Cited by 796Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityElectronic Health Records SystemsBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Fhirchain: applying blockchain to securely and scalably share clinical data

Open access
Zhang, Peng, White, Jules, Schmidt, Douglas C., Lenz, Gunther, Rosenbloom, S. Trent·2018·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Secure and scalable data sharing is essential for collaborative clinical decision making. Conventional clinical data efforts are often siloed, however, which creates barriers to efficient information exchange and impedes effective treatment decision made for patients. This paper provides four contributions to the study of applying blockchain technology to clinical data sharing in the context of technical requirements defined in the “Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap” from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). First, we analyze the ONC requirements and their implications for blockchain-based systems. Second, we present FHIRChain, which is a blockchain-based architecture designed to meet ONC requirements by encapsulating the HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard for shared clinical data. Third, we demonstrate a FHIRChain-based decentralized app using digital health identities to authenticate participants in a case study of collaborative decision making for remote cancer care. Fourth, we highlight key lessons learned from our case study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.07.004

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [14]Downey A.S. Olson S. Sharing clinical research data: Workshop summary 2013 National Academies Press 23700647
  2. [27]Zhang P. White J. Schmidt D.C. Lenz G. Applying software patterns to address interoperability in blockchain-based healthcare apps, the 24th pattern languages of programming conference 2017
  3. [31]Krawiec R. Housman D. White M. Filipova M. Quarre F. Barr D. Blockchain: Opportunities for health care Proc. NIST Workshop Blockchain Healthcare 2018 1 16
  4. [35]Ekblaw A. Azaria A. Halamka J.D. Lippman A. A case study for blockchain in healthcare:“medrec” prototype for electronic health records and medical research data Proceedings of IEEE Open & Big Data Conference 2018
  5. [61]Even S. Goldreich O. Yacobi Y. Electronic wallet Advances in Cryptology 2018 Springer 383 386
  6. [62]Anthes G. Estonia: a model for e-government Communications of the ACM 58 2015 18 20

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, P., White, J., Schmidt, D. C., Lenz, G., & Rosenbloom, S. T.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Varian Medical Systems (United States) (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Peng
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2018-01
Volume
16
Pages
267-278
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963993810
Cited by
796
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 7
FWCI
119.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Varian Medical Systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, clinical data sharing, FHIR, HL7, decentralized applications, clinical decision-making, data security, interoperability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review