64-channel double-layered sieve electrode with increased porosity for improved axon regeneration and high spatial resolution,
Abstract
Double-layered sieve-type neural electrode with high channel density is suggested for peripheral nerve interface. The neural electrode has double channel density due to its two separated metal layers including electrodes and distribution interconnects. Also it can be utilized to acquire and stimulate throughout the whole nerve cross-section. The measurement results of the electrochemical impedance confirm that the fabricated neural electrode has the neural signal recording feasibility. In-vivo implantation of the device is performed and functional recovery has been investigated. From the preliminary experimental results, new improved device design with higher porosity is suggested for next step.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sieve electrodes can be created with up to 64 electrodes.
“It has been shown that sieve electrodes can be created with up to 64 electrodes (Jeong et al., 2016).”
From Update on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics (2018) · cites this paper as Jeong et al., 2016
A recent double-layered sieve electrode with 64 channels implanted in the rat sciatic nerve had unfavorable results after 4 months in terms of motor function, attributed to inadequate porosity.
“A recent design incorporated 64 channels in a double-layered sieve electrode in order to double interconnection density and increase spatial resolution. It was implanted in the rat sciatic nerve. The results were not favorable after 4 months in terms of motor function, which was attributed to inadequate porosity [121].”
From Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review (2020) · cites this paper as [121]
Cites
Neural Stimulation and Recording Electrodes
Cogan, S. F. (2008) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160518 · Cited by 2,243 · see citing works
Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future
Lebedev, M. A., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2006) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.07.004 · Cited by 1,875 · see citing works
Navarro, X., Krueger, T. B., Lago, N., Micera, S., Stieglitz, T., & Dario, P. (2005) · Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System · doi:10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10303.x · Cited by 845 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Cuff-type electrode has a similar problem [4].”
Biddiss, E. A., & Chau, T. T. (2007) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0b013e3181587f6c · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Ludwig, K. A., Uram, J. D., Yang, J., Martin, D. C., & Kipke, D. R. (2006) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/3/1/007 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm
Dhillon, G. S., & Horch, K. W. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.856072 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control
Rossini, P. M., Micera, S., Benvenuto, A., Carpaneto, J., Cavallo, G., Citi, L., Cipriani, C., Denaro, L., Denaro, V., Di Pino, G., et al. (2010) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.001 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Long-term stimulation and recording with a penetrating microelectrode array in cat sciatic nerve
Branner, A., Stein, R. B., Fernandez, E., Aoyagi, Y., & Normann, R. A. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.820321 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Schultz, A. E., & Kuiken, T. A. (2011) · PM&R · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.016 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Lago, N., Ceballos, D., J Rodrı́guez, F., Stieglitz, T., & Navarro, X. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.025 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Lago, N., Udina, E., Ramachandran, A., & Navarro, X. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.891168 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Ramachandran, A., Schuettler, M., Lago, N., Doerge, T., Koch, K. P., Navarro, X., Hoffmann, K.-P., & Stieglitz, T. (2006) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/3/2/005 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Lee, S. H., Jung, J. H., Chae, Y. M., Suh, J. F., & Kang, J. Y. (2010) · Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/20/3/035015 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Juan, W. H., & Pang, S. W. (1994) · Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena · doi:10.1116/1.587138 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review for the peripheral nerve interface designer
Larson, C. E., & Meng, E. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108523 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review
Yildiz, K. A., Shin, A. Y., & Kaufman, K. R. (2020) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-020-00667-5 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“The results were not favorable after 4 months in terms of motor function, which was attributed to inadequate porosity [121].”
BackgroundUpdate on Peripheral Nerve Electrodes for Closed-Loop Neuroprosthetics
Rijnbeek, E. H., Eleveld, N., & Olthuis, W. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00350 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Compliant peripheral nerve interfaces.
Paggi, V., Akouissi, O., Micera, S., & Lacour, S. P. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abcdbe · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“12 016016 [119] Jeong J, Jung W, Kim O, Chu J-U, Youn I, Kim K, Oh S R, Park J W and Kim J 2016 64-channel double-layered sieve electrode with increased porosity for improved axon regeneration and high spatial resolution 2016 6th IEEE Int.”
BackgroundMethodActive Neural Interface Circuits and Systems for Selective Control of Peripheral Nerves: A Review
Habibollahi, M., Jiang, D., Lancashire, H. T., & Demosthenous, A. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2024.3430038 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Initially proposed as a planar disc in 1974, sieve electrodes comprise several metal holes that form a physical barrier between axon groups with enclosed electrode contacts [30].”
A handheld device for magnetically inserting a neural interface into a peripheral nervous system
Yim, S., Hwang, D., Ihn, Y. S., Jeong, J., Oh, S.-R., & Kim, K. (2017) · 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2017.8036803 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Jeong, J., Jung, W., Kim, O., Chu, J.-U., Youn, I., Kim, K., Oh, S. R., Park, J. W., & Kim, J.
- Affiliations
- Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KR)
- Korea University (KR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-06
- Pages
- 1148-1153
- ISSN
- 2155-1774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2505331947
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) (publishedVersion)
- Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Keywords
- axon regeneration, peripheral nerve interfaces, neural recording, electrochemical impedance, in vivo implantation, functional recovery, electrode porosity, neurostimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
