YY1 and CTCF orchestrate a 3D chromatin looping switch during early neural lineage commitment
Open accessAbstract
CTCF is an architectural protein with a critical role in connecting higher-order chromatin folding in pluripotent stem cells. Recent reports have suggested that CTCF binding is more dynamic during development than previously appreciated. Here, we set out to understand the extent to which shifts in genome-wide CTCF occupancy contribute to the 3D reconfiguration of fine-scale chromatin folding during early neural lineage commitment. Unexpectedly, we observe a sharp decrease in CTCF occupancy during the transition from naïve/primed pluripotency to multipotent primary neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Many pluripotency gene-enhancer interactions are anchored by CTCF, and its occupancy is lost in parallel with loop decommissioning during differentiation. Conversely, CTCF binding sites in NPCs are largely preexisting in pluripotent stem cells. Only a small number of CTCF sites arise de novo in NPCs. We identify another zinc finger protein, Yin Yang 1 (YY1), at the base of looping interactions between NPC-specific genes and enhancers. Putative NPC-specific enhancers exhibit strong YY1 signal when engaged in 3D contacts and negligible YY1 signal when not in loops. Moreover, siRNA knockdown of Yy1 specifically disrupts interactions between key NPC enhancers and their target genes. YY1-mediated interactions between NPC regulatory elements are often nested within constitutive loops anchored by CTCF. Together, our results support a model in which YY1 acts as an architectural protein to connect developmentally regulated looping interactions; the location of YY1-mediated interactions may be demarcated in development by a preexisting topological framework created by constitutive CTCF-mediated interactions.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
During early neural lineage commitment, CTCF occupancy is globally pruned from pluripotent stem cells to multipotent neural progenitor cells (NPCs), while NPC-specific enhancer–gene loops are instead anchored by YY1. The paper proposes that YY1-mediated NPC looping interactions arise within a preexisting constitutive CTCF-anchored topological framework.
Key findings
- CTCF binding decreases stepwise across ES 2i, ES serum, and NPCs: 56,138, 50,185, and 28,860 sites, respectively, with 60,688 unique sites total. Of these, 26,435 were constitutive, 8,832 were “2i only,” 20,068 were “2i+Serum,” and only 1,119 were “NPC-only”; CTCF gene expression and protein levels also decreased in NPCs.
- 5C analysis identified 141 constitutive loops, 46 “2i+Serum” loops lost in NPCs, and 75 NPC-only loops. “2i+Serum” loops were enriched for “2i+Serum” CTCF sites, and the pluripotency-specific Sox2–ES enhancer loop broke concurrently with CTCF loss.
- NPC-only loops were not enriched for NPC-only CTCF binding: almost 40% of NPC-only interactions lacked CTCF anchoring, versus <5% of constitutive and <10% of “2i+serum” interactions. Instead, YY1 was strongly enriched at NPC-only loops and at NPC-specific enhancers engaged in 3D contacts, with negligible YY1 signal at NPC-specific enhancers not in loops.
- YY1 sites were less constitutive than CTCF sites (36%, 39%, and 25% constitutive across ES serum, NPCs, and pro-B cells; n = 3,474). NPC-specific enhancers were enriched in NPC-only loops when bound by YY1 without CTCF, but not when bound by CTCF without YY1. Yy1 siRNA knockdown produced >50% reduction in Yy1 expression/protein, disrupted the Sox2–enhancer loop, decreased Sox2 expression, and also reduced Klf4 and Zfp462 looping and Nes/Olig1/Olig2 expression.
Methods
- ChIP-seq was performed for CTCF in mouse ES 2i, ES serum, and NPCs, with ENCODE mouse brain CTCF data reanalyzed; RNA-seq and Western blot assessed CTCF expression/protein. YY1 and H3K27ac ChIP-seq datasets were also analyzed.
- 5C with high-throughput sequencing generated fine-scale chromatin architecture maps at ~4- to 12-kb matrix resolution across >7 Mb of the mouse genome, using n = 2 biological replicates and reanalyzed published 5C libraries. A new computational pipeline used donut and lower-left background filters, logistic-distribution P-values, interaction scores, and seven looping classes; top five dynamic classes had empirical FDR <15%.
- Yy1 knockdown in NPCs used Dharmacon siRNA pools at 20 nM for 78 h, followed by Western blot, qPCR, and 3C/5C analysis.
Limitations
- Stated: the authors cannot rule out that heterogeneity in ENCODE brain tissues contributed to the aggregate CTCF decrease, though their NPC cultures were >90% SOX2 positive. The role of YY1 in ES cells remains unclear because of possible greater ES reliance on CTCF, different ChIP methods between ES and NPC YY1 datasets, or a different regulatory role for YY1 in the two cell types.
- Stated: technical issues with poor library complexity prevented high-complexity 5C maps at Olig1, Olig2, and Nes after Yy1 knockdown; for those loci, only expression reductions were observed.
- Evident: 5C covered selected regions (>7 Mb) rather than the whole genome, and the Yy1 perturbation was an siRNA knockdown with >50% reduction rather than a complete knockout, so some conclusions about YY1’s architectural role remain correlative or partial.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 59 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
YY1 is present at the base of looping interactions between NPC-specific genes and enhancers.
“We identify another zinc finger protein, Yin Yang 1 (YY1), at the base of looping interactions between NPC-specific genes and enhancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CTCF binding sites in NPCs are largely preexisting in pluripotent stem cells.
“Conversely, CTCF binding sites in NPCs are largely preexisting in pluripotent stem cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of CTCF binding sites decreased in a stepwise manner during the transition from naïve pluripotency to multipotency, with the sharpest drop between ES serum and NPC conditions.
“We first noticed that the number of CTCF binding sites decreased in a stepwise manner during the transition from naïve pluripotency to multipotency, with the sharpest drop in binding sites between ES serum and NPC conditions (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CTCF occupancy decreases sharply during the transition from naïve/primed pluripotency to multipotent primary neural progenitor cells (NPCs).
“Unexpectedly, we observe a sharp decrease in CTCF occupancy during the transition from naïve/primed pluripotency to multipotent primary neural progenitor cells (NPCs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
YY1-mediated interactions between NPC regulatory elements are often nested within constitutive loops anchored by CTCF.
“YY1-mediated interactions between NPC regulatory elements are often nested within constitutive loops anchored by CTCF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Only a small number of CTCF sites arise de novo in NPCs.
“Only a small number of CTCF sites arise de novo in NPCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Western blot analysis showed a similar decrease in CTCF protein levels in NPCs compared to pluripotent ES cells.
“Moreover, Western blot analysis of CTCF protein levels showed a similar decrease in NPCs compared to pluripotent ES cells (Supplemental Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
siRNA knockdown of Yy1 specifically disrupts interactions between key NPC enhancers and their target genes.
“Moreover, siRNA knockdown of Yy1 specifically disrupts interactions between key NPC enhancers and their target genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Published ENCODE CTCF ChIP-seq peaks showed a global decrease in adult brain regions (cortex, cerebellum, olfactory) compared to E14.5 brain tissue.
“Consistent with trends in our cellular models, published ENCODE CTCF ChIP-seq peaks also showed a global decrease in adult brain regions (cortex, cerebellum, olfactory) compared to the E14.5 brain tissue (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shen et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Loops in all three cell types were highly enriched for convergently oriented CTCF motifs compared with divergent or tandem orientations.
“Finally, we assessed the orientation of the CTCF motifs at loop anchors and confirmed that loops in all three cell types were highly enriched for convergently oriented motifs compared with divergent or tandem orientations (Supplemental Fig. 9A,B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Approximately 44% of CTCF sites (n = 26,435) displayed constant occupancy across the three cell types and were classified as constitutive.
“We found that approximately 44% of CTCF sites (n = 26,435) displayed constant occupancy across our three cell types of interest and were thus classified as “constitutive.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPC-specific enhancers were strongly enriched in "NPC-only" looping interactions when bound by YY1 without CTCF, but not when bound by CTCF without YY1.
“Importantly, NPC-specific enhancers were strongly enriched in “NPC-only” looping interactions when bound by YY1 without CTCF, but not when bound by CTCF without YY1 (Fig. 5I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
47%, 53%, and 92% of classified CTCF binding sites were constitutive in ES 2i, ES serum, and NPC conditions, respectively.
“In the case of CTCF, 47%, 53%, and 92% of classified binding sites were constitutive (n = 26,435) in the ES 2i, ES serum, and NPC cellular conditions, respectively (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Nes and Bcan expression markedly increased in NPCs in concert with the increase in 3D contact with the putative enhancer element.
“As expected, Nes and Bcan expression markedly increased in NPCs in concert with the increase in 3D contact with the putative enhancer element (Fig. 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
YY1 signal was enriched at NPC-specific and constitutively expressed genes in looping interactions compared to nonloops.
“Similarly, YY1 signal was also enriched at NPC-specific and constitutively expressed genes in looping interactions compared to nonloops (Supplemental Fig. 12A–C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of "NPC-only" CTCF sites that arose during differentiation was relatively small (n = 1119).
“Importantly, the number of “NPC-only” CTCF sites that arose during differentiation was relatively small (n = 1119), indicating that the vast majority of CTCF peaks called in NPCs were already present in the pluripotent cell types (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
"2i+Serum" looping interactions across 5C regions were enriched with "2i+Serum" CTCF sites.
“In concordance with these locus-specific examples, “2i+Serum” looping interactions across our 5C regions were enriched with “2i+Serum” CTCF sites (Fig. 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPCs have roughly the same number of looping interactions as ES serum/ES 2i in the genomic regions covered by 5C primers.
“NPCs have roughly the same number of looping interactions as ES serum/ES 2i in the genomic regions covered by our 5C primers (Fig. 3J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Globally across all 5C loops, YY1 was strongly enriched in "NPC-only" 3D interactions compared to background nonloops.
“Moreover, globally across all our 5C loops, we observed that YY1 was strongly enriched in “NPC-only” 3D interactions compared to background nonloops (Fig. 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Strong occupancy of YY1 was observed at the putative NPC-specific enhancer.
“Interestingly, we observed strong occupancy of the zinc-finger protein Yin Yang 1 (YY1) at the putative NPC-specific enhancer (Fig. 5B,D, green box, x-axis; Supplemental Fig. 11B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
"NPC-only" looping interactions across 5C regions were not enriched for "NPC-only" CTCF binding.
“Moreover, “NPC-only” looping interactions across our 5C regions were not enriched for “NPC-only” CTCF binding (Fig. 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We identified 56,138, 50,185, and 28,860 CTCF binding sites in ES 2i, ES serum, and NPCs, respectively, with a total of 60,688 unique, nonredundant sites across all three cell types.
“We identified 56,138, 50,185, and 28,860 binding sites in ES 2i, ES serum, and NPCs, respectively, with a total of 60,688 unique, nonredundant sites across all three cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Local background filters capture the more nuanced aspects of the distance-dependence expected interaction frequency and the TAD/subTAD domain structure.
“Local background filters capture the more nuanced aspects of the distance-dependence expected interaction frequency and the TAD/subTAD domain structure (Fig. 3C,D; Supplemental Figs. 4, 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only a relatively minor reduction in CTCF occupancy occurred between ES 2i and ES serum ("2i only" class, n = 8832).
“but we observed only a relatively minor reduction in CTCF occupancy between ES 2i and ES serum (“2i only” class, n = 8832).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Constitutive CTCF binding sites display markedly higher occupancy signal than sites that are dynamically altered upon changes in cellular state.
“The ChIP-seq pileup plots indicate that constitutive CTCF binding sites display markedly higher occupancy signal than sites that are dynamically altered upon changes in cellular state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A striking overlap of YY1 with H3K27ac signal was observed.
“We also observed a striking overlap of YY1 with H3K27ac signal (Supplemental Fig. 12H), which prompted us to query the overlap of cell-type–specific genes and regulatory elements with CTCF and YY1 and how this impacts looping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Constitutive and NPC-specific genes were significantly enriched in "constitutive" and "NPC-only" looping interactions, respectively, when bound by YY1 without CTCF.
“Similarly, constitutive and NPC-specific genes were also significantly enriched in “constitutive” and “NPC-only” looping interactions, respectively, when bound by YY1 without CTCF (Supplemental Fig. 12K,M).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of CTCF sites lost between ES serum and NPCs nearly matched that of the constitutive class ("2i+Serum" class, n = 20,068).
“In contrast, we noticed that the number of CTCF sites lost between ES serum and NPCs nearly matched that of the constitutive class (“2i+Serum” class, n = 20,068), suggesting that the transition from pluripotency to multipotent progenitor cells represents a critical developmental window in establishing the neural CTCF landscape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPC genes were slightly enriched in 'constitutive' interactions.
“Importantly, NPC genes were also slightly enriched in “constitutive” interactions (Fig. 6A), corroborating our observation that NPC gene-enhancer loops connected by YY1 often appear adjacent to and nested within constitutive looping events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Loop ablation was observed upon Yy1 knockout at the Zfp462 gene.
“and at the Zfp462 gene (Supplemental Fig. 14C,D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Key YY1-mediated NPC-specific looping interactions occur adjacent to and nested within punctate constitutive looping interactions anchored by convergently oriented, constitutively bound CTCF.
“Finally, we found that key YY1-mediated NPC-specific looping interactions occur adjacent to and nested within punctate constitutive looping interactions anchored by convergently oriented, constitutively bound CTCF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Olig1 and Olig2 show markedly increased expression in NPCs compared to ES 2i/ES serum.
“these genes show markedly increased expression in NPCs compared to ES 2i/ES serum (Fig. 6B–D, magenta arrows).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
NPC-specific CTCF was not significantly enriched in NPC-specific loops in the 5C regions.
“Here, unexpectedly, we found that NPC-specific CTCF was not significantly enriched in NPC-specific loops in our 5C regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No strong correlation was observed between CTCF occupancy and NPC-specific interactions.
“Third, we did not observe a strong correlation between CTCF occupancy and NPC-specific interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Sox2 gene forms a long-range 'NPC-only' interaction with a putative NPC-specific enhancer marked by H3K27ac.
“Similarly, the Sox2 gene also forms a long-range “NPC-only” interaction with a putative NPC-specific enhancer marked by H3K27ac (Fig. 6G, magenta arrow; Supplemental Fig. 10A,B, second green box).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Reduction in YY1 levels resulted in a decrease in Sox2 expression.
“and a decrease in Sox2 expression (Fig. 7D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Two 'constitutive' interactions anchored by constitutive CTCF sites in a convergent orientation are adjacent to the NPC-specific interactions formed by the Olig1 and Olig2 genes.
“Similar to the Nes locus, we observed two “constitutive” interactions anchored by constitutive CTCF sites in a convergent orientation adjacent to the NPC specific interactions formed by the Olig1 and Olig2 genes (Fig. 6F, red boxes/green arrows).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Constitutive CTCF was the most significantly enriched chromatin mark underlying 'constitutive' interactions.
“Consistent with this idea, constitutive CTCF was the most significantly enriched chromatin mark underlying “constitutive” interactions (Fig. 6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Transfection of the Yy1-targeting siRNA pool produced a >50% decrease in Yy1 expression and protein levels compared to a control nontargeting pool condition.
“Transfection of the Yy1-targeting siRNA pool produced a >50% decrease in Yy1 expression and protein levels compared to a control nontargeting pool condition (Fig. 7A,B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reduced CTCF occupancy is correlated with the loss of chromatin interactions between ES-specific genes and enhancers.
“Second, reduced CTCF occupancy is correlated with the loss of chromatin interactions between ES-specific genes and enhancers, indicating that loss of CTCF binding is a critical step during the decommissioning of pluripotency gene expression programs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPC gene-enhancer loops connected by YY1 often appear adjacent to and nested within constitutive looping events.
“corroborating our observation that NPC gene-enhancer loops connected by YY1 often appear adjacent to and nested within constitutive looping events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Significant NPC YY1 signal was observed at all NPC-specific genes and enhancers at the Olig1/2 locus.
“We observed significant NPC YY1 signal at all NPC-specific genes and enhancers at the Olig1/2 locus (Fig. 6E; Supplemental Fig. 13A–D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The Sox2 'NPC-only' interaction exists adjacent to and nested within a punctate 'constitutive' interaction anchored by convergent CTCF.
“Again, the “NPC-only” interaction exists adjacent to and nested within a punctate “constitutive” interaction anchored by convergent CTCF (Fig. 6I, lower red boxes, consensus orientation not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
YY1 is detected at both Sox2 and the putative NPC-specific enhancer.
“YY1 is detected at both Sox2 and the putative NPC-specific enhancer (Fig. 6H,I, upper green boxes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In NPCs, putative enhancer(s) marked by NPC-specific H3K27ac connect to both Olig1 and Olig2 in a rosette-like structure.
“In NPCs, putative enhancer(s) marked by NPC-specific H3K27ac connect to both Olig1 and Olig2 in a rosette-like structure, and these genes show markedly increased expression in NPCs compared to ES 2i/ES serum (Fig. 6B–D, magenta arrows).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loop ablation was observed upon Yy1 knockout at interactions between the Klf4 gene and a downstream putative NPC-enhancer.
“We also observed loop ablation upon Yy1 knockout at interactions between the Klf4 gene and a downstream putative NPC-enhancer (Supplemental Figs. 14A,B, 15A,B, second green box)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reduction in YY1 levels resulted in a striking loss of interaction frequency between the upstream putative NPC-specific enhancer and the Sox2 gene.
“Reduction in YY1 levels resulted in a striking loss of interaction frequency between the upstream putative NPC-specific enhancer and the Sox2 gene (Figs. 3K, 7C; Supplemental Fig. 10A,B, second green box)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Upon Yy1 knockdown, a reduction in the expression of Nes, Olig1, and Olig2 genes was observed.
“However, upon Yy1 knockdown we observed a reduction in the expression of these genes, suggesting that the enhancer-promoter loops that Nes, Olig1, and Olig2 engage in might be disrupted by Yy1 knockdown (Supplemental Fig. 14E,F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only a small group of about 1200 CTCF sites are acquired de novo in NPCs.
“In contrast, we only observe a small group of about 1200 CTCF sites that are acquired de novo in NPCs, suggesting that the vast majority of the CTCF sites occupied in NPCs were preexisting from earlier stages in development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
CTCF plays an essential role in early neural development.
“Together, these studies indicate that CTCF plays an essential role in early neural development and highlight the importance of unraveling the currently unknown mechanisms linking occupancy with genome architecture and expression in the brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
CTCF is an architectural protein that functions in an orientation-dependent manner to organize mammalian genomes across several length scales.
“Together, these data indicate the CTCF is an architectural protein that functions in an orientation-dependent manner to organize mammalian genomes across several length scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
At most 20% of possible unique CTCF sites were classified as constitutive when comparing 40 cellular states.
“Notably, at most 20% of possible unique sites were classified as constitutive when comparing 40 cellular states, indicating that CTCF binding is more dynamic during development than previously reported (Wang et al. 2012; Maurano et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wang et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Maurano et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CTCF binding is more dynamic during development than previously appreciated.
“Notably, at most 20% of possible unique sites were classified as constitutive when comparing 40 cellular states, indicating that CTCF binding is more dynamic during development than previously reported (Wang et al. 2012; Maurano et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wang et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Maurano et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The transition from pluripotency to multipotent progenitor cells represents a critical developmental window in establishing the neural CTCF landscape.
“In contrast, we noticed that the number of CTCF sites lost between ES serum and NPCs nearly matched that of the constitutive class (“2i+Serum” class, n = 20,068), suggesting that the transition from pluripotency to multipotent progenitor cells represents a critical developmental window in establishing the neural CTCF landscape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
CTCF might not be the critical architectural protein connecting developmentally regulated looping interactions that arise de novo in differentiated NPCs.
“These results suggested that CTCF might not be the critical architectural protein connecting developmentally regulated looping interactions that arise de novo in differentiated NPCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
5C data showed strong biological concordance with published Hi-C data from the murine cortex across a 1-Mb region surrounding the Sox2 gene in NPCs.
“Additionally, our 5C data showed strong biological concordance with published Hi-C data from the murine cortex (Dixon et al. 2012) across a 1-Mb region surrounding the Sox2 gene in NPCs (Supplemental Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dixon et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The resultant Relative Interaction Frequency data binned at 4-kb matrix resolution exhibited high reproducibility between biological replicates.
“The resultant “Relative Interaction Frequency” data binned at 4-kb matrix resolution exhibited high reproducibility between biological replicates (Fig. 3A; Supplemental Table 1; Supplemental Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Loss of CTCF occupancy at key looping interactions during the departure from pluripotency is accompanied by a decrease in looping strength.
“Together, these data suggest that the loss of CTCF occupancy at key looping interactions during the departure from pluripotency is accompanied by a decrease in looping strength.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The CTCF occupancy landscape in NPCs does not result from a marked reshuffling and/or extensive de novo acquisition of new CTCF binding sites.
“Our results suggest that the CTCF occupancy landscape in NPCs does not result from a marked reshuffling and/or extensive de novo acquisition of new CTCF binding sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The vast majority of CTCF peaks called in NPCs were already present in the pluripotent cell types.
“Importantly, the number of “NPC-only” CTCF sites that arose during differentiation was relatively small (n = 1119), indicating that the vast majority of CTCF peaks called in NPCs were already present in the pluripotent cell types (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
NPC-specific enhancers, constitutive genes, and NPC-specific genes can engage in strong 3D interactions in NPCs when bound by YY1 in the absence of CTCF.
“Together, these data indicate that NPC-specific enhancers, constitutive genes, and NPC-specific genes can engage in strong 3D interactions in NPCs when bound by YY1 in the absence of CTCF.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
YY1 binding is enriched at "NPC-only" looping interactions.
“These data demonstrate that YY1 binding is enriched at “NPC-only” looping interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The enhancer-promoter loops that Nes, Olig1, and Olig2 engage in might be disrupted by Yy1 knockdown.
“suggesting that the enhancer-promoter loops that Nes, Olig1, and Olig2 engage in might be disrupted by Yy1 knockdown (Supplemental Fig. 14E,F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
YY1 is critical for the formation of developmentally regulated looping interactions in NPCs.
“Together, these results support our working hypothesis that YY1 is critical for the formation developmentally regulated looping interactions in NPCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
CTCF-mediated constitutive interactions might serve to pre-mark genomic locations of connections between somatic developmentally regulated gene-enhancer interactions through punctate, constitutive 'seed' interactions.
“Here, our results confirm and extend this model to suggest that CTCF-mediated constitutive interactions might also might serve to pre-mark genomic locations of connections between somatic developmentally regulated gene-enhancer interactions through punctate, constitutive “seed” interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
YY1 is strongly enriched in genome-wide looping interactions in human cell lines.
“(1) it is strongly enriched in genome-wide looping interactions in human cell lines (Rao et al. 2014);”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rao et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Loss of CTCF binding is a critical step during the decommissioning of pluripotency gene expression programs.
“indicating that loss of CTCF binding is a critical step during the decommissioning of pluripotency gene expression programs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
YY1 may serve as an architectural protein connecting developmentally regulated genes and enhancers in NPCs.
“suggesting that YY1 may serve as an architectural protein connecting developmentally regulated genes and enhancers in NPCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The vast majority of the CTCF sites occupied in NPCs were preexisting from earlier stages in development.
“suggesting that the vast majority of the CTCF sites occupied in NPCs were preexisting from earlier stages in development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The transition from ES cells to early NPCs is associated with a large increase in DNA methylation.
“The transition from ES cells to early NPCs is associated with a large increase in DNA methylation (Sharma et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sharma et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
DNA methylation is a critical regulator of CTCF binding.
“and CTCF binding (Renda et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Renda et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A large proportion of genomic loci that are methylated in NPCs maintain the mark through the duration of neural development.
“Importantly, a large proportion of genomic loci that are methylated in NPCs maintain the mark through the duration of neural development (Ziller et al. 2015; Sharma et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ziller et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sharma et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Constitutive topological frameworks may be critical for proper gene expression because they create insulated neighborhoods around coregulated genes and enhancers that will interact during subsequent differentiation steps.
“Constitutive topological frameworks may be critical for proper gene expression because they create insulated neighborhoods around coregulated genes and enhancers that will interact during subsequent differentiation steps (Dowen et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dowen et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 32
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany pluripotency gene-enhancer interactions are anchored by CTCF, and CTCF occupancy is lost in parallel with loop decommissioning during differentiation.
“Many pluripotency gene-enhancer interactions are anchored by CTCF, and its occupancy is lost in parallel with loop decommissioning during differentiation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPutative NPC-specific enhancers exhibit strong YY1 signal when engaged in 3D contacts and negligible YY1 signal when not in loops.
“Putative NPC-specific enhancers exhibit strong YY1 signal when engaged in 3D contacts and negligible YY1 signal when not in loops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCTCF binding can display the opposite trend in other developmental lineages, in some cases increasing between embryonic and adult stages.
“Notably, when we investigated other developmental lineages, we found that CTCF binding can display the opposite trend, in some cases increasing between the embryonic and adult stages (Supplemental Fig. 1A,B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCTCF gene expression decreased between pluripotent stem cell states and multipotent NPCs and between embryonic mouse brain and mature adult brain regions.
“We observed a general accordance between the ChIP-seq and RNA-seq results in our cellular models: CTCF gene expression decreased between the pluripotent stem cell states and multipotent NPCs (Fig. 1C) and also between the embryonic mouse brain and mature adult brain regions (Fig. 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlmost 40% of "NPC-only" interactions were not anchored by CTCF binding, whereas only <5% and <10% of "constitutive" and "2i+serum" interactions lacked CTCF binding, respectively.
“Notably, when we explored the percentage of key looping classes anchored by CTCF, we found that almost 40% of “NPC-only” interactions were not anchored by CTCF binding, whereas only <5% and <10% of “constitutive” and “2i+serum” interactions lacked CTCF binding, respectively (Fig. 4E, black bars).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the departure from pluripotency, CTCF binding is lost, and the looping interaction connecting the Sox2 gene to the putative ES-specific enhancer concurrently breaks apart.
“During the departure from pluripotency, CTCF binding is lost, and the looping interaction connecting the Sox2 gene to the putative ES-specific enhancer concurrently breaks apart (Fig. 4B,C; Supplemental Fig. 10A,B, red arrow).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCTCF signal was negligible at all classes of YY1 binding, suggesting YY1 and CTCF do not, for the most part, directly colocalize.
“CTCF signal was negligible at all classes of YY1 binding, suggesting that YY1 and CTCF do not, for the most part, directly colocalize (Supplemental Fig. 12F,G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStrong YY1 signal at NPC-specific enhancers engaged in "NPC-only" looping interactions and negligible YY1 binding at NPC-specific enhancers that do not loop.
“We found strong YY1 signal at NPC-specific enhancers engaged in “NPC-only” looping interactions and negligible YY1 binding at NPC-specific enhancers that do not loop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe identified 141 loops present in all three cell types ("Constitutive"), 46 loops present in both ES 2i and ES serum but lost in NPCs ("2i+Serum"), and 75 loops specific to the NPC state ("NPC-only").
“Altogether, we identified several classes of 3D interactions (Fig. 3I) and elected to focus our analysis on three main groups: (1) 141 loops present in all three cell types (“Constitutive,” gray class); (2) 46 loops present in both ES 2i and ES serum but lost in NPCs (“2i+Serum,” purple class); and (3) 75 loops specific to the NPC state (“NPC-only,” green class).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA markedly lower proportion of classified YY1 sites were constitutive among ES serum, NPCs, and primary pro-B cells (36%, 39%, and 25%, respectively; n = 3474), indicating YY1 might exhibit more cell-type-specific binding than CTCF.
“In contrast, a markedly lower proportion of classified YY1 sites were constitutive among ES serum, NPCs, and primary pro-B cells (36%, 39%, and 25%, respectively; n = 3474), indicating that YY1 might exhibit more cell-type–specific binding than CTCF (Fig. 5H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCTCF occupancy is predominantly lost in the transition from ES cells to multipotent NPCs, and CTCF occupancy is highest in the naïve pluripotent stem cell state and globally decreases during commitment to multipotent NPCs.
“First, we find that CTCF occupancy is predominantly lost in the transition from ES cells to multipotent NPCs, suggesting that the CTCF occupancy landscape might be saturated in naïve pluripotency and regulated primarily through selective pruning of CTCF binding sites.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Here, we find that CTCF occupancy is highest in the naïve pluripotent stem cell state and globally decreases in parallel with its expression during the commitment to multipotent NPCs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataUpon knockdown of Yy1 in NPCs, many 3D interactions break apart, including several key NPC-specific enhancer-gene looping interactions.
“Several key NPC-specific enhancer-gene looping interactions were ablated upon Yy1 knockdown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA large cohort of roughly 8000 and roughly 20,000 CTCF sites are lost during the transition from ES 2i to ES serum and ES serum to NPCs, respectively.
“A large cohort of roughly 8000 and roughly 20,000 CTCF sites are lost during the transition from ES 2i to ES serum and ES serum to NPCs, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHigh levels of YY1 occupancy were detected at NPC-specific genes and enhancers when engaged in NPC-specific 3D interactions, and negligible YY1 levels when these regulatory elements did not interact.
“Rather, we detected high levels of occupancy of the zinc finger protein YY1 at NPC-specific genes and enhancers when engaged in NPC-specific 3D interactions and negligible YY1 levels when these regulatory elements did not interact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data"2i+serum" looping interactions were enriched for ES-specific enhancers regardless of CTCF and YY1 occupancy, whereas ES-specific genes were only enriched in "2i+serum" looping interactions when bound by CTCF without YY1.
“Additionally, “2i+serum” looping interactions were enriched for ES-specific enhancers regardless of CTCF and YY1 occupancy, whereas ES-specific genes were only enriched in “2i+serum” looping interactions when bound by CTCF without YY1 (Supplemental Fig. 12J,L).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataYY1 occupancy signal was low and diffuse across putative ES-specific regulatory elements and did not show a clear preference between those engaged in loops versus nonloops.
“YY1 occupancy signal was low and diffuse across putative ES-specific regulatory elements and did not show a clear preference between those engaged in loops versus nonloops (Supplemental Fig. 12D,E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe majority of architectural protein-bound NPC-specific enhancers were bound by YY1 without CTCF, whereas the majority of ES-specific enhancers were bound by CTCF without YY1.
“By focusing on distal cell-type–specific regulatory elements that overlap binding sites of CTCF, YY1, or both (and not considering those bound by neither), we observed that the majority of architectural protein-bound NPC-specific enhancers were bound by YY1 without CTCF, whereas the majority of ES-specific enhancers were bound by CTCF without YY1 (Fig. 5J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLooping interactions and sub-TADs often link genes to developmentally regulated enhancers and are markedly reorganized between cellular states.
“Looping interactions and sub-TADs often link genes to developmentally regulated enhancers and are markedly reorganized between cellular states (Tolhuis et al. 2002; Sanyal et al. 2012; Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013; Dowen et al. 2014; Smith et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Tolhuis et al. 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sanyal et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough CTCF occupancy appears to decrease during the transition from pluripotency to early neuronal lineage commitment, it is not a pervasive trend across all developmental lineages.
“Thus, although CTCF occupancy appears to decrease during the transition from pluripotency to early neuronal lineage commitment, it is not a pervasive trend across all developmental lineages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCTCF is found at the base of looping interactions, and knockdown of CTCF abrogates chromatin connections.
“CTCF is found at the base of looping interactions, and knockdown of the protein abrogates chromatin connections (Kurukuti et al. 2006; Hadjur et al. 2009; Handoko et al. 2011; Splinter et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kurukuti et al. 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hadjur et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Handoko et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn independent study reported a decrease in CTCF protein levels in whole mouse brains during the transition from E15 to post-natal week 1.
“Corroborating our results, while this manuscript was under review, an independent study also reported a decrease in CTCF protein levels in whole mouse brains during the transition from E15 to post-natal week 1 (Sams et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sams et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCTCF-mediated interactions can be disrupted by mutation, inversion, and/or deletion of the CTCF motif, indicating that consensus orientation is a critical contributing factor in loop establishment and/or maintenance.
“CTCF-mediated interactions can be disrupted by mutation, inversion, and/or deletion of the CTCF motif, indicating that consensus orientation is a critical contributing factor in loop establishment and/or maintenance (de Wit et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2015; Sanborn et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites de Wit et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guo et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sanborn et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataYY1 acts as an architectural protein to connect developmentally regulated looping interactions, and the location of YY1-mediated interactions may be demarcated in development by a preexisting topological framework created by constitutive CTCF-mediated interactions.
“Together, our results support a model in which YY1 acts as an architectural protein to connect developmentally regulated looping interactions; the location of YY1-mediated interactions may be demarcated in development by a preexisting topological framework created by constitutive CTCF-mediated interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOf the subset of loops bound by CTCF with clear consensus sequences, 92% were anchored by consensus sequences pointed toward each other in a convergent orientation.
“Importantly, of the subset of loops bound by CTCF with clear consensus sequences, 92% were anchored by consensus sequences pointed toward each other in a convergent orientation (Rao et al. 2014; Vietri Rudan et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rao et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vietri Rudan et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCTCF functions as an architectural protein to connect higher-order chromatin configurations.
“A leading hypothesis is that CTCF's diverse regulatory roles can be explained by a unifying mechanism in which it functions as an architectural protein to connect higher-order chromatin configurations (Phillips and Corces 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Phillips and Corces 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThresholds were chosen so that the top five largest dynamic looping classes achieved an empirical false discovery rate less than 15%.
“Thresholds were chosen so that our top five largest dynamic looping classes achieved an empirical false discovery rate less than 15% (Supplemental Methods; Supplemental Fig. S8B–D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCTCF has a well-established role in connecting long-range looping interactions.
“CTCF has a well-established role in connecting long-range looping interactions (de Wit et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites de Wit et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Guo et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSox2 forms a pluripotency-specific loop with a putative ES-specific enhancer ∼120 kb downstream that is essential for proper expression of the gene in ES cells.
“Sox2 forms a pluripotency-specific loop with a putative ES-specific enhancer ∼120 kb downstream that is essential for proper expression of the gene in ES cells (Fig. 4A,B, magenta arrowhead; Li et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Li et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationHeterogeneity in cells derived from ENCODE tissues may contribute to the aggregate decrease in CTCF levels.
“Sams et al. also identified differential CTCF levels across neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes from the hippocampus, highlighting that we cannot rule out the possibility that heterogeneity in cells derived from ENCODE tissues may contribute to the aggregate decrease in CTCF levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sams et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataChIP-seq experiments were conducted in the same batch, sequenced on the same flow cell, and down-sampled to the same read depth to attenuate technical artifacts.
“ChIP-seq experiments were conducted in the same batch, sequenced on the same flow cell, and down-sampled to the same read depth to attenuate technical artifacts that might influence our observed results (Fig. 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThere is a larger class of dynamically occupied CTCF sites than previously appreciated.
“These results confirm and extend recent reports suggesting that there is a larger class of dynamically occupied CTCF sites than previously appreciated (Shen et al. 2012; Maurano et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Shen et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Maurano et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationNPC cultures exhibited a highly consistent morphology throughout the population, and >90% were SOX2 positive.
“Our NPC cultures exhibited a highly consistent morphology throughout the population, and >90% were SOX2 positive (Beagan et al. 2016), suggesting that our NPC preparations were substantially less heterogeneous than brain tissue lysates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beagan et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCTCF gene and protein expression levels decrease in the transition from pluripotency to multipotent neural progenitor cells in parallel with a global decrease in the number of genome-wide CTCF binding sites.
“Our data indicate that CTCF gene and protein expression levels decrease in the transition from pluripotency to multipotent neural progenitor cells in parallel with a global decrease in the number of genome-wide CTCF binding sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA large proportion of CTCF sites are preestablished at least as early in development as naïve pluripotency and selectively lost in early neural lineage commitment.
“Rather, a large proportion of CTCF sites are preestablished at least as early in development as naïve pluripotency and selectively lost in early neural lineage commitment (Fig. 2D, orange and purple classes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataYY1 is present at NPC regulatory elements engaged in 3D interactions and might serve as an architectural protein to connect NPC-specific genes and enhancers.
“These data suggest that YY1 is present at NPC regulatory elements engaged in 3D interactions and support our working hypothesis that YY1 might serve as an architectural protein to connect NPC-specific genes and enhancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA notable proportion of the large class (n = ∼20,000) of '2i+serum' CTCF sites might be methylated during the initial establishment of the neural lineage and subsequently remain methylated and unbound through terminal differentiation in the developing/maturing brain.
“Because CTCF binding is anti-correlated with DNA methylation, we posit that a notable proportion of the large class (n = ∼20,000) of “2i+serum” CTCF sites might be methylated during the initial establishment of the neural lineage and subsequently remain methylated and unbound through terminal differentiation in the developing/maturing brain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CTCF binding is anti-correlated with DNA methylation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDue to technical issues related to poor library complexity across all conditions in this batch of experiments, high complexity 5C maps could not be obtained at Olig1, Olig2, and Nes regions.
“Due to technical issues related to poor library complexity across all conditions in this batch of experiments, we were unable to obtain high complexity 5C maps at Olig1, Olig2, and Nes regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDevelopmentally regulated genes such as Nes, Olig1, Olig2, and Sox2 form de novo connections to their target enhancers via YY1 within a larger topological framework preexisting from naïve pluripotency and connected by constitutive CTCF.
“Together, these results support a working model of 3D genome folding in which developmentally regulated genes such as Nes, Olig1, Olig2, and Sox2 form de novo connections to their target enhancers via YY1 within a larger topological framework preexisting from naïve pluripotency and connected by constitutive CTCF.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Our data support a model in which YY1-anchored looping interactions arise de novo in NPCs within a larger topological framework established prior to or during naïve pluripotency and connected by constitutively bound CTCF (Fig. 7E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe CTCF occupancy landscape might be saturated in naïve pluripotency and regulated primarily through selective pruning of CTCF binding sites.
“suggesting that the CTCF occupancy landscape might be saturated in naïve pluripotency and regulated primarily through selective pruning of CTCF binding sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Olig1 and Olig2 genes encode bHLH transcription factors involved in differentiation along the oligodendrocyte lineage.
“The Olig1 and Olig2 genes encode bHLH transcription factors involved in differentiation along the oligodendrocyte lineage (Zhou et al. 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhou et al. 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationYY1 is necessary for the formation of specific 3D interactions in B cells.
“(2) it is necessary for the formation of specific 3D interactions in B cells (Medvedovic et al. 2013);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Medvedovic et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCells in the naïve pluripotency state (ES 2i) have consistently been found to exhibit an extreme state of hypomethylation across the genome.
“in which cells have consistently been found to exhibit an extreme state of hypomethylation across the genome (Ficz et al. 2013; Habibi et al. 2013; Leitch et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ficz et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Habibi et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Leitch et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenArchitectural proteins such as YY1 might cooperatively build upon a constitutive CTCF architectural 'seed' scaffold to connect nearby developmentally regulated genes and enhancers.
“Thus we posit that architectural proteins such as YY1 might cooperatively build upon a constitutive CTCF architectural “seed” scaffold to connect nearby developmentally regulated genes and enhancers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataIt is not clear to what extent observed differences between ES and NPC YY1 are due to increased reliance by ES cells on CTCF, different ChIP methods, or a different regulatory role for YY1.
“It is not clear to what extent our observed differences between ES and NPC YY1 are due to (1) an increased reliance by ES cells on CTCF as the primary architectural protein; (2) different ChIP methods between the ES and NPC YY1 data sets (Supplemental Methods); or (3) a different regulatory role for YY1 in the two cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough data indicate YY1 might be important for developmentally regulated looping in somatic cells, we cannot conclusively define or rule out any role for YY1 in mediating loops in ES cells.
“Thus, although our data indicate that YY1 might be important for developmentally regulated looping in somatic cells, we cannot conclusively define or rule out any role for YY1 in mediating loops in ES cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe REPO domain of YY1 physically interacts with cohesin.
“Previous studies have shown that the REPO domain of YY1 physically interacts with cohesin (Pan et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pan et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUp to 30% of YY1 sites bind at locations directly adjacent to CTCF and might work together to cooperatively influence occupancy.
“Furthermore, a recent genomics analysis showed that up to 30% of YY1 sites bind at locations directly adjacent to CTCF and might work together to cooperatively influence occupancy (Schwalie et al. 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwalie et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation5C primer biases were corrected by adapting and modifying the Express matrix balancing algorithm.
“5C primer biases were corrected by adapting and modifying the Express matrix balancing algorithm (Sauria et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sauria et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCTCF-mediated looping interactions might function to coordinate nearby interactions involving RNA Pol II.
“In agreement with this idea, Ruan and colleagues reported evidence that CTCF-mediated looping interactions might function to coordinate nearby interactions involving RNA Pol II (Tang et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA chromatin molecular motor, such as cohesin/condensin, might extrude chromatin until blocked by architectural proteins, resulting in looped out chromatin.
“Marko, Mirny, Lieberman-Aiden and colleagues have posited that a chromatin molecular motor, such as cohesin/condensin, might extrude chromatin until blocked by architectural proteins, resulting in looped out chromatin (Alipour and Marko 2012; Sanborn et al. 2015; Fudenberg et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Alipour and Marko 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sanborn et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fudenberg et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe largest rearrangement of DNA methylation during neural development occurs upon the departure from pluripotency.
“Recent reports suggest that the largest rearrangement of DNA methylation during neural development occurs upon the departure from pluripotency (Ziller et al. 2015; Sharma et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ziller et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sharma et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSeminal genome-wide CTCF occupancy studies based on two to three cell types initially suggested that the CTCF binding landscape remains largely unchanged across mammalian lineages.
“Seminal genome-wide CTCF occupancy studies based on two to three cell types initially suggested that the CTCF binding landscape remains largely unchanged across mammalian lineages (Kim et al. 2007; Cuddapah et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kim et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cuddapah et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDNA methylation is a critical regulator of neural lineage commitment.
“DNA methylation is a critical regulator of neural lineage commitment (Meissner et al. 2008) and CTCF binding (Renda et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meissner et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationYY1 can connect a long-range interaction in B cells in the absence of its transcriptional activation domain.
“(3) it can connect a long-range interaction in B cells in the absence of its transcriptional activation domain (Mehra et al. 2016);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mehra et al. 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe zinc fingers of YY1 may interact with the N terminus of CTCF.
“Biochemical studies have indicated that the zinc fingers of YY1 may interact with the N terminus of CTCF (Donohoe et al. 2007), suggesting that YY1 could anchor loops via homodimerization (Supplemental Fig. 16A) or heterodimerization (Supplemental Fig. 16B) mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Donohoe et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisecitationSub-TAD/TAD boundaries, anchored by constitutive CTCF, might constrain developmentally regulated enhancers from aberrantly looping to off-target genes.
“A leading hypothesis is that sub-TAD/TAD boundaries, anchored by constitutive CTCF, might constrain developmentally regulated enhancers from aberrantly looping to off-target genes (Dowen et al. 2014; Symmons et al. 2014; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016; Hnisz et al. 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dowen et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Symmons et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lupiáñez et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPluripotency genes connect to enhancers in smaller looping interactions nested within larger constitutive structures.
“We and others have previously reported that pluripotency genes connect to enhancers in smaller looping interactions nested within larger constitutive structures (Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013; Dowen et al. 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dowen et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA more recent comparison of CTCF occupancy across 40 cell types revealed that at least 80% of CTCF sites are dynamic across cellular states.
“A more recent comparison of CTCF occupancy across 40 cell types revealed that at least 80% of CTCF sites are dynamic across cellular states (Maurano et al. 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maurano et al. 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationYY1 is required for proper neural development.
“(4) it is required for proper neural development (He et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites He et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo facilitate comparison of ChIP-seq libraries across cell types, mapped reads were filtered to remove optical and PCR duplicates and then down-sampled to equivalent read numbers across cellular states.
“To facilitate the comparison of ChIP-seq libraries across cell types, the mapped reads were filtered to remove optical and PCR duplicates and then down-sampled to equivalent read numbers across cellular states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationBinned 5C counts were normalized for the expected background interaction frequency with local 'donut' and 'lower left' filters.
“Binned 5C counts were normalized for the expected background interaction frequency with local “donut” and “lower left” filters (Rao et al. 2014) as detailed in the Supplemental Methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rao et al. 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenBackground-corrected interaction frequencies for each independent replicate and region were fitted with a logistic distribution, and P-values were assigned to each bin-bin pair.
“Background-corrected interaction frequencies for each independent replicate and region were fitted with a logistic distribution, and P-values were assigned to each bin–bin pair.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The 5C interrogated regions are representative of genome-wide 3D chromatin architecture.
“We generated fine-scale chromatin architecture maps (∼4- to12-kb matrix resolution) across >7 Mb of the mouse genome surrounding key developmentally regulated genes with Chromosome-Conformation-Capture-Carbon-Copy (5C) and high-throughput sequencing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Putative NPC-specific enhancers are bona fide regulatory enhancers.
“we parsed our putative genome-wide NPC-specific enhancers (Supplemental Methods) into those that engage in “NPC-only” loops (Fig. 5F) and those that do not participate in long-range interactions (Fig. 5G).”
The paper relies on this without support.
CTCF binding is anti-correlated with DNA methylation.
“Because CTCF binding is anti-correlated with DNA methylation, we posit that a notable proportion of the large class (n = ∼20,000) of “2i+serum” CTCF sites might be methylated during the initial establishment of the neural lineage and subsequently remain methylated and unbound through terminal differentiation in the developing/maturing brain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The putative NPC-specific enhancers marked by H3K27ac are functional enhancers that regulate the associated genes.
“In NPCs, putative enhancer(s) marked by NPC-specific H3K27ac connect to both Olig1 and Olig2 in a rosette-like structure, and these genes show markedly increased expression in NPCs compared to ES 2i/ES serum (Fig. 6B–D, magenta arrows).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Yy1-targeting siRNA specifically reduces YY1 without off-target effects.
“Transfection of the Yy1-targeting siRNA pool produced a >50% decrease in Yy1 expression and protein levels compared to a control nontargeting pool condition (Fig. 7A,B).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
YY1 has a global role in connecting cell type-specific active enhancers and promoters in a range of mammalian cell types including mESCs and neural progenitor cells.
“Recent studies have confirmed its global role in connecting cell type-specific active enhancers and promoters in a range of mammalian cell types including mESCs [295] and neural progenitor cells [365].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [365]
The Results section reports YY1 enrichment at looping NPC-specific enhancers and genes, and loss of several such loops after Yy1 knockdown. But the paper describes YY1 as a candidate architectural protein and does not establish the claimed global role; it also says it cannot conclusively define YY1’s looping role in ES cells. In the citing sentence, the ES-cell example is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredYY1 and ZNF143 are zinc finger TFs with DNA binding domains that have been implicated as looping factors mediating interactions between active regulatory elements.
“YY1 and ZNF143 are both zinc finger TFs with DNA binding domains that have recently been implicated as looping factors mediating interactions between active regulatory elements [295, 362–365].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [365]
The Results section identifies YY1 as a zinc-finger protein enriched at enhancer–gene looping interactions, and the Discussion describes it as a candidate architectural protein. Our copy does not address ZNF143, so it supports the YY1 part of the claim but not the assertion about both factors. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNo statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes, but the sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications.
“No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes but our sample sizes are similar to those reported in previous publications17,27,28.”
From Three-dimensional genome restructuring across timescales of activity-induced neuronal gene expression (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
An siRNA knockdown is called a knockout
MinorThe described intervention uses siRNA to reduce Yy1 levels, but the results later call it a Yy1 knockout.
“We also observed loop ablation upon Yy1 knockout at interactions between the Klf4 gene and a downstream putative NPC-enhancer”
“We performed Yy1 knockdown using an siRNA pool purchased from Dharmacon (Supplemental Methods) to target multiple sites along the Yy1 transcript.”
Cites
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Reads were aligned to mouse genome build mm9 using Bowtie with default mismatch parameters (Langmead et al. 2009).”
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386 · cited 1× · see citing works
“0 (MACS2 [Zhang et al. 2008]).”
A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping
Rao, S. S. P., Huntley, M. H., Durand, N. C., Stamenova, E. K., Bochkov, I. D., Robinson, J. T., Sanborn, A. L., Machol, I., Omer, A. D., Lander, E. S., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 · Cited by 9,212 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Looping interactions can be detected in 5C heatmaps as concentrated points of high interaction frequency compared to the surrounding localbackground (Rao et al. 2014).”
InfluentialComprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome
Lieberman-Aiden, E., van Berkum, N. L., Williams, L., Imakaev, M., Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Amit, I., Lajoie, B. R., Sabo, P. J., Dorschner, M. O., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181369 · Cited by 8,898 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Within individual chromosomes, open chromatin and active genes tend to spatially cluster into “ A ” compartments, whereas closed, inactive chromatin spatially segregates into “ B ” compartments (Lieberman-Aiden et al. 2009; Rao et al. 2014).”
Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions
Dixon, J. R., Selvaraj, S., Yue, F., Kim, A., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Hu, M., Liu, J. S., & Ren, B. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11082 · Cited by 6,829 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Thus, the emerging model is that mammalian genomes are arranged into a nested hierarchy of unique structural features, ofwhichthefiner,sub-megabasescaleconfigurations withinTADs are critical for the proper activation and inactivation of genes during development.”
InfluentialThe ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal
Ying, Q.-L., Wray, J., Nichols, J., Batlle-Morera, L., Doble, B., Woodgett, J., Cohen, P., & Smith, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06968 · Cited by 3,442 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We used well-established cellular models of early neural lineage commitment: (1) mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells cultured in GSK3/MEK inhibitors (“2i” conditions) representing a state of naïve pluripotency from the earliest stages of a preimplantation embryo (Ying et al. 2008);”
CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein
Lendahl, U., Zimmerman, L. B., & McKay, R. D. G. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90662-x · Cited by 3,164 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Since its discovery, the Nes genehasbeenawidelyreferencedmarkerofproliferatingNPCs (Lendahl et al. 1990; Park et al. 2010).”
Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre
Nora, E. P., Lajoie, B. R., Schulz, E. G., Giorgetti, L., Okamoto, I., Servant, N., Piolot, T., van Berkum, N. L., Meisig, J., Sedat, J., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11049 · Cited by 2,895 · cited 2× · see citing works
“CTCF is also enriched at the boundaries of TADs (Dixon et al. 2012; Nora et al. 2012), and deletion or inversion of these motifs can perturb domain boundaries and disrupt nearby gene expression (Dowen et al. 2014; de Wit et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2015; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Narendra et al. 2015;…”
Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells
Meissner, A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gu, H., Wernig, M., Hanna, J., Sivachenko, A., Zhang, X., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Jaffe, D. B., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07107 · Cited by 2,536 · cited 2× · see citing works
“DNAmethylation is a critical regulator of neural lineage commitment (Meissner et al. 2008) and CTCF binding (Renda et al.”
Chen, X., Han, X., Yuan, P., Fang, F., Huss, M., Vega, V. B., Wong, E., Orlov, Y. L., Zhang, W., Jiang, J., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.043 · Cited by 2,474 · cited 2× · see citing works
“across more than 100 mammalian cell types (Kim et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2008; Cuddapah et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2012; Maurano et al. 2015).”
Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions
Lupiáñez, D. G., Kraft, K., Heinrich, V., Krawitz, P., Brancati, F., Klopocki, E., Horn, D., Kayserili, H., Opitz, J. M., Laxova, R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004 · Cited by 2,132 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…of TADs (Dixon et al. 2012; Nora et al. 2012), and deletion or inversion of these motifs can perturb domain boundaries and disrupt nearby gene expression (Dowen et al. 2014; de Wit et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2015; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Narendra et al. 2015; Sanborn et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016).”
InfluentialFormation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion
Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Lu, C., Goloborodko, A., Abdennur, N., & Mirny, L. A. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.085 · Cited by 2,003 · see citing works
Sanborn, A. L., Rao, S. S. P., Huang, S.-C., Durand, N. C., Huntley, M. H., Jewett, A. I., Bochkov, I. D., Chinnappan, D., Cutkosky, A., Li, J., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1518552112 · Cited by 1,730 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In the context of the loop extrusion model, it is possible that YY1 works as an architectural protein to physically impedeloopextrusion(SupplementalFig.16C)withinlargerloops where extrusion is blocked by CTCF (Sanborn et al. 2015; Fudenberg et al. 2016).”
InfluentialChromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation
Dixon, J. R., Jung, I., Selvaraj, S., Shen, Y., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J. E., Lee, A. Y., Ye, Z., Kim, A., Rajagopal, N., Xie, W., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14222 · Cited by 1,646 · cited 2× · see citing works
“transcription is not deterministically regulated at the compartment level (Dixon et al. 2015).”
CTCF: Master Weaver of the Genome
Phillips‐Cremins, J. E., & Corces, V. G. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.001 · Cited by 1,540 · see citing works
Self-citationThe long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters
Sanyal, A., Lajoie, B. R., Jain, G., & Dekker, J. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11279 · Cited by 1,489 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Looping interactions and sub-TADs often link genes to developmentally regulated enhancers and are markedly reorganized be-tween cellular states (Tolhuis et al. 2002; Sanyal et al. 2012; Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013; Dowen et al. 2014; Smith et al. 2016).”
A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome
Shen, Y., Yue, F., McCleary, D. F., Ye, Z., Edsall, L., Kuan, S., Wagner, U., Dixon, J., Lee, L., Lobanenkov, V. V., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11243 · Cited by 1,361 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These results confirm and extend recent reports suggesting that there is a larger class of dynamically occupied CTCF sites than previously appreciated (Shen et al. 2012; Maurano et al. 2015).”
Looping and Interaction between Hypersensitive Sites in the Active β-globin Locus
Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.-J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F., & de Laat, W. (2002) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00781-5 · Cited by 1,344 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Looping interactions and sub-TADs often link genes to developmentally regulated enhancers and are markedly reorganized be-tween cellular states (Tolhuis et al. 2002; Sanyal et al. 2012; Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013; Dowen et al. 2014; Smith et al. 2016).”
Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas
Flavahan, W. A., Drier, Y., Liau, B. B., Gillespie, S. M., Venteicher, A. S., Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., Suvà, M. L., & Bernstein, B. E. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16490 · Cited by 1,288 · cited 3× · see citing works
“TAD structural integrity is critical for proper gene expression; perturbation of TAD boundaries leads to ectopic enhancer looping and aberrant activation of nontarget genes (Dowen et al. 2014; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Narendra et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016; Hnisz et al. 2016).”
Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment
Phillips-Cremins, J. E., Sauria, M. E. G., Sanyal, A., Gerasimova, T. I., Lajoie, B. R., Bell, J. S. K., Ong, C.-T., Hookway, T. A., Guo, C., Sun, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.053 · Cited by 1,187 · cited 3× · see citing works
“We and others have previously re-ported that pluripotency genes connect to enhancers in smaller looping interactions nested within larger constitutive structures (Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013; Dowen et al. 2014).”
Self-citationCTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function
Ong, C., & Corces, V. G. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3663 · Cited by 1,044 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is a ubiquitously expressed zinc finger protein implicated in the regulation of a wide range of genome functions including transcription, insulation, splicing, replication, recombination, and repair (Ong and Corces 2014).”
Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods
Hnisz, D., Weintraub, A. S., Day, D. S., Valton, A.-L., Bak, R. O., Li, C. H., Goldmann, J., Lajoie, B. R., Fan, Z. P., Sigova, A. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9024 · Cited by 1,042 · cited 4× · see citing works
“TAD structural integrity is critical for proper gene expression; perturbation of TAD boundaries leads to ectopic enhancer looping and aberrant activation of nontarget genes (Dowen et al. 2014; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Narendra et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016; Hnisz et al. 2016).”
InfluentialAnalysis of the Vertebrate Insulator Protein CTCF-Binding Sites in the Human Genome
Kim, T. H., Abdullaev, Z., Smith, A. D., Ching, K. A., Loukinov, D. I., Green, R. D., Zhang, M. Q., Lobanenkov, V. V., & Ren, B. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.048 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Genome-wide CTCF occupancy patterns have been mapped across more than 100 mammalian cell types (Kim et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2008; Cuddapah et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2012; Maurano et al. 2015).”
CTCF-Mediated Human 3D Genome Architecture Reveals Chromatin Topology for Transcription
Tang, Z., Luo, O. J., Li, X., Zheng, M., Zhu, J. J., Szalaj, P., Trzaskoma, P., Magalska, A., Wlodarczyk, J., Ruszczycki, B., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.024 · Cited by 982 · cited 3× · see citing works
“tive CTCF sites might form loops that create a preexisting topological framework ,within which critical developmentally dynamic chromatin interactions form (Symmons et al. 2014; Tang et al. 2015; Smith et al. 2016).”
CRISPR Inversion of CTCF Sites Alters Genome Topology and Enhancer/Promoter Function
Guo, Y., Xu, Q., Canzio, D., Shou, J., Li, J., Gorkin, D. U., Jung, I., Wu, H., Zhai, Y., Tang, Y., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.038 · Cited by 958 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…of TADs (Dixon et al. 2012; Nora et al. 2012), and deletion or inversion of these motifs can perturb domain boundaries and disrupt nearby gene expression (Dowen et al. 2014; de Wit et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2015; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Narendra et al. 2015; Sanborn et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016).”
Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes
Dowen, J. M., Fan, Z. P., Hnisz, D., Ren, G., Abraham, B. J., Zhang, L. N., Weintraub, A. S., Schuijers, J., Lee, T. I., Zhao, K., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.030 · Cited by 884 · cited 11× · see citing works
“highly dynamic architectural features exist: (1) small-scale contact domains termed sub-TADs (Phillips-Cremins et al. 2013; Dowen et al. 2014; Rao et al. 2014), and (2) loops (Rao et al.”
InfluentialDefining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse
Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Breault, D. T., & Hochedlinger, K. (2008) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.02.001 · Cited by 823 · cited 1× · see citing works
“5 ES cells (C57Bl6×129SvJae) and NPCs from mice maintained on a mixed C57Bl6/129SvJae background (Stadtfeld et al. 2008).”
Zhou, Q., Wang, S., & Anderson, D. J. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80898-3 · Cited by 789 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The Olig1 and Olig2 genes encode bHLH transcription factors involved in differentiation along the oligodendrocyte lineage (Zhou et al. 2000).”
Comparative Hi-C Reveals that CTCF Underlies Evolution of Chromosomal Domain Architecture
Vietri Rudan, M., Barrington, C., Henderson, S., Ernst, C., Odom, D. T., Tanay, A., & Hadjur, S. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.004 · Cited by 680 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Importantly, of the subset of loops bound by CTCF with clear consensus sequences, 92% were anchored by consensus sequences pointed toward each other in a convergent orientation (Rao et al. 2014; Vietri Rudan et al. 2015).”
CTCF Binding Polarity Determines Chromatin Looping
de Wit, E., Vos, E. S. M., Holwerda, S. J. B., Valdes-Quezada, C., Verstegen, M. J. A. M., Teunissen, H., Splinter, E., Wijchers, P. J., Krijger, P. H. L., & de Laat, W. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.09.023 · Cited by 641 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…of TADs (Dixon et al. 2012; Nora et al. 2012), and deletion or inversion of these motifs can perturb domain boundaries and disrupt nearby gene expression (Dowen et al. 2014; de Wit et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2015; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Narendra et al. 2015; Sanborn et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016).”
Cuddapah, S., Jothi, R., Schones, D. E., Roh, T.-Y., Cui, K., & Zhao, K. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.082800.108 · Cited by 637 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Seminal genome-wide CTCF occupancy studies based on two to three cell types initially suggested that the CTCF binding land-scaperemains largely unchangedacrossmammalian lineages(Kim et al. 2007; Cuddapah et al. 2009).”
InfluentialCTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells
Handoko, L., Han, X., Li, G., Ngan, C. Y., Chew, E. G. Y., Schnapp, M., Lee, C. W. H., Ye, C., Ping, J. L. H., Mulawadi, F. H., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.857 · Cited by 614 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CTCF is found at the base of looping interactions, and knockdown of the protein abrogates chromatin connections (Kurukuti et al. 2006; Hadjur et al. 2009; Handoko et al. 2011; Splinter et al. 2012).”
Widespread plasticity in CTCF occupancy linked to DNA methylation
Wang, H., Maurano, M. T., Qu, H., Varley, K. E., Gertz, J., Pauli, F., Lee, K., Canfield, T., Weaver, M., Sandstrom, R., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.136101.111 · Cited by 588 · cited 4× · see citing works
“across more than 100 mammalian cell types (Kim et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2008; Cuddapah et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2012; Maurano et al. 2015).”
InfluentialSelf-organization of domain structures by DNA-loop-extruding enzymes
Alipour, E., & Marko, J. F. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks925 · Cited by 540 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Marko, Mirny, Lieberman-Aiden and colleagues have posited that a chromatin molecular motor, such as cohesin/condensin, might extrude chromatin until blocked by architectural proteins, resulting in looped out chromatin (Alipour and Marko 2012; Sanborn et al. 2015; Fudenberg et al. 2016).”
Narendra, V., Rocha, P. P., An, D., Raviram, R., Skok, J. A., Mazzoni, E. O., & Reinberg, D. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1262088 · Cited by 535 · cited 2× · see citing works
“TAD structural integrity is critical for proper gene expression; perturbation of TAD boundaries leads to ectopic enhancer looping and aberrant activation of nontarget genes (Dowen et al. 2014; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Narendra et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016; Hnisz et al. 2016).”
Cohesins form chromosomal cis-interactions at the developmentally regulated IFNG locus
Hadjur, S., Williams, L. M., Ryan, N. K., Cobb, B. S., Sexton, T., Fraser, P., Fisher, A. G., & Merkenschlager, M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08079 · Cited by 525 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CTCF is found at the base of looping interactions, and knockdown of the protein abrogates chromatin connections (Kurukuti et al. 2006; Hadjur et al. 2009; Handoko et al. 2011; Splinter et al. 2012).”
Naive pluripotency is associated with global DNA hypomethylation
Leitch, H. G., McEwen, K. R., Turp, A., Encheva, V., Carroll, T., Grabole, N., Mansfield, W., Nashun, B., Knezovich, J. G., Smith, A., et al. (2013) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2510 · Cited by 516 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…severely between 2i and serum conditions due to the known hypo-methylated state of naïve pluripotent stem cells (Ficz et al. 2013; Habibi et al. 2013; Leitch et al. 2013), but we observed only a relatively minor reduction in CTCF occupancy between ES 2i and ES serum ( “ 2i only ” class, n = 8832).”
Kurukuti, S., Tiwari, V. K., Tavoosidana, G., Pugacheva, E., Murrell, A., Zhao, Z., Lobanenkov, V., Reik, W., & Ohlsson, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600326103 · Cited by 511 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CTCF is found at the base of looping interactions, and knockdown of the protein abrogates chromatin connections (Kurukuti et al. 2006; Hadjur et al. 2009; Handoko et al. 2011; Splinter et al. 2012).”
Habibi, E., Brinkman, A. B., Arand, J., Kroeze, L. I., Kerstens, H. H. D., Matarese, F., Lepikhov, K., Gut, M., Heath, I. B., Hubner, N. C., et al. (2013) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.06.002 · Cited by 470 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…state of hypomethylation across the genome Schematic depicting a CTCF-mediated constitutive interaction, present across all early stages of neural lineage commitment, and a YY1-mediated gene-enhancer interaction, present only in NPCs. (Ficz et al. 2013; Habibi et al. 2013; Leitch et al. 2013).”
Functional and topological characteristics of mammalian regulatory domains
Symmons, O., Uslu, V. V., Tsujimura, T., Ruf, S., Nassari, S., Schwarzer, W., Ettwiller, L., & Spitz, F. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.163519.113 · Cited by 455 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A leading hypothesis is that sub-TAD/TAD boundaries, anchored by constitutive CTCF, might constrain developmentally regulated enhancers from aberrantly looping to off-target genes (Dowen et al. 2014; Symmons et al. 2014; Lupiáñez et al. 2015; Flavahan et al. 2016; Hnisz et al. 2016).”
Ficz, G., Hore, T. A., Santos, F., Lee, H. J., Dean, W., Arand, J., Krueger, F., Oxley, D., Paul, Y., Walter, J., et al. (2013) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.06.004 · Cited by 387 · cited 9× · see citing works
“These results suggested that CTCF might not be the critical architectural protein connecting developmentally regulated looping interactions that arise de novo in differentiated NPCs.”
InfluentialNestin Is Required for the Proper Self-Renewal of Neural Stem Cells
Park, D., Xiang, A. P., Mao, F. F., Zhang, L., Di, C.-G., Liu, X., Shao, Y., Ma, B., Lee, J., Ha, K., et al. (2010) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.541 · Cited by 332 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Since its discovery, the Nes genehasbeenawidelyreferencedmarkerofproliferatingNPCs (Lendahl et al. 1990; Park et al. 2010).”
The second decade of 3C technologies: detailed insights into nuclear organizationPreprint
Denker, A., & de Laat, W. (2016) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.281964.116 · Cited by 323 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent advances in proximity-ligation and deep-sequencing technologies have enabled the interrogation of genome organization at a genome-wide scale and nucleosome resolution (de Laat and Dekker 2012; Denker and de Laat 2016).”
Role of DNA Methylation in Modulating Transcription Factor Occupancy
Maurano, M. T., Wang, H., John, S., Shafer, A., Canfield, T., Lee, K., & Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A. (2015) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.024 · Cited by 281 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Genome-wide CTCF occupancy patterns have been mapped across more than 100 mammalian cell types (Kim et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2008; Cuddapah et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2012; Maurano et al. 2015).”
InfluentialThe Transcription Factor Yin Yang 1 Is Essential for Oligodendrocyte Progenitor Differentiation
He, Y., Dupree, J. L., Wang, J., Sandoval, J., Li, J., Liu, H., Shi, Y., Nave, K. A., & Casaccia‐Bonnefil, P. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.029 · Cited by 263 · cited 2× · see citing works
“2016); and (4) it is required for proper neural development (He et al. 2007).”
CTCF/cohesin-mediated DNA looping is required for protocadherin α promoter choice
Guo, Y., Monahan, K., Wu, H., Gertz, J., Varley, K. E., Li, W., Myers, R. M., Maniatis, T., & Wu, Q. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1219280110 · Cited by 258 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, CTCF binding is also required for the differential expression of protocadherin ( Pcdh) isoforms that enable branching neurites to self-recognize (Guo et al. 2012).”
Identification of a Ctcf Cofactor, Yy1, for the X Chromosome Binary Switch
Donohoe, M. E., Zhang, L., Xu, N., Shi, Y., & Lee, J. T. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.017 · Cited by 239 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Biochemical studies have indicated that the zinc fingers of YY1 may interact with the N terminus of CTCF (Donohoe et al. 2007), suggesting that YY1 could anchor loops via homodimerization (Supplemental Fig.”
Splinter, E., de Wit, E., van de Werken, H. J. G., Klous, P., & de Laat, W. L. (2012) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.04.009 · Cited by 224 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CTCF is found at the base of looping interactions, and knockdown of the protein abrogates chromatin connections (Kurukuti et al. 2006; Hadjur et al. 2009; Handoko et al. 2011; Splinter et al. 2012).”
CRISPR Reveals a Distal Super-Enhancer Required for Sox2 Expression in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells
Li, Y., Rivera, C. M., Ishii, H., Jin, F., Selvaraj, S., Lee, A. Y., Dixon, J. R., & Ren, B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114485 · Cited by 212 · cited 1× · see citing works
“4A,B, magenta arrowhead; Li et al. 2014).”
Dissecting neural differentiation regulatory networks through epigenetic footprinting
Ziller, M. J., Edri, R., Yaffe, Y., Donaghey, J., Pop, R., Mallard, W., Issner, R., Gifford, C. A., Goren, A., Xing, J. C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13990 · Cited by 197 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Importantly, a large proportion of genomic loci that are methylated in NPCs maintain the mark through the duration of neural development (Ziller et al. 2015; Sharma et al. 2016).”
CTCF Is Required for Neural Development and Stochastic Expression of Clustered Pcdh Genes in Neurons
Hirayama, T., Tarusawa, E., Yoshimura, Y., Galjart, N., & Yagi, T. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.06.014 · Cited by 180 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Moreover, Ctcf knockout in post-mitotic cortical and hippocampal neurons (Hirayama et al. 2012), or the hippocampus more broadly (Sams et al.”
Ficz, G., Hore, T. A., Santos, F., Lee, H. J., Dean, W., Arand, J., Krueger, F., Oxley, D., Paul, Y., Walter, J., et al. (2013) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/1868-7083-5-s1-s2 · Cited by 164 · cited 8× · see citing works
“These results suggested that CTCF might not be the critical architectural protein connecting developmentally regulated looping interactions that arise de novo in differentiated NPCs.”
InfluentialCritical DNA Binding Interactions of the Insulator Protein CTCF
Renda, M., Baglivo, I., Burgess-Beusse, B. L., Esposito, S., Fattorusso, R., Felsenfeld, G., & Pedone, P. V. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m706213200 · Cited by 152 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DNAmethylationisacriticalregula-tor of neural lineage commitment (Meissner et al. 2008) and CTCF binding (Renda et al. 2007).”
Smith, E. M., Lajoie, B. R., Jain, G., & Dekker, J. (2016) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.12.002 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Medvedovic, J., Ebert, A., Tagoh, H., Tamir, I., Schwickert, T. A., Novatchkova, M., Sun, Q., Veld, P. J. H. I. ’., Guo, C., Yoon, H. S., et al. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.08.011 · Cited by 136 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…looping interactions in human cell lines (Rao et al. 2014); (2) it is necessary for the formation of specific 3D interactions in B cells (Medvedovic et al. 2013); (3) it can connect a long-range interaction in B cells in the absence of its transcriptional activation domain (Mehra et al.…”
Beagan, J. A., Gilgenast, T. G., Kim, J., Plona, Z., Norton, H. K., Hu, G., Hsu, S. C., Shields, E. J., Lyu, X., Apostolou, E., et al. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.004 · Cited by 134 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Our NPC cultures exhibited a highly consistent morphology throughout the population, and >90% were SOX2 positive (Beagan et al. 2016), suggesting that our NPC preparations”
InfluentialSelf-citationSuper-Enhancers at the Nanog Locus Differentially Regulate Neighboring Pluripotency-Associated Genes
Blinka, S. M., Reimer, M. H., Pulakanti, K., & Rao, S. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Galonska, C., Ziller, M. J., Karnik, R., & Meissner, A. (2015) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.005 · Cited by 118 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(2) ES cells cultured in serum/LIF representing a slightly more mature state of pluripotency with increased poising of developmentally regulated genes (Galonska et al. 2015); and (3) primary multipotent neural progenitor cells (NPCs) representing the earli-”
Sams, D. S., Nardone, S., Getselter, D., Raz, D., Tal, M., Rayi, P. R., Kaphzan, H., Hakim, O., & Elliott, E. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.004 · Cited by 92 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Moreover, Ctcf knockout in post-mitotic cortical and hippocampal neurons (Hirayama et al. 2012), or the hippocampus more broadly (Sams et al. 2016), resulted in defects in gene expression, synaptic connectivity, and learning and memory behavior.”
3C-based technologies to study the shape of the genome
de Laat, W., & Dekker, J. (2012) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.11.005 · Cited by 84 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent advances in proximity-ligation and deep-sequencing technologies have enabled the interrogation of genome organization at a genome-wide scale and nucleosome resolution (de Laat and Dekker 2012; Denker and de Laat 2016).”
Schwalie, P., Ward, M. C., Cain, C. E., Faure, A. J., Gilad, Y., Odom, D., & Flicek, P. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r148 · Cited by 83 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Furthermore, a recent genomics analysis showed that up to 30% of YY1 sites bind at locations directly adjacent to CTCF and might work together to co-operatively influence occupancy (Schwalie et al. 2013).”
Dual Effect of CTCF Loss on Neuroprogenitor Differentiation and Survival
Watson, L. A., Wang, X., Elbert, A., Kernohan, K. D., Galjart, N., & Bérubé, N. G. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3769-13.2014 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Conditional knockdown of Ctcf at early, embryonic stagesofmousedevelopmenttriggeredmarkedapoptosisofprima-ryneuralprogenitorcells(NPCs),prematureneurogenesis,anddis-ruption of tissue architecture (Watson et al. 2014).”
YY1 controls Igκ repertoire and B‐cell development, and localizes with condensin on the Igκ locus
Pan, X., Papasani, M. R., Hao, Y., Calamito, M., Wei, F., Quinn, W. J., Basu, A., Wang, J., Hodawadekar, S., Zápražná, K., et al. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.66 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Previous studies have shown that the REPO domain of YY1 physically interacts with cohesin (Pan et al. 2013).”
HiFive: a tool suite for easy and efficient HiC and 5C data analysis
Sauria, M. E. G., Phillips‐Cremins, J. E., Corces, V. G., & Taylor, J. (2015) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0806-y · Cited by 59 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Briefly, 5C primer biases were corrected by adapting and modifying the Express matrix balancing algorithm (Sauria et al. 2015).”
Self-citationPrinciples Governing DNA Methylation during Neuronal Lineage and Subtype Specification
Sharma, A., Klein, S. L., Barboza, L., Lodhi, N., & Tóth, M. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4037-15.2016 · Cited by 47 · cited 6× · see citing works
“…mature state of pluripotency with increased poising of developmentally regulated genes (Galonska et al. 2015); and (3) primary multipotent neural progenitor cells (NPCs) representing the earliest departure from pluripotency and commitment to lineages in the mammalian brain (Sharma et al. 2016).”
InfluentialYY1 controls Eμ-3′RR DNA loop formation and immunoglobulin heavy chain class switch recombination
Mehra, P., Gerasimova, T. I., Basu, A., Jha, V., Banerjee, A., Sindhava, V. J., Gray, F., Berry, C. T., Sen, R., & Atchison, M. L. (2016) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2016000372 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture
Rowley, M. J., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0060-8 · Cited by 1,171 · see citing works
Long-range enhancer–promoter contacts in gene expression control
Schoenfelder, S., & Fraser, P. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
YY1 Is a Structural Regulator of Enhancer-Promoter Loops
Weintraub, A. S., Li, C. H., Zamudio, A. V., Sigova, A. A., Hannett, N. M., Day, D. S., Abraham, B. J., Cohen, M. A., Nabet, B., Buckley, D. L., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.008 · Cited by 992 · see citing works
“As this manuscript was completed, a paper appeared reporting that YY1 is present at the base of interactions between neuronal precursor cell-specific enhancers and genes and that YY1 knockdown causes a loss of these interactions (Beagan et al., 2017).”
Resolving the 3D Landscape of Transcription-Linked Mammalian Chromatin Folding
Hsieh, T.-H. S., Cattoglio, C., Slobodyanyuk, E., Hansen, A. S., Rando, O. J., Tjian, R., & Darzacq, X. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.002 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Hsieh, T.-H. S., Cattoglio, C., Slobodyanyuk, E., Hansen, A. S., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01223-8 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Live-cell imaging reveals enhancer-dependent Sox2 transcription in the absence of enhancer proximity
Alexander, J. M., Guan, J., Li, B., Maliskova, L., Song, M., Shen, Y., Huang, B., Lomvardas, S., & Weiner, O. D. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41769 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
The relationship between genome structure and function
Oudelaar, A. M., & Higgs, D. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-00303-x · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Promoter-proximal CTCF binding promotes distal enhancer-dependent gene activation
Kubo, N., Ishii, H., Xiong, X., Bianco, S., Meitinger, F., Hu, R., Hocker, J. D., Conte, M., Gorkin, D., Yu, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-00539-5 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Predicting 3D genome folding from DNA sequence with Akita
Fudenberg, G., Kelley, D. R., & Pollard, K. S. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0958-x · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Chromatin structure dynamics during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition
Zhang, H., Emerson, D. J., Gilgenast, T. G., Titus, K. R., Lan, Y., Huang, P., Zhang, D., Wang, H., Keller, C. A., Giardine, B., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1778-y · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent evidence that TADs and chromatin loops are dynamic structures
Hansen, A. S., Cattoglio, C., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2018) · Nucleus · doi:10.1080/19491034.2017.1389365 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Disease-Associated Short Tandem Repeats Co-localize with Chromatin Domain Boundaries
Sun, J. H., Zhou, L., Emerson, D. J., Phyo, S. A., Titus, K. R., Gong, W., Gilgenast, T. G., Beagan, J. A., Davidson, B. L., Tassone, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.005 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Why of YY1: Mechanisms of Transcriptional Regulation by Yin Yang 1
Verheul, T. C. J., van Hijfte, L., Perenthaler, E., & Barakat, T. S. (2020) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.592164 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Giammartino, D. C. D., Kloetgen, A., Polyzos, A., Liu, Y., Kim, D., Murphy, D., Abuhashem, A., Cavaliere, P., Aronson, B. E., Shah, V., et al. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0390-6 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
A Muscle-Specific Enhancer RNA Mediates Cohesin Recruitment and Regulates Transcription In trans
Tsai, P.-F., Dell’Orso, S., Rodriguez, J., Vivanco, K. O., Ko, K.-D., Jiang, K., Juan, A. H., Sarshad, A. A., Vian, L., Tran, M. D., et al. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.008 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
“…of transcriptional activators and coactivators, such as Mediator (Lai et al., 2013), the CBP acetyltransferase (Bose et al., 2017), the negative elongation factor NELF (Schaukowitch et al., 2014), or transcription factors (Sigova et al., 2015) (Beagan et al., 2017) (Weintraub et al., 2017).”
BackgroundWAPL maintains a cohesin loading cycle to preserve cell-type-specific distal gene regulation
Liu, N. Q., Maresca, M., van den Brand, T., Braccioli, L., Schijns, M. M. G. A., Teunissen, H., Bruneau, B. G., Nora, E. P., & de Wit, E. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00744-4 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Uyehara, C. M., & Apostolou, E. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112068 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Beagan, J. A., Pastuzyn, E. D., Fernandez, L. R., Guo, M. H., Feng, K., Titus, K. R., Chandrashekar, H., Shepherd, J. D., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0634-6 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
“…the intrinsic biases in 5C data, binned maps to 4-kb matrix resolution, and applied our previously published modeling approaches to identify loops with statistically significant interaction frequency above the local distance-dependence and TAD or subTAD background 27,28,34 (Extended Data Fig.”
MethodSelf-citationDeveloping in 3D: the role of CTCF in cell differentiation
Arzate‐Mejía, R. G., Targa, F. R., & Corces, V. G. (2018) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.137729 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“CTCF occupancy across cell types is variable (Beagan et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2012; Martin et al., 2011; Maurano et al., 2015; Prickett et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2012).”
BackgroundAcute depletion of CTCF directly affects MYC regulation through loss of enhancer–promoter looping
Hyle, J. W., Zhang, Y., Wright, S., Xu, B., Shao, Y., Easton, J. B., Tian, L., Feng, R., Xu, P., & Li, C. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz462 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Genome-wide analyses of chromatin interactions after the loss of Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III
Jiang, Y.-P., Huang, J., Lun, K., Li, B., Zheng, H., Li, Y.-J., Zhou, R., Duan, W.-J., Wang, C., Feng, Y.-Q., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02067-3 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
LADL: light-activated dynamic looping for endogenous gene expression control
Kim, J. H., Rege, M., Valeri, J., Dunagin, M. C., Metzger, A., Titus, K. R., Gilgenast, T. G., Gong, W., Beagan, J. A., Raj, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0436-5 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationRhie, S., Perez, A. A., Lay, F. D., Schreiner, S., Shi, J., Polin, J., & Farnham, P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12079-8 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Patten, D. K., Corleone, G., Győrffy, B., Perone, Y., Slaven, N., Barozzi, I., Erdős, E., Saiakhova, A., Goddard, K. S., Vingiani, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0091-x · Cited by 129 · see citing works
The Mediator complex regulates enhancer-promoter interactions
Ramasamy, S., Aljahani, A., Karpińska, M. A., Cao, T. B. N., Velychko, T., Cruz, J., Lidschreiber, M., & Oudelaar, A. M. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01027-2 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Tome, J. M., Tippens, N. D., & Lis, J. T. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0234-5 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Chakraborty, S., Kopitchinski, N., Zuo, Z., Eraso, A., Awasthi, P., Chari, R., Mitra, A., Tobias, I. C., Moorthy, S. D., Dale, R. K., et al. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01295-6 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Looping the Genome with SMC Complexes
Kim, E., Barth, R., & Dekker, C. (2023) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-032620-110506 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
G-quadruplexes associated with R-loops promote CTCF binding
Wulfridge, P., Yan, Q., Rell, N., Doherty, J. K., Jacobson, S., Offley, S. R., Deliard, S., Feng, K., Phillips‐Cremins, J. E., Gardini, A., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.009 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationBarrington, C., Georgopoulou, D., Pezic, D., Varsally, W., Herrero, J., & Hadjur, S. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10725-9 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
A TAD boundary is preserved upon deletion of the CTCF-rich Firre locus
Barutcu, A. R., Maass, P., Lewandowski, J. P., Weiner, C. L., & Rinn, J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03614-0 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
CTCF as a boundary factor for cohesin-mediated loop extrusion: evidence for a multi-step mechanism
Hansen, A. S. (2020) · Nucleus · doi:10.1080/19491034.2020.1782024 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Popay, T. M., & Dixon, J. R. (2022) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102117 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“(149) identified a subset of CTCFindependent chromatin interactions in mouse NPCs that were bound by YY1, with YY1 knockdown causing a loss of these long-range contacts.”
BackgroundGabriele, M., Lopez Tobon, A., D'Agostino, G., & Testa, G. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.12.013 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Epigenetic regulation of human papillomavirus transcription in the productive virus life cycle
Burley, M., Roberts, S., & Parish, J. L. (2020) · Seminars in Immunopathology · doi:10.1007/s00281-019-00773-0 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“CTCF and YY1 have been previously shown to directly interact and co-operate in the stabilization of chromatin loops between distant loci in the human genome, providing an alternative mechanism of chromatin organization [99, 100].”
BackgroundMapping the Global Chromatin Connectivity Network for Sox2 Function in Neural Stem Cell Maintenance
Bertolini, J. A., Favaro, R., Zhu, Y., Pagin, M., Ngan, C. Y., Wong, C., Tjong, H., Vermunt, M. W., Martynoga, B., Barone, C., et al. (2019) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.02.004 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Intriguingly, in neural progenitor cells (NPCs), YY1 is bound to a large subset of NPC-specific promoter-enhancer interactions (Beagan et al., 2017).”
BackgroundIntegrating ChIP-seq with other functional genomics data
Jiang, S., & Mortazavi, A. (2018) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/ely002 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Quevedo, M., Meert, L., Dekker, M. R., Dekkers, D. H. W., Brandsma, J. H., van den Berg, D. L. C., Özgür, Z., van IJcken, W. F. J., Demmers, J., Fornerod, M. W. J., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10502-8 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Wang, W., Qiao, S., Li, G., Cheng, J., Yang, C., Chen, Z., Stovall, D. B., Shi, J., Teng, C., Li, D., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac233 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Llères, D., Moindrot, B., Pathak, R., Piras, V., Matelot, M., Pignard, B., Marchand, A., Poncelet, M., Perrin, A., Tellier, V., et al. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1896-8 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Xiao, T., Li, X., & Felsenfeld, G. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2023127118 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“YY1 interacts with the SMC1 subunit of cohesin (44) and helps stabilize promoter–enhancer interactions in the genome (43, 45).”
BackgroundForces driving the three‐dimensional folding of eukaryotic genomes
Rada-Iglesias, Á., Grosveld, F. G., & Papantonis, A. (2018) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20188214 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Similarly, although cohesin and TADs may facilitate the establishment of long-range enhancer – gene interactions, these might still occur at most genes on the basis of additional non-mutually exclusive mechanisms (e.g., via YY1 or compartmentalization), thus enabling gene expression homeostasis and interaction specifi…”
Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters
Ray-Jones, H., & Spivakov, M. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03903-w · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“YY1 does not seem to co-localise with CTCF [365] and instead has been proposed to associate with cohesin independently, in a manner analogous to CTCF itself [295].”
BackgroundUnderstanding the 3D genome: Emerging impacts on human disease
Krumm, A., & Duan, Z. (2018) · Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.07.004 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Pentland, I., Campos-León, K., Cotic, M., Davies, K.-J., Wood, C. D., Groves, I. J., Burley, M., Coleman, N., Stockton, J., Noyvert, B., et al. (2018) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2005752 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
The human leukemia virus HTLV-1 alters the structure and transcription of host chromatin in cis
Melamed, A., Yaguchi, H., Miura, M., Witkover, A., Fitzgerald, T. W., Birney, E., & Bangham, C. R. M. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.36245 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Gain of CTCF-Anchored Chromatin Loops Marks the Exit from Naive Pluripotency
Pękowska, A., Klaus, B., Xiang, W., Severino, J., Daigle, N., Klein, F. A., Oleś, M., Casellas, R., Ellenberg, J., Steinmetz, L. M., et al. (2018) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.09.003 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“Consistent with recently published results (Beagan et al., 2017), we identified more CTCF peaks in ESCs than NSCs (61,560 and 44,848 CTCF peaks in ESCs and”
ResultPerenthaler, E., Yousefi, S., Niggl, E., & Barakat, T. S. (2019) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2019.00352 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“These enhancer-promoter loops, similarly to the CTCF-mediated loops, are thought to be established by the binding and dimerization of the TF YY1 and its interaction with the cohesin complex (Figure 1) (Beagan et al., 2017; Weintraub et al., 2017).”
BackgroundEpigenetic control of transcriptional regulation in pluripotency and early differentiation
Gökbuget, D., & Blelloch, R. H. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.164772 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
“Two recent studies identified the TF YY1 as such a factor, demonstrating that YY1 binding at promoters and enhancers is necessary for looping and proper cognate gene expression in naïve ESCs and during ESC to NPC differentiation (Beagan et al., 2017;Weintraub et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSynthetic regulatory genomics uncovers enhancer context dependence at the Sox2 locus
Brosh, R., Coelho, C., Ribeiro-dos-Santos, A. M., Ellis, G., Hogan, M. S., Ashe, H. J., Somogyi, N., Ordóñez, R., Luther, R. D., Huang, E., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.02.027 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions in Higher Eukaryotes
Georgiev, P. G., & Kyrchanova, O. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22020671 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“YY1 is predominantly associated with gene enhancers and promoters, which is consistent with a potential role in distance interactions [88,89].”
BackgroundInfluentialTranscription factors: building hubs in the 3D space
Giammartino, D. C. D., Polyzos, A., & Apostolou, E. (2020) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2020.1805238 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Other examples of TFs mediating enhancer–promoter contacts include Nanog [105] and Sox2 [103] in pluripotent stem cells, GATA1 [106] and Klf1 [22] in erythrocytes, Pax3 [104] and MyoD [96] during myogenesis, Pax5 [102] in B cell differentiation, Notch [38] in the context of cancer and YY1 in various cell types [39,107…”
BackgroundCTCF is a barrier for 2C-like reprogramming
Olbrich, T., Vega-Sendino, M., Tillo, D., Wu, W., Zolnerowich, N., Pavani, R., Tran, A. D., Domingo, C. N., Franco, M., Markiewicz-Potoczny, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25072-x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The interdependence of gene-regulatory elements and the 3D genome
Vermunt, M. W., Zhang, D., & Blobel, G. A. (2018) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201809040 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“While some proteins act in a more cell type–specific manner (e.g., GATA1, Ldb1, and EKLF at the βglobin locus in erythroblasts [Drissen et al., 2004; Vakoc et al., 2005; Song et al., 2007], TAF3 in mESCs [Liu et al., 2011], and SATB1 in thymocytes [Cai et al., 2006]), others are thought to serve as more general loopin…”
BackgroundInfluentialWulfridge, P., & Sarma, K. (2024) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-024-01437-4 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“127).”
Cresswell, K. G., Stansfield, J. C., & Dozmorov, M. G. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03652-w · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“, STAG2, SMC3, SMC1A, RAD21, MED12) (Splinter et al. 2006; Dixon et al. 2012; Rao et al. 2014, 2014; Beagan et al. 2017; Sanyal et al. 2012; Tang et al. 2015; Phillips and Corces 2009; Handoko et al. 2011; Vietri Rudan et al. 2015; Corces and Corces 2016; Zuin et al. 2014; Sofueva et al. 2013), marks of transcriptiona…”
BackgroundLDB1 establishes multi-enhancer networks to regulate gene expression
Aboreden, N. G., Lam, J. C., Goel, V. Y., Wang, S., Wang, X., Midla, S. C., Quijano, A., Keller, C. A., Giardine, B. M., Hardison, R. C., et al. (2025) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.11.037 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Enhancer-gene specificity in development and disease
Pachano, T., Haro, E., & Rada-Iglesias, Á. (2022) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.186536 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Molecular architecture of enhancer–promoter interaction
Hamamoto, K., & Fukaya, T. (2022) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2022.01.003 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Hong, T., Parameswaran, S., Donmez, O., Miller, D. E., Forney, C., Lape, M., Ribeiro, M. S. J., Liang, J., Edsall, L. E., Magnusen, A., et al. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.264705.120 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“Other TFs, such as YY1 andCTCF, can affect the three-dimensional structure of chromatin by facilitating the formation of novel chromatin loops that alter gene transcription (Beagan et al. 2017; Weintraub et al. 2017).”
Xu, C., Tsai, Y., Galbo, P. M., Gong, W., Storey, A. J., Xu, Y., Byrum, S. D., Xu, L., Whang, Y. E., Parker, J. S., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab252 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“In addition to serving as a transcriptional regulator through direct binding to consensus motifs (such as CCAT sites at the PFKP promoter), YY1 was recently shown to function as a three-dimensional (3D) genome ‘organizer’ through interaction with 3D-genome regulator such as CTCF, thereby mediating formation of looping…”
BackgroundSong, Y., Liang, Z., Zhang, J., Hu, G.-C., Wang, J.-H., Li, Y.-Y., Guo, R., Dong, X.-T., Babarinde, I. A., Ping, W., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110626 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Regulatory architecture of housekeeping genes is driven by promoter assemblies
Déjosez, M., Dall’Agnese, A., Ramamoorthy, M., Platt, J. M., Yin, X., Hogan, M. S., Brosh, R., Weintraub, A. S., Hnisz, D., Abraham, B. J., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112505 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“14,17 In both cases, there are many additional factors and components that contribute to proper gene regulation, but the concept that gene regulation is linked to chromosome architecture is now extended to housekeeping gene clusters through promoter-promoter interaction.”
InfluentialRegulation of Chromatin Structure During Neural Development
Kishi, Y., & Gotoh, Y. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00874 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Function and regulation of chromatin insulators in dynamic genome organization
Chen, D., & Lei, E. P. (2019) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2019.02.001 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“CTCF occupancy sharply decreases during the transition between multipotent to neural progenitor cells (NPCs) [52], and CTCF is required for survival of neural progenitor cells, as well as prevention of their premature differentiation [53].”
BackgroundYin Yang 1 sustains biosynthetic demands during brain development in a stage-specific manner
Zurkirchen, L., Varum, S., Giger, S., Klug, A., Häusel, J., Bossart, R., Zemke, M., Cantù, C., Atak, Z. K., Zamboni, N., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09823-5 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Chovanec, P., Collier, A. J., Krueger, C., Várnai, C., Semprich, C. I., Schoenfelder, S., Corcoran, A. E., & Rugg‐Gunn, P. J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22201-4 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
3D genome, on repeat: Higher-order folding principles of the heterochromatinized repetitive genome
Haws, S. A., Simándi, Z., Barnett, R. J., & Phillips‐Cremins, J. E. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.052 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationPereira, A., Diwakar, J., Masserdotti, G., Beşkardeş, S., Simon, T., So, Y., Martín-Loarte, L., Bergemann, F., Vasan, L., Schauer, T., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01677-5 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
FoxP3 associates with enhancer-promoter loops to regulate Treg-specific gene expressionPreprint
Ramírez, R. N., Chowdhary, K., Léon, J., Mathis, D. J., & Benoist, C. O. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.11.12.468430 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Evolution of 3D chromatin organization at different scales
Acemel, R. D., & Lupiáñez, D. G. (2023) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2022.102019 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Ma, L., Yu, L., Jiang, B., Wang, J., Guo, X., Huang, Y., Ren, J., Sun, N., Gao, D. S., Ding, H., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20210920 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Recent studies suggest that TFs also control gene expression, possibly via their binding to the enhancers or silencers at distal upstream/downstream of the targeted gene promoter (Ba et al., 2020; Beagan et al., 2017; Lin et al., 2019; Nolis et al., 2009; Ogbourne and Antalis, 1998; Park et al., 2014; Thurman et al.,…”
BackgroundYY1-controlled regulatory connectivity and transcription are influenced by the cell cycle
Lam, J. C., Aboreden, N. G., Midla, S. C., Wang, S., Huang, A., Keller, C. A., Giardine, B. M., Henderson, K. A., Hardison, R. C., Zhang, H., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01871-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Another study based on observations in neuronal progenitor cells suggested that YY1-anchored loops form within encompassing CTCF-bound structural loops 39 .”
Ji, H. Y., Uyan, Ö., Yan, K., Liu, T., Zhu, Q., Tóthová, Z., Botten, G. A., Xu, J., Yuan, G., Dekker, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26574-4 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The macro and micro of chromosome conformation capture
Goel, V. Y., & Hansen, A. S. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.395 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“…rewiring of structure during development underscored the dynamism of nuclear architecture and helped shift the field from a fairly cell-type invariant view of chromatin spatial organization toward a more cell-type-specific one (Beagan et al., 2017; Bonev et al., 2017; Pękowska et al., 2018).”
Hi-TrAC reveals division of labor of transcription factors in organizing chromatin loops
Liu, S., Cao, Y.-Q., Cui, K.-R., Tang, Q.-S., & Zhao, K.-J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34276-8 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
p63 cooperates with CTCF to modulate chromatin architecture in skin keratinocytes
Qu, J., Yi, G., & Zhou, H. (2019) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-019-0280-y · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Shen, C., Feng, X., Mao, T., Yang, D., Zou, J., Zao, X., Deng, Q., Chen, X., & Lu, F. (2020) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2020.1840311 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“have found that YY1 is a structural regulator of enhancer-promoter chromatin loops [16,29], and the expression of YY1 was increased during HBV infec-”
BackgroundPBRM1 Regulates Stress Response in Epithelial Cells
Porter, E. G. P., Dhiman, A., Chowdhury, B., Carter, B. C., Lin, H., Stewart, J. C., Kazemian, M., Wendt, M. K., & Dykhuizen, E. C. (2019) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2019.04.027 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Kwon, D. Y., Xu, B., Zhao, Y.-T., Beagan, J. A., Beagan, J. A., Cui, Y., Xu, B., Zaitseva, D., Phillips‐Cremins, J. E., Blendy, J. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27571-3 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationRoles Played by YY1 in Embryonic, Adult and Cancer Stem Cells
Martinez‐Ruíz, G. U., Morales‐Sánchez, A., & Pacheco-Hernandez, A. F. (2021) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-021-10151-9 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Hsieh, T.-H. S., Cattoglio, C., Slobodyanyuk, E., Hansen, A. S., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.14.452365 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Snetkova, V., & Skok, J. A. (2018) · Epigenomics · doi:10.2217/epi-2017-0157 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Nazim, M., Lin, C.-H., Feng, A., Xiao, W., Yeom, K., Li, M., Daly, A. E., Tan, X., Vu, H., Ernst, J., et al. (2024) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2024.04.001 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
High-resolution dynamic imaging of chromatin DNA communication using Oligo-LiveFISH
Zhu, Y., Balaji, A., Han, M., Andronov, L. P., Roy, A. R., Wei, Z., Chen, C., Miles, L., Cai, S., Gu, Z., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.03.032 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Lee, D.-I., & Roy, S. (2021) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02378-z · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“In particular, we recovered YY1/2 proteins that have been shown to interact with CTCF to establish long-range regulatory programs during lineage commitment [62].”
Meléndez-Ramírez, C., Durán, R. C., Barrios‐García, T., Giacoman-Lozano, M., López-Ornelas, A., Herrera-Gamboa, J. G., Estudillo, E., Soto‐Reyes, E., Velasco, I., & Treviño, V. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96263-1 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Genome organization at different scales: nature, formation and function
Serizay, J., & Ahringer, J. (2018) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2018.03.009 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Similarly, during early neural lineage commitment, enrichment of transcription factor YY1 at a set of pre-established regulatory loops is associated with transcription activation [33].”
BackgroundHIFI: estimating DNA-DNA interaction frequency from Hi-C data at restriction-fragment resolution
Cameron, C. J. F., Dostie, J., & Blanchette, M. (2020) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1913-y · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Spatially coordinated heterochromatinization of long synaptic genes in fragile X syndrome
Malachowski, T., Chandradoss, K., Boya, R., Zhou, L., Cook, A. L., Su, C., Pham, K., Haws, S. A., Kim, J. H., Ryu, H.-S., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.019 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvances and Limitations of Current Epigenetic Studies Investigating Mammalian Axonal Regeneration
Palmisano, I., & Giovanni, S. D. (2018) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-018-0636-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
TF-COMB – Discovering grammar of transcription factor binding sites
Bentsen, M. S., Heger, V., Schultheis, H., Kuenne, C. T., & Looso, M. (2022) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.025 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Additionally, SMC3 is an essential component of cohesin [48], and YY1 has been shown to mediate 3D chromatin interactions in collaboration with CTCF [49].”
Evolution of Regulated Transcription
Bylino, O. V., Ibragimov, A. N., & Shidlovskii, Y. V. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071675 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Three-dimensional chromatin organization in cardiac development and disease
Bertero, A., & Rosa‐Garrido, M. (2020) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2020.11.008 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“promoter looping during mouse cardiac development [80], possibly through Ctcf-independent stalling of cohesin extrusion and/or through Yy1 dimerization [81,82].”
BackgroundAguilar, M. R., & Prieto, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.672489 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
CTCF and Its Partners: Shaper of 3D Genome during Development
Sun, X., Zhang, J., & Cao, C. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13081383 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“More importantly, as a CTCF’s partner, the interactions mediated by YY1 between regulatory elements are often in CTCF-anchored constituent loops [47].”
BackgroundGene regulation in adult neural stem cells. Current challenges and possible applications
Encinas, J. M., & Fitzsimons, C. P. (2017) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.07.016 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Pioneering work from Beagan and colleagues has revealed a role for the architectural protein CTCF, which plays critical role in connecting higher-order chromatin folding, during early neural lineage commitment of NPCs isolated from neonatal mouse brains [62].”
BackgroundChromatin Interactions and Regulatory Elements in Cancer: From Bench to Bedside
See, Y. X., Wang, B. Z., & Fullwood, M. J. (2018) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2018.11.007 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Doi, H., Matsuda, T., Sakai, A., Matsubara, S., Hoka, S., Yamaura, K., & Nakashima, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2107596118 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“We also employed public chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) data for CTCF and NFI family members from NSCs and neural progenitor cells (26, 29, 30), allowing us to compare the enrichment of these factors in gained-open regions in P10 MDZ mice with that in randomly selected regions from the whole genome…”
Dual Role of YY1 in HPV Life Cycle and Cervical Cancer Development
Warowicka, A., Broniarczyk, J. K., Węglewska, M., Kwaśniewski, W. M., & Goździcka‐Józefiak, A. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23073453 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“It has recently been reported that the DNA looping mediated by YY1 and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) alters the chromatin architecture and transcription regulation in neural progenitor cells [46].”
Background
- Authors
- Beagan, J. A., Duong, M. T., Titus, K. R., Zhou, L., Cao, Z., Ma, J., Lachanski, C. V., Gillis, D. R., & Phillips-Cremins, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Genome Research
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2017-05-23
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1139-1152
- ISSN
- 1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5469
- PMC
- PMC5495066
- OpenAlex
- W2616964127
- Semantic Scholar
- ef47c2402c2ca8c046dfd6f1c16e7268ea95d80a
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Genome Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The New York Stem Cell Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- NIH Director's New Innovator Award from the National Institute of Mental Health (1DP2MH11024701)
- 4D Nucleome (NIH) Common (1U01HL12999801)
- NSF-NIGMS (1562665)
- National Science Foundation (DGE-1321851)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Keywords
- CTCF, YY1, neural progenitor cells, enhancer-promoter interactions, chromatin structure, pluripotency, zinc finger proteins, chromatin looping
- MeSH terms
- Human Embryonic Stem Cells, CCCTC-Binding Factor, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Chromatin, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, YY1 Transcription Factor, Genome-Wide Association Study, Neural Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review