Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

General concepts for PCR primer design.

Open access
Dieffenbach, C W, Lowe, T M, Dveksler, G S·1993·Genome Research

Abstract

PCR is a technology born of the modern molecular biology era.The enzyme used for PCR, Taq DNA polymerase, supplied with the 10x buffer, is purchased as a cloned product, and the nucleoside triphosphates are ultrapure, buffered, and available at a convenient concentration.Yet, with all of these commercially available starting materials, PCR still fails, particularly for the novice.Assuming that all of the reagents have been added in the proper concentrations, two critical PCR components are left to the researcher.The first is the nucleic acid template, which should be of sufficient quality and contain no inhibitors of Taq DNA polymerase (although when it comes to template purity, PCR is more permissive than many other molecular biology techniques).The second is the selection of the oligonucleotide primers.This process is often critical for the overall success of a PCR experiment, for without a functional primer set, there will be no PCR product.Although the selection of a single primer set may be trivial, the construction of primer sets for applications such as multiplex or nested PCR becomes more challenging.The manual selection of optimal PCR oligonucleotide primer sets can be quite tedious and thus lends itself very naturally to computer analysis.The primary factors that affect the function of the oligonucleotides--their melting temperatures as well as possible homology among primers--are welldefined and straightforward tasks that are easily encoded in computer software.Once the computer has provided a small number of candidate primer sets, the task of selection can be (and still is) performed manually.In this approach, the researcher is taking advantage of the raw speed of computer calculations, trying all possible permutations of a primer's placement, length, and relation to the other primers that meet conditions specified by the user.From the thousands of combinations tested by the computer, a software program can present just those that are suitable for the needs of the experiment.Thus, the overall "quality" (as defined by the user in program parameters) of the primers selected is almost guaranteed to be better than the handful chosen and hand-tested by the research without computer assistance.As with any tool, understanding its function will make the end product more useful.A wide range of programs have been written to perform primer selection, varying significantly in selection criteria, comprehensiveness, interactive design, and user-friendliness.(1-1~ There are also commercially available specialty primer design software programs that offer enhanced user interfaces, additional features, and updated selection criteria, (1'2) as well as primer design options that have been added to larger, more general software packages.Although most people would agree that application of analytic computer software to a well-defined problem is a smart thing to do, not all researchers are convinced that PCR primer selection is a nontrivial task, or that the selection rules that make a primer amplify efficiently are even well defined.Even though many of the rules discussed have been fine-tuned by collective empirical wisdom, most are based on firm theoretical ground, if not c o m m o n sense.The purpose of this chapter is to explain basic rules of oligonucleotide primer design.With this understanding of primer selection criteria, the information deduced by primer design software can be rationally interpreted and manipulated to fit your experimental needs.PARAMETERS USED IN BASIC PCR PRIMER DESIGN Primer design is aimed at obtaining a balance between two goals: specificity and efficiency of amplification.Specificity is defined as the frequency with which a mispriming event occurs.Primers with mediocre to poor specificity tend to produce PCR products with extra unrelated and undesirable ampli-$30 PCR Methods and Applications 3:$30-S37 9 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.3.3.s30

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Dieffenbach, C. W., Lowe, T. M., & Dveksler, G. S.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
1993-12-01
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
S30-S37
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018255407
Cited by
484
References
20
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.