor marker SOX9 (Figures 1A and 1B).[7][8][9]”

    From Kupffer-cell-derived IL-6 is repurposed for hepatocyte dedifferentiation via activating progenitor genes from injury-specific enhancers (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results and Discussion report hepatocyte-derived biphenotypic cells that were most abundant in periportal regions, while the Figure 2 legend describes HNF4a- and Sox9-positive cells with hepatocyte morphology. The paper does not say they formed specifically or exclusively around periportal regions, and it calls them intermediate cells rather than LPLCs. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several extrinsic signals, including Notch and Wnt, have been proposed for LPLC formation.

    “Several extrinsic signals have been proposed for LPLC formation, including Notch and Wnt.9,10”

    From Kupffer-cell-derived IL-6 is repurposed for hepatocyte dedifferentiation via activating progenitor genes from injury-specific enhancers (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results and Discussion report that Notch activation produces hepatocyte-derived cells with an intermediate phenotype and that Notch signaling is required for reprogramming after injury. Our copy does not identify Wnt as a signal involved in this process, so it supports the Notch part of the claim but not the Wnt part. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mature hepatocytes were found reprogrammed into LPLCs to contribute to liver repair after periportal injury.

    “Importantly, mature hepatocytes were found reprogrammed into LPLCs to contribute to liver repair after periportal injury.7,9,13”

    From Kupffer-cell-derived IL-6 is repurposed for hepatocyte dedifferentiation via activating progenitor genes from injury-specific enhancers (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results and Discussion report that lineage-labeled hepatocytes acquired biliary markers and became atypical ductal or biliary epithelial cells after DDC injury; intermediate cells were most abundant in periportal regions. The paper does not identify those cells as LPLCs or establish repair specifically after periportal injury. It describes their contribution to regeneration more broadly. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yanger, K., Zong, Y., Maggs, L. R., Shapira, S. N., Maddipati, R., Aiello, N. M., Thung, S. N., Wells, R. G., Greenbaum, L. E., & Stanger, B. Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2013-03-21
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
719-724
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2084074847
Cited by
484
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pew Charitable Trusts
  • Cancer Research Institute
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016520)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK090306, T32DK007066, R01DK083355, DK083355)
  • Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
cellular reprogramming, liver regeneration, Notch signaling, hepatocytes, cholangiocytes, liver injury, lineage tracing, cell identity, hepatocyte differentiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Epithelial Cells, Liver Regeneration, Stem Cells, Signal Transduction, Cell Lineage, Hepatocytes, Mice, Receptors, Notch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review