Cited by 512Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning Development

Attachment in the early life course: Meta-analytic evidence for its role in socioemotional development

Open access
Groh, Ashley M, Fearon, R M Pasco, van IJzendoorn, Marinus H, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J, Roisman, Glenn I·2017·Child Development Perspectives

Abstract

Abstract After decades of research on early attachment relationships, questions remain concerning whether the evidence supports claims made by attachment theory, in particular, that variation in early attachment predicts children's developmental adaptation or maladaptation, and that characteristics of children's temperament does not determine attachment. To evaluate these claims, we conducted meta-analyses on early attachment and children's social competence with peers, externalizing problems, internalizing symptoms, and temperament. In this article, we summarize our findings, which support attachment theory—though we note caveats. We also call for new measurement models, a focus on mediating and moderating mechanisms, and multisite replications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdep.12213

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • From childhood to adolescence, individuals develop peer attachment.

    “From childhood to adolescence, individuals develop peer attachment [32].”

    From The Relationship between Empathy and Attachment in Children and Adolescents: Three-Level Meta-Analyses. (2022) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Abstract and 'Sequelae and Origins of Early Attachment Security' discuss how early attachment relates to children's peer competence through early adolescence. The 'Looking Ahead and Conclusion' section notes developmental changes in peer relationships, but none of these passages says that individuals develop attachment to peers from childhood to adolescence. Searches for peer attachment and its development found no such passage in our copy; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Vaughn, B. E., & Bost, K. K. (2016). Attachment and temperament as intersecting developmental products and interacting developmen- tal contexts throughout infancy and childhood. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clini- cal applications (3rd ed., pp. 202-222). New York, NY: Guilford.
  2. Belsky, J., & Cassidy, J. (1994). Attachment theory and evidence. In M. Rutter & D. Hay (Eds.), Development through life (pp. 373- 402). London, UK: Blackwell.
  3. Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2012). Integrating temperament and attachment. In M. Zentner & R. L. Shiner (Eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 403-424). New York, NY: Guilford.
  4. Fearon, R. P., Groh, A. M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Roisman, G. I. (2016). Attachment and devel- opment psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology, volume one, theory and method (3rd ed., pp. 325- 384). New York, NY: Wiley.
  5. Coan, J. A. (2016). Towards a neuroscience of attachment. In J. Cas- sidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 242-269). New York, NY: Guilford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Groh, A. M., Fearon, R. M. P., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Roisman, G. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University College London
  • Leiden University
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Groh, Ashley M
Venue
Child Development Perspectives
Published
2017-02-08
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
70-76
ISSN
  • 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8606
OpenAlex
W2553646641
Cited by
512
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 13
FWCI
37.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
attachment, attachment theory, early attachment, social-emotional development, social competence, peer relationships, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, child temperament, developmental adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review