Cited by 375Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and TraumaPsychology and Mental Health

Stress and psychopathology in children and adolescents: is there evidence of specificity?

McMahon, Susan D., Grant, Kathryn E., Compas, Bruce E., Thurm, Audrey E., Ey, Sydney·2003·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Research on the relations between specific stressors and specific psychological outcomes among children and adolescents is reviewed. Specificity, the notion that particular risk factors are uniquely related to particular outcomes is discussed from a theoretical perspective, and models of specificity are described. Several domains of stressors are examined from a specificity framework (e.g., exposure to violence, abuse, and divorce/marital conflict) in relation to broad‐band outcomes of internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Studies that tested for specificity conducted within the past 15 years are examined, and definitional problems are highlighted. Little evidence for specificity was found. Methodological problems in the literature and the lack of theory‐driven specificity research are discussed, and directions for future research are identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-7610.00105

Cites

184 of 184 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age, sex, and learning difficulties, as well as low socioeconomic status, are well-established predictors of mental health problems in children in general.

    “Age, sex, and learning difficulties [31,32], as well as low socioeconomic status [33,34], are well-established predictors of mental health problems in children in general.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMahon, S. D., Grant, K. E., Compas, B. E., Thurm, A. E., & Ey, S.
Affiliations
  • DePaul University (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Pacific University (US)
Corresponding author
McMahon, Susan D.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-13
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
107-133
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2014736315
Cited by
375
References
184
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
specificity, childhood stress, adolescent psychopathology, risk factors, violence exposure, child abuse, parental divorce, marital conflict, internalizing problems, externalizing problems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Family, Humans, Life Change Events, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review