Cited by 121Silicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesRadiation Effects in ElectronicsGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials

Evaluation of Aging's Effect on Temperature-Sensitive Electrical Parameters in SiC mosfets

Yang, Fei, Ugur, Enes, Akin, Bilal·2020·IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

Abstract

The temperature-sensitive electrical parameters (TSEPs) have been used in silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFETS junction temperature measurement for over-temperature protection and condition monitoring. However, the device aging can affect the TSEPs and thus leads to false T3measurement. In this article, the aging's impacts on various TSEPs are comprehensively investigated. Specifically, utilizing the dc power cycling test, both the gate oxide instability and package degradation are considered. Then the commercial devices with different structures are aged, and their temperature-dependent static and switching characteristics are evaluated at different aging cycles. Both the positive gate bias-induced threshold voltage shift and package degradation are observed, and their impacts on each TSEP are evaluated independently. Based on the evaluation results at various operating conditions, the temperature measurement errors due to different aging mechanisms are well summarized for each TSEP. From the dc power cycling test result, the package degradation's impact on TSEPs is found to be more significant than the gate oxide instability. It is pointed out that the aging's effect on TSEPs is an important factor that needs to be considered for accurate T3measurement in SiC MOSFETS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpel.2019.2950311

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, F., Ugur, E., & Akin, B.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Published
2020-06
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
6315-6331
ISSN
  • 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0107
OpenAlex
W2983240990
Cited by
121
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1454311)
  • Semiconductor Research Corporation (2712.026)
  • Texas Instruments Foundational Technology Research Center on Power Density (1806417)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Keywords
SiC MOSFET, temperature-sensitive electrical parameters, device aging, junction temperature measurement, overheating prevention, condition monitoring, gate oxide degradation, threshold voltage shift, temperature measurement error, switching characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review