The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 34 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Why people participate in the sharing economy: an empirical investigation of Uber
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of inhibiting, motivating, and technological factors on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Design/methodology/approach A self-reported online survey was conducted among Uber users in Hong Kong. A total of 295 valid responses were collected. The research model was empirically tested using the structural equation modeling technique. Findings The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users’ intention to participate in Uber. Research limitations/implications This study bridged the research gaps in the sharing economy literature by examining the effects of perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust in the platform on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Moreover, this study enriched the extended valence framework by incorporating perceived platform qualities into the research model, responding to the calls for the inclusion of technological variables in information systems research. Practical implications The findings provided practitioners with insights into enhancing users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Originality/value This study presented one of the first attempts to systematically examine the effects of inhibiting, motivating, and technological factors on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 12 Own method · 10 Own result · 9 Sources not found · 8 No full text of the sources · 3 Not checked yet · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The positive relationship between platform qualities and trust has been well-validated across a variety of e-commerce contexts”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.4 Perceived Platform Qualities
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2015a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lim et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Muhammad et al., 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The results section (“We used SPSS and AMOS-IBM version 21”) reports a positive relationship between website information quality and e-trust in Chinese online retailing. But §2.1 notes that a cited study found a positive effect of information design on trust in Canada, not in China or Germany. This paper therefore supports a relationship for one platform quality in its studied context, not the claim that platform qualities have been well-validated across a variety of contexts. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The research model explained 51% of the variance of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the demographic variables, i.e., age, gender, education level and income, exhibited no significant effects on users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Research Model Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As illustrated in Table 3, the square roots of all of the AVEs were larger than all of the cross-correlations”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The assessments of the cross-loadings table (Appendix B), with indicator loadings larger than crossloadings”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the HTMT values range between 0.076 to 0.77, which are well below the threshold of 0.90 (Hair et al., 2017)”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 11
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effect size analysis showed that the f 2 values involved in the relationships between perceived benefits, perceived risks, trust in the platform, and users' intention to participate are 0.182, 0.015, and 0.036, respectively.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Research Model Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As illustrated in Table 2, all of the latent constructs exceed the recommended thresholds, with CR values ranging from 0.89 to 0.95, AVE values ranging from 0.72 to 0.87, and all item loadings exceeding 0.70”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We invited an expert panel of IS researchers to assess the face validity of the preliminary measurement items”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“perceived risks and perceived benefits are two fundamental aspects of consumer decision-making”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peter and Tarpey, 1975 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The extended valence framework indicates that perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust have direct effects on consumers' purchase intention.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kim et al., 2009 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“the extended framework suggests that trust alters consumers' perceptions of risks negatively and benefits positively”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kim et al., 2009 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we included gender, age, education level and income as control variables in the research model”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Respondents who did not have any experience with Uber were screened out.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which were then pretested for comprehensiveness, clarity, and desirable psychometric properties”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Responses from those who took an exceptionally short time to complete the survey were also discarded to ensure the quality of the data.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the items in the dataset loaded significantly onto more than one principal component, indicating no single dominant factor”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.1 Preliminary Analysis
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other than minor modifications in formatting, no major problems surfaced during the pretest.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We used multiple items to assess each construct to ensure construct validity and reliability.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Previous empirical findings showed that trust served as an important risk-mitigating factor in e-commerce and e-government transactions”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.3.1 Trust in the Platform and Perceived Risks
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“well below the threshold of 0.90 (Hair et al., 2017)”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Ballus-Armet et al. (2014) conducted a survey regarding public perception of peer-to-peer ridesharing in the US, and found that convenience and availability, monetary saving, and expanded mobility options were essential motivators for participating in peer-to-peer ridesharing services.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ballus-Armet et al., 2014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Convergent validity is assessed using three criteria: (1) the composite reliability (CR) should be at least 0.70 (Chin, 1998), (2) the average variance extracted (AVE) should be at least 0.50 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981), and (3) all of the item loadings should exceed 0.70 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981;Hair et al., 2009).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chin, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Fornell and Larcker, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“researchers have repeatedly called for the inclusion of technological variables in information systems research (Hong et al., 2014).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.1 Implications for Research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hong et al., 2014 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Security risk has been found a salient inhibitor to various online services”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lin and Lu, 2015 source
- Not matchedcites Powell, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Tai and Ku, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“perceived platform qualities and trust in the platform have been found to be important factors in previous e-commerce literature (Beldad et al., 2012;Cheung and Lee, 2006;Gefen et al., 2003).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Hamari et al. (2015) found that economic reward and enjoyment were significant antecedents of user participation in the sharing economy.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hamari et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“is demonstrated when the square root of the AVE for each construct is greater than the correlations between it and all of the other constructs.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Fornell and Larcker, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“negative relationships between privacy risk and online activities have been found in previous studies”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hajli and Lin, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pavlou et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All the hypotheses were supported, providing strong statistical evidence that perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust in the platform are important determinants of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6 DISCUSSION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“enjoyment and economic reward are important intrinsic and extrinsic motivators that determine users' intention to participate in the sharing economy”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.2 Perceived Benefits
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hamari et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“considering crowdsourcing, project attributes (e.g., duration and difficulty level) and competition situation (e.g., competition intensity and market price) are important determinants of user participation added above the well-studied intrinsic and extrinsic motivations (Shao et al., 2012).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.3.1 Generalizability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Shao et al., 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“platform qualities are the salient drivers that instill the perception of trust in the platform, which is considered the core of technology-enabled services.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“there are also numbers of plausible means to instill users' trust in sharing economy platforms, such as adopting actionable rating systems and providing social proof (Iyer, 2016).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Iyer, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, perceived platform qualities instill users' trust in the platform, playing a substantial role in influencing users' intention to participate in the sharing economy.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6 DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The provision of sharing economy services relies heavily on information and internetworking technologies.
“Since the provision of sharing economy services hinges on the information and networking technologies”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participating in different sharing economy services often requires users to enter into transactions with strangers.
“participating in different sharing economy services, such as Uber or Airbnb, often requires users to enter into such transactions with strangers”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sharing economy services, such as Uber and Airbnb, can be provided at a much lower price compared to their traditional counterparts.
“the sharing economy services, such as Uber and Airbnb, can be provided at a much lower price compared to their traditional counterparts”
The paper relies on this without support.
Trust reflects users' willingness to take risks to fulfill their needs.
“Trust reflects users' willingness to take risks to fulfill their needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Consumers in the e-commerce context always concern that the sellers may not adhere to their transactional obligations.
“Consumers in the ecommerce context always concern that the sellers may not adhere to their transactional obligations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The target audience of Uber users is predominantly Internet-savvy.
“Given the predominantly Internet-savvy target audience of Uber users”
The paper relies on this without support.
Past studies on the sharing economy have been qualitative in nature or focused on examining motivating factors of users' participation.
“past studies on the sharing economy have been qualitative in nature or focused on examining motivating factors of users' participation in the sharing economy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The role of inhibiting factors in user participation in the sharing economy has not received commensurate scholarly attention.
“the role of inhibiting factors in user participation in the sharing economy has not received commensurate scholarly attention.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Contemporary sharing economy services are enabled by information technologies.
“contemporary sharing economy services are enabled by information technologies (e.g., the online platforms of Uber and Airbnb)”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
“TRU3 0.75 12.40 4.58 1.12”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Additional information
“TRU3 0.29 0.37 0.53 0.52 -0.09 -0.18 0.8 0.45”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
(2014) · DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) · Cited by 12,785
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 · Cited by 8,490
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 2015, American tourist claims he was held captive and sexually assaulted by his transexual Airbnb host in Spain
- 2011, What’s Mine is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live
- Chin, W.W. (1998), “The partial least square approach to structural equation modeling”, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-336.
- 2014, The business model for the sharing economy between SMEs, WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 11, 625
- 2009, Multivariate Data Analysis
- Iyer, A. (2016), “How modern marketplaces like Uber and Airbnb build trust to achieve liquidity”, available at: http://firstround.com/review/How-Modern-Marketplaces-Like-Uber-Airbnb-Build-Trust-to-Hit-Liquidity/ (accessed December 22, 2017).
- 2015, Handbook on Research on Sustainable Consumption
- 2014, Making Sense of the UK Collaborative Economy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, S., & Wang, J. (2019) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.044 · Cited by 334
Nadeem, W., Juntunen, M., Shirazi, F., & Hajli, N. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119786 · Cited by 279
Styvén, M. E., & Mariani, M. M. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21334 · Cited by 234
“First, it contributes to the sharing economy and collaborative consumption lines of research (Belk, 2014; Hamari et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018; Zervas et al., 2017) by adopting an integrative and comprehensive framework, to identify the drivers (including, monetary and non-monetary ones) of buying…”
InfluentialGong, Z., Han, Z., Li, X., Yu, C., & Reinhardt, J. D. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00286 · Cited by 164
“The extended valence framework has been applied in studies regarding e-commerce, and has been considered a useful and valid theoretical framework to guide our understanding of people’s behaviors in the e-commerce context ( 33), including online health information seeking behavior (4).”
BackgroundNadeem, W., Juntunen, M., Hajli, N., & Tajvidi, M. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04314-5 · Cited by 166
Spurlock, C. A., Sears, J., Wong‐Parodi, G., Walker, V., Jin, L., Taylor, M., Duvall, A., Gopal, A., & Todd, A. (2019) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.014 · Cited by 142
Jeon, M. M., Lee, S. A., & Jeong, M. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102341 · Cited by 138
Pantano, E., & Stylos, N. D. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21345 · Cited by 138
Dabbous, A., & Tarhini, A. A. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119775 · Cited by 136
The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework
C. Köbis, N., Soraperra, I., & Shalvi, S. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320967740 · Cited by 129
Building trust in the sharing economy: Current approaches and future considerations
Räisänen, J., Ojala, A., & Tuovinen, T. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123724 · Cited by 118
Fauzi, A. A., & Sheng, M. L. (2020) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2020.1745536 · Cited by 170
“Ride-sharing service is an online peer-to-peer app that allows people to lease or rent a ride (Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundDeterminants of consumers’ continuance intention to use dynamic ride-sharing services
Si, H., Duan, X., Cheng, L., & Zhang, Z. (2022) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103201 · Cited by 98
Shao, Z., & Yin, H. (2019) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-02-2018-0086 · Cited by 94
The Sharing Economy: A Marketing Perspective
Lim, W. M. (2020) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.007 · Cited by 99
Jiang, Y., & Lau, A. K. W. (2021) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101050 · Cited by 100
Sharing economy: International marketing strategies
Kozlenkova, I. V., Lee, J.-Y., Xiang, D., & Palmatier, R. W. (2021) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00393-z · Cited by 102
Attar, R. W., Almusharraf, A. I., alfawaz, A. A., & Hajli, N. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142316024 · Cited by 141
“…support and facilitate decision-making, but their impact on the integrated platforms (S-Commerce and sharing commerce) can vary across the regions, and accordingly, the design and levels of integration have to be accordingly modified with respect to the consumer’s preferences in different regions.”
BackgroundAshaduzzaman, M., Jebarajakirthy, C., Weaven, S. K., Maseeh, H. I., Das, M., & Pentecost, R. D. (2022) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-07-2020-0563 · Cited by 92
Sources of value co-destruction: Uber customer perspectives
Sthapit, E., & Björk, P. (2019) · Tourism Review · doi:10.1108/tr-12-2018-0176 · Cited by 89
Fauzi, A. A., & Sheng, M. L. (2020) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-05-2019-0332 · Cited by 89
To grab or not to grab? The role of trust and perceived value in on-demand ridesharing services
Aw, E. C., Basha, N. K., Ng, S. I., & Sambasivan, M. (2019) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-09-2018-0368 · Cited by 97
“Thus, so far, organizationallevel studies have raised ample attention from researchers but individual-level studies remain under-researched (Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundUnderstanding the sharing economy and its implication on sustainability in smart cities
Akande, A., Cabral, P., & Casteleyn, S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124077 · Cited by 93
Lee, S. E., Jung, H. J., & Lee, K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041804 · Cited by 92
Chuah, S. H., Tseng, M., Wu, K., & Cheng, C.-F. (2021) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105892 · Cited by 79
Akter, S., Babu, M. M., Hossain, M. A., & Hani, U. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.077 · Cited by 83
Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City
Liang, J.-K., Eccarius, T., & Lu, C. (2019) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.006 · Cited by 75
An investigation into sharing economy enabled ridesharing drivers’ trust: A qualitative study
Cheng, X., Su, L., & Yang, B. (2020) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100956 · Cited by 75
Ofori, K. S., Anyigba, H., Adeola, O., Chai, J., Osakwe, C. N., & David‐West, O. (2021) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-06-2019-0285 · Cited by 77
Consumer attitude and intention toward ridesharing
Cheah, I., Shimul, A. S., Liang, J., & Phau, I. (2020) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/0965254x.2020.1733050 · Cited by 67
“…sharing economy has started to emerge (e.g. Puschmann & Alt, 2016; PWC, 2015), and a scientific understanding of the phenomenon is still evolving (Lee et al., 2018) there still remains a dearth of understanding as to why people participate in collaborative consumption (Hamari et al., 2015),…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMedia richness, social presence and loyalty to mobile instant messaging
Tseng, F., Cheng, T. C. E., Yu, P.-L., Huang, T., & Teng, C. (2019) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-09-2018-0415 · Cited by 66
Take me on a ride: The role of environmentalist identity for carpooling
Hartl, B., Kamleitner, B., & Holub, S. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21340 · Cited by 63
How does media richness foster online gamer loyalty?
Tseng, F., Huang, T., Pham, T. T. L., Cheng, T. C. E., & Teng, C. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102439 · Cited by 73
Elnadi, M., & Gheith, M. H. (2022) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2022.06.002 · Cited by 72
How to Grow the Sharing Economy? Create Prosumers!
Lang, B., Botha, E., Robertson, J., Kemper, J. A., Dolan, R. M., & Kietzmann, J. (2020) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.012 · Cited by 63
Sources of influences on customers' trust in ride-sharing: why use experience matters?
Shao, Z., Guo, Y., Li, X.-T., & Barnes, S. (2020) · Industrial management & data systems · doi:10.1108/imds-12-2019-0651 · Cited by 54
Evaluating the effectiveness of Didi ride-hailing security measures: An integration model
Jing, P., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Pan, K., & Yuan, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.11.004 · Cited by 64
Shared consumption and its determinants: A systematic literature review and future research agenda
Khalek, S. A., & Chakraborty, A. (2023) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12913 · Cited by 64
Taxi within a grab? A gender-invariant model of mobile taxi adoption
Ooi, K., Foo, F. E., Tan, G. W., Hew, J.-J., & Leong, L.-Y. (2020) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-04-2020-0239 · Cited by 67
Olayode, I. O., Severino, A. G., Alex, F. J., Macioszek, E., & Tartibu, L. K. (2023) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2023.100943 · Cited by 59
Exploration of Sharing Accommodation Platform Airbnb Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model
Jung, J., Park, E., Moon, J., & Lee, W. S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13031185 · Cited by 70
“In sum, various studies on Airbnb are underway, but many of them approached it from a psychological perspective, such as host and guest motivation and satisfaction [22,25,26].”
BackgroundWhy Do(n’t) We Buy Second-Hand Luxury Products?
Stolz, K. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148656 · Cited by 57
“In the context of digitalization and the usage of social media, the trend towards second-hand trade is increasing [16,64,65].”
BackgroundZardari, B. A., Hussain, Z., Arain, A. A., Rizvi, W. H., & Vighio, M. S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13116201 · Cited by 78
“These findings are consistent with previous studies addressing the user acceptance of e-learning technology [43,44] and other technologies [45–48 ,50, The construct appeal from the UX model has significant impacts on both pleasure and satisfaction.”
Guo, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.885515 · Cited by 55
“In support, the study refers to videoconferencing as an innovative tool driving the firm’s communication (Lee et al., 2018) and employees’ satisfaction.”
BackgroundThe sharing economy: the influence of perceived corporate social responsibility on brand commitment
Fatma, M., Khan, I. M., Rahman, Z., & Pérez, A. (2020) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-04-2020-2862 · Cited by 56
RetractedThe role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in sharing economy post-adoption
Oliveira, T., Barbeitos, I., & Calado, A. S. C. (2021) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-01-2020-0007 · Cited by 63
Burghard, U., & Scherrer, A. (2022) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112874 · Cited by 49
Gaber, H. R., & ElSamadicy, A. M. (2021) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2021.1944009 · Cited by 50
“For instance, Lee et al. (2018) argued that economic benefits are one of the main benefits that influence customers’ intention to use these apps.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialShao, Z., Zhang, L., Li, X., & Zhang, R. (2022) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101119 · Cited by 49
Sharing economy: seeing through the fog
Trabucchi, D., Muzellec, L., & Ronteau, S. (2019) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-03-2018-0113 · Cited by 49
Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model
Martínez-González, J. A., Parra-López, E., & Barrientos–Báez, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13010430 · Cited by 52
“The fourth approach that addresses consumers’ intentions in the tourism sharing economy has emerged due to the digital nature of young consumers, the intangible nature of tourism, and other limitations and critical factors mentioned within the three approaches above [39].”
BackgroundLeong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114185 · Cited by 47
Sharing achievement and social entrepreneurial intention
Wu, W., Wang, H., Wei, C., & Zheng, C. (2020) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2019-0667 · Cited by 50
Tang, L., & Jiang, J. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141168 · Cited by 52
Why do consumers become providers? Self-determination in the sharing economy
Lang, B., Kemper, J. A., Dolan, R. M., & Northey, G. (2021) · Journal of Service Theory and Practice · doi:10.1108/jstp-09-2020-0220 · Cited by 50
Ethical Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda
Arman, S. M., & Mark‐Herbert, C. (2024) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.13079 · Cited by 57
Collaborative innovation in the sharing economy
Abhari, K., Davidson, E., & Xiao, B. S. (2019) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-03-2018-0129 · Cited by 45
Guo, J., Lin, J., & Li, L. (2020) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2020.1807894 · Cited by 45
“In addition, perceived bene fi ts have a greater e ff ect on calculative-based trust than perceived risk, which is consistent with the signi fi cant positive e ff ect of perceived bene fi ts on individual behavior, proposed by Lee et al. (2018).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCharatsari, C., Lioutas, E. D., Rosa, M. D., & Vecchio, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.872706 · Cited by 43
Cha, M., & Lee, H.-J. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102515 · Cited by 43
Does heavy ICT usage contribute to the adoption of ride-hailing app?
Fu, X.-M. (2020) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2020.06.005 · Cited by 39
Assessing carpooling drivers and barriers: Evidence from Bangkok, Thailand
Tsai, Y., Yu, C., & Boonprakob, R. (2021) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2021.07.017 · Cited by 44
Barriers to access-based consumption in the circular transition: A systematic review
Arekrans, J., Sopjani, L., Laurenti, R., & Ritzén, S. (2022) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106364 · Cited by 54
“…prevailing regulatory, political, and technical frameworks in favor of protecting traditional industries create barriers to entry for new ABC offerings; furthermore, these pro-tections also conflict with the goals of sustainable consumption (Mont, 2004a; Hong and Lee, 2018; Paik et al., 2018).”
BackgroundCui, L., Yang, K., Lei, Z., Lim, M. K., & Hou, Y. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.009 · Cited by 43
Liu, Y., Gao, Q., & Rau, P. (2022) · Travel Behaviour & Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2021.10.009 · Cited by 37
‘Do not talk to strangers’: A study on trust in Brazilian ridesharing apps
Vaclavik, M. C., Macke, J., & Silva, D. F. E. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101379 · Cited by 38
The determinants of customer loyalty in the Indonesian ride-sharing services: offline vs online
Kuswanto, A., Sundari, S., Harmadi, A., et al. (2019) · Innovation & Management Review · doi:10.1108/inmr-05-2019-0063 · Cited by 35
“The influence of information quality and system quality on trust is in accordance with a research by Lee et al. (2018) in the context of Uber service in Hong Kong.”
ResultAttracted to or Locked In? Explaining Consumer Loyalty toward Airbnb
Kim, B.-S., & Kim, D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072814 · Cited by 35
“Social benefits have been shown to be significant antecedents of user participation in the sharing economy [43].”
BackgroundExamining user attitudes towards ride-hailing services – A SEM-MIMIC Ordered Probit approach
Bhaduri, E., & Goswami, A. (2023) · Travel Behaviour & Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2022.08.008 · Cited by 35
Drivers of the Sharing Economy That Affect Consumers’ Usage Behavior: Moderation of Perceived Risk
Anaya, Ó., & la Vega, I. D. (2022) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci12040171 · Cited by 36
Yang, H., & Xia, L. (2021) · Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science · doi:10.1080/21639159.2020.1808833 · Cited by 38
“Ride-sharing platforms provide online peer-to-peer ride-sharing service that can better match the supply of drivers with the customers’ demand for rides by pricing and compensation policy (Bimpikis et al., 2019; Z. W. Y. Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundCasidy, R., Leckie, C., Nyadzayo, M. W., & Johnson, L. W. (2022) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2021-0803 · Cited by 36
Jiang, J., Feng, R., & Li, E. Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13095095 · Cited by 32
Factors Affecting the Adoption of Photovoltaic Systems in Rural Areas of Poland
Angowski, M., Kijek, T., Lipowski, M., & Bondos, I. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14175272 · Cited by 32
Nguyen-Phuoc, D. Q., Oviedo-Trespalacios, Ó., Nguyen, M. H., Dinh, M. T. T., & Su, D. N. (2022) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.103691 · Cited by 33
“, 2020), and Hong Kong (Lee et al., 2018)) by considering various additional influential constructs as part of the TPB such as perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, safety risk, perceived trust or perceived usability.”
Pu, R., Chankoson, T., Dong, R. K., & Song, L. (2022) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-05-2022-0241 · Cited by 32
Towards a typology of sharing economy business model transformation
Öberg, C. (2023) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102722 · Cited by 34
“Benoit et al., 2017; Chen and Xie, 2017; Davidson et al., 2018; Hwang and Griffiths, 2017; Lee et al., 2018; Lutz and Newlands, 2018; Milanova and Maas, 2017; So et al., 2018; Wilhelms et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2017 Trust and repeated exchanges How trust is created as exchanges become transactional…”
Boukis, A., Christodoulides, G., Semaan, R. W., & Σταθοπούλου, Α. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114634 · Cited by 34
He, L., Sopjani, L., & Laurenti, R. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.027 · Cited by 29
Tripp, J. F., McKnight, D. H., & Lankton, N. K. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2062469 · Cited by 33
“Uber and Airbnb are well-known.”
Impact of Consumer Environmental Consciousness on Consumer Perceived Value from Sharing Economy
Gadeikienė, A., & Švarcaitė, A. (2021) · Engineering Economics · doi:10.5755/j01.ee.32.4.28431 · Cited by 28
Relationships among actors within the sharing economy: Meta-analytics review
Barari, M. M., Paul, J., Ross, M., Quach, S., & Surachartkumtonkun, J. (2022) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103215 · Cited by 31
“This can lead to higher service variability and inconsistency in this business model (Lee, 2020).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWhy people use the sharing economy: A meta-analysis
Rossmannek, O., & Chen, M. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135824 · Cited by 32
Sun, R., & Gregor, S. D. (2023) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101791 · Cited by 33
The Sharing Economy: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
Khodayari, M., Akbari, M., & Foroudi, P. (2025) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.70010 · Cited by 32
Lou, L., Li, L., Yang, S., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13031533 · Cited by 26
“It is worth noting that research on why individuals adopt the sharing economy is helpful for predicting and enhancing users’ sharing economy propensity [48,66], while research on consumer/user (i.”
BackgroundAn Investigation of Patient Decisions to Use eHealth
Zheng, S., Chang, P.-Y., Chen, J., Chang, Y., & Fan, H. (2021) · Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · doi:10.4018/joeuc.289433 · Cited by 26
Determinants of on-demand ridesharing: the role of awareness of environmental consequences
Sajid, M., Zakkariya, K. A., Peethambaran, M., & George, A. (2022) · Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-10-2021-0235 · Cited by 27
A trust-based peer-to-peer digital brand equity (P2P-DBE) model
Ozbal, O., Duman, T., & Topaloglu, O. (2020) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2020.1794901 · Cited by 35
Hien, N. N., Vo, L. T., Ngan, N. T. T., & Ghi, T. N. (2023) · Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100181 · Cited by 26
Drivers’ perceptions of the sharing economy for transport services
Hossain, M., & Mozahem, N. A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121668 · Cited by 25
Zhu, L., Jiang, X., & Cao, J. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11030374 · Cited by 31
Činjarević, M., Kožo, A., & Berberović, D. (2019) · South East European Journal of Economics and Business · doi:10.2478/jeb-2019-0003 · Cited by 24
“In the context of the sharing economy, scholars have emphasized the importance of functional/utilitarian, and hedonic value (Bardhi and Eckhardt 2012; Lee et al. 2018; Wu, Zeng, and Xie 2017).”
BackgroundMalik, F., & Wahaj, Z. (2019) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18400-1_20 · Cited by 26
Upadhyay, C. K., Tewari, V., & Tiwari, V. (2021) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2021.1971147 · Cited by 25
Interplay between perceived value, trust and continuance intention: evidence in the sharing economy
Tumaku, J., Ren, J., Boakye, K. G., Ofori, K. S., & Abubakari, A. (2023) · International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences · doi:10.1108/ijqss-05-2022-0048 · Cited by 38
Carbonara, N., Petruzzelli, A. M., Panniello, U., & Vita, D. D. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142744 · Cited by 24
Freelancers as Part-time Employees: Dimensions of FVP and FJS in E-Lancing Platforms
Nawaz, Z., Zhang, J., Mansoor, R., Hafeez, S., & Ilmudeen, A. (2020) · South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management · doi:10.1177/2322093720908453 · Cited by 28
Exploring post-usage behaviour in app-based ride-sourcing services: Evidence from Egypt
Elnadi, M., Troise, C., Jones, P. K., & Gheith, M. H. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123643 · Cited by 25
Exploring the attitudes of Millennials and Generation Xers toward ridesourcing services
Azimi, G., Rahimi, A., & Jin, X. (2021) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-021-10227-y · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, Z. W. Y., Chan, T. K. H., Balaji, M. S., & Chong, A. Y.-L.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-06-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 829-850
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787919713
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 53.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Internet Research (publishedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Keywords
- sharing economy, Uber, risk perception, perceived benefits, platform trust, technological factors, ride-hailing platforms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
