The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 121 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
User‐centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation.
Open accessAbstract
The current paper articulates how common difficulties encountered when attempting to implement or scale-up evidence-based treatments are exacerbated by fundamental design problems, which may be addressed by a set of principles and methods drawn from the contemporary field of user-centered design. User-centered design is an approach to product development that grounds the process in information collected about the individuals and settings where products will ultimately be used. To demonstrate the utility of this perspective, we present four design concepts and methods: (a) clear identification of end users and their needs, (b) prototyping/rapid iteration, (c) simplifying existing intervention parameters/procedures, and (d) exploiting natural constraints. We conclude with a brief design-focused research agenda for the developers and implementers of evidence-based treatments.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This conceptual paper argues that common failures in implementing and scaling evidence-based psychosocial treatments stem partly from design flaws and can be addressed by user-centered design principles. It proposes four design concepts—identifying users and needs, prototyping/rapid iteration, simplification, and exploiting natural constraints—and outlines a design-focused research agenda.
Key findings
- The paper contends that evidence-based treatments are often disseminated as static, complex protocols, creating mismatches with community users and implementation contexts; it proposes user-centered design as a way to improve acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and long-term effectiveness.
- It identifies four transferable design concepts: clearly specifying primary, secondary, and negative users; using prototyping and rapid iteration; simplifying intervention parameters and materials; and treating contextual barriers as design constraints rather than obstacles to overcome.
- It cites examples and figures from other work, including that the 10-item System Usability Scale yields scores from 0–100 with scores above 70 considered acceptable for digital technologies, that software updates may be pushed out roughly every 6 weeks, and that school-based service windows may be about 3–4 sessions.
- It recommends a research agenda that includes usability assessment protocols, adapting measures such as the System Usability Scale to evidence-based treatments, using adherence data as a usability signal, and testing intervention configurations through routine outcome monitoring.
Methods
- Design: conceptual/theoretical paper, not an empirical study; it synthesizes user-centered design literature and applies it to psychosocial intervention development, packaging, and implementation.
- Data or sample: no study sample or dataset is analyzed; examples are drawn from prior literature and existing intervention efforts.
- Main analysis: narrative argument and framework development, organized around four design concepts with definitions, techniques, and applications to evidence-based treatments.
Limitations
- The authors state that the paper remains largely theoretical and that research is needed to test the applicability of user-centered design principles and evaluate system-, provider-, and client-level outcomes.
- The authors note that few studies have examined evidence-based treatment design features such as simplicity and usability in relation to implementation outcomes, and that no specific funding mechanisms currently support comparable rapid work in behavioral health.
- Evident from the text: there is no empirical evaluation, sample, or quantitative result reported here, so the proposed benefits and applications are not directly tested in this paper.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
87 Not checked yet · 39 Own interpretation · 1 Supported so far · 1 No basis given
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“even intensive “train and hope” approaches are unlikely to result in meaningful practitioner behavior change without ongoing consultation or coaching (Beidas & Kendall, 2010; Fixsen et al., 2005; Lyon, Stirman, Kerns, & Bruns, 2011)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Beidas & Kendall, 2010
- Not checked yetcites Fixsen et al., 2005
- Supportedcites Lyon, Stirman, Kerns, & Bruns, 2011 source
The Extended Contact section says single-exposure “train and hope” models are ineffective at producing practitioner behavior change and that workshops have limited ability to produce sustained change. The Discussion says intensive coaching or mentoring will likely be necessary for the complex behavior change involved in implementing new therapies. (LLM, conf=0.91)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the implementation and widespread reach of EBT in service systems are known to be influenced by a range of factors operating across multiple system levels (Aarons, Hurlburt, & Horwitz, 2011)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aarons, Hurlburt, & Horwitz, 2011 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“intervention characteristics are commonly included in leading implementation frameworks (e.g., Damschroder et al., 2009; Rogers, 2003)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Damschroder et al., 2009 source
- Not checked yetcites Rogers, 2003
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“many are exacerbated by the design or structure of EBT, user responses to those designs, and the ways that elements of EBT design interact with implementation processes”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“manualized EBT protocols remain the primary medium through which research evidence is packaged and disseminated for use (Garland, Hawley, Brookman-Frazee, & Hurlburt, 2008)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Garland, Hawley, Brookman-Frazee, & Hurlburt, 2008
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“numerous concerns about EBT appear to contribute to their low level of use by community practitioners (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001; Kazdin, 2008)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“are not routinely employed in service delivery (Kazdin, 2008; McHugh & Barlow, 2010).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Abstract
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we articulate in this paper how many of the contemporary difficulties encountered during EBT implementation are exacerbated by fundamental design problems – embedded in both EBT themselves and typical EBT implementation processes”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Abstract
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Product developers tend to underestimate user diversity in their design processes”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kujala & Kauppinen, 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ongoing adjustment and evaluation of EBT to ensure that a program is response to the local context provides an opportunity to increase intervention effectiveness over time (Aarons et al., 2012; Chambers et al., 2013)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 48
- It may state two separate claims as one. 19
In the paper
“the field of implementation science has emerged, explicitly tasked with improving the use of well-researched interventions in everyday service settings (Eccles & Mittman, 2006)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Eccles & Mittman, 2006 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“there is ongoing debate surrounding the extent to which EBT are able to effectively balance structure and flexibility when introduced to service providers working in community contexts (Chambless & Ollendick, 2001; Hill & Owens, 2013; Lieb, Mayfield, Miller, & Pennucci, 2004)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chambless & Ollendick, 2001 source
- Not checked yetcites Hill & Owens, 2013
- Not checked yetcites Lieb, Mayfield, Miller, & Pennucci, 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Wu et al. (2014) have discussed the relevance of the related discipline of engineering to implementation and mental health services”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wu et al., 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Maguire (2001) has identified that usable systems result in increased productivity, a reduction of errors, require fewer resources for training and support, are more acceptable to users, and enjoy enhanced reputations within the user market.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maguire, 2001 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The UCD field places strong emphasis on explicitly identifying primary, secondary, and sometimes tertiary users in order to ensure that new products effectively meet their needs (Cooper, Reimann, & Cronin, 2007; Grudin & Pruitt, 2002).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cooper, Reimann, & Cronin, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Grudin & Pruitt, 2002
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Usability has been conceptualized as a combination of constructs including (a) learnability, (b) efficiency, (c) memorability, (d) error frequency/severity, and (e) satisfaction (Nielsen, 1994).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nielsen, 1994
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Although this method has been found to improve the efficiency of the product design process (Olson & Bakke, 2001)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Olson & Bakke, 2001
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“others have advocated for usability testing and iterative design in the context of health information technologies to support clinical decision-making (e.g., Bickman, Kelley, & Anthay, 2012; Lyon et al., in press-b)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bickman, Kelley, & Anthay, 2012
- Not checked yetcites Lyon et al., in press-b
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“but careful identification of representative user needs can correct this bias and enhance product quality (Kujala & Kauppinen, 2004)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kujala & Kauppinen, 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the failure of most implementation processes to incorporate ongoing, iterative intervention development increases the risk that local users will find new technologies to be low on key implementation outcomes such as acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness (Proctor et al., 2011) and may limit effectiveness (Chambers et al., 2013)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One parsimonious model for user identification is the lead user approach, wherein the experiences of particularly advanced users are collected to uncover system problems and solutions (which lead users often identify on their own) (von Hippel, 1989).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites von Hippel, 1989 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because EBT have historically focused primarily on the identification of robust, often complicated, solutions for highly specified problems (i.e., diagnosable clinical disorders), it could be said that they have overemphasized engineering to the detriment of design.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Other authors have included additional criteria for usable products such as functional minimalism (i.e., too many features, functions, or components will reduce usability), low cognitive load (i.e., minimize the amount of thinking required to complete a task), clear feedback to users (e.g., about product status, success or failure), and exploitation of the natural constraints present in an environ”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Norman, 1988
- Not checked yetcites Tognazzini, 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“most psychosocial interventions are complex, and carry numerous decision points during the course of their use (Chorpita, Bernstein, & Daleiden, 2008)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chorpita, Bernstein, & Daleiden, 2008
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Flexibility (e.g., via allowable adaptations) is inherently appealing when working to deliver individualized or locally-relevant services (Lyon, Lau, McCauley, Vander Stoep, & Chorpita, 2014)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lyon, Lau, McCauley, Vander Stoep, & Chorpita, 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“trends suggest increasing complexity as EBT developers pursue applications to wider populations, but this added complexity often carries little additional benefit (e.g., Chaffin et al., 2004)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chaffin et al., 2004 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Chorpita and Daleiden (2014) recently distinguished this dominant emphasis on “design time” control (i.e., determining features in advance) from “run time” control, which they defined as configuration based on how a product interacts with its environment.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chorpita & Daleiden, 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Use of diverse user groups is important when designing products for organizations, which inevitably contain individuals representing different user types (Kujala & Kauppinen, 2004).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kujala & Kauppinen, 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A reconceptualization of how intervention technologies are initially developed, prepared for dissemination, and then ultimately implemented may help to capitalize on opportunities to increase intervention appropriateness and effectiveness over time.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Just like other consumer products, EBT can be intentionally designed using methods that ensure the needs of target users are incorporated into the development process.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Gaps in EBT Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These changes may include increases in individual staff expertise due to experience (e.g., new therapists becoming increasingly comfortable in clinical interactions) or specific development of specific new competencies, but may also include decreases in a system’s collective expertise due to staff turnover.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Deviations such as these represent the EBT equivalent of a software “workarounds,” in which temporary fixes are used to bypass identified system usability problems.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“therapists sometimes question the relevance or effectiveness of EBT for their specific populations or struggle to deliver them when presented with engagement difficulties, crises, or comorbidities (Chandler, Peters, Field, & Juliano-bult, 2004; Kazdin, 2008; Whaley & Davis, 2007)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a large body of implementation-focused research has documented the impact of organizational processes to successful implementation – including leadership buy-in and administrative support (Beidas & Kendall, 2010)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Beidas & Kendall, 2010
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“mechanisms that allow service systems to update components of EBT to meet these changing needs are vital”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“satisfaction is only one of many indicators of a usable and effective product, and one that may be particularly subject to bias – and therefore less informative – when a user has no experience with a comparable product to which to compare a new innovation.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although workarounds can often be effective problem-solving strategies in the short term, they are likely to decrease usability and product functioning if unaddressed.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Revising an existing EBT to be applicable to a new class of service providers (e.g., paraprofessionals) may be an appropriate impetus for system redesign.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Chorpita and colleagues (2014) have pointed out that these situations often require therapists to go “off protocol,” changing their intervention plans in unexpected ways that are inconsistent with the intended treatment.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chorpita et al., 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“EBT design processes may be most effective if they incorporate a developmental perspective and attend to how individual service provider and service system needs change over time (Chorpita & Daleiden, 2014)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chorpita & Daleiden, 2014
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In both cases, increasing capacity may also have the effect of identifying and addressing problems in less severe populations of service users.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“due to their built-in flexibility, newer transdiagnostic or modular approaches to service delivery (described above) may be more likely to be responsive in these ways.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Hackos and Redish (1998) proposed a process for incorporating a broader variety of users into the design process that includes: (a) brainstorming a preliminary list of users, (b) articulating user characteristics, (c) describing and prioritizing main user groups, (d) selecting typical and representative users from those groups, and (e) gathering information from users to inform the redesign of the”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hackos & Redish, 1998
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies project, cognitive-behavioral approaches were explicitly packaged as low intensity versus high intensity to efficiently expand workforce capability and ensure that people with less severe problems could receive care from psychological wellbeing practitioners with less intensive training (Clark et al., 2009; Glover, Webb, & Evison, 2010)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Clark et al., 2009 source
- Not checked yetcites Glover, Webb, & Evison, 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Holmqvist and Walsh (2014) found that although web- and telehealth-based CBT for insomnia were equally effective, service recipients favored web-based delivery.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holmqvist & Walsh, 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Well-designed EBT should be similarly responsive to changes in staff needs.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reconsideration of primary EBT users and service delivery models also opens the door to task-shifting strategies”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it may be equally important for intervention developers to explicitly articulate the characteristics of negative users who are not intended targets for an intervention”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“software updates are pushed out to users with astonishing regularity (e.g., every 6 weeks; Khomh, Dhaliwal, Zou, & Adams, 2012)”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Identifying Users and User Needs
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Khomh, Dhaliwal, Zou, & Adams, 2012
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“so too EBT protocols have historically only been available to highly trained (and often highly motivated) mental health providers.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“increasing evidence has emerged that routinely monitoring psychotherapy client outcomes and providing data-driven feedback to therapists can reduce premature dropout and improve outcomes irrespective of the particular intervention approach used by the therapist (Bickman, Kelley, Breda, de Andrade, & Reimer, 2011; Lambert et al., 2003).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Design Simplification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bickman, Kelley, Breda, de Andrade, & Reimer, 2011
- Not checked yetcites Lambert et al., 2003 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Product design depends largely on this type of constraint, which may include limitations on or requirements for a product’s form, function, budget, operating conditions, or time to completion, among others (Moggridge, 2007).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Exploit Natural Constraints
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moggridge, 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Prototyping, and rapid iterations based on evaluation of each successive prototype, is an excellent example of the overarching design process of collecting data and feedback at all stages of a product development cycle (Maguire, 2001).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Prototyping and Rapid Iteration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maguire, 2001 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“With the goals of increasing learnability and decreasing the cognitive load required as users interact with a product, design simplification has long been a hallmark of UCD (Norman, 1988).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Design Simplification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Norman, 1988
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
““Design thinking” holds promise in the extent to which it can drive a reconceptualization of EBT users, support more rapid innovation and testing of novel approaches, simplify standard EBT designs, and incorporate – rather than struggle to overcome – barriers and other natural constraints for new and existing interventions.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Discussion and Future Directions
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“there is now growing consensus that the time has come to move implementation science beyond the identification of barriers toward the development of explicit strategies that facilitate EBT use and client improvement (Proctor, Powell, Baumann, Hamilton, & Santens, 2012).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Exploit Natural Constraints
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Proctor, Powell, Baumann, Hamilton, & Santens, 2012
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“As EBT are increasingly scaled up across large service systems, alignment of multiple interventions within organizations is quickly becoming a priority (Chorpita et al., 2011).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Discussion and Future Directions > A Design-Based Research Agenda
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chorpita et al., 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“clear presentation of visual information is essential to the functioning of any product to allow users to understand the state of a system, what actions are possible, and how they should be completed (Norman, 1988).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Design Simplification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Norman, 1988
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“there is now widespread acknowledgment that nearly ubiquitous digital tools need to be able to work together and share information in a way that enhances convenience and value for the user (Fontaine, Ross, Zink, & Schilling, 2010).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Discussion and Future Directions > A Design-Based Research Agenda
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fontaine, Ross, Zink, & Schilling, 2010 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“affordances rely heavily on human perception and have no existence independent of a joint consideration of the individual and environment (Zaff, 1995).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Exploit Natural Constraints
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zaff, 1995
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS; Brooke, 1996), for instance, is generally considered to be among the most sensitive, robust, and widely used scales of its type (Sauro, 2011; Tullis & Stetson, 2004).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Discussion and Future Directions > A Design-Based Research Agenda
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sauro, 2011
- Not checked yetcites Tullis & Stetson, 2004
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Using this technique early in the design process allows for the inexpensive exploration of novel ideas and solutions prior to more costly production.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Prototyping and Rapid Iteration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The transition to more rapid approaches may be uncomfortable for some researchers accustomed to the traditionally slow scientific slog down a single investigative pathway, but is likely to pay important dividends related to scientific discovery and the widespread use of well-designed, contextually appropriate, and empirically-based interventions.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Explicit co-design processes – in which EBT developers specify major core components and an overarching structure, but allow service providers and recipients opportunities to determine more specific aspects of the intervention in real time – have been proposed as a method for the development of complex, contextually-appropriate practices in fields such as education (Penuel, Roschelle, & Shechtman,”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Exploit Natural Constraints
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Penuel, Roschelle, & Shechtman, 2007
- Not checked yetcites Chorpita, Bernstein, & Daleiden, 2011
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Failure to explicitly consider a product’s design is a guaranteed pathway to problematic design.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Discussion and Future Directions
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Vigilant application of the principle of simplification works to contain this complexity while enhancing user experiences and facilitating the scalability of products (Rogers, 2003; Yamey, 2011).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Design Simplification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rogers, 2003
- Not checked yetcites Yamey, 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“From a UCD perspective, all human-made products are designed and “the alternative to good design is bad design, not no design at all” (Martin, 1990, p.12).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Discussion and Future Directions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Martin, 1990
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Norman (2004) has discussed cultural constraints, or learned conventions shared by a group, as a type of affordance that influences user expectations and perceptions and, in doing so, impacts design decisions.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Exploit Natural Constraints
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Norman, 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is our perspective that a UCD approach represents a promising collection of methods and a way forward for researchers and practitioners interested in supporting the dissemination and implementation of psychosocial interventions.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > Conclusion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Constraints of this type are unavoidable when working in the real world and must be considered during the design or redesign process if a new product is to function well in a destination context.”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Exploit Natural Constraints
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Robust evidence supports the use of prototyping to improve a product’s match with users and overall “ease of use” (Gordon & Bieman, 1997).”
§ User-Centered Design for Psychosocial Intervention Development and Implementation > User-Centered Design to Improve EBT Development, Packaging, and Implementation Usability and User-Centered Design > Prototyping and Rapid Iteration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gordon & Bieman, 1997
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing implementation frameworks provide almost no guidance on specific methods for ensuring that EBT successfully meet user needs.
“existing frameworks provide almost no guidance surrounding specific methods for ensuring that EBT successfully meet user needs”
The paper relies on this without support.
High complexity can interfere with the extent to which EBT are readily accessible to providers or organizations interested in adopting them.
“High complexity can interfere with the extent to which EBT are readily accessible to providers or organizations interested in adopting them to improve their practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EBT are exceedingly difficult to train and learn.
“As a partial function of their complexity, EBT are exceedingly difficult to train and learn.”
The paper relies on this without support.
High-quality EBT training is expensive and elusive for many practitioners.
“As a result of the effort required, high-quality EBT training is expensive and elusive for many practitioners.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are currently few clear principles or procedures available to guide ongoing adjustment and evaluation of EBT effectively.
“However, there are currently few clear principles or procedures available to guide this work effectively.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A university-based research team traditionally develops and tests an intervention extensively before it is disseminated as a fully-formed, static intervention protocol.
“a university-based research team most traditionally develops and tests an intervention extensively, articulating its key functions and structure, before it is disseminated more broadly as a fully-formed, static intervention protocol.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A UCD approach has not yet been applied to the development or implementation of EBT themselves.
“Nevertheless, a UCD approach has not yet been applied to the development or implementation of EBT themselves.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EBT development processes tend to emphasize the needs and perspectives of intervention developers over those of well-defined user groups.
“EBT development processes tend to emphasize the needs and perspectives of intervention developers over those of well-defined user groups.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Little research has focused on designing EBT to be responsive to the needs of decision makers while keeping intervention effectiveness intact or on systematically planning evaluations of the modifications needed to better fit setting constraints.
“little research has focused on ways to design EBT to be responsive to the needs of these decision makers while keeping intervention effectiveness intact or to systematically plan evaluations of the modifications needed to better fit setting constraints”
The paper relies on this without support.
No specific funding mechanisms currently exist to support comparable, rapid work in behavioral health.
“but no specific funding mechanisms currently exist to support comparable, rapid work in behavioral health.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“iNNOVBC was developed using a user-centered design approach involving its primary and secondary end users, that is, BCSs (11/24, 46%) and mental health professionals (13/24, 54%).”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, interventions’ design processes are rarely reported, and the absence of evidence-based reasoning behind its development [36] contributes to a research-practice gap in the internet interventions domain, wherein evidenced-based treatments struggle to be adopted in routine care [37].”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Intervention programs are frequently planned by neglecting end users’ perspective (eg, individual’s goals, needs, skills, and contexts) and researchers often fail to involve end users in the development process [37,38].”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In this study, iNNOVBC—a guided, internet-delivered, individually tailored, ACT-influenced CBT intervention aiming at treating mild to moderate anxiety and depression as well as improving fatigue, insomnia, sexual dysfunction, and HRQoL in BCSs—was developed with a user-centered design approach [37] and explored concerning its usefulness, usability, and feasibility.”
From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721
Norman, D. A. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,415
(1993) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-21512-1 · Cited by 5,552
The Visual Display of Quantitative Information
Olson, J., & Tufte, E. (1985) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2002.s78 · Cited by 5,449
Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 · Cited by 4,963
Principles of Instructional Design
Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974) · Cited by 4,467
Usability Evaluation In Industry
(1996) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781498710411 · Cited by 4,445
(2005) · Cited by 3,748
Information Visualization: Perception for Design
Ware, C. (2000) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-381464-7.00018-1 · Cited by 3,742
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Aarons, 2013, Scaling-up evidence-based practices in child welfare services systems, CYF News
- Balas, 2000, Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: Patient-centered systems, 65
- Cooper, 2007, About face 3: The essentials of interaction design
- Grudin, 2002, PDC 2002 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Sweden, 144
- International Standards Organization, 1998, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability
- Martin, 1990, Book design: A practical introduction
- Rogers, 2003, Diffusions of innovations
- Salvo, 2007, A case of exhaustive documentation: Re-centering system-oriented organizations around user need, Technical Communication, 54, 46
- Sauro, 2011, A practical guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, benchmarks & best practices
- Weisz, 2011, Child and adolescent therapy: Cognitive-behavioral procedures, 379
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care
Shelton, R. C., Cooper, B. R., & Stirman, S. W. (2018) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014731 · Cited by 806
Design Thinking in Health Care
Altman, M., Huang, T. T. K., & Breland, J. Y. (2018) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd15.180128 · Cited by 548
Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery
Baumann, A. A., & Cabassa, L. J. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4975-3 · Cited by 479
Mohr, D. C., Lyon, A. R., Lattie, E. G., Reddy, M., & Schueller, S. M. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7725 · Cited by 432
Self-citationA glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts
Dopp, A. R., Parisi, K. E., Munson, S. A., & Lyon, A. R. (2018) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/iby119 · Cited by 301
Self-citationKazdin, A. E. (2019) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12937 · Cited by 274
Revisiting concepts of evidence in implementation science
Brownson, R. C., Shelton, R. C., Geng, E., & Glasgow, R. E. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01201-y · Cited by 223
Psychology's Replication Crisis and Clinical Psychological Science
Tackett, J. L., Brandes, C. M., King, K. M., & Markon, K. E. (2019) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095710 · Cited by 221
Lyon, A. R., & Bruns, E. J. (2019) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-018-09306-w · Cited by 191
Self-citationLyon, A. R., Munson, S. A., Renn, B. N., Atkins, D. C., Pullmann, M. D., Friedman, E., & Areán, P. A. (2019) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/14990 · Cited by 194
Self-citationWeisz, J. R., Kuppens, S., Ng, M. Y., Vaughn-Coaxum, R. A., Ugueto, A. M., Eckshtain, D., & Corteselli, K. A. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691618805436 · Cited by 180
Lyon, A. R., & Bruns, E. J. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3060 · Cited by 178
Self-citationDopp, A. R., Parisi, K. E., Munson, S. A., & Lyon, A. R. (2020) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00020-w · Cited by 180
Self-citationQuality Enhancement Research Initiative Implementation Roadmap
Kilbourne, A. M., Goodrich, D. E., Miake-Lye, I. M., Braganza, M. Z., & Bowersox, N. W. (2019) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001144 · Cited by 168
Lyon, A. R., Brewer, S. K., & Areán, P. A. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000652 · Cited by 152
Self-citationShelton, R. C., Lee, M., Brotzman, L., Wolfenden, L., Nathan, N., & Wainberg, M. L. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-020-09848-x · Cited by 148
A Pilot Study of Trauma-Focused Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy Delivered via Telehealth Technology
Stewart, R. W., Orengo‐Aguayo, R., Cohen, J. A., Mannarino, A. P., & de Arellano, M. A. (2017) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559517725403 · Cited by 130
Dopp, A. R., Parisi, K. E., Munson, S. A., & Lyon, A. R. (2019) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0403-0 · Cited by 129
Self-citationDesigning the Future of Children’s Mental Health Services
Lyon, A. R., Dopp, A. R., Brewer, S. K., Kientz, J. A., & Munson, S. A. (2020) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-020-01038-x · Cited by 120
Self-citationDuffy, A., Christie, G. J., & Moreno, S. (2022) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/35693 · Cited by 114
Reid, R. J., Wodchis, W. P., Kuluski, K., Lee-Foon, N. K., Lavis, J. N., Rosella, L. C., & Desveaux, L. (2024) · SSM - Health Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100010 · Cited by 109
Kaveladze, B. T., Wasil, A. R., Bunyi, J., Ramirez, V., & Schueller, S. M. (2021) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/30766 · Cited by 104
User‐centered design for technology‐enabled services for eating disorders
Graham, A. K., Wildes, J. E., Reddy, M. C., Munson, S. A., Taylor, C. B., & Mohr, D. C. (2019) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23130 · Cited by 103
Lyon, A. R., Coifman, J., Cook, H., McRee, E., Liu, F. F., Ludwig, K. A., Dorsey, S., Koerner, K., Munson, S. A., & McCauley, E. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00183-0 · Cited by 94
Self-citationLim, S. S., Liang, X., Hill, B., Teede, H. J., Moran, L., & O'Reilly, S. L. (2019) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12846 · Cited by 90
Fischer, M., Safaeinili, N., Haverfield, M. C., Brown‐Johnson, C. G., Zionts, D. L., & Zulman, D. M. (2021) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-020-06451-4 · Cited by 85
A Comprehensive Review of Wraparound Care Coordination Research, 1986–2014
Coldiron, J. S., Bruns, E. J., & Quick, H. (2017) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0639-7 · Cited by 73
Lyon, A. R., Koerner, K., & Chung, J. (2020) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/2633489520932924 · Cited by 68
Self-citationHaines, E. R., Dopp, A. R., Lyon, A. R., Witteman, H. O., Bender, M., Vaisson, G., Hitch, D., & Birken, S. A. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00147-4 · Cited by 64
Self-citationRemote Monitoring of Patient- and Family-Generated Health Data in Pediatrics
Foster, C. C., Schinasi, D. A., Kan, K., Macy, M. L., Wheeler, D. S., & Curfman, A. (2022) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2021-054137 · Cited by 63
Hogue, A., Bobek, M., Dauber, S., Henderson, C. E., McLeod, B. D., & Southam-Gerow, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/1067828x.2017.1322020 · Cited by 61
Future Directions in Mental Health Treatment with Stigmatized Youth
Price, M. A., & Hollinsaid, N. L. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2022.2109652 · Cited by 65
Considering a Unified Model of Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Social Work: A Systematic Review
Garkisch, M., & Goldkind, L. (2024) · Journal of Human Rights and Social Work · doi:10.1007/s41134-024-00326-y · Cited by 72
Hogue, A., Bobek, M., Dauber, S., Henderson, C. E., McLeod, B. D., & Southam-Gerow, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1555762 · Cited by 53
Guerin, R. J., Glasgow, R. E., Tyler, A. N., Rabin, B. A., & Huebschmann, A. G. (2022) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105763 · Cited by 61
Krolikowski, K. A., Bi, M., Baggott, C. M., Khorzad, R., Holl, J. L., & Kruser, J. M. (2022) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.153999 · Cited by 50
Developing an automated VR cognitive treatment for psychosis: gameChange VR therapy
Lambe, S., Knight, I., Kabir, T., West, J., Patel, R., Lister, R., Rosebrock, L., Rovira, A., Garnish, B., Freeman, J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jbct.2019.12.001 · Cited by 48
Collaborative care in schools: enhancing integration and impact in youth mental health
Lyon, A. R., Whitaker, K. M., French, W. P., Richardson, L. P., Wasse, J. K., & McCauley, E. (2016) · Advances in School Mental Health Promotion · doi:10.1080/1754730x.2016.1215928 · Cited by 46
Self-citationØvretveit, J., Mittman, B. S., Rubenstein, L. V., & Ganz, D. A. (2017) · International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance · doi:10.1108/ijhcqa-01-2017-0019 · Cited by 46
Portnoy, G. A., Colon, R., Gross, G. M., Adams, L. J., Bastian, L. A., & Iverson, K. M. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05595-7 · Cited by 53
Lau, N., O’Daffer, A., Yi‐Frazier, J. P., & Rosenberg, A. R. (2021) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/29689 · Cited by 46
Nwaozuru, U., Obiezu‐Umeh, C., Shato, T., Uzoaru, F., Mason, S., Carter, V., Manu, S., Modi, K., Parker, J., Ezechi, O., et al. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00230-w · Cited by 49
Orden, K. A. V., & Heffner, K. L. (2022) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gnac032 · Cited by 45
Rinawan, F. R., Susanti, A. I., Amelia, I., Ardisasmita, M. N., Widarti, Dewi, R. K., Ferdian, D., Purnama, W. G., & Purbasari, A. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11035-w · Cited by 60
Using Digital Health Technology to Prevent and Treat Diabetes
Kaufman, N., & Dadashi, M. (2018) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2018.2506 · Cited by 39
Social rhythm therapy—A potentially translatable psychosocial intervention for bipolar disorder
Crowe, M., Inder, M., Swartz, H. A., Murray, G., & Porter, R. (2019) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12840 · Cited by 39
Munson, S. A., Friedman, E. C., Osterhage, K. P., Allred, R., Pullmann, M. D., Areán, P. A., & Lyon, A. R. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/37585 · Cited by 43
Self-citationThe clinician crowdsourcing challenge: using participatory design to seed implementation strategies
Stewart, R. E., Williams, N. J., Byeon, Y. V., Buttenheim, A. M., Sridharan, S., Zentgraf, K. A., Jones, D. T., Hoskins, K., Candon, M. K., & Beidas, R. S. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0914-2 · Cited by 37
Werner, N. E., Brown, J. C., Loganathar, P., & Holden, R. J. (2022) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/33863 · Cited by 37
Promoting learning from null or negative results in prevention science trials
Axford, N., Berry, V., Lloyd, J., Hobbs, T., & Wyatt, K. (2022) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-020-01140-4 · Cited by 34
Technology-assisted peer therapy: a new way of delivering evidence-based psychological interventions
Atif, N., Nazir, H., Sultan, Z. H., Rauf, R., Waqas, A., Malik, A., Sikander, S., & Rahman, A. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08233-6 · Cited by 34
Vroom, E. B., & Massey, O. T. (2021) · The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/s11414-021-09765-1 · Cited by 34
Baumann, A. A., Mejía, A., Lachman, J. M., Parra‐Cardona, J. R., López‐Zerón, G., Buenabad, N. G. A., Contreras, E. V., & Rodríguez, M. M. D. (2018) · Global Social Welfare · doi:10.1007/s40609-018-0121-0 · Cited by 34
Osborne, C. L., Juengst, S. B., & Smith, E. E. (2020) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/0308022620954115 · Cited by 32
Zhai, S., Hash, J. B., Ward, T. M., Yuwen, W., & Sonney, J. (2023) · Journal of Pediatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2023.07.011 · Cited by 40
Triplett, N. S., Munson, S., Mbwayo, A., Mutavi, T., Weiner, B. J., Collins, P., Amanya, C., & Dorsey, S. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00102-9 · Cited by 30
Understanding Factors Affecting Positive Education in Practice: an Australian Case Study
Halliday, A. J., Kern, M. L., Garrett, D. K., & Turnbull, D. A. (2020) · Contemporary School Psychology · doi:10.1007/s40688-019-00229-0 · Cited by 30
HCI Contributions in Mental Health: A Modular Framework to Guide Psychosocial Intervention Design
Slovák, P., & Munson, S. A. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642624 · Cited by 38
Jennings, P. A. (2023) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-02062-8 · Cited by 30
Engell, T., Kirkøen, B., Hammerstrøm, K. T., Kornør, H., Ludvigsen, K. H., & Hagen, K. A. (2020) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-020-01091-w · Cited by 28
Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., Malik, K., Gellatly, R., Boustani, M. M., Michelson, D., Knudsen, K. S., Mathur, S., & Patel, V. (2020) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103698 · Cited by 28
Nitsch, M., Adamcik, T., Kuso, S., Zeiler, M. D., & Waldherr, K. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11040713 · Cited by 28
Schwarz, U. V. T., Giannotta, F., Neher, M., Zetterlund, J., & Hasson, H. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00131-y · Cited by 31
Lyon, A. R., Lewis, C. C., Melvin, A., Boyd, M. R., Nicodimos, S., Liu, F. F., & Jungbluth, N. J. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0495-2 · Cited by 28
Self-citationProctor, B. J., Moghaddam, N. G., Evangelou, N., & das Nair, R. (2018) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.07.006 · Cited by 26
“Such a process could be usefully informed by User-Centred Design principles and practices (Lyon & Koerner, 2016), and might include cognitive interviewing with prospective users (persons with MS) focussed on intervention content, format, and ease of understanding (Willis, 2015) with a view to…”
BackgroundDeveloping the universal unified prevention program for diverse disorders for school-aged children
Ishikawa, S., Kishida, K., Oka, T., Saito, A., Shimotsu, S., Watanabe, N., Sasamori, H., & Kamio, Y. (2019) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-019-0303-2 · Cited by 27
Duran, A. T., Keener-DeNoia, A., Stavrolakes, K., Fraser, A., Blanco, L., Fleisch, E., Pieszchata, N., Cannone, D. E., McKay, C. K., Whittman, E., et al. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/47264 · Cited by 24
Crane, M. E., Phillips, K. E., Maxwell, C. A., Norris, L. A., Rifkin, L. S., Blank, J. M., Sorid, S. D., Read, K. L., Swan, A. J., Kendall, P. C., et al. (2021) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-021-09424-y · Cited by 27
Understanding Lay Counselor Perspectives on Mobile Phone Supervision in Kenya: Qualitative Study
Triplett, N. S., Johnson, C. M., Kiche, S. W., Dastrup, K., Nguyen, J. K., Daniels, A., Mbwayo, A., Amanya, C., Munson, S. A., Collins, P. Y., et al. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/38822 · Cited by 24
LeRouge, C., Durneva, P., Sangameswaran, S., & Gloster, A.-M. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14430 · Cited by 24
Braun, L., Titzler, I., Terhorst, Y., Freund, J., Thielecke, J., Ebert, D. D., & Baumeister, H. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.066 · Cited by 27
State of the Science in Behavior Therapy: Taking Stock and Looking Forward
Comer, J. S. (2024) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2024.07.007 · Cited by 24
Becker, S. J., Scott, K., Murphy, C. M., Pielech, M., Tosto, S. A., Yap, K. R., & Garner, B. R. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4308-6 · Cited by 23
Health Equity and Implementation Science in Heart, Lung, Blood, and Sleep-Related Research
Sterling, M. R., Echeverría, S. E., Commodore-Mensah, Y. Y., Breland, J. Y., & Nuñez-Smith, M. (2019) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.119.005586 · Cited by 23
Collaborative Care to Improve Access and Quality in School‐Based Behavioral Health
Lyon, A. R., Whitaker, K. M., Richardson, L. P., French, W. P., & McCauley, E. (2019) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/josh.12843 · Cited by 22
Self-citationAgeberg, E., Bunke, S., Nilsén, P., & Donaldson, A. (2020) · Injury Prevention · doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043468 · Cited by 22
Biran, N., Kouyaté, R. A., Yücel, E., McGovern, G. E., Schoenthaler, A., Durling, O. G., Unawane, R., Schutt, A., & Panjabi, S. S. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/18982 · Cited by 22
Weiskittle, R., Tsang, W., Schwabenbauer, A. K., Andrew, N., & Mlinac, M. E. (2021) · Clinical Gerontologist · doi:10.1080/07317115.2021.1906812 · Cited by 23
Wiberg, A.-C., Ghaderi, A., Danielsson, H. B., Safarzadeh, K., Parling, T., Carlbring, P., Jansson, M., & Welch, E. (2022) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2022.100570 · Cited by 22
O’Hara, K. L., Knowles, L. M., Guastaferro, K., & Lyon, A. R. (2022) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/26334895221131052 · Cited by 22
Self-citationKirk, J. W., Nilsen, P., Andersen, O., Stefánsdóttir, N. T., Grønfeldt, B., Brødsgaard, R., Pedersen, B. S., Bandholm, T., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T., & Pedersen, M. M. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07142-4 · Cited by 21
Danitz, S. B., Stirman, S. W., Grillo, A. R., Dichter, M. E., Driscoll, M., Gerber, M. R., Gregor, K. L., Hamilton, A. B., & Iverson, K. M. (2019) · BMC Women s Health · doi:10.1186/s12905-019-0837-8 · Cited by 21
Beck, K. B., Northrup, J. B., Breitenfeldt, K. E., Porton, S., Day, T. N., MacKenzie, K. T., Conner, C. M., & Mazefsky, C. A. (2021) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613211061936 · Cited by 22
Agapie, E., Haldar, S., & Poblete, S. G. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555610 · Cited by 21
Braddock, W. R. T., Ocasio, M. A., Comulada, W. S., Mandani, J., & Fernandez, M. I. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/42983 · Cited by 21
Kweon, Y.-R., & Park, J. (2023) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105849 · Cited by 21
Tutor of Resilience: A Model for Psychosocial Care Following Experiences of Adversity
Giordano, F., Cipolla, A., & Ungar, M. T. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.559154 · Cited by 21
Hall, J., Jordan, S., van Ommeren, M., Au, T. M., Sway, R. A., Crawford, J., Ghalayani, H., Hamdani, S. U., Luitel, N. P., Malik, A., et al. (2022) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20947 · Cited by 21
Examining How CBT Interventions for Anxious Youth Are Delivered Across Settings
Cox, J., McLeod, B., Jensen-Doss, A., Srivastava, V., Southam-Gerow, M., Kendall, P., & Weisz, J. (2019) · The Behavior Therapist · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2019.11.008 · Cited by 11
Iterative redesign of a caregiver-mediated intervention for use in educational settings
Bearss, K. E., Tagavi, D. M., Lyon, A. R., & Locke, J. J. (2022) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613211066644 · Cited by 20
Self-citationDopp, A. R., Gilbert, M., Silovsky, J. F., Ringel, J. S., Schmidt, S. R., Funderburk, B. W., Jorgensen, A. G., Powell, B. J., Luke, D. A., Mandell, D. S., et al. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00234-6 · Cited by 20
Precision Implementation: An Approach to Mechanism Testing in Implementation Research
Frank, H. E., Kemp, J. J., Benito, K., & Freeman, J. B. (2022) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-022-01218-x · Cited by 20
Grillo, A. R., Danitz, S. B., Dichter, M. E., Driscoll, M., Gerber, M. R., Hamilton, A. B., Stirman, S. W., & Iverson, K. M. (2019) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260519840408 · Cited by 20
Mendes-Santos, C., Nunes, F., Weiderpass, E., Santana, R., & Andersson, G. (2022) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/33550 · Cited by 19
“Moreover, interventions’ design processes are rarely reported, and the absence of evidence-based reasoning behind its development [36] contributes to a research-practice gap in the internet interventions domain, wherein evidenced-based treatments struggle to be adopted in routine care [37].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialShkel, J., Green, G., Le, S., Kaveladze, B., Marcotte, V., Rushton, K., Nguyen, T., & Schueller, S. M. (2023) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/46062 · Cited by 10
Eaves, E. R., Doerry, E., Lanzetta, S. A., Kruithoff, K. M., Negron, K., Dykman, K., Thoney, O., & Harper, C. C. (2022) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171221113834 · Cited by 19
Fitzsimmons‐Craft, E. E., Rackoff, G. N., Shah, J., Strayhorn, J. C., D’Adamo, L., DePietro, B., Howe, C. P., Firebaugh, M., Newman, M. G., Collins, L. M., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.24260 · Cited by 19
Lyon, A. R., Stanick, C., & Pullmann, M. D. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12265 · Cited by 20
Self-citationLobo, E. H., Frølich, A., Rasmussen, L. J., Livingston, P. M., Grundy, J., Abdelrazek, M., & Kensing, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.647249 · Cited by 19
Clinician Concerns About Cognitive Processing Therapy: A Review of the Evidence
LoSavio, S. T., Holder, N. D., Wells, S. Y., & Resick, P. A. (2022) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.08.005 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyon, A. R., & Koerner, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
- Published
- 2016-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-200
- ISSN
- 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2850
- PMC
- PMC5812700
- OpenAlex
- W2443106973
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 132
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 31.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K08 MH095939, R25 MH080916)
- US Department of Veterans Affairs
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- user-centered design, psychosocial interventions, evidence-based practice implementation, scale-up, end-user needs, rapid prototyping, natural constraints, design principles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
