Cited by 96Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Efficacy of a psychological online intervention for depression in people with epilepsy: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Schröder, Johanna, Brückner, Katja, Fischer, Anja, Lindenau, Matthias, Köther, Ulf, Vettorazzi, Eik, Moritz, Steffen·2014·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Objective: Depression is the most prevalent psychiatric disorder in persons with epilepsy (PWE s). Despite its major impact on quality of life and risk of suicide, most PWE s are not treated for depression. A current challenge in mental health care is how to close this treatment gap and increase access to psychological services. Psychological online interventions (POI s) have shown efficacy in improving depression among individuals without neurologic disorders. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a psychological online intervention for depression (Deprexis) in PWE s who have symptoms of depression. Methods: Participants with self‐reported epilepsy and subjective complaints of depressive symptoms were randomized to an intervention condition (Deprexis) or to a waiting list control (WLC) condition. After 9 weeks, participants were invited to complete an online reassessment. Results: Relative to the waiting list group, program users experienced a significant symptom decline on the Beck Depression Inventory ‐ I (BDI‐I, primary outcome) with a moderate effect size in the complete observations analysis and a small effect size in the intention‐to‐treat analysis. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement with a moderate effect size on the “energy/fatigue” subscale of the Quality of Life In Epilepsy Inventory ‐ 31 (QOLIE‐31). Significance: The results of this trial suggest that POI s may be a feasible and beneficial tool for PWE s who have comorbid depressive symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.12833

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shafer AB. Meta-analysis of the factor structures of four depression questionnaires. J Clin Psychol 2006;62:123-146.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schröder, J., Brückner, K., Fischer, A., Lindenau, M., Köther, U., Vettorazzi, E., & Moritz, S.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Alsterdorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Schröder, Johanna
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-19
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
2069-2076
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2021491081
Cited by
96
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
13.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression, epilepsy, Deprexis, depressive symptoms, treatment gap, feasibility, fatigue, quality of life, comorbidities, digital mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Online Systems, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Psychotherapeutic Processes, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review