The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: A cross‐national comparison
Abstract
This study examined the effects of organisational culture and leadership styles on job satisfaction and organisational commitment in samples of Hong Kong and Australian managers. Statistically significant differences between the two samples were found for measures of innovative and supportive organizational cultures, job satisfaction and organizational commitment, with the Australian sample having higher mean scores on all these variables. However, differences between the two samples for job satisfaction and commitment were removed after statistically controlling for organizational culture, leadership and respondents' demographic characteristics. For the combined samples, innovative and supportive cultures, and a consideration leadership style, had positive effects on both job satisfaction and commitment, with the effects of an innovative culture on satisfaction and commitment, and the effect of a consideration leadership style on commitment, being stronger in the Australian sample. Also, an “initiating Structure” leadership style had a negative effect on job satisfaction for the combined sample. Participants' level of education was found to have a slight negative effect on satisfaction, and a slight positive effect on commitment. National culture was found to moderate the effect of respondents' age on satisfaction, with the effect being more positive amongst Hong Kong managers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Angle, H. (1981), “An empirical assessment of organisational commitment and organisational effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1‐14. · DOI · Paper page
- Bass, B. (1990), Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership, Free Press, New York, NY.
- Benkhoff, B. (1997), “Disentangling organisational commitment: the changes of the OCQ for research and policy”, Personnel Review, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 114‐20. · DOI
- Chen, Z.X. and Francesco, A.M. (2000), “Employee demography, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions in China: do cultural differences matter?”, Human Relations, Vol. 3 No. 6, pp. 869‐87. · DOI · Paper page
- Cheng, B.S. (1995), “‘Chaxugeju’ (differential mode of association) and Chinese organizational behaviour”, in Yang, K.S. (Ed.), Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Society, Vol. 3, pp. 142‐219.
- Deal, T. and Kennedy, A. (1982), A Corporate Culture, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.
- El Kahal, S. (2001), Business in Asia Pacific, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Hansen, G. and Wernerfelt, B. (1989), “Determinants of firm performance: the relative impact of economic and organizational factors”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 399‐411. · DOI · Paper page
- Hofstede, G. (1991), Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
- Iverson, R. and Roy, P. (1994), “A causal model of behavioural commitment: evidence from a study of Australian blue‐collar employees”, Journal of Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 15‐41. · DOI · Paper page
- Knight, J. and Shi, L. (1996), “Educational attainment and the rural‐urban divide in China”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 83‐117. · DOI
- Laschinger, H. (2001), “The impact of workplace commitment, organizational trust on staff nurses' work satisfaction and organizational commitment”, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 7‐24. · DOI · Paper page
- Lok, P. and Crawford, J. (1999), “The relationship between commitment and organizational culture, subcultures, leadership styles, job satisfaction in organizational change and development”, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 365‐73. · DOI · Paper page
- Lok, P. and Crawford, J. (2001), “Antecedents of organizational commitment and the mediating role of job satisfaction”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 594‐613. · DOI · Paper page
- Malone, T. (1997), “Is empowerment just a fad? control decision making and IT”, Sloan Management Review, pp. 23‐35.
- Manz, C. and Sims, H. (1991), “Superleadership: beyond the myth of heroic leadership”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 2, pp. 18‐35. · DOI · Paper page
- Martin, J. (1992), Cultures in Organizations – Three Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford. · DOI · Paper page
- Mathieu, J. and Zajac, D. (1990), “A review of met‐analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 108 No. 2, pp. 171‐94. · DOI · Paper page
- Michael, P. (1994), “An expanded conceptual framework of organizational commitment and job satisfaction for salesforce management”, Journal of Business and Society, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 42‐67.
- Miller, D. (1978), “Career planning and management in organizations”, Advance Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 33‐43.
- Miroshnik, V. (2002), “Culture and international management: a review”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp. 521‐44. · DOI
- Mowday, R., Steers, R. and Porter, L. (1979), “The measurement of organizational commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, Vol. 14, pp. 224‐7. · DOI · Paper page
- Pye, L. (1985), Asian Power and Politics: the Cultural Dimensions of Authority, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. · DOI · Paper page
- Redding, G. (1990), The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism, Walter de Gruyter, New York, NY. · DOI · Paper page
- Riketta, M. (2002), “Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: a meta‐analysis”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 257‐66. · DOI · Paper page
- Salancik, G. (1977), “Commitment and the control of organizational behaviour and belief”, in Shaw, B.M. and Salancik, G.R. (Eds), New Directions in Organizational Behaviour, St Clare Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 123‐35.
- Sarros, J. and Woodman, D. (1993), “Leadership in Australia and its organizational outcomes”, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 3‐9. · DOI
- Schein, E. (1990), “Organizational culture”, American Psychologist, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 109‐19. · DOI · Paper page
- Somers, M. (1995), “Organizational commitment, turnover and absenteeism: an examination of direct and indirect effects”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 16, pp. 49‐58. · DOI · Paper page
- Sommer, S., Bae, S. and Luthans, F. (1996), “Organizational commitment across cultures: the impact of antecedents on Korean employees”, Human Relations, Vol. 49 No. 7, pp. 977‐93. · DOI
- Stogdill, R. (1974), Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research, Free Press, New York, NY.
- Trompenaars, F. and Hampden‐Turner, C. (1998), Riding the Waves of Culture, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
- Walder, S. (1995), “China's transitional economy, interpreting its significance”, The China Quarterly, Vol. 144, pp. 963‐80. · DOI
- Wallach, E. (1983), “Individuals and organization: the cultural match”, Training and Development Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 28‐36.
- Warr, P., Cook, J. and Wall, T. (1979), “Scales for the measurement of some work attitude and aspects of psychological well‐being”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 129‐48. · DOI · Paper page
- Westwood, R. and Posner, B. (1997), “Managerial values across cultures: Australia, Hong Kong and the United States”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 14, pp. 31‐66. · DOI
- Williams, L. and Hazer, J. (1986), “Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover modes: a re‐analysis using latent variables structural equation methods”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71 No. 2, pp. 219‐31. · DOI · Paper page
- Mathieu, J. and Hamel, D. (1989), “A causal model of the antecedents of organizational commitment among professionals and non‐professionals”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, Vol. 34, pp. 299‐317. · DOI
- Pearson, C. and Entrekin, L. (2001), “Cross‐cultural value sets of Asian managers: the comparative cases of Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resource, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 79‐92. · DOI
- Price, J. and Mueller, C. (1981), “A causal model of turnover for nurses”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 543‐65. · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, G. (1987), “Differences in corporate cultures and their relationship to organizational effectiveness”, Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 10‐13. · DOI
- Steers, R. (1977), “Antecedents and outcomes of organizational effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 22, pp. 40‐56. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Leadership, Job Well-Being, and Health Effects—A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis
Kuoppala, J., Lamminpää, A., Liira, J., & Vainio, H. (2008) · Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0b013e31817e918d · Cited by 565
C.H. Chan, S., & Mak, W.-M. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-08-2011-0125 · Cited by 209
Yigitcanlar, T., Li, R. Y. M., Beeramoole, P. B., & Paz, A. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101833 · Cited by 142
Strategizing for survival–enablers of South African not-for-profit organization sustainability
Vorwerk Marren, I., Davis, A., & Williamson, C. M. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2323775 · Cited by 8
“…to make personal sacrifices. the culture was further guided and demonstrated by leadership, which siddiqi (2001, p. 21) affirms as necessary. lok and crawford (2004) similarly state that organizational commitment depends on innovative and supportive culture, job satisfaction, and a…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lok, P., & Crawford, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Development
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-338
- ISSN
- 0262-1711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1531151704
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: A cross‐national comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/02621710410529785
- The paper
- Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (2004). The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: A cross‐national comparison. Journal of Management Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710410529785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.