The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 34 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Why people participate in the sharing economy: an empirical investigation of Uber
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of inhibiting, motivating, and technological factors on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Design/methodology/approach A self-reported online survey was conducted among Uber users in Hong Kong. A total of 295 valid responses were collected. The research model was empirically tested using the structural equation modeling technique. Findings The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users’ intention to participate in Uber. Research limitations/implications This study bridged the research gaps in the sharing economy literature by examining the effects of perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust in the platform on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Moreover, this study enriched the extended valence framework by incorporating perceived platform qualities into the research model, responding to the calls for the inclusion of technological variables in information systems research. Practical implications The findings provided practitioners with insights into enhancing users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy. Originality/value This study presented one of the first attempts to systematically examine the effects of inhibiting, motivating, and technological factors on users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 12 Own method · 10 Own result · 9 Sources not found · 8 No full text of the sources · 3 Not checked yet · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The positive relationship between platform qualities and trust has been well-validated across a variety of e-commerce contexts”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.4 Perceived Platform Qualities
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chen et al., 2015a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Lim et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites Muhammad et al., 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The results section (“We used SPSS and AMOS-IBM version 21”) reports a positive relationship between website information quality and e-trust in Chinese online retailing. But §2.1 notes that a cited study found a positive effect of information design on trust in Canada, not in China or Germany. This paper therefore supports a relationship for one platform quality in its studied context, not the claim that platform qualities have been well-validated across a variety of contexts. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results suggested that perceived risks, perceived benefits, trust in the platform, and perceived platform qualities were significant predictors of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Abstract
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The research model explained 51% of the variance of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the demographic variables, i.e., age, gender, education level and income, exhibited no significant effects on users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Research Model Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As illustrated in Table 3, the square roots of all of the AVEs were larger than all of the cross-correlations”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The assessments of the cross-loadings table (Appendix B), with indicator loadings larger than crossloadings”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the HTMT values range between 0.076 to 0.77, which are well below the threshold of 0.90 (Hair et al., 2017)”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 11
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effect size analysis showed that the f 2 values involved in the relationships between perceived benefits, perceived risks, trust in the platform, and users' intention to participate are 0.182, 0.015, and 0.036, respectively.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Research Model Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As illustrated in Table 2, all of the latent constructs exceed the recommended thresholds, with CR values ranging from 0.89 to 0.95, AVE values ranging from 0.72 to 0.87, and all item loadings exceeding 0.70”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We invited an expert panel of IS researchers to assess the face validity of the preliminary measurement items”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“perceived risks and perceived benefits are two fundamental aspects of consumer decision-making”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peter and Tarpey, 1975 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The extended valence framework indicates that perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust have direct effects on consumers' purchase intention.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kim et al., 2009 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“the extended framework suggests that trust alters consumers' perceptions of risks negatively and benefits positively”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kim et al., 2009 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we included gender, age, education level and income as control variables in the research model”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Respondents who did not have any experience with Uber were screened out.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which were then pretested for comprehensiveness, clarity, and desirable psychometric properties”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Responses from those who took an exceptionally short time to complete the survey were also discarded to ensure the quality of the data.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the items in the dataset loaded significantly onto more than one principal component, indicating no single dominant factor”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.1 Preliminary Analysis
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other than minor modifications in formatting, no major problems surfaced during the pretest.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We used multiple items to assess each construct to ensure construct validity and reliability.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 4.1 Research Design
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Previous empirical findings showed that trust served as an important risk-mitigating factor in e-commerce and e-government transactions”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.3.1 Trust in the Platform and Perceived Risks
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“well below the threshold of 0.90 (Hair et al., 2017)”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Ballus-Armet et al. (2014) conducted a survey regarding public perception of peer-to-peer ridesharing in the US, and found that convenience and availability, monetary saving, and expanded mobility options were essential motivators for participating in peer-to-peer ridesharing services.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ballus-Armet et al., 2014 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Convergent validity is assessed using three criteria: (1) the composite reliability (CR) should be at least 0.70 (Chin, 1998), (2) the average variance extracted (AVE) should be at least 0.50 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981), and (3) all of the item loadings should exceed 0.70 (Fornell and Larcker, 1981;Hair et al., 2009).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chin, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Fornell and Larcker, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hair et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“researchers have repeatedly called for the inclusion of technological variables in information systems research (Hong et al., 2014).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.1 Implications for Research
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Hong et al., 2014 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Security risk has been found a salient inhibitor to various online services”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lin and Lu, 2015 source
- Not matchedcites Powell, 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Tai and Ku, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“perceived platform qualities and trust in the platform have been found to be important factors in previous e-commerce literature (Beldad et al., 2012;Cheung and Lee, 2006;Gefen et al., 2003).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Hamari et al. (2015) found that economic reward and enjoyment were significant antecedents of user participation in the sharing economy.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hamari et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“is demonstrated when the square root of the AVE for each construct is greater than the correlations between it and all of the other constructs.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Fornell and Larcker, 1981
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“negative relationships between privacy risk and online activities have been found in previous studies”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 2.2 Research on the Sharing Economy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hajli and Lin, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Pavlou et al., 2007 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All the hypotheses were supported, providing strong statistical evidence that perceived risks, perceived benefits, and trust in the platform are important determinants of users' intention to participate in Uber.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6 DISCUSSION
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“enjoyment and economic reward are important intrinsic and extrinsic motivators that determine users' intention to participate in the sharing economy”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 3.2 Perceived Benefits
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hamari et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“considering crowdsourcing, project attributes (e.g., duration and difficulty level) and competition situation (e.g., competition intensity and market price) are important determinants of user participation added above the well-studied intrinsic and extrinsic motivations (Shao et al., 2012).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.3.1 Generalizability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Shao et al., 2012 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“platform qualities are the salient drivers that instill the perception of trust in the platform, which is considered the core of technology-enabled services.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“there are also numbers of plausible means to instill users' trust in sharing economy platforms, such as adopting actionable rating systems and providing social proof (Iyer, 2016).”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6.2 Implications for Practice
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Iyer, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, perceived platform qualities instill users' trust in the platform, playing a substantial role in influencing users' intention to participate in the sharing economy.”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 6 DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The provision of sharing economy services relies heavily on information and internetworking technologies.
“Since the provision of sharing economy services hinges on the information and networking technologies”
The paper relies on this without support.
Participating in different sharing economy services often requires users to enter into transactions with strangers.
“participating in different sharing economy services, such as Uber or Airbnb, often requires users to enter into such transactions with strangers”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sharing economy services, such as Uber and Airbnb, can be provided at a much lower price compared to their traditional counterparts.
“the sharing economy services, such as Uber and Airbnb, can be provided at a much lower price compared to their traditional counterparts”
The paper relies on this without support.
Trust reflects users' willingness to take risks to fulfill their needs.
“Trust reflects users' willingness to take risks to fulfill their needs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Consumers in the e-commerce context always concern that the sellers may not adhere to their transactional obligations.
“Consumers in the ecommerce context always concern that the sellers may not adhere to their transactional obligations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The target audience of Uber users is predominantly Internet-savvy.
“Given the predominantly Internet-savvy target audience of Uber users”
The paper relies on this without support.
Past studies on the sharing economy have been qualitative in nature or focused on examining motivating factors of users' participation.
“past studies on the sharing economy have been qualitative in nature or focused on examining motivating factors of users' participation in the sharing economy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The role of inhibiting factors in user participation in the sharing economy has not received commensurate scholarly attention.
“the role of inhibiting factors in user participation in the sharing economy has not received commensurate scholarly attention.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Contemporary sharing economy services are enabled by information technologies.
“contemporary sharing economy services are enabled by information technologies (e.g., the online platforms of Uber and Airbnb)”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > 5.3.1 Reliability and Validity of Constructs
“TRU3 0.75 12.40 4.58 1.12”
§ Why People Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Empirical Investigation of Uber > Additional information
“TRU3 0.29 0.37 0.53 0.52 -0.09 -0.18 0.8 0.45”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
(2014) · DigitalCommons - Kennesaw State University (Kennesaw State University) · Cited by 12,785
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 · Cited by 8,490
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 2015, American tourist claims he was held captive and sexually assaulted by his transexual Airbnb host in Spain
- 2011, What’s Mine is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption is Changing the Way We Live
- Chin, W.W. (1998), “The partial least square approach to structural equation modeling”, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-336.
- 2014, The business model for the sharing economy between SMEs, WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 11, 625
- 2009, Multivariate Data Analysis
- Iyer, A. (2016), “How modern marketplaces like Uber and Airbnb build trust to achieve liquidity”, available at: http://firstround.com/review/How-Modern-Marketplaces-Like-Uber-Airbnb-Build-Trust-to-Hit-Liquidity/ (accessed December 22, 2017).
- 2015, Handbook on Research on Sustainable Consumption
- 2014, Making Sense of the UK Collaborative Economy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 306
Kahraman, O., Cifci, I., & Tiwari, S. (2023) · Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management · doi:10.1080/19368623.2023.2173351 · Cited by 22
Spatial and socioeconomic analysis of host participation in the sharing economy
Sarkar, A., Koohikamali, M., & Pick, J. B. (2019) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2018-0481 · Cited by 21
What decides my purchase of non‐fungible tokens?
Prasad, V., V, Murthy, M. D. P., Joseph, J., & Adhikari, A. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2221 · Cited by 20
Ashrafi, D. M., Alam, I., & Anzum, M. (2021) · International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management · doi:10.1142/s0219877021500401 · Cited by 20
Chen, L. F., Huang, J.-H., Jing, P., Wang, B., Yu, X., Zha, Y., & Jiang, C. (2023) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2023.103881 · Cited by 21
Computing the User Experience via Big Data Analysis: A Case of Uber Services
Kim, J. H., Nan, D., Kim, Y., et al. (2021) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2021.014922 · Cited by 18
From Homeowner to Airbnb Host: The Role of Trust and Perceived Value
Zhu, G., & Kubíčková, M. (2022) · Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism · doi:10.1080/1528008x.2021.2024781 · Cited by 18
“Previous studies have demonstrated that perceived value is one of the core determinants of users’ behavior for information technology in the field of tourism and hospitality (Lee et al., 2018; Liang et al., 2018; Ponte et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundZhang, C., Sankaran, S., & Aarts, H. (2022) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2923 · Cited by 20
Shao, Z., Guo, Y., & Ge, C. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.114 · Cited by 18
“Since the premise of sharing economy is to unleash the value from underutilized personal commodities [12, 13], it is necessary to conduct a systematic and comprehensive analysis of different value steams, in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of value creation in the context of bicycle sharing from a custo…”
BackgroundPeran Internet dalam Meningkatkan Jumlah Pekerja Lepas di Indonesia
Widodo, A. S. (2019) · Nyimak Journal of Communication · doi:10.31000/nyimak.v3i2.1811 · Cited by 18
Parallel-machine scheduling in shared manufacturing
Ji, M., Ye, X., Qian, F., et al. (2020) · Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization · doi:10.3934/jimo.2020174 · Cited by 18
Ming-hua, H., Qin, J., Wen, M., & Chen, W. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3130890 · Cited by 22
Consumer intentions to use collaborative economy platforms: A meta‐analysis
Ertz, M., & Sarigöllü, E. (2022) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12840 · Cited by 21
Jiang, G., & Yang, W. (2023) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.05.009 · Cited by 17
Sharing More, Owning Less: How Consumer Minimalism Drives the Sharing Economy
Rasheed, A., & Balakrishnan, J. (2023) · Journal of Promotion Management · doi:10.1080/10496491.2023.2279769 · Cited by 17
“While it can often provide more affordable transportation than owning a car, the cost-effectiveness of Uber rides depends on individual customers’ travel habits and consumption (Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundImpact of corporate social responsibility on brand trust and brand loyalty: Case of Uber
Moon, J., Hwang, J., & Lee, W. S. (2024) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.2629 · Cited by 20
A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in the sharing economy
Jiang, J., Li, E. Y., & Tang, L. (2024) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-08-2022-0655 · Cited by 17
Policy compliance and deterrence mechanism in the sharing economy
Park, S. K., Kwak, K. T., & Lee, B. G. (2019) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-03-2018-0098 · Cited by 16
Service providers' intention to continue sharing: the moderating role of two-way review system
Chen, V., Biamukda, S., & Tran, S. T. T. (2020) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-08-2019-0436 · Cited by 15
Goel, P., & Haldar, P. (2020) · Asian Journal of Business and Accounting · doi:10.22452/ajba.vol13no2.10 · Cited by 15
Spillover effects from web to mobile payment services
Zhang, K. Z. K., Gong, X., Chen, C., Zhao, S. J., & Lee, M. (2019) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-11-2017-0457 · Cited by 15
Utilitarian and altruistic motivations in using car sharing: The moderating role of perceived power
Magno, F. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128409 · Cited by 14
The Motivations to Engage in Sharing Economy: A Case Study of Uber Morocco
Fikri, I. E., Koubaa, S., & Belhcen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies · doi:10.20469/ijbas.5.10002-5 · Cited by 17
Kaushal, L. A., & Prashar, A. (2022) · Journal of Global Information Technology Management · doi:10.1080/1097198x.2022.2062993 · Cited by 14
Guest and Host Perspectives of Service Quality and Satisfaction in Digital Home-sharing Platforms
Amat‐Lefort, N., Marimón, F., & Mas‐Machuca, M. (2022) · Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism · doi:10.1080/1528008x.2022.2089945 · Cited by 13
Jia, Y., Chen, Q., Mu, W., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16820 · Cited by 13
Su, L., Cheng, X., & Zarifis, A. (2024) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2024.105086 · Cited by 17
A Multi-Modal Route Choice Model with Ridesharing and Public Transit
Li, M., Hua, G., & Huang, H. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114275 · Cited by 13
The online marketplace for business education: An exploratory study
Mozahem, N. A. (2021) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100544 · Cited by 13
Li, W., Waris, I., Sun, C., Hameed, I., Bhutto, M. Y., & Ali, R. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.970444 · Cited by 15
“At the organizational level, research on sharing economy focused on model development and its application to industrial sectors (Binninger et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundLi, X., Zhang, S., Liu, D., Cheng, T., & Zhang, Z. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10102035 · Cited by 12
Huang, T.-L., Chen, C.-H., Liao, G., Cheng, T. C. E., & Teng, C. (2022) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2022.2050583 · Cited by 12
“For example, Web certifications offer shoppers assurance [49, 50, 51], imply quality [46], and influence user behavior [45].”
BackgroundFollowing the herd? An empirical investigation into the adoption of mobile payment systems
Hung, S., Cheng, M.-J., & Tung, Y.-J. (2024) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-03-2023-0195 · Cited by 18
Li, L., Lee, K. Y., Chang, Y., Yang, S., & Park, P. (2021) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2021.1882366 · Cited by 12
“Lee et al. (2018) found that privacy risks are negatively associated with users ’ intention to participate in these services.”
BackgroundDigitalization of Employment: Working via Online Platforms
Hünefeld, L., Meyer, S.-C., & Backhaus, N. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74128-0_9 · Cited by 12
Ridesourcing mode choice: A latent class choice model for UberX in Chile
García-Melero, G., Sainz-González, R., Coto-Millán, P., & Valencia-Vásquez, A. (2022) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100722 · Cited by 12
Bright and dark sides of adopting a platform‐based sharing economy business model
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Mahto, R. V. (2023) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12650 · Cited by 12
Hong, I. B., & Kim, M. (2024) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2023.102096 · Cited by 11
Hou, K., & Hou, T. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-05685-3 · Cited by 13
“Trust in live streaming includes two items adapted from Lee et al. (2018).”
Bhatt, K., Halvadia, N. B., Shah, P., et al. (2024) · Research in Transportation Business & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101113 · Cited by 14
Purchase intention for second-hand luxury goods: An empirical study of Chinese consumers
Yan, G., Li, Y., Zhang, T., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304967 · Cited by 11
Alatawi, F. M. H., Alomar, J. A., & Balakrishnan, J. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123231 · Cited by 18
Analysis of Sharing Economy Services:Initial Findings from Sharing Cities Sweden
Markendahl, J. I., Hossain, M. I., McCormick, K., Lund, T., City of Gothenburg, S., Möller, J., City of Stockholm, S., Näslund, P., & City of Umeå, S. (2018) · Nordic and Baltic Journal of Information and Communications Technologies · doi:10.13052/nbjict1902-097x.2018.013 · Cited by 12
“Few papers looked into the users’ intention to participate in the sharing economy [11, 12] where other articles focus on the regulatory and economic issues [13, 14].”
BackgroundJemio, P. R., Merino‐Saum, A., Hansmann, R., & Binder, C. R. (2024) · Cleaner and Responsible Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.clrc.2024.100210 · Cited by 10
Jia, Y., 高, 爽., Gao, L., Gao, J., & Wang, T. (2024) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-12-2023-0433 · Cited by 11
Trần, V. Đ. (2020) · Journal of Project Management · doi:10.5267/j.jpm.2020.8.003 · Cited by 10
“It is regulated via a fixed of social relations such as friendships and relationships, whilst business economy is governed by the good judgment of market like price mechanism (Lessig, 2008). Shaheen, Chan and Gaynor (2016) showed that sharing economic system is a famous consumer concept that makes a speciality of acce…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Dual Effects of Consumer Satisfaction on Brand Switching Intention of Sharing Apparel
Wang, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14084526 · Cited by 17
Paylaşım Ekonomisi Kapsamında Yemek Paylaşma Sitelerinin Analizi
DEMİR, Y. (2020) · Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.32572/guntad.678419 · Cited by 10
Trust Transfer in Sharing Accommodation: The Moderating Role of Privacy Concerns
Lu, B., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14127384 · Cited by 9
“[45] proposed that trust in the platform is a significant predictor of users’ intention to participate in Uber.”
BackgroundValue co-creation in shared mobility: The case of carpooling in China
Tian, C., Tu, K., Sui, H., & Sun, Q. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123481 · Cited by 9
A latent class analysis of public perceptions about shared mobility barriers and benefits
Chahine, R., Christ, S. L., & Gkritza, K. (2024) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2024.101132 · Cited by 10
Wang, Y., Wu, J., Gu, J., & Wang, F. (2024) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.025 · Cited by 9
Cheng, X., Xu, Y., Yang, B., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-08-2023-0715 · Cited by 9
Factors Affecting Consumers’ Intention to Use Mobile Ride Hailing Services in Developing Countries
Al-masaeed, S., Alnawayseh, M., AlFawwaz, B. M., Maqableh, M., Alnabhan, M. M., Masa’deh, R. M. T., & Al-Shatnawi, A. (2022) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v16i11.30579 · Cited by 8
Tran, T. P., Wen, C., & Gugenishvili, I. (2023) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology · doi:10.1108/jhtt-09-2021-0270 · Cited by 11
Wang, N., Yang, Y., Fang, Y., Li, H., & Lu, A. (2023) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.14046 · Cited by 9
“Empirical studies on the sharing economy have indeed confirmed the positive effects of economic incentives on user participation intention by furthering user interest and public recognition (Böcker & Meelen, 2017; Garud et al., 2022; Hamari et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundDoes Online Ride-Hailing Affect Car Purchasing Intention Under the Sharing Economy?
Zhou, F.-L., Si, D., Tiwari, S., Ma, P., & Lim, M. K. (2024) · IEEE transactions on engineering management · doi:10.1109/tem.2024.3431677 · Cited by 10
“Perceived risk in the sharing economy model is also a crucial factor hindering consumer participation in sharing behavior [62], [63], [64].”
Worker Empowerment in the Era of Sharing Economy Platforms in Global South
Keskinen, P. (2020) · Participatory Design Conference · doi:10.1145/3384772.3385147 · Cited by 8
“Examples of successful multi-sided platforms that utilise this concept include Uber (transportation) [25], Task-Rabbit (small tasks) [9] and Airbnb [20].”
MethodSelf-employment through ride-hailing: Drivers’ experiences in Johannesburg, South Africa
Wilmans, G., & Rashied, N. (2021) · Acta Commercii · doi:10.4102/ac.v21i1.926 · Cited by 9
Why do people shop together around the same screen?
Roten, Y. S., & Vanheems, R. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-08-2020-4053 · Cited by 8
Understanding entity shared product usage: an innovation-adoption coupling model
Chen, C., & Li, X. (2021) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-04-2021-0279 · Cited by 8
Exploring driver and user perspectives of service quality in sharing economy transport platforms
Amat‐Lefort, N., Marimón, F., & Mas‐Machuca, M. (2023) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2023.2169123 · Cited by 8
“These are some of the reasons that have motivated passengers to use these services, making them an increasingly attractive alternative for them (Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundCustomer misbehavior and service providers’ risk perception in the sharing economy
Rossmannek, O., David, N. A., Schramm‐Klein, H., & van der Borgh, M. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114340 · Cited by 11
Auditianto, A., Sucahyo, Y. G., Gandhi, A., & Ruldeviyani, Y. (2019) · International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.1109/icacsis47736.2019.8979958 · Cited by 8
“Platform quality refers to a user’s assessment of the platform to fulfill their needs and as a reflection of the overall platform excellence [13].”
BackgroundInfluentialChinese Consumers’ Attitudes toward and Intentions to Continue Using Skill-Sharing Service Platforms
Chen, Y., & Ryu, M. H. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14090765 · Cited by 10
The impact of support on behavioural intention in a customer-to-customer retail service context
Ahn, J. (2024) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2024.2322019 · Cited by 8
“Previous collaborative/sustainable consumption literature has focused on the service context such as accommodation (Ert, Fleischer, and Magen 2016; Yang et al. 2019) and transportation (Lee et al. 2018).”
Zarifis, A., Cheng, X., & Kroenung, J. (2019) · International Journal of Electronic Business · doi:10.1504/ijeb.2019.099059 · Cited by 9
“CC still faces a degree of challenge to earn the trust of the consumer (Lee et al., 2018), and the percentage of people that have used CC ranges from 42% in the USA to 1% in Japan (Cusumano, 2018).”
BackgroundSharing car park system for parking units of multiple EVs in a power market
Zhang, M., Kang, J., Tang, R., et al. (2020) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118489 · Cited by 7
Vulnerability and perceived risks in the peer‐to‐peer sharing economy
Culiberg, B., Koklič, M. K., Kukar‐Kinney, M., & Vida, I. (2024) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.13028 · Cited by 6
Increasing immersive virtual reality platform loyalty: The role of embodiment
Lin, Y., Suh, A., & Wagner, C. (2025) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2025.104255 · Cited by 6
Exploring the Behavioral Intention to Use Collaborative Commerce: A Case of Uber
Lee, C. C., Ruane, S. G., Lim, H. S., Zhang, R., & Shin, H. (2021) · Journal of international technology and information management · doi:10.58729/1941-6679.1545 · Cited by 6
Promoting customer advocacy in the ride-hailing sector: A generational cohort perspective
van Tonder, E., & Petzer, D. J. (2023) · South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences · doi:10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4670 · Cited by 6
“…popularity following the 2008 financial crisis (Kuswanto et al. 2020:76), the sharing economy and platform business models have become part of many consumers’ daily existence in terms of accommodation-, entertainment- and transportation-related services (Lee et al. 2018:829; Wang et al. 2022:197).”
BackgroundBulin, D., Gheorghe, G., Kanovici, A. L., et al. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16073028 · Cited by 6
“Other controversies related to Uber’s operations include the unfairness and inadequacy of legislation, low Uber’s contribution to the state budget due to low prices and lack of regulation [25], the benefits for competition, and the significant role Uber plays in urban transportation.”
BackgroundHasan, N., Khan, A. G., Hossen, M. A., & Islam, A. (2021) · International Journal of E-Adoption · doi:10.4018/ijea.2021070102 · Cited by 7
Borchert, A., & Heisel, M. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13010034 · Cited by 8
“Risks originating from the social media applications especially refer to security or information leakages depending on the applied technology [10,12].”
BackgroundDeveloping the Maturity Model for Gig Economy Business Processes
Gandhi, A., Budiardjo, E. K., & Sucahyo, Y. G. (2019) · IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE) · doi:10.1109/iscaie.2019.8743832 · Cited by 6
“2, 10 articles are elected: [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21].”
Delgado, Ó. A. M., & Paredes, M. R. (2023) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2023.2287789 · Cited by 6
“Other factors that may discourage the creation of user trust in providers is the sharing of personal information, financial information, or location information, which may raise particular concerns about security and privacy risk (Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSarkar, A., Pick, J. B., & Jabeen, S. (2023) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi13010004 · Cited by 6
Khalek, S. A., & Chakraborty, A. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102886 · Cited by 6
Determinant Factors to Become a Gig Worker in an Online Course
Alif, I., Sucahyo, Y. G., & Gandhi, A. (2020) · 2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS) · doi:10.1109/icacsis51025.2020.9263168 · Cited by 5
“The original sample should be accepted if it matches the direction of the hypothesis, while the hypothesis is negative if the original sample is negative [30].”
BackgroundInvestigating the impact of home-sharing on the traditional rental market
Zhang, X., Lin, Z., & Maeng, J. (2021) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-03-2021-0190 · Cited by 5
The approach to circular fashion design: An exploration of designing for otherways[project]
Lettmann, S. (2022) · International Journal of Sustainable Fashion & Textiles · doi:10.1386/sft_0011_1 · Cited by 5
Carrillo, M. B. M., Pérez, M. S., Terán-Yépez, E., & López, N. R. (2025) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-025-00509-5 · Cited by 6
“Regarding emotional values , the study by Clauss et al. ( 2019 ) shows that positive emotions increase loyalty to SEPs.”
InfluentialWhat inspires us to “share”? Motives to provide goods and services in the sharing economy
Quirós, P., & Chankov, S. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.100 · Cited by 5
Tang, Z. R., Kim, S., Wang, H., Xue, B., & Zhou, Y. (2026) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105592 · Cited by 5
Chad, P., & Isbanner, S. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2449 · Cited by 4
May the Fourth (Industrial) Revolution be with You: Value Convergence within Uber’s Sharing Economy
Tham, A., & Ogulin, R. (2021) · International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management · doi:10.1142/s0219877021400137 · Cited by 4
DEMİR, Y., & Bertan, S. (2025) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1080/15378020.2024.2448641 · Cited by 4
“A sharing economy is a collaborative consumption model that emerges as individuals share, exchange, and rent services or goods without purchasing them (Choi et al., 2014; Demir, 2020; Z. W. Lee et al., 2018).”
Shao, F., & Wang, N. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0326774 · Cited by 6
“Given mobile applications’ critical role in sharing platform success [60], our study analyzes operational data from Chinese sharing platforms with active mobile apps.”
Peng, Y., Wang, L., & Yang, S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246483 · Cited by 4
“The valence framework has been applied in various research environments including online shopping [13], mobile payment [11], and sharing economy [14].”
BackgroundMOTIVATORS FOR THE USE OF VEHICLE SHARING SERVICES ON DEMAND IN BRAZIL
Violín, F. L. (2022) · Journal of Globalization Competitiveness and Governability · doi:10.3232/gcg.2021.v15.n3.02 · Cited by 4
“From the users' point of view, their motivations for use can orbit around economic and social elements, specifically focused on cost, the convenience of use, availability, sustainability, social interaction, and support (Ozanne & Ozanne, 2020), at the same time that they can perceive risks related to privacy and secur…”
BackgroundSocio-technological system of sharing economy
Singh, A. (2021) · Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University Management · doi:10.21638/11701/spbu08.2021.203 · Cited by 4
Huang, L., Ladikas, M., He, G., Hahn, J., & Schippl, J. (2021) · Competition and Regulation in Network Industries · doi:10.1177/17835917211051223 · Cited by 4
“The concept of the multi-sided market is regarded as an essential part of the data-driven platform services and a critical feature of the overall online platform economy (Just, 2018; Lee et al., 2018).”
Ye, P., Liu, L., & Tan, J. (2022) · International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijthi.299076 · Cited by 4
“PT has a great impact on the users’ adoption of sharing economy(Chua et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2018).”
BackgroundIdentifying the critical factors of physical gig economy usage
Tripathi, M. A., Tripathi, R., & Yadav, U. S. (2022) · International Journal of Health Sciences · doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6ns4.9553 · Cited by 4
Nawaz, Z., Talib, M. N. A., & Abbas, A. (2024) · Human Systems Management · doi:10.3233/hsm-240049 · Cited by 3
“There are 4 items related to demographics, 5 items for Economic Value [47, 83], 5 items for Developmental Value [84, 85], 5 items for Social Value [86, 87], 3 items for Hedonic Value [28], 4 items for Autonomy Value [72], 6 items for Platform Brand Trust [25, 88], 4 items for attitude towards use…”
The continuance use of e-renewal of a health insurance subscription in Ghana
Alhassan, M. D., & Adam, I. O. (2022) · International Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.1080/20479700.2022.2099336 · Cited by 4
“ious technologies allow firms and businesses to prioritize their limited resources to enhance their services and promote key benefits [19,20].”
BackgroundMapping the big data analytics in sharing economy: A bibliometric literature review
Yang, Y., Su, X. D., Yao, S., & Chen, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.1045943 · Cited by 6
“The third cluster, “ trust building ” , hints that the adoption of big data analytics also helps SE platforms to build trust which constitutes a critical factor in mitigating risk precepted by users (Lee et al., 2018; Nienaber et al., 2021).”
BackgroundReconceptualizing marketing: an assessment of the marketing system in an emerging economy
Fowler, J. G., Watson, A., Sen, S. S., & Sinha, N. (2023) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-01-2023-0025 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, Z. W. Y., Chan, T. K. H., Balaji, M. S., & Chong, A. Y.-L.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-06-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 829-850
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2787919713
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 53.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Internet Research (publishedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Keywords
- sharing economy, Uber, risk perception, perceived benefits, platform trust, technological factors, ride-hailing platforms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
