The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 34 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Why people participate in the sharing economy: an empirical investigation of Uber
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of inhibiting, motivating, and technological factors on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Design/methodology/approach A self-reported online survey was conducted among Uber users in Hong Kong. A total of 295 valid responses were collected. The research model was empirically tested using the structural equation modeling technique. Findings The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users’ intention to participate in Uber. Research limitations/implications This study bridged the research gaps in the sharing economy literature by examining the effects of perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust in the platform on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Moreover, this study enriched the extended valence framework by incorporating perceived platform qualities into the research model, responding to the calls for the inclusion of technological variables in information systems research. Practical implications The findings provided practitioners with insights into enhancing users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Originality/value This study presented one of the first attempts to systematically examine the effects of inhibiting, motivating, and technological factors on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 12 Own method · 10 Own result · 9 Sources not found · 8 No full text of the sources · 3 Not checked yet · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The positive relationship between platform qualities and trust has been well-validated across a variety of e-commerce contexts”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.4 Perceived Platform Qualities
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2015a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lim et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Muhammad et al., 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The results section (“We used SPSS and AMOS-IBM version 21”) reports a positive relationship between website information quality and e-trust in Chinese online retailing. But §2.1 notes that a cited study found a positive effect of information design on trust in Canada, not in China or Germany. This paper therefore supports a relationship for one platform quality in its studied context, not the claim that platform qualities have been well-validated across a variety of contexts. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The research model explained 51% of the variance of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the demographic variables, i.e., age, gender, education level and income, exhibited no significant effects on users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Research Model Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As illustrated in Table 3, the square roots of all of the AVEs were larger than all of the cross-correlations”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The assessments of the cross-loadings table (Appendix B), with indicator loadings larger than crossloadings”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the HTMT values range between 0.076 to 0.77, which are well below the threshold of 0.90 (Hair et al., 2017)”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 11
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effect size analysis showed that the f 2 values involved in the relationships between perceived benefits, perceived risks, trust in the platform, and users' intention to participate are 0.182, 0.015, and 0.036, respectively.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Research Model Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As illustrated in Table 2, all of the latent constructs exceed the recommended thresholds, with CR values ranging from 0.89 to 0.95, AVE values ranging from 0.72 to 0.87, and all item loadings exceeding 0.70”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We invited an expert panel of IS researchers to assess the face validity of the preliminary measurement items”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“perceived risks and perceived benefits are two fundamental aspects of consumer decision-making”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peter and Tarpey, 1975 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The extended valence framework indicates that perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust have direct effects on consumers' purchase intention.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kim et al., 2009 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“the extended framework suggests that trust alters consumers' perceptions of risks negatively and benefits positively”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kim et al., 2009 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we included gender, age, education level and income as control variables in the research model”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Respondents who did not have any experience with Uber were screened out.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which were then pretested for comprehensiveness, clarity, and desirable psychometric properties”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Responses from those who took an exceptionally short time to complete the survey were also discarded to ensure the quality of the data.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the items in the dataset loaded significantly onto more than one principal component, indicating no single dominant factor”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.1 Preliminary Analysis
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other than minor modifications in formatting, no major problems surfaced during the pretest.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We used multiple items to assess each construct to ensure construct validity and reliability.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Previous empirical findings showed that trust served as an important risk-mitigating factor in e-commerce and e-government transactions”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.3.1 Trust in the Platform and Perceived Risks
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“well below the threshold of 0.90 (Hair et al., 2017)”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Ballus-Armet et al. (2014) conducted a survey regarding public perception of peer-to-peer ridesharing in the US, and found that convenience and availability, monetary saving, and expanded mobility options were essential motivators for participating in peer-to-peer ridesharing services.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ballus-Armet et al., 2014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Convergent validity is assessed using three criteria: (1) the composite reliability (CR) should be at least 0.70 (Chin, 1998), (2) the average variance extracted (AVE) should be at least 0.50 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981), and (3) all of the item loadings should exceed 0.70 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981;Hair et al., 2009).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chin, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Fornell and Larcker, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“researchers have repeatedly called for the inclusion of technological variables in information systems research (Hong et al., 2014).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.1 Implications for Research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hong et al., 2014 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Security risk has been found a salient inhibitor to various online services”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lin and Lu, 2015 source
- Not matchedcites Powell, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Tai and Ku, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“perceived platform qualities and trust in the platform have been found to be important factors in previous e-commerce literature (Beldad et al., 2012;Cheung and Lee, 2006;Gefen et al., 2003).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Hamari et al. (2015) found that economic reward and enjoyment were significant antecedents of user participation in the sharing economy.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hamari et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“is demonstrated when the square root of the AVE for each construct is greater than the correlations between it and all of the other constructs.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Fornell and Larcker, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“negative relationships between privacy risk and online activities have been found in previous studies”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hajli and Lin, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pavlou et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All the hypotheses were supported, providing strong statistical evidence that perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust in the platform are important determinants of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6 DISCUSSION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“enjoyment and economic reward are important intrinsic and extrinsic motivators that determine users' intention to participate in the sharing economy”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.2 Perceived Benefits
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hamari et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“considering crowdsourcing, project attributes (e.g., duration and difficulty level) and competition situation (e.g., competition intensity and market price) are important determinants of user participation added above the well-studied intrinsic and extrinsic motivations (Shao et al., 2012).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.3.1 Generalizability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Shao et al., 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“platform qualities are the salient drivers that instill the perception of trust in the platform, which is considered the core of technology-enabled services.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“there are also numbers of plausible means to instill users' trust in sharing economy platforms, such as adopting actionable rating systems and providing social proof (Iyer, 2016).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Iyer, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, perceived platform qualities instill users' trust in the platform, playing a substantial role in influencing users' intention to participate in the sharing economy.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6 DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The provision of sharing economy services relies heavily on information and internetworking technologies.
“Since the provision of sharing economy services hinges on the information and networking technologies”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participating in different sharing economy services often requires users to enter into transactions with strangers.
“participating in different sharing economy services, such as Uber or Airbnb, often requires users to enter into such transactions with strangers”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sharing economy services, such as Uber and Airbnb, can be provided at a much lower price compared to their traditional counterparts.
“the sharing economy services, such as Uber and Airbnb, can be provided at a much lower price compared to their traditional counterparts”
The paper relies on this without support.
Trust reflects users' willingness to take risks to fulfill their needs.
“Trust reflects users' willingness to take risks to fulfill their needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Consumers in the e-commerce context always concern that the sellers may not adhere to their transactional obligations.
“Consumers in the ecommerce context always concern that the sellers may not adhere to their transactional obligations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The target audience of Uber users is predominantly Internet-savvy.
“Given the predominantly Internet-savvy target audience of Uber users”
The paper relies on this without support.
Past studies on the sharing economy have been qualitative in nature or focused on examining motivating factors of users' participation.
“past studies on the sharing economy have been qualitative in nature or focused on examining motivating factors of users' participation in the sharing economy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The role of inhibiting factors in user participation in the sharing economy has not received commensurate scholarly attention.
“the role of inhibiting factors in user participation in the sharing economy has not received commensurate scholarly attention.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Contemporary sharing economy services are enabled by information technologies.
“contemporary sharing economy services are enabled by information technologies (e.g., the online platforms of Uber and Airbnb)”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
“TRU3 0.75 12.40 4.58 1.12”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Additional information
“TRU3 0.29 0.37 0.53 0.52 -0.09 -0.18 0.8 0.45”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
(2014) · DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) · Cited by 12,785
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 · Cited by 8,490
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Harman, H. H. (1960) · Cited by 5,148
User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems1
van der Heijden, H. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148660 · Cited by 3,850
The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23552 · Cited by 3,439
From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research
Chang, S., van Witteloostuijn, A. C., & Eden, L. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.88 · Cited by 3,365
Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Agarwal, J. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0032 · Cited by 3,173
You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online
Belk, R. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001 · Cited by 2,951
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250981 · Cited by 2,780
Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148783 · Cited by 2,646
The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry
Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2017) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0204 · Cited by 2,376
Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009 · Cited by 2,084
Lee, M.-C. (2009) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2008.11.006 · Cited by 2,037
Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing: Table 1.
Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/666376 · Cited by 2,015
Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957454_3 · Cited by 1,895
An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success1
Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250957 · Cited by 1,477
Möhlmann, M. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1512 · Cited by 1,325
Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys
Huang, J. L. W., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2011) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8 · Cited by 1,315
Awad, N. F., & Krishnan, M. S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148715 · Cited by 1,252
Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality
Aladwani, A. M., & Palvia, P. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00113-6 · Cited by 1,164
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2009) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0188 · Cited by 990
Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects
Alexander Hars, S. O. (2002) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2002.11044241 · Cited by 964
Electronic Commerce: A Manager's Guide
Kalakota, R., & Whinston, A. B. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 946
An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success
Kim, B.-G. (2005) · Cited by 887
Lu, Y., Yang, S., Chau, P. Y. K., & Cao, Y. (2011) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.09.006 · Cited by 751
A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies
Peter, J. P., & Tarpey, Sr. (1975) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208613 · Cited by 697
An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare
Gao, Y., Li, H., & Luo, Y. (2015) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-03-2015-0087 · Cited by 673
Internet Users’ Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological MODEL1
Son, J.-Y., & Kim, S. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148854 · Cited by 632
Community Structure and Collaborative Consumption: A Routine Activity Approach
Felson, M., & Spaeth, J. L. (1978) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/000276427802100411 · Cited by 619
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0501 · Cited by 609
The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel IndustryPreprint
Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2366898 · Cited by 563
Working for free? Motivations of participating in open source projects
Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2005) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2001.927045 · Cited by 521
The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumptionPreprint
Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M., & Ukkonen, A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2271971 · Cited by 470
Hsu, C.-L., Chang, K.-C., & Chen, M.-C. (2012) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-011-0181-5 · Cited by 451
Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce
Metzger, M. J. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00292.x · Cited by 426
The impact of website quality dimensions on customer satisfaction in the B2C e-commerce context
Lin, H.-F. (2007) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783360701231302 · Cited by 410
A customer value, satisfaction, and loyalty perspective of mobile application recommendations
Xu, C., Peak, D. A., & Prybutok, V. R. (2015) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.08.008 · Cited by 369
The Promise of the Sharing Economy among Disadvantaged Communities
Dillahunt, T. R., & Malone, A. R. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702189 · Cited by 334
Sun, Y., Wang, N., Shen, X., & Zhang, X. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.006 · Cited by 321
Hajli, N., & Lin, X. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2346-x · Cited by 321
The effect of flow experience on mobile SNS users' loyalty
Zhou, T., Li, H., & Yong, L. (2010) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571011055126 · Cited by 301
Hwang, J., & Griffiths, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2015-1560 · Cited by 288
Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: Insights from the sharing economy
Martin, C. J., Upham, P., & Budd, L. C. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.001 · Cited by 260
Predicting and explaining the adoption of online trading: An empirical study in Taiwan
Lee, M.-C. (2009) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.003 · Cited by 252
Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, Z. W. Y., & Chan, T. K. H. (2015) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-09-2013-0192 · Cited by 240
Self-citationTransaction costs and the sharing economy
Henten, A., & Windekilde, I. M. (2016) · Info · doi:10.1108/info-09-2015-0044 · Cited by 235
Kuan, H.-H., Bock, G., & Vathanophas, V. (2006) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290600801959 · Cited by 229
Predicting mobile social network acceptance based on mobile value and social influence
Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2015) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2014-0018 · Cited by 218
Roles of perceived value and individual differences in the acceptance of mobile coupon applications
Liu, F., Zhao, X., Chau, P. Y. K., & Tang, Q. (2015) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-02-2014-0053 · Cited by 218
Understanding the evolution of consumer trust in mobile commerce: a longitudinal study
Lin, J., Wang, B., Wang, N., & Lu, Y. (2013) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-013-0172-y · Cited by 210
Understanding consumer trust in Internet shopping: A multidisciplinary approach
Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20312 · Cited by 205
The joint moderating role of trust propensity and gender on consumers’ online shopping behavior.
Chen, Y., Yan, X., Fan, W., & Gordon, M. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.020 · Cited by 200
Collaborative consumption: business model opportunities and barriers for fashion libraries
Pedersen, E. R. G., & Netter, S. (2015) · Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management · doi:10.1108/jfmm-05-2013-0073 · Cited by 198
Understanding the determinants of mobile payment continuance usage
Zhou, T. (2014) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-02-2014-0068 · Cited by 187
Chen, C. (2010) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2010.06.005 · Cited by 184
The conceptualization of trust, risk and their electronic commerce: the need for clarifications
Gefen, D., Srinivasan Rao, V., & Tractinsky, N. (2003) · 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the · doi:10.1109/hicss.2003.1174442 · Cited by 182
Ballús-Armet, I., Shaheen, S. A., Clonts, K., & Weinzimmer, D. (2014) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2416-04 · Cited by 157
E-commerce web site loyalty: A cross cultural comparison
Chen, V., Yen, D. C., Pornpriphet, W., & Widjaja, A. E. (2014) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9499-0 · Cited by 138
The influence of internet‐retailing factors on price expectations
Grewal, D., Munger, J. L., Iyer, G. R., & Levy, M. (2003) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10083 · Cited by 110
(2013) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 102
Health beliefs and the valence framework in health information seeking behaviors
Mou, J., Shin, D.-H., & Cohen, J. (2016) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-06-2015-0140 · Cited by 102
(2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 98
Factors affecting participation of solvers in crowdsourcing: an empirical study from China
Shao, B., Shi, L., Xu, B., & Liu, L. (2012) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-012-0093-3 · Cited by 97
Many-to-many exchange without money: why people share their resources
McArthur, E. (2014) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/10253866.2014.987083 · Cited by 97
The impact of reference effects on online purchase intention of agricultural products
Zhao, X., Deng, S., & Zhou, Y. (2017) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-03-2016-0082 · Cited by 86
Understanding continuance usage of mobile sites
Zhou, T. (2013) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-01-2013-0001 · Cited by 75
Binninger, A., Ourahmoune, N., & Robert, I. (2015) · Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) · doi:10.19030/jabr.v31i3.9229 · Cited by 71
An economy of access is opening for business: five strategies for success
Denning, S. (2014) · Strategy and Leadership · doi:10.1108/sl-05-2014-0037 · Cited by 60
The distinct roles of dedication-based and constraint-based mechanisms in social networking sites
Kim, B., & Min, J. (2015) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-11-2013-0253 · Cited by 52
Qutaishat, F. T. (2012) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v6n1p97 · Cited by 50
THE SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF THE SHARING ECONOMY
Nica, E., & Potcovaru, A.-M. (2015) · Economics Management and Financial Markets · Cited by 44
Beldad, A., van der Geest, T., de Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2012) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.572331 · Cited by 39
Regulating Innovation in the New Economy
Gobble, M. M. (2015) · doi:10.5437/08956308x5802005 · Cited by 36
Regulating Innovation in the New Economy
Gobble, M. M. (2015) · Research-Technology Management · Cited by 28
Sustainable Development and Citizen-Centric E-Government Services
Nica, E. (2015) · Economics Management and Financial Markets · Cited by 25
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Ziaullah, M., Feng, Y., Akhter, S. N., Khan, M. F., & University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (2014) · Journal of Competitiveness · doi:10.7441/joc.2014.04.01 · Cited by 22
Role of Trust in Adoption of Online Auto Insurance
Lim, S. H., Hur, Y., Lee, S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 2015, American tourist claims he was held captive and sexually assaulted by his transexual Airbnb host in Spain
- 2011, What’s Mine is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live
- Chin, W.W. (1998), “The partial least square approach to structural equation modeling”, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-336.
- 2014, The business model for the sharing economy between SMEs, WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 11, 625
- 2009, Multivariate Data Analysis
- Iyer, A. (2016), “How modern marketplaces like Uber and Airbnb build trust to achieve liquidity”, available at: http://firstround.com/review/How-Modern-Marketplaces-Like-Uber-Airbnb-Build-Trust-to-Hit-Liquidity/ (accessed December 22, 2017).
- 2015, Handbook on Research on Sustainable Consumption
- 2014, Making Sense of the UK Collaborative Economy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Y., Gu, J., Wang, S., & Wang, J. (2019) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.044 · Cited by 334
Nadeem, W., Juntunen, M., Shirazi, F., & Hajli, N. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119786 · Cited by 279
Styvén, M. E., & Mariani, M. M. (2020) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21334 · Cited by 234
“First, it contributes to the sharing economy and collaborative consumption lines of research (Belk, 2014; Hamari et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018; Zervas et al., 2017) by adopting an integrative and comprehensive framework, to identify the drivers (including, monetary and non-monetary ones) of buying…”
InfluentialGong, Z., Han, Z., Li, X., Yu, C., & Reinhardt, J. D. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00286 · Cited by 164
“The extended valence framework has been applied in studies regarding e-commerce, and has been considered a useful and valid theoretical framework to guide our understanding of people’s behaviors in the e-commerce context ( 33), including online health information seeking behavior (4).”
BackgroundNadeem, W., Juntunen, M., Hajli, N., & Tajvidi, M. (2019) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04314-5 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, Z. W. Y., Chan, T. K. H., Balaji, M. S., & Chong, A. Y.-L.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-06-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 829-850
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787919713
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 53.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Internet Research (publishedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Keywords
- sharing economy, Uber, risk perception, perceived benefits, platform trust, technological factors, ride-hailing platforms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
