Cited by 25Sleep and related disordersTreatment of Major DepressionCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Wake and light therapy for moderate-to-severe depression – a randomized controlled trial

Kragh, M., Martiny, K., Videbech, P., Møller, D. N., Wihlborg, C. S., Lindhardt, T., Larsen, E. R.·2017·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of using wake and light therapy as a supplement to standard treatment of hospitalized patients with depression. METHOD: In this randomized, controlled study, 64 patients with moderate-to-severe depression were allocated to standard treatment or to the intervention, which additionally consisted of three wake therapy sessions in one week, 30-min daily light treatment and sleep time stabilization over the entire nine-week study period. RESULTS: , 17.39 (CI 15.6-19.2) vs. 20.19 (CI 18.3-22.09) (P = 0.04), whereas no statistically significant differences were found between the groups in weeks two to nine. At week nine, the wake therapy group had a significantly larger increase in general self-efficacy (P = 0.001), and waking up during nights was a significantly less frequent problem (1.9 times vs. 3.2) (P = 0.0008). In most weeks, significantly fewer patients in the wake therapy group slept during the daytime, and if they slept, their naps were shorter (week three: 66 min vs. 117 min P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The antidepressant effect initially achieved could not be maintained during the nine-week study period. However, sleep and general self-efficacy improved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acps.12741

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kragh, M., Martiny, K., Videbech, P., Møller, D. N., Wihlborg, C. S., Lindhardt, T., & Larsen, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Glostrup Hospital (DK)
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Kragh, M.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-04-19
Volume
136
Issue
6
Pages
559-570
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2606235815
Cited by
25
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
wake therapy, phototherapy, depression, moderate to severe depression, hospitalized patients, general self-efficacy, daytime sleep, adjunctive therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phototherapy, Severity of Illness Index, Wakefulness, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review