Cited by 106Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Selective recording of the canine hypoglossal nerve using a multicontact flat interface nerve electrode

Yoo, P.B., Durand, D.M.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

A flat-interface nerve electrode (FINE) is presented as a potential solution for using multifascicle nerve recordings as part of a closed-loop control system. To investigate the ability of this electrode to achieve selective recordings at physiological signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a finite-element model (FEM) of a beagle hypoglossal nerve with an implanted FINE was constructed. Action potentials (AP) were generated at various SNR levels and the performance of the electrode was assessed with a selectivity index (0 < or = SI < or = 1; ability of the electrode to distinguish two active sources). Computer simulations yielded a selective range (0.05 < or = SI < or = 0.76) that was 1) related to the interfiber distance and 2) used to predict the minimum interfiber distance (0.23 mm < or = d < or = 1.42 mm) for selective recording at each SNR. The SI was further evaluated using recorded compound APs elicited from electrically activating the branches of the beagle hypoglossal nerve. For all experiments (n = 7), the selectivity (SI = 0.45 +/- 0.16) was within the range predicted by the FEM. This study suggests that the FINE can record the activity from a multifasciculated nerve and, more importantly, distinguish neural signals from pairs of fascicles at physiologic SNR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2005.851482

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FINE's recording ability and selectivity of the periphery of the stimulated nerve have been demonstrated.

    “Its recording ability (Yoo and Durand, 2005) and selectivity of the periphery of the stimulated nerve have been demonstrated (Schiefer et al., 2013; Ortiz-Catalan et al., 2014).”

    From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Yoo and Durand, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoo, P. B., & Durand, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2005-08
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
1461-1469
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152448309
Cited by
106
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl066267-04)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1 R01 HL66267-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
hypoglossal nerve, signal-to-noise ratio, finite element analysis, action potential, compound action potential, beagle dogs
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Computer Simulation, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Dogs, Electrodes, Implanted, Electrodiagnosis, Equipment Design, Hypoglossal Nerve, Microelectrodes, Models, Neurological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Computer-Aided Design, Equipment Failure Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review