Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A single short reprogramming early in life initiates and propagates an epigenetically related mechanism improving fitness and promoting an increased healthy lifespan

Alle, Quentin, Le Borgne, Enora, Bensadoun, Paul, Lemey, Camille, Béchir, Nelly, Gabanou, Mélissa, Estermann, Fanny, Bertrand‐Gaday, Christelle, Pessemesse, Laurence, Toupet, Karine, Desprat, Romain, Vialaret, Jérôme, Hirtz, Christophe, Noël, Danièle, Jorgensen, Christian, Casas, François, Milhavet, Ollivier, Lemaitre, Jean‐Marc·2022·Aging Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Recent advances in cell reprogramming showed that OSKM induction is able to improve cell physiology in vitro and in vivo. Here, we show that a single short reprogramming induction is sufficient to prevent musculoskeletal functions deterioration of mice, when applied in early life. In addition, in old age, treated mice have improved tissue structures in kidney, spleen, skin, and lung, with an increased lifespan of 15% associated with organ‐specific differential age‐related DNA methylation signatures rejuvenated by the treatment. Altogether, our results indicate that a single short reprogramming early in life might initiate and propagate an epigenetically related mechanism to promote a healthy lifespan.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.13714

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A single 2.5-week period of continuous overexpression increased lifespan by 15% and partially ameliorated the premature signs of aging in mice, despite having no noticeable difference in the median age of death.

    “Furthermore, a single 2.5-week period of continuous overexpression increased lifespan by 15% and partially ameliorated the premature signs of aging in mice, despite having no noticeable difference in the median age of death.”

    From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [104]

    In Results and Discussion, “A single early short transient reprogramming increases late age lifespan” (page unavailable), a single 2.5-week treatment improved late-life survival without a noticeable change in median age at death. The paper reports the third-quartile age at death rising from 44.3 to 54.8 weeks, not a 15% lifespan increase. Its Introduction and Conclusion describe improvements in age-related tissue deterioration, supporting that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Continuous overexpression of OSKM with a lower dosage of DOX (0.2 mg ml-1) in LAKI/+;4F/+ mice produced a near-identical increase in lifespan compared with the standard Ocampo protocol.

    “Specifically, they compared continuous overexpression of OSKM with a lower dosage of DOX (0.2 mg ml -1 ) in LAKI/+;4F/+ mice to the standard protocol of Ocampo and colleagues and observed a near-identical increase in the lifespan of mice treated with both protocols.”
  • When the same protocol was applied to nonprogeric mice, the effects were markedly less pronounced, with lifespan only being extended by 18 weeks.

    “Interestingly, when the same protocol was applied to nonprogerice mice, the effects were markedly less pronounced, with lifespan only being extended by 18 weeks.”
  • Alle and colleagues demonstrated that rejuvenation outcomes might be more consistent by modifying OSKM methods.

    “A recent paper published by Alle and colleagues demonstrated that rejuvenation outcomes might be more consistent by modifying OSKM methods (Fig. 3c) 104 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1038/nature12586 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/978‐981‐13‐3681‐2_16 · DOI
  3. 10.4049/jimmunol.1001271 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nmeth.1410 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.abg5159 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/acel.13578 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/stem.2842 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.008 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/s41576‐018‐0004‐3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/s0140‐6736(19)30417‐9 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s11357‐013‐9589‐9 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nature08290 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1155/2012/171383 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/s13059‐015‐0584‐6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1172/jci60323 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/acel.12877 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1126/sciadv.1600584 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/acel.12971 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.1127168 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.3389/fvets.2018.00178 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/nature08285 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Alle, Q., Le Borgne, E., Bensadoun, P., Lemey, C., Béchir, N., Gabanou, M., Estermann, F., Bertrand‐Gaday, C., Pessemesse, L., Toupet, K., Desprat, R., Vialaret, J., Hirtz, C., Noël, D., Jorgensen, C., Casas, F., Milhavet, O., & Lemaitre, J.
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-17
Volume
21
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
Cited by
66
References
31
Language
en
Funders
  • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Montpellier (Facilities)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Recurrent annual grant)
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer (Comité régional Aveyron et Hérault)
  • Université de Montpellier (Annual dotation)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review