The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption
Open accessAbstract
The need for more sustainable production and consumption of animal source food (ASF) is central to the achievement of the sustainable development goals: within this context, wise use of land is a core challenge and concern. A key question in feeding the future world is: how much ASF should we eat? We demonstrate that livestock raised under the circular economy concept could provide a significant, nonnegligible part (9–23 g/per capita) of our daily protein needs (~50–60 g/per capita). This livestock then would not consume human‐edible biomass, such as grains, but mainly convert leftovers from arable land and grass resources into valuable food, implying that production of livestock feed is largely decoupled from arable land. The availability of these biomass streams for livestock then determines the boundaries for livestock production and consumption. Under this concept, the competition for land for feed or food would be minimized and compared to no ASF, including some ASF in the human diet could free up about one quarter of global arable land. Our results also demonstrate that restricted growth in consumption of ASF in Africa and Asia would be feasible under these boundary conditions, while reductions in the rest of the world would be necessary to meet land use sustainability criteria. Managing this expansion and contraction of future consumption of ASF is essential for achieving sustainable nutrition security.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“in order for organic production to be a viable option for feeding the world, production and consumption of animalsource foods must be both significantly reduced and transformed to reduce the use of feeds which compete with food (Muller et al. 2018; van Zanten et al. 2018; Willett et al. 2019).”
From Delivering “less but better” meat in practice—a case study of a farm in agroecological transition (2022) · cites this paper as van Zanten et al. 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As it is undesirable to increase meat production from a sustainability perspective (Röös et al. 2017; van Zanten et al. 2018; Willett et al. 2019)”
From Delivering “less but better” meat in practice—a case study of a farm in agroecological transition (2022) · cites this paper as van Zanten et al. 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Ruminant livestock can play a positive role in this regard by transforming inedible biomass into highly nutritious food, but only when limited to land that is unsuitable for cropping (so that arable land can be used for direct food production) or fed waste streams from food production (Mottet et al. 2017; van Zanten et al. 2018).”
From Delivering “less but better” meat in practice—a case study of a farm in agroecological transition (2022) · cites this paper as van Zanten et al. 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Hence, ruminants can graze pastureland that is unsuitable for growing crops for human consumption, thus contributing to food security without competing for cropland (Van Zanten et al., 2018).”
From Time-dependent climate impact of beef production – can carbon sequestration in soil offset enteric methane emissions? (2022) · cites this paper as Van Zanten et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S. I., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03180-140232 · Cited by 7,187
Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006) · Agritrop (Cirad) · Cited by 4,383
Self-citationWorld agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revisionPreprint
Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.288998 · Cited by 3,192
Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health
Tilman, D., & Clark, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13959 · Cited by 3,026
(2013) · Cited by 2,540
Self-citationSustainable Intensification in Agriculture: Premises and Policies
Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., Burlingame, B., Dawkins, M., Dolan, L., Fraser, D., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234485 · Cited by 1,741
Self-citationComparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments
de Vries, M., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2009) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007 · Cited by 1,237
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- FAO, 2017, FAOSTAT: Food balance sheets
- Garnett T., 2014, What is a sustainable healthy diet?
- T. Garnett E. Röös D. C. Little 2015 Food Climate Research Network (FCRN) Oxford UK
- Parker R., 2012, Review of life cycle assessment research on products derived from fisheries and aquaculture: A report for Seafish as part of the collective action to address greenhouse gas emissions in seafood
- Picard M., 1986, FAO animal production and health paper
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Regenerative agriculture – the soil is the base
Schreefel, L., Schulte, R. P. O., de Boer, I. J. M., Pas, A., & van Zanten, H. H. E. (2020) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404 · Cited by 540
The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems
Rockström, J., Thilsted, S. H., Willett, W. C., Gordon, L. J., Herrero, M., Hicks, C. C., Mason-D’Croz, D., Rao, N., Springmann, M., Wright, E. C., et al. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(25)01201-2 · Cited by 621
Self-citationPrinciples, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Van Zanten, H. H. E., Metze, T. A. P., Termeer, C. J. A. M., van Ittersum, M. K., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2021) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7 · Cited by 403
The battle for biomass: A systematic review of food-feed-fuel competition
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., de Boer, I. J. M., & Ripoll‐Bosch, R. (2019) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100330 · Cited by 408
The potential of future foods for sustainable and healthy diets
Parodi, A., Leip, A., de Boer, I. J. M., Slegers, P. M., Ziegler, F., Temme, E. H. M., Herrero, M., Tuomisto, H. L., Valin, H., van Middelaar, C. E., et al. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0189-7 · Cited by 412
Self-citationMayer, A., Haas, W., Wiedenhofer, D., Krausmann, F., Nuss, P., & Blengini, G. A. (2018) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12809 · Cited by 397
“…to be considered refer to soil degradation, overexploitation of water resources, efficient management of plant nutrients and livestock manure (Zanten et al. 2018; Dawson and Hilton 2011), the regional scale of ecological loop closing (Therond et al. 2017), and net carbon losses related to…”
The role of farm animals in a circular food system
van Zanten, H. H. E., van Ittersum, M. K., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2019) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.06.003 · Cited by 376
Schils, R. L. M., Bufe, C., Rhymer, C. M., Francksen, R. M., Klaus, V. H., Abdalla, M., Milazzo, F., Lellei-Kovács, E., Berge, H. T., Bertora, C., et al. (2022) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2022.107891 · Cited by 296
The carbon opportunity cost of animal-sourced food production on land
Hayek, M. N., Harwatt, H., Ripple, W. J., & Mueller, N. D. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-020-00603-4 · Cited by 237
Food system by-products upcycled in livestock and aquaculture feeds can increase global food supply
Sandström, V., Chrysafi, A., Lamminen, M., Troell, M. F., Jalava, M., Piipponen, J., Siebert, S., van Hal, O., Virkki, V., & Kummu, M. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00589-6 · Cited by 255
Friend or Foe? The Role of Animal-Source Foods in Healthy and Environmentally Sustainable Diets
Beal, T., Gardner, C. D., Herrero, M., Iannotti, L. L., Merbold, L., Nordhagen, S., & Mottet, A. (2023) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.10.016 · Cited by 228
Self-citationTowards achieving circularity and sustainability in feeds for farmed blue foods
Colombo, S. M., Roy, K., Mráz, J., Wan, A. H. L., Davies, S. J., Tibbetts, S. M., Øverland, M., Francis, D. S., Rocker, M. M., Gasco, L., et al. (2022) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12766 · Cited by 190
Circularity in Europe strengthens the sustainability of the global food system
van Zanten, H., Simon, W., van Selm, B., Wacker, J., Maindl, T., Frehner, A., Hijbeek, R., van Ittersum, M. V., & Herrero, M. (2023) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-023-00734-9 · Cited by 141
Self-citationDewanckele, L., Toral, P. G., Vlaeminck, B., & Fievez, V. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-17662 · Cited by 169
van Hal, O., de Boer, I. J. M., Müller, A. W., de Vries, S., Erb, K., Schader, C., Gerrits, W. J. J., & van Zanten, H. H. E. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.329 · Cited by 171
Self-citationGlobal option space for organic agriculture is delimited by nitrogen availability
Barbieri, P., Pellerin, S., Seufert, V., Smith, L. G., Ramankutty, N., & Nesme, T. (2021) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00276-y · Cited by 160
Circularity in animal production requires a change in the EAT-Lancet diet in Europe
van Selm, B., Frehner, A., de Boer, I. J. M., van Hal, O., Hijbeek, R., van Ittersum, M. K., Talsma, E. F., Lesschen, J. P., Hendriks, C. M. J., Herrero, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00425-3 · Cited by 125
Self-citationGlobal trends in grassland carrying capacity and relative stocking density of livestock
Piipponen, J., Jalava, M., de Leeuw, J., Rizayeva, A., Godde, C., Cramer, G., Herrero, M., & Kummu, M. (2022) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16174 · Cited by 129
Self-citationCircularity in Agricultural production
de Boer, I. J. M., & van Ittersum, M. K. (2018) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 125
Veldhuizen, L. J. L., Giller, K. E., Oosterveer, P. J. M., Brouwer, I. D., Janssen, S. J. C., van Zanten, H. H. E., & Slingerland, M. A. (2019) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100336 · Cited by 126
Shah, A. M., Zhang, H., Shahid, M., Ghazal, H., Shah, A. R., Niaz, M., Naz, T., Ghimire, K., Goswami, N., Shi, W., et al. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15081184 · Cited by 113
“With innovative processing technologies, multi-stakeholder collaboration can help unlock the potential of these un-derutilized resources, contributing to food security and sustainability [16].”
The Key Role of Production Efficiency Changes in Livestock Methane Emission Mitigation
Chang, J., Peng, S., Yin, Y., Ciais, P., Havlík, P., & Herrero, M. (2021) · AGU Advances · doi:10.1029/2021av000391 · Cited by 108
Self-citationSela, I., Meir, A. Y., Brandis, A. S., Krajmalnik‐Brown, R., Zeibich, L., Chang, D. J., Dirks, B., Tsaban, G., Kaplan, A., Rinott, E., et al. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12103067 · Cited by 111
Circular economy, bioeconomy, and sustainable development goals: a systematic literature review
Ferraz, D., & Pyka, A. (2023) · Environmental science and pollution research international · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-29632-0 · Cited by 111
van der Wiel, B. Z., Weijma, J., van Middelaar, C. E., Kleinke, M., Buisman, C. J. N., & Wichern, F. (2020) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104901 · Cited by 101
Review of food safety hazards in circular food systems in Europe
Focker, M., Asselt, E. D. V., Berendsen, B. J. A., van de Schans, M. G. M., van Leeuwen, S. P. J., Visser, S. M., & van der Fels‐Klerx, H. J. (2022) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111505 · Cited by 101
Approaches to sustainable agriculture: exploring the pathways towards the future of farming
Oberč, B. P., & Schnell, A. A. (2020) · doi:10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.07.en · Cited by 113
Costantini, M., Ferrante, V., Guarino, M., & Bacenetti, J. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.086 · Cited by 117
Bowles, N. I., Alexander, S., & Hadjikakou, M. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.033 · Cited by 93
Dietary choices and environmental impact in four European countries
Mertens, E., Kuijsten, A., van Zanten, H. H. E., Kaptijn, G., Dofková, M., Mistura, L., D’Addezio, L., Turrini, A., Dubuisson, C., Havard, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117827 · Cited by 97
Halting European Union soybean feed imports favours ruminants over pigs and poultry
Karlsson, J. O., Parodi, A., van Zanten, H. H. E., Hansson, P., & Röös, E. (2020) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-020-00203-7 · Cited by 98
Self-citationAdelodun, B., Kareem, K. Y., Kumar, P., Kumar, V., Choi, K. S., Yadav, K. K., Yadav, A. N., El-Denglawey, A., Cabral-Pinto, M. M. S., Son, C. T., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128451 · Cited by 94
Transforming sustainable aquaculture by applying circularity principles
Chary, K., van Riel, A., Muscat, A., Wilfart, A., Harchaoui, S., Verdegem, M. C. J., Filgueira, R., Troell, M. F., Henriksson, P. J. G., de Boer, I. J. M., et al. (2023) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12860 · Cited by 99
Harder, R., Giampietro, M., & Smukler, S. (2021) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105693 · Cited by 88
Sustainable grazing management in rangelands: Over a century searching for a silver bullet
di Virgilio, A., Lambertucci, S. A., & Morales, J. M. (2019) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2019.05.020 · Cited by 83
Waste-to-nutrition: a review of current and emerging conversion pathways
Javourez, U., O’Donohue, M. J., & Hamelin, L. (2021) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107857 · Cited by 91
A life cycle sustainability assessment of organic and conventional pork supply chains in Sweden
Zira, S., Rydhmer, L., Ivarsson, E., Hoffmann, R., & Röös, E. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.028 · Cited by 80
Self-citationSoil and water threats in a changing environment
Pereira, P., Barceló, ., & Panagos, P. (2020) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109501 · Cited by 82
Karlsson, J. O., & Röös, E. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.035 · Cited by 76
Self-citationElzerman, J. E., Keulemans, L., Sap, R., & Luning, P. A. (2020) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104108 · Cited by 76
Duluins, O., & Baret, P. V. (2024) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-023-00906-7 · Cited by 83
“Finally, numerous studies explore the future of animal proteins and their role in food systems, investigating the effects of achieving multiple targets on animal protein production and consumption 13,14 .”
BackgroundCheng, L., Zhang, X., Reis, S., Ren, C., Xu, J. M., & Gu, B. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00661-1 · Cited by 83
The value of manure - Manure as co-product in life cycle assessment
Leip, A., Ledgard, S. F., Uwizeye, A., Palhares, J. C. P., Aller, M. F., Amon, B., Binder, M., Cordovil, C. M. D. S., Camillis, C. D., Dong, H., et al. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.059 · Cited by 72
Utilization of Agro-Industrial By-Products for Sustainable Poultry Production
Georganas, A., Giamouri, E., Pappas, A. C., Zoidis, E., Goliomytis, M., & Simitzis, P. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15043679 · Cited by 86
Simon, W. J., Hijbeek, R., Frehner, A., Cardinaals, R. P. M., Talsma, E. F., & van Zanten, H. H. E. (2024) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-024-00975-2 · Cited by 86
Pope, D. H., Karlsson, J. O., Baker, P., & McCoy, D. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182312678 · Cited by 74
Zubieta, Á. S., Savian, J. V., Filho, W. D. S., Wallau, M., Gómez, A. M., Bindelle, J., Bonnet, O. J. F., & Carvalho, P. C. D. F. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142029 · Cited by 80
van Hal, O., Weijenberg, A., de Boer, I. J. M., & van Zanten, H. H. E. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118241 · Cited by 71
Circular Food Behaviors: A Literature Review
do Canto, N. R., Grunert, K. G., & de Barcellos, M. D. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041872 · Cited by 70
“[69] To assess the potential contribution of livestock—fed with low-opportunity cost feedstuff—to the food supply, while reducing arable land use.”
BackgroundAryal, D. R., Ruiz, D. E. M., López-Cruz, S. D. C., Marroquín, C. N. T., Lara-Nucamendi, A., Jiménez-Trujillo, J. A., Pérez-Sánchez, E., Betanzos-Simon, J. E., Casasola-Coto, F., Martínez‐Salinas, A., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21089-4 · Cited by 82
The ‘bioeconomics vs bioeconomy’ debate: Beyond criticism, advancing research fronts
Allain, S., Ruault, J., Moraine, M., & Madelrieux, S. (2021) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2021.11.004 · Cited by 82
Dietary-Nutraceutical Properties of Oat Protein and Peptides
Rafique, H., Dong, R., Wang, X., Alim, A., Aadil, R. M., Li, L., Zou, L., & Hu, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.950400 · Cited by 66
“Livestock puts much higher pressure on global warming, resource, and land use than plant-based food (25).”
BackgroundGil, J., Daioglou, V., van Ittersum, M. K., Reidsma, P., Doelman, J., van Middelaar, C. E., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2019) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101983 · Cited by 65
Nutrition and health of edible insects.
van Huis, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care · doi:10.1097/mco.0000000000000641 · Cited by 75
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Kovacic, Z., de Boer, I. J. M., & Ripoll‐Bosch, R. (2021) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.001 · Cited by 66
Nature-Based Solutions for Agriculture in Circular Cities: Challenges, Gaps, and Opportunities
Canet-Martí, A., Pineda‐Martos, R., Junge, R., Bohn, K., Paço, T. A., Delgado, C., Alenčikienė, G., Skar, S. L. G., & Baganz, G. F. M. (2021) · Water · doi:10.3390/w13182565 · Cited by 63
“Food system analysis reveals that natural resource use and emissions associated with modern systems can be substantially reduced by shifting towards a circular system [25,26].”
Background‘Less but better’ meat is a sustainability message in need of clarity
Resare Sahlin, K., Röös, E., & Gordon, L. J. (2020) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-020-00140-5 · Cited by 59
Self-citationThe Moral Complexity of Agriculture: A Challenge for Corporate Social Responsibility
de Olde, E. M., & Valentinov, V. (2019) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-019-09782-3 · Cited by 60
Alternative sources of protein for food and feed
Thornton, P. K., Gurney‐Smith, H., & Wollenberg, E. K. (2023) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101277 · Cited by 62
Berton, M., Bovolenta, S., Corazzin, M., Gallo, L., Pinterits, S., Ramanzin, M., Ressi, W., Spigarelli, C., Zuliani, A., & Sturaro, E. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127056 · Cited by 58
Sahlin, K. R., & Trewern, J. (2022) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00536-5 · Cited by 57
Wang, H., Long, W., Chadwick, D. R., Velthof, G. L., Oenema, O., Ma, W., Wang, J., Qin, W., Hou, Y., & Zhang, F. S. (2019) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2019.106748 · Cited by 53
Kaufmann, L., Mayer, A., Matej, S., Kalt, G., Lauk, C., Theurl, M. C., & Erb, K.-H. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.014 · Cited by 51
Mayer, A. C. R., Kaufmann, L., Kalt, G., Matej, S., Theurl, M. C., Morais, T. G., Leip, A., & Erb, K. (2021) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101344 · Cited by 54
Feeding food losses and waste to pigs and poultry: Implications for feed quality and production
Boumans, I. J. M. M., Schop, M., Bracke, M. B. M., de Boer, I. J. M., Gerrits, W. J. J., & Bokkers, E. A. M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134623 · Cited by 53
Paris, B., Vandorou, F., Tyris, D., Balafoutis, A. Τ., Vaiopoulos, K., Kyriakarakos, G., Manolakos, D., & Papadakis, G. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12042142 · Cited by 50
Ecosystem management using livestock: embracing diversity and respecting ecological principles
Thompson, L. R., Rowntree, J. E., Windisch, W. M., Waters, S. M., Shalloo, L., & Manzano, P. (2023) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.1093/af/vfac094 · Cited by 58
Can agroecology help in meeting our 2050 protein requirements?
Sijpestijn, G. F., Wezel, A., & Chriki, S. (2022) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104822 · Cited by 50
Livestock and Sustainable Food Systems: Status, Trends, and Priority Actions
Herrero, M., Mason-D’Croz, D., Thornton, P. K., Fanzo, J., Rushton, J., Godde, C., Bellows, A. L., Ruiz, A. D. G., Palmer, J., Chang, J., et al. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5_20 · Cited by 64
Self-citationFang, Q., Zhang, X., Dai, G., Tong, B., Wang, H., Oenema, O., van Zanten, H. H. E., Gerber, P., & Hou, Y. (2023) · Nature Food · doi:10.1038/s43016-023-00813-x · Cited by 48
Self-citationOptimising diets to reach absolute planetary environmental sustainability through consumers
Lucas, E., Guo, M., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.003 · Cited by 52
Designing a future food vision for the Nordics through a participatory modeling approach
Karlsson, J. O., Carlsson, G., Lindberg, M., Sjunnestrand, T., & Röös, E. (2018) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-018-0528-0 · Cited by 45
Self-citationMorais, T. G., Teixeira, R. F. M., Lauk, C., Theurl, M. C., Winiwarter, W., Mayer, A. C. R., Kaufmann, L., Haberl, H., Domingos, T., & Erb, K. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102313 · Cited by 48
Cornelissen, K., & Piqueras‐Fiszman, B. (2022) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/1750-3841.16372 · Cited by 51
Energy scarcity and rising cost: Towards a paradigm shift for livestock
Benoît, M., & Mottet, A. (2022) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103585 · Cited by 43
A Shift to Healthy and Sustainable Consumption Patterns
Herrero, M., Hugas, M., Lele, U., Wirakartakusumah, A., & Torero, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5_5 · Cited by 54
Self-citationMoreira, S. G., Hoogenboom, G., Nunes, M. R., Martin-Ryals, A. D., & Sanchez, P. A. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163031 · Cited by 47
Moreno, G., Hernández-Esteban, A., Rolo, V., & Igual, J. M. (2021) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-021-05023-7 · Cited by 48
Nitrogen flows in global pork supply chains and potential improvement from feeding swill to pigs
Uwizeye, A., Gerber, P., Opio, C. I., Tempio, G., Mottet, A., Makkar, H. P. S., Falcucci, A., Steinfeld, H., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2019) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.032 · Cited by 44
Self-citationFernández-Mena, H., MacDonald, G. K., Pellerin, S., & Nesme, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00041 · Cited by 41
Evaluation of the contribution of 16 European beef production systems to food security
Mosnier, C., Jarousse, A., Madrange, P., Balouzat, J., Guillier, M., Pirlo, G., Mertens, A., O’Riordan, E. G., Pahmeyer, C., Hennart, S., et al. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103088 · Cited by 41
Anim-Jnr, A. S., Sasu, P., Boesch, C., Mabiki, F. P., Frimpong, Y. O., Emmambux, M. N., & Greathead, H. M. R. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su152115326 · Cited by 44
Consumer strategies towards a more sustainable food system: insights from Switzerland
Frehner, A., de Boer, I. J. M., Müller, A. W., van Zanten, H. H. E., & Schader, C. (2021) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqab401 · Cited by 46
“By a smart mix of strategies, it is possible to improve all impact categories assessed simultaneously—more concretely, by a combination of better performing consumption patterns (RM and FBDG strategies; less ASFs, healthier plant-based foods), reductions of food waste (FW strategy), and changes in production (ORG and…”
InfluentialSelf-citationHeat stress on cattle embryo: gene regulation and adaptation
Naranjo‐Gómez, J. S., Uribe-García, F., Herrera‐Sánchez, M. P., Lozano‐Villegas, K. J., Rodríguez‐Hernández, R., & Rondón‐Barragán, I. S. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06570 · Cited by 38
Restoring nutrient circularity in a nutrient-saturated area in Germany requires systemic change
van der Wiel, B. Z., Weijma, J., van Middelaar, C. E., Kleinke, M., Buisman, C. J. N., & Wichern, F. (2021) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-021-10172-3 · Cited by 38
Are Livestock Always Bad for the Planet? Rethinking the Protein Transition and Climate Change Debate
Houzer, E., & Scoones, I. (2021) · OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) · doi:10.19088/steps.2021.003 · Cited by 41
How food choices link sociodemographic and lifestyle factors with sustainability impacts
Frehner, A., van Zanten, H. H. E., Schader, C., de Boer, I. J. M., Pestoni, G., Rohrmann, S., & Müller, A. W. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126896 · Cited by 40
“…of dietary guidelines (Springmann et al., 2020); examples for resource-oriented prede fi ned scenarios are scenarios that consider the suitability of resources, such as limiting animal-source foods to the extent that can be produced based on low-opportunity cost biomass (Van Zanten et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationvan der Wiel, B. Z., Weijma, J., van Middelaar, C. E., Kleinke, M., Buisman, C. J. N., & Wichern, F. (2019) · Resources Conservation & Recycling X · doi:10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100014 · Cited by 36
Competing for food waste – Policies’ market feedbacks imply sustainability tradeoffs
Latka, C., Parodi, A., van Hal, O., Heckelei, T., Leip, A., Witzke, P., & van Zanten, H. H. E. (2022) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106545 · Cited by 38
Moberg, E., Säll, S., Hansson, P., & Röös, E. (2021) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102090 · Cited by 36
Self-citationThe promised land: contrasting frames of marginal land in the European Union
Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Candel, J. J. L., de Boer, I. J. M., & Ripoll-Bosch, R. (2022) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105860 · Cited by 33
The farmers’ dilemma: Meat, means, and morality
Bryant, C. J., & van der Weele, C. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105605 · Cited by 33
Dou, Z., Toth, J. D., Pitta, D., Bender, J. S., Hennessy, M. L., Vecchiarelli, B., Indugu, N., Chen, T., Li, Y., Sherman, R., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-17812-w · Cited by 33
Nutritional value of suckler beef from temperate pasture systems
Lee, M. R. F., McAuliffe, G. A., Tweed, J. K. S., Griffith, B. A., Morgan, S. A., Rivero, M. J., Harris, P., Takahashi, T., & Cardenas, L. M. (2021) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100257 · Cited by 33
Nilsson, J., & Martin, M. A. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.006 · Cited by 44
Frehner, A., Cardinaals, R. P. M., de Boer, I. J. M., Müller, A. W., Schader, C., van Selm, B., van Hal, O., Pestoni, G., Rohrmann, S., Herrero, M., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00119-x · Cited by 32
Self-citationde Vries, M., Zahra, W. A., Wouters, A. P., van Middelaar, C. E., Oosting, S. J., Tiesnamurti, B., & Vellinga, T. V. (2019) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00049 · Cited by 31
“…as part of a balanced diet for cows is not only advantageous because of its positive effects on milk yield, but also because utilizing these co-products as animal feed prevents foodfeed competition and contributes to circularity of food systems (Vellinga et al., 2012; Van Zanten et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBai, Z., Zhao, J., Wei, Z., Jin, X., & Ma, L. (2019) · Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1080/1943815x.2019.1671463 · Cited by 33
“…it utilizes approximately 70% of global agricultural land resources, consumes a large proportion of global water resources, and contributes greatly to nutrient inputs to and losses from agriculture production systems (Mekonnen and Hoekstra 2012; Bouwman et al. 2013; van Zanten et al. 2018).”
BackgroundLiebe, D. M., Hall, M. B., & White, R. R. (2020) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2020-18570 · Cited by 29
Role of nanotechnology in animal production and veterinary medicine
Ali, A., Ijaz, M. U., Khan, Y. R., Sajid, H. A., Hussain, K., Rabbani, A. H., Shahid, M. F., Naseer, O., Ghaffar, A., Naeem, M. A., et al. (2021) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-021-02951-5 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Zanten, H. H. E., Herrero, M., Van Hal, O., Röös, E., Muller, A., Garnett, T., Gerber, P. J., Schader, C., & De Boer, I. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Animal Production Systems Group Wageningen University & Research Wageningen the Netherlands
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Frick Switzerland
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
- Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau (CH)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4185-4194
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2804166887
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Global Change Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Epsilon Open Archive (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet biblioteket (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences)) (acceptedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
- Keywords
- animal source foods, livestock consumption, sustainable land use, circular economy, arable land, protein requirements, Sustainable Development Goals
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Animal Husbandry, Cattle, Diet, Food Supply, Livestock
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review