The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry
Abstract
We examine thirty years of computer industry market structure. Our analysis explains the persistence of dominant computer firms, their recent decline, and the changing success of competitive entry. It emphasizes the importance of technological competition between computer ‘platforms’, not firms. This aspect of competition has changed little over time. Two things did change. Young platforms serving newly founded segments eventually challenged established platforms across segment boundaries through a process of indirect entry. Vertically disintegrated platforms have led to divided technical leadership in important segments. The result is an industry with far more technological competition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History
(1995) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036867 · Cited by 1,175
Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Uses of Computers
Bresnahan, T., Greenstein, S., Brownstone, D., & Flamm, K. (1996) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics · doi:10.2307/2534746 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Cited by
Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12105 · Cited by 2,394
Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps
McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2596 · Cited by 1,109
West, J. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00052-0 · Cited by 854
Boudreau, K. J. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0678 · Cited by 676
Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context
Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2014) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2011.0105 · Cited by 639
Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0869 · Cited by 567
Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: Anetwork‐centric view
Srinivasan, A., & Venkatraman, N. (2018) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1272 · Cited by 331
Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Uses of Computers
Bresnahan, T., Greenstein, S., Brownstone, D., & Flamm, K. (1996) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics · doi:10.2307/2534746 · Cited by 254
Self-citationStandard Setting Committees: Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms
Simcoe, T. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.305 · Cited by 243
Sandberg, J., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/14520 · Cited by 236
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2024) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104906 · Cited by 220
Rietveld, J., Ploog, J. N., & Nieborg, D. B. (2020) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2019.0064 · Cited by 151
When does AI pay off? AI-adoption intensity, complementary investments, and R&D strategy
Lee, Y. S., Kim, T., Choi, S., & Kim, W. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102590 · Cited by 141
Kingpins, Bottlenecks, and Value Dynamics Along a Sector
Jacobides, M. G., & Tae, C. J. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0958 · Cited by 118
Innovating big tech firms and competition policy: favoring dynamic over static competition
Petit, N., & Teece, D. J. (2021) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtab049 · Cited by 109
Lindley, J., Coulton, P., & Sturdee, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025742 · Cited by 103
Pan, J. (2017) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2016.1181525 · Cited by 92
Multihoming within Platform Ecosystems: The Strategic Role of Human Capital
Venkataraman, V., Ceccagnoli, M., & Forman, C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3134846 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bresnahan, T. F., & Greenstein, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Industrial Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-40
- ISSN
- 0022-1821 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6451
- OpenAlex
- W2112390372
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 53.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.