The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks
Open accessAbstract
We propose an alternative generator architecture for generative adversarial networks, borrowing from style transfer literature. The new architecture leads to an automatically learned, unsupervised separation of high-level attributes (e.g., pose and identity when trained on human faces) and stochastic variation in the generated images (e.g., freckles, hair), and it enables intuitive, scale-specific control of the synthesis. The new generator improves the state-of-the-art in terms of traditional distribution quality metrics, leads to demonstrably better interpolation properties, and also better disentangles the latent factors of variation. To quantify interpolation quality and disentanglement, we propose two new, automated methods that are applicable to any generator architecture. Finally, we introduce a new, highly varied and high-quality dataset of human faces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It has been demonstrated that GANbased synthesis approaches may create unexpectedly high-quality false videos (Karras et al. 2019).”
From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Karras et al. 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“100K-Generated-Images (Karras et al., 2019): This dataset includes 100,000 synthesised face, bedroom, car and cat images by a GAN generator trained based on real images in the FFHQ28 and LSUN29 datasets”
From Deepfake: definitions, performance metrics and standards, datasets, and a meta-review (2024) · cites this paper as Karras et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The generator learns to produce increasingly realistic images through this adversarial process, creating convincing deepfakes (Karras, Laine & Aila, 2019).”
From Deepfake forensics: a survey of digital forensic methods for multimodal deepfake identification on social media (2024) · cites this paper as Karras, Laine & Aila, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“StyleGAN (Karras et al. 2019) has proposed a new design to automatically learn the unsupervised separation of high-level attributes such as pose and human identity.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Karras et al. 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The StyleGAN is able to generate high-resolution images with higher image quality and wider detailed variations.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Karras et al. 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It contains 70,000 high-quality images at 1024 × 1024 resolution.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Karras et al. 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“iFakeFaceDB (Neves et al. 2020) is a fake image dataset for the study of synthetic face manipulation detection. It contains about 87,000 synthetic face images generated by the StyleGAN model (Karras et al. 2019) and transformed with the GANprintR (Neves et al. 2020) approach.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Karras et al. 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Generative AI technologies have reached an inflection point in consumer adoption and enterprise value, sparked by technological advancements in machine learning architectures such as GANs [56, 79], VAEs [86], and transformers [38, 170].”
From Design Principles for Generative AI Applications (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In this paper, the five most famous and effective architectures in state-of-the-art for face Deepfakes were taken into account: STARGAN [6], STYLEGAN [19], STYLEGAN2 [20], ATTGAN [15] and GDWCT [5].”
From DeepFake Detection by Analyzing Convolutional Traces (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Hsu et al. [85] introduced a two-phase deep learn- ing method for detection of deepfake images.”
From Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey (2022) · cites this paper as [85]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Discrim- inative features between the fake and real images are extracted through the CFFN learning process based on the use of pairwise information, which is the label of each pair of two input images.”
From Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey (2022) · cites this paper as [85]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Models such as StyleGAN [79], GPT [20, 130, 137, 138], and Codex [28] have demonstrated that powerful generative models can produce works at a human-like level of fidelity.”
From Design Principles for Generative AI Applications (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
In the citing paper
“On first glance, deepfakes and other algorithmically generated images of people (e.g., images generated by StyleGAN) look quite realistic (35).”
From Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Generative adversarial networks
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2020) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3422622 · Cited by 18,384
TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learningPreprint
Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.5555/3026877.3026899 · Cited by 16,548
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate ShiftPreprint
Ioffe, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/o9raffed · Cited by 15,273
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric
Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A. A., Shechtman, E., & Wang, O. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00068 · Cited by 14,623
GANs Trained by a Two Time-Scale Update Rule Converge to a Local Nash Equilibrium
Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., & Hochreiter, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.08500 · Cited by 8,365
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- doan, 2018, Online adaptative curriculum learning for GANs, CoRR
- durugkar, 2016, Generative multiadversarial networks, CoRR
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,057 of 1,057
Khan, S. A., & Dang-Nguyen, D.-T. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3348450 · Cited by 53
Generative Adversarial Networks to Improve Fetal Brain Fine-Grained Plane Classification
Montero, A., Bonet-Carne, E., & Burgos-Artizzu, X. P. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21237975 · Cited by 48
Deepfake Video Detection with Spatiotemporal Dropout Transformer
Zhang, D., Lin, F., Hua, Y., Wang, P., Zeng, D., & Ge, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3503161.3547913 · Cited by 50
On the Generalization of Deep Learning Models in Video Deepfake Detection
Coccomini, D. A., Caldelli, R., Falchi, F., & Gennaro, C. (2023) · Preprint (MDPI) · doi:10.20944/preprints202303.0161.v1 · Cited by 46
“Reference [6] proposes StyleGAN, a highly-customizable deepfake generation method that allows for fine-grained control over the generated images.”
MethodC2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detection
Tan, C., Tao, R., Liu, H., Gu, G., Wu, B., Zhao, Y., & Wei, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i7.32772 · Cited by 93
GANCollage: A GAN-Driven Digital Mood Board to Facilitate Ideation in Creativity Support
Wan, Q., & Lu, Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3563657.3596072 · Cited by 46
GenConViT: Deepfake Video Detection Using Generative Convolutional Vision Transformer
Deressa, D. W., Mareen, H., Lambert, P., Atnafu, S., Akhtar, Z., & Van Wallendael, G. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15126622 · Cited by 46
Wolfe, R., Yang, Y., Howe, B., & Caliskan, A. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594072 · Cited by 42
Visual Deepfake Detection: Review of Techniques, Tools, Limitations, and Future Prospects
Ur Rehman Ahmed, N., Badshah, A., Adeel, H., Tajammul, A., Daud, A., & Alsahfi, T. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3523288 · Cited by 45
Beyond Text-to-Image: Multimodal Prompts to Explore Generative AI
Liu, V. (2023) · Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544549.3577043 · Cited by 38
Dang, H., Mecke, L., & Buschek, D. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3502141 · Cited by 37
Retrieval-based Spatially Adaptive Normalization for Semantic Image Synthesis
Shi, Y., Liu, X., Wei, Y., Wu, Z., & Zuo, W. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01094 · Cited by 36
Fsbi: Deepfake detection with frequency enhanced self-blended images
Abul Hasanaath, A., Luqman, H., Katib, R., & Anwar, S. (2025) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2025.105418 · Cited by 34
Rethinking Vision-Language Model in Face Forensics: Multi-Modal Interpretable Forged Face Detector
Guo, X., Song, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., & Liu, X. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.00019 · Cited by 34
Emergence of deepfakes and video tampering detection approaches: A survey
Kingra, S., Aggarwal, N., & Kaur, N. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13100-x · Cited by 33
Qiao, S., Pan, S., Luo, G., Pang, S., Chen, T., Singh, A. K., & Lv, Z. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3143319 · Cited by 32
MFF-Net: Deepfake Detection Network Based on Multi-Feature Fusion
Zhao, L., Zhang, M., Ding, H., & Cui, X. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23121692 · Cited by 32
Nonlinear 3D cosmic web simulation with heavy-tailed generative adversarial networks
Feder, R. M., Berger, P., & Stein, G. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.103504 · Cited by 30
“Despite these practicali-ties, GANs with reasonable model capacity and sufficient training data can be trained successfully and produce high-fidelity samples from the underlying data distribution [30, 31].”
BackgroundForensic Analysis of Synthetically Generated Western Blot Images
Mandelli, S., Cozzolino, D., Cannas, E. D., Cardenuto, J. P., Moreira, D., Bestagini, P., Scheirer, W. J., Rocha, A., Verdoliva, L., Tubaro, S., et al. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3179116 · Cited by 26
Rethinking AI in Education: Highlighting the Metacognitive Challenge
Levin, I., Marom, M., & Kojukhov, A. (2025) · BRAIN BROAD RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE · doi:10.70594/brain/16.s1/21 · Cited by 31
Learning cortical representations through perturbed and adversarial dreaming
Deperrois, N., Petrovici, M. A., Senn, W., & Jordan, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76384 · Cited by 28
Multimodal Approach for DeepFake Detection
Lomnitz, M., Hampel-Arias, Z., Sandesara, V., & Hu, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR) · doi:10.1109/aipr50011.2020.9425192 · Cited by 30
Barrientos-Espillco, F., Gascó, E., López-González, C. I., Gómez-Silva, M. J., & Pajares, G. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110315 · Cited by 26
Blind detection of glow-based facial forgery
Guo, Z., Hu, L., Xia, M., & Yang, G. (2021) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-10098-y · Cited by 23
A step toward building a unified framework for managing AI bias
Rana, S. A., Azizul, Z. H., & Awan, A. A. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1630 · Cited by 23
Drawing Conversations Mediated by AI
Yurman, P., & Reddy, A. V. (2022) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3527927.3531448 · Cited by 23
Marchesi, R., Micheletti, N., I-Hsien Kuo, N., Barbieri, S., Jurman, G., & Osmani, V. (2025) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013080 · Cited by 29
Swin-Fake: A Consistency Learning Transformer-Based Deepfake Video Detector
Gong, L. Y., Li, X. J., & Chong, P. H. J. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13153045 · Cited by 22
Weakly-supervised deepfake localization in diffusion-generated images
Ţânţaru, D.-C., Oneaţă, E., & Oneaţă, D. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv57701.2024.00614 · Cited by 25
DeepFake detection method based on multi-scale interactive dual-stream network
Cheng, Z., Wang, Y., Wan, Y., & Jiang, C. (2024) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2024.104263 · Cited by 19
WorldScore: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for World Generation
Duan, H., Yu, H., Chen, S., Fei–Fei, L., & Wu, J. (2025) · 2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.02573 · Cited by 17
General intelligence requires rethinking exploration
Jiang, M., Rocktäschel, T., & Grefenstette, E. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.07819 · Cited by 17
LT-GAN: Self-Supervised GAN with Latent Transformation Detection
Patel, P., Kumari, N., Singh, M., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00323 · Cited by 18
Alam, M. M., & Latifi, S. (2025) · doi:10.20944/preprints202506.1854.v1 · Cited by 17
Membership Inference Attacks against GANs by Leveraging Over-representation Regions
Hu, H., & Pang, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3460120.3485338 · Cited by 16
Self-Supervised Video GANs: Learning for Appearance Consistency and Motion Coherency
Hyun, S., Kim, J., & Heo, J.-P. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01068 · Cited by 16
BIGVSAN: Enhancing Gan-Based Neural Vocoders with Slicing Adversarial Network
Shibuya, T., Takida, Y., & Mitsufuji, Y. (2024) · ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10446121 · Cited by 14
GANprintR: Improved Fakes and Evaluation of the State of the Art in Face Manipulation Detection
Neves, J. C., Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Lopes, V., Proenca, H., & Fierrez, J. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.3007250 · Cited by 12
Suthar, A. C., Joshi, V., & Prajapati, R. (2022) · Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8786-7.ch003 · Cited by 11
Learning beyond sensations: How dreams organize neuronal representations
Deperrois, N., Petrovici, M. A., Senn, W., & Jordan, J. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105508 · Cited by 9
DEEPFAKER: A Unified Evaluation Platform for Facial Deepfake and Detection Models
Wang, L., Meng, X., Li, D., Zhang, X., Ji, S., & Guo, S. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/3634914 · Cited by 11
Compressed Deepfake Video Detection Based on 3D Spatiotemporal Trajectories
Chen, Z., Liao, X., Wu, X., & Chen, Y. (2024) · 2024 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC) · doi:10.1109/apsipaasc63619.2025.10848944 · Cited by 10
Multisemantic Path Neural Network for Deepfake Detection
Wu, N., Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., Yao, S., & Zhou, W. (2022) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1155/2022/4976848 · Cited by 9
Switch Diffusion Transformer: Synergizing Denoising Tasks with Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
Park, B., Go, H., Kim, J.-Y., Woo, S., Ham, S., & Kim, C. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73668-1_27 · Cited by 9
Li, X., Li, T., Wang, M., Tao, S., Zhou, X., Wei, X., & Guan, N. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3539104 · Cited by 8
Pontorno, O., Guarnera, L., & Battiato, S. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78305-0_12 · Cited by 6
Evolving from Single-modal to Multi-modal Facial Deepfake Detection: Progress and Challenges
Liu, P., Tao, Q., & Zhou, J. T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.06965 · Cited by 6
Chen, Z., Lu, L., Yuan, Z., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Yuan, C., & Deng, W. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27889 · Cited by 3
PVGAN: a generative adversarial network for object simplification in prosthetic vision
Elnabawy, R. H., Abdennadher, S., Hellwich, O., & Eldawlatly, S. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac8acf · Cited by 3
Machine learning approaches for skin neoplasm diagnosis
Asaduzzaman, A., Thompson, C. C., & Uddin, M. J. (2024) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c03640 · Cited by 3
Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution
Song, Y., & Ermon, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.05600 · Cited by 1,453
Generating diverse high-fidelity images with vq-vae-2
Razavi, A., Oord, A. V. D., & Vinyals, O. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.00446 · Cited by 709
FaceShifter: Towards High Fidelity And Occlusion Aware Face Swapping
Li, L., Bao, J., Yang, H., Chen, D., & Wen, F. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.13457 · Cited by 236
ForensicTransfer: Weakly-supervised Domain Adaptation for Forgery Detection
Cozzolino, D., Thies, J., Rössler, A., Riess, C., Nießner, M., & Verdoliva, L. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.02510 · Cited by 221
Adversarial Video Generation on Complex Datasets
Clark, A., Donahue, J., & Simonyan, K. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.06571 · Cited by 157
Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Proving
Polu, S., & Sutskever, I. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.03393 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Karras, T., Laine, S., & Aila, T.
- Affiliations
- Nvidia (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4396-4405
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904367110
- Semantic Scholar
- ceb2ebef0b41e31c1a21b28c2734123900c005e2
- Cited by
- 11,714
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 922 · 2025: 1949 · 2024: 2294 · 2023: 2157 · 2022: 1594 · 2021: 1550 · 2020: 920 · 2019: 319
- FWCI
- 357.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- TIB Data Manager
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- generative adversarial networks, generator architecture, style transfer, disentangled representations, face synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
