Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Silicon-substrate intracortical microelectrode arrays for long-term recording of neuronal spike activity in cerebral cortex

Kipke, D.R., Vetter, R.J., Williams, J.C., Hetke, J.F.·2003·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

This study investigated the use of planar, silicon-substrate microelectrodes for chronic unit recording in the cerebral cortex. The 16-channel microelectrodes consisted of four penetrating shanks with four recording sites on each shank. The chronic electrode assembly included an integrated silicon ribbon cable and percutaneous connector. In a consecutive series of six rats, 5/6 (83%) of the implanted microelectrodes recorded neuronal spike activity for more than six weeks, with four of the implants (66%) remaining functional for more than 28 weeks. In each animal, more than 80% of the electrode sites recorded spike activity over sequential recording sessions during the postoperative time period. These results provide a performance baseline to support further electrode system development for intracortical neural implant systems for medical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2003.814443

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1126/science.1070291 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/TBME.2003.820311 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/00001756-199806010-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/416141a · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nn947 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/s00422-002-0374-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TRE.2000.847807 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/86.847809 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S1385-299X(99)00034-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1006/meth.2001.1231 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1109/10.7273 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/10.914800 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1142/9789812561763_0023 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/10.284959 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1201/9781420040876.ch7 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/CNE.2003.1196908 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/86.788468 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80295-0 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-18-08083.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1109/MMB.2002.1002321 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/CNE.2003.1196783 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/CNE.2003.1196787 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/6040.938305 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/10.605435 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Kipke, D. R., Vetter, R. J., Williams, J. C., & Hetke, J. F.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2003-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
151-155
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2144030012
Cited by
367
References
2
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Silicon-substrate intracortical microelectrode arrays for long-term recording of neuronal spike activity in cerebral cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2003.814443
The paper
Kipke, D. R., Vetter, R. J., Williams, J. C., & Hetke, J. F. (2003). Silicon-substrate intracortical microelectrode arrays for long-term recording of neuronal spike activity in cerebral cortex. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2003.814443

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.