Cited by 159Silicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesRadiation Effects in ElectronicsSemiconductor materials and devices

Degradation Assessment and Precursor Identification for SiC MOSFETs Under High Temp Cycling

Ugur, Enes, Yang, Fei, Pu, Shi, Zhao, Shuai, Akin, Bilal·2019·IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

Abstract

Silicon carbide (SiC) power mosfets are promising alternatives to Si devices in high-voltage, high-frequency, and high-temperature applications. The rapid and widespread deployment of SiC devices raises long-term reliability concerns, particularly for mission and safety critical systems due to limited field data and potential uncertainties. Therefore, it is essential to investigate progressive degradations and parameter shifts in SiC devices to develop system integrated degradation monitoring tools for self-monitoring converters, which can recognize failure precursors at the earliest stage and prevent catastrophic failures. This paper presents a comprehensive long-term reliability analysis of commercially available SiC mosfets under high temperature operation and high temperature swing, degradation related key precursors, and possible causes behind them. For this purpose, discrete SiC devices are power cycled and all datasheet parameters are recorded at certain intervals with the aid of the curve tracer. Variation of electrical parameters throughout the tests is presented in order to assess their correlation with the aging/degradation state of the switch. Among them, gate oxide charge trapping related threshold voltage drift and corresponding on state resistance variation has been observed for all samples. For some samples, bond wire heel cracking is found to be the root cause of sudden on state resistance and body diode voltage increases. The discussions regarding aging precursors are supported by failure analysis obtained through the decapsulation of failed devices. Finally, the findings are evaluated in order to define the suitability of electrical parameters as an aging precursor parameter under the light of practical implementation related issues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tia.2019.2891214

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ugur, E., Yang, F., Pu, S., Zhao, S., & Akin, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Published
2019-05
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
2858-2867
ISSN
  • 0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-9367
OpenAlex
W2910218467
Cited by
159
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • TXACE/SRC (2712.026)
  • National Science Foundation (1454311)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor materials and devices
Keywords
SiC MOSFET, device degradation, high-temperature cycling, threshold voltage shift, on-resistance, failure analysis, degradation monitoring, power cycling, reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review