The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytic and Heuristic Processing Influences on Adolescent Reasoning and Decision-Making
Abstract
The normative/descriptive gap is the discrepancy between actual reasoning and traditional standards for reasoning. The relationship between age and the normative/descriptive gap was examined by presenting adolescents with a battery of reasoning and decision-making tasks. Middle adolescents (N= 76) performed closer to normative ideals than early adolescents (N=66), although the normative/descriptive gap was large for both groups. Correlational analyses revealed that (1) normative responses correlated positively with each other, (2) nonnormative responses were positively interrelated, and (3) normative and nonnormative responses were largely independent. Factor analyses suggested that performance was based on two processing systems. The “analytic” system operates on “decontextualized” task representations and underlies conscious, computational reasoning. The “heuristic” system operates on “contextualized,” content-laden representations and produces “cognitively cheap” responses that sometimes conflict with traditional norms. Analytic processing was more clearly linked to age and to intelligence than heuristic processing. Implications for cognitive development, the competence/performance issue, and rationality are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, previous research has indicated some degree of common variance among them (Bruine de Bruin, Parker, & Fischhoff, 2007;Finucane & Gullion, 2010;Klaczynski, 2001;Parker & Fischhoff, 2005;Slugoski, Shields, & Dawson, 1993;Stanovich & West, 1998c, 2000;West, Toplak, & Stanovich, 2008).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Klaczynski, 2001
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A Handbook of Child Psychology
(1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/130331a0 · Cited by 10,133
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,996
The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958) · Basic Books · doi:10.1037/10034-000 · Cited by 4,607
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699 · cited 1×
“…items are presented during an early phase of an experiment, both children and adults later identify the complete items more accurately and quickly than nonprimed items—despite being unaware that they had previously examined the primed items (Bargh & Chartland, 1999; Hayes & Hennessy, 1996).”
BackgroundIntegration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
Epstein, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 · Cited by 2,883 · cited 7×
“Successful analytic reasoning depends on the acquisition of abilities that are frequently prescribed as normative for reasoning and decision-making (Epstein, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIntellectual Evolution from Adolescence to Adulthood
Piaget, J. (2009) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000271225 · Cited by 1,936
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012 · Cited by 2,397
Reyna, V. F., & Farley, F. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x · Cited by 1,244
The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1 · Cited by 1,047
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672 · Cited by 840
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008) · The Innate Mind, Volume 3 · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019 · Cited by 650
The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03193858 · Cited by 682
A Developmental Perspective on Alcohol and Youths 16 to 20 Years of Age
Brown, S. A., McGue, M., Maggs, J., Schulenberg, J., Hingson, R., Swartzwelder, S., Martin, C., Chung, T., Tapert, S. F., Sher, K., et al. (2008) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2243d · Cited by 612
The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review
Boyer, T. W. (2006) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.05.002 · Cited by 622
An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning
Osman, M. (2004) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196730 · Cited by 444
West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012842 · Cited by 416
On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780601008825 · Cited by 396
Judgment and Decision Making in Adolescence
Albert, D., & Steinberg, L. D. (2011) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00724.x · Cited by 429
Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2011) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.007 · Cited by 355
Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., & Hamilton, J. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1883 · Cited by 303
Implicit cognition and substance use: a meta-analysis
Rooke, S. E., Hine, D. W., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2008) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.009 · Cited by 278
Kokis, J. V., Macpherson, R., Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0965(02)00121-2 · Cited by 274
Levin, I. P., & Hart, S. S. (2003) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.453 · Cited by 264
Neys, W. D. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/02724980543000123 · Cited by 246
Viljoen, J. L., Klaver, J., & Roesch, R. G. (2005) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-005-3613-2 · Cited by 186
Nudge: Concept, Effectiveness, and Ethics
Lin, Y., Osman, M., & Ashcroft, R. E. (2017) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2017.1356304 · Cited by 180
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034910 · Cited by 170
Stanovich, K. E. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022 · Cited by 169
The Development of Judgment and Decision Making During Childhood and Adolescence
Jacobs, J. E., & Klaczynski, P. A. (2002) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00188 · Cited by 167
Self-citationThe Second Decade: What Develops (and How)
Kuhn, D., & Franklin, S. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0222 · Cited by 160
Stich, S. G. W. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.001.0001 · Cited by 160
Neys, W. D., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780442000222 · Cited by 146
Individual Differences in Deductive Reasoning
Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J., Harley, C., Wright, H. G., & Farrelly, D. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980343000116 · Cited by 146
A developmental perspective on underage alcohol use.
Masten, A. S., Faden, V. B., Zucker, R. A., & SPEAR, L. P. (2009) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 143
Sensitivity to “sunk costs” in mice, rats, and humans
Sweis, B. M., Abram, S. V., Schmidt, B., Seeland, K. D., MacDonald, A. W., Thomas, M. J., & Redish, A. D. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar8644 · Cited by 156
The Development of Rational Thought: A Taxonomy of Heuristics and Biases
Stanovich, K. E., Toplak, M. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(08)00006-2 · Cited by 150
Acar, Ö., Türkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2009) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690902991805 · Cited by 151
Decision-making styles in a real-life decision: Choosing a college major
Galotti, K. M., Ciner, E., Altenbaumer, H. E., Geerts, H. J., Rupp, A., & Woulfe, J. M. (2006) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.003 · Cited by 154
Effects of dialogic learning on value-loaded critical thinking
Frijters, S., Dam, G. T. M. T., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.001 · Cited by 142
A dual-process specification of causal conditional reasoning
Verschueren, N., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780442000178 · Cited by 128
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Markov, A., Grossman, R., & Bulger, M. (2015) · Journal of Children and Media · doi:10.1080/17482798.2015.1056817 · Cited by 119
Viljoen, J. L., & Roesch, R. G. (2005) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-005-7978-y · Cited by 107
Grabner‐Kräuter, S., & Waiguny, M. K. J. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3991 · Cited by 107
Kuhn, D. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001007 · Cited by 102
Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218783192 · Cited by 102
: From inference to reasoning: The construction of rationality
Moshman, D. (2004) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780442000024 · Cited by 97
Dimensions of decision-making: An evidence-based classification of heuristics and biases
Ceschi, A., Costantini, A., Sartori, R., Weller, J. A., & Fabio, A. D. (2018) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.033 · Cited by 104
Klaczynski, P. A. (2004) · Advances in child development and behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(04)80005-3 · Cited by 84
Self-citationGauffroy, C., & Barrouillet, P. (2009) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2009.09.002 · Cited by 80
The relationship of sexual abuse, early initiation of substance use, and adolescent trauma to PTSD
Kingston, S., & Raghavan, C. (2009) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.20381 · Cited by 79
Neys, W. D., & Gelder, E. V. (2008) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00746.x · Cited by 84
In Search of Counter-Examples: Deductive Rationality in Human Reasoning
Schroyens, W. J., Schaeken, W., & Handley, S. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980245000043 · Cited by 78
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011) · The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977244.040 · Cited by 77
Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality
Teovanović, P., Knežević, G., & Stankov, L. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.008 · Cited by 77
Verschueren, N., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195301 · Cited by 77
Morsanyi, K., & Handley, S. J. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.08.003 · Cited by 75
Problem Solving and Decision Making
Hickson, L., & Khemka, I. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398786.013.013.0015 · Cited by 70
A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyond
Pennycook, G. (2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2022.11.003 · Cited by 95
17 Some Innate Foundations of Social and Moral Cognition
Wynn, K. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0017 · Cited by 69
Dual Processes in the Psychology of Mathematics Education and Cognitive Psychology
Gillard, E., Dooren, W. V., Schaeken, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2009) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000202728 · Cited by 68
Amsel, E. A., Klaczynski, P. A., Johnston, A. T., Bench, S. W., Close, J., Sadler, E., & Walker, R. (2008) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.002 · Cited by 67
Self-citationWhen Easy Comes Hard: The Development of Adaptive Strategy Selection
Mata, R., von Helversen, B., & Rieskamp, J. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01535.x · Cited by 78
Klaczynski, P. A., & Cottrell, J. M. (2004) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780442000042 · Cited by 61
Self-citationUnderage alcohol use: summary of developmental processes and mechanisms: ages 16-20.
Brown, S. A., McGue, M., Maggs, J. L., Schulenberg, J. E., Hingson, R., Swartzwelder, S. H., Martin, C. S., Chung, T. A., Tapert, S. F., Sher, K. J., et al. (2009) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 61
Assessment of Decision‐making Competence in Preadolescence
Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., Rose, J. P., & Bossard, E. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.744 · Cited by 60
Osman, M., & Stavy, R. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03213907 · Cited by 59
The Use of Argument Maps as an Assessment Tool in Higher Education
Rapanta, C., & Walton, D. (2016) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.002 · Cited by 55
Working memory and counterexample retrieval for causal conditionals
Neys, W. D., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780442000105 · Cited by 53
Improving Children’s Competence as Decision Makers
Xin, Z., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J. A., Miller, B., Nguyen‐Jahiel, K., Lin, T., Zhang, J., Jadallah, M., Scott, T., Sun, J., et al. (2015) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831215618663 · Cited by 53
Working memory capacity and cognitive styles in decision-making
Fletcher, J., Marks, A. D. G., & Hine, D. W. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.002 · Cited by 56
Developmental trends in everyday conditional reasoning: The retrieval and inhibition interplay
Neys, W. D., & Everaerts, D. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.03.003 · Cited by 52
Weller, J. A., Moholy, M., Bossard, E., & Levin, I. P. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1822 · Cited by 51
Chiesi, F., Primi, C., & Morsanyi, K. (2011) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2011.598401 · Cited by 50
A Cognitive Assistant for improving human reasoning skills
Le, N.-T., & Wartschinski, L. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.02.005 · Cited by 50
Coordinating the effects of multiple variables: A skill fundamental to scientific thinking
Kuhn, D., Dreibelbis, M. A. P., & Wirkala, C. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.009 · Cited by 49
Introduction to the special issue
Klaczynski, P. A., Byrnes, J. P., & Jacobs, J. E. (2001) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0193-3973(01)00081-8 · Cited by 49
Self-citationPrior beliefs and methodological concepts in scientific reasoning
Greenhoot, A. F., Semb, G. B., Colombo, J. A., & Schreiber, T. A. (2004) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.959 · Cited by 46
A Context for Self-Determination and Agency: Adolescent Developmental Theories
Hansen, D. M., & Jessop, N. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_3 · Cited by 47
Measuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations
Aczél, B., Bagó, B., Szollosi, A., Foldes, A., & Lukács, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01770 · Cited by 53
Freud's dual process theory and the place of the a-rational
Brakel, L. A. W., & Shevrin, H. (2003) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x03210116 · Cited by 44
Landry, S. H., & Smith, K. E. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327694.003.0016 · Cited by 45
Different developmental patterns of simple deductive and probabilistic inferential reasoning
Markovits, H., & Thompson, V. L. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.6.1066 · Cited by 42
Children's Beliefs About Everyday Reasoning
Amsterlaw, J. (2006) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00881.x · Cited by 41
Shen, L., Monahan, J. L., Rhodes, N. D., & Roskos‐Ewoldsen, D. R. (2008) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650208326466 · Cited by 40
Explaining the Misuse of Information Systems Resources in the Workplace: A Dual-Process Approach
Chu, A. M. Y., Chau, P. Y. K., & So, M. K. P. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2250-4 · Cited by 39
Donati, M. A., Panno, A., Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2014) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803395.2014.918091 · Cited by 41
Reasoning with conditionals: Does every counterexample count? It’s frequency that counts
Geiger, S. M., & Oberauer, K. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03192938 · Cited by 38
Toplak, M. E., & Flora, D. B. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2214 · Cited by 37
Ricco, R. B., & Overton, W. F. (2011) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.005 · Cited by 40
General intelligence predicts reasoning ability even for evolutionarily familiar content
Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Reis, D. L., & Gray, J. R. (2011) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2011.05.002 · Cited by 35
Dual-process theories of reasoning: The test of development
Barrouillet, P. (2011) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.006 · Cited by 35
Klaczynski, P. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00665 · Cited by 33
Self-citation10 Rational Statistical Inference and Cognitive Development
Xu, F. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0010 · Cited by 34
Individual differences in conditional reasoning: A dual-process account
Klaczynski, P. A., & Daniel, D. B. (2005) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780442000196 · Cited by 30
Self-citationMeasuring Probabilistic Reasoning: The Construction of a New Scale Applying Item Response Theory
Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Donati, M. A., Galli, S., & Chiesi, F. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2011 · Cited by 30
Intention of adolescents to seek professional help for emotional and behavioural difficulties
Farrand, P. A., Parker, M., & Lee, C. (2007) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00705.x · Cited by 29
Dixon, J. A., & Bangert, A. S. (2004) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.12.001 · Cited by 28
Cognitive and social cognitive development: Dual-process research and theory
Klaczynski, P. A. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0012 · Cited by 28
Self-citationBerthet, V., & de Gardelle, V. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145246 · Cited by 27
13 The Creative Action Theory of Creativity
Carruthers, P. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0013 · Cited by 27
Feeney, A. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193513 · Cited by 28
A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyondPreprint
Pennycook, G. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j3w7d · Cited by 27
Recency Effects in Primary-Age Children and College Students
Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2009) · International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.29333/iejme/240 · Cited by 26
A developmental perspective on option generation and selection.
Musculus, L., Ruggeri, A., Raab, M., & Lobinger, B. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000665 · Cited by 26
Theories of Conditional Reasoning: A Developmental Examination of Competing Hypotheses.
Klaczynski, P. A., Schuneman, M. J., & Daniel, D. B. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.559 · Cited by 26
Self-citationThe rationality debate as a progressive research program
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2003) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x03240115 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Klaczynski, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Klaczynski, Paul A
- ORCID
- Klaczynski, Paul A
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 844-861
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2005819009
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Child Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- decision-making, analytical processing, heuristic processing, cognitive development, age differences, intelligence, rationality, competence versus performance, dual-process models
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Awareness, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Development, Probability Learning, Problem Solving, Reference Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review