PreprintCited by 130Memory and Neural MechanismsCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

CB1 cannabinoid receptors modulate kinase and phosphatase activity during extinction of conditioned fear in mice

Open access
Cannich, Astrid, Wotjak, Carsten T., Kamprath, Kornelia, Hermann, Heike, Lutz, Beat, Marsicano, Giovanni·2004·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Cannabinoid receptors type 1 (CB1) play a central role in both short-term and long-term extinction of auditory-cued fear memory. The molecular mechanisms underlying this function remain to be clarified. Several studies indicated extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase with its downstream effector AKT, and the phosphatase calcineurin as potential molecular substrates of extinction behavior. To test the involvement of these kinase and phosphatase activities in CB1-dependent extinction of conditioned fear behavior, conditioned CB1-deficient mice (CB1(-/-)) and wild-type littermates (CB1(+/+)) were sacrificed 30 min after recall of fear memory, and activation of ERKs, AKT, and calcineurin was examined by Western blot analysis in different brain regions. As compared with CB1(+/+), the nonreinforced tone presentation 24 h after auditory-cued fear conditioning led to lower levels of phosphorylated ERKs and/or calcineurin in the basolateral amygdala complex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsal hippocampus, and ventral hippocampus of CB1(-/-). In contrast, higher levels of phosphorylated p44 ERK and calcineurin were observed in the central nucleus of the amygdala of CB1(-/-). Phosphorylation of AKT was more pronounced in the basolateral amygdala complex and the dorsal hippocampus of CB1(-/-). We propose that the endogenous cannabinoid system modulates extinction of aversive memories, at least in part via regulation of the activity of kinases and phosphatases in a brain structure-dependent manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.77904

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CB1R negatively regulates N- and P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channels and positively regulates inwardly rectifying K+ channels, as well as calcineurin, to change the phosphorylation state of effector molecules.

    “In addition, CB1R negatively regulates N- and P/Q-type voltage-gated calcium channels [26] and positively regulates inwardly rectifying K+ channels [26,27], as well as protein serine/threonine phosphatase 2B (calcineurin, PP2B) to change the phosphorylation state of various effector molecules [28,29].”
  • CB1R knockout or systemic antagonist (SR141716A) administration produces impairments in extinction learning but not fear conditioning.

    “and produced impairments in extinction learning (but not fear conditioning) by CB1R KO or systemic antagonist (SR141716A) administration [28,86]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rescorla, R.A. 2001. Experimental extinction. In Handbook of contemporary learning theories (eds. R.R. Mowrer and S. Klein), pp. 119-154. Erlbaum, Mahawah, NJ.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cannich, A., Wotjak, C. T., Kamprath, K., Hermann, H., Lutz, B., & Marsicano, G.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2004-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
625-632
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2144069251
Cited by
130
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Volkswagen Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
CB1 receptor, fear extinction, conditioned fear memory, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, Akt phosphorylation, calcineurin, endocannabinoid system, basolateral amygdala, central amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsal hippocampus, ventral hippocampus, aversive memory
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Amygdala, Animals, Brain, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Protein Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Reinforcement, Psychology, Time Factors, Blotting, Western, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Prefrontal Cortex, Mice, Knockout, Calcineurin, 1-Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase, Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1, Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review