Cited by 341Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

ERK/MAPK regulates hippocampal histone phosphorylation following contextual fear conditioning

Open access
Chwang, Wilson B., O’Riordan, Kenneth J., Levenson, Jonathan M., Sweatt, J. David·2006·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Long-term memory formation is regulated by many distinct molecular mechanisms that control gene expression. An emerging model for effecting a stable, coordinated pattern of gene transcription involves epigenetic tagging through modifications of histones or DNA. In this study, we investigated the regulation of histone phosphorylation in the hippocampus by the ERK/MAPK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway. We found that activation of ERK/MAPK in vitro significantly increased histone H3 phosphorylation in hippocampal area CA1. Furthermore, we found that contextual fear conditioning in vivo leads to a rapid time-dependent increase in histone H3 phosphorylation in area CA1. This increase paralleled the time course of contextual fear-dependent activation of ERK, and was inhibited in vivo by a latent inhibition paradigm as well as by injection of an N -methyl-d-aspartic acid receptor (NMDA-R) antagonist. Finally, injection of an inhibitor of MEK (MAP kinase/ERK kinase), the unique dual-specificity kinase upstream of ERK, blocked the increase in histone H3 phosphorylation seen after contextual fear conditioning. These results demonstrate that changes in histone phosphorylation in the hippocampus are regulated by ERK/MAPK following a behavioral fear conditioning paradigm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.152906

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chwang, W. B., O’Riordan, K. J., Levenson, J. M., & Sweatt, J. D.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2006-05
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
322-328
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2143524000
Cited by
341
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 22
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Health Assistance Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (NS37444)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 57014, R01MH057014)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 37444, NS-13546, R01NS013546, P01NS037444)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
ERK signaling, histone H3 phosphorylation, hippocampus, CA1, contextual fear conditioning, long-term memory, epigenetic regulation, MEK inhibition, NMDA receptor, latent inhibition, fear memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Fear, Gene Expression Regulation, Hippocampus, Histones, Male, Memory, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Signal Transduction, Rats, Wistar, Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review