Cited by 102Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyProbiotics and Fermented FoodsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Antibacterial activity of lactic acid bacteria included in inoculants for silage and in silages treated with these inoculants

Gollop, N., Zakin, V., Weinberg, Z.G.·2005·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

AIMS: To determine antibacterial activity in lactic acid bacteria (LAB) silage inoculants and in wheat and corn silages which were treated with these inoculants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Wheat and two corn silages were prepared in 0.25 l sealed glass jars. Inoculant treatments were prepared for each type of silage with each of 10 LAB silage inoculants at inoculation rate of 10(6) CFU g(-1). Untreated silages served as controls. Antibacterial activity was determined in the inoculants and in their respective silages with Micrococcus luteus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibacterial activity was detected in nine of the 10 inoculants whereas such activity in the silages varied. Control silages did not have antibacterial activity. CONCLUSIONS: Many LAB silage inoculants have antibacterial activity and in some cases this activity is imparted on inoculated silages. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study was conducted as part of a broader research objective, which is to find out how LAB silage inoculants enhance ruminant performance. The results of this study indicate that LAB silage inoculants produce antibacterial activity, and therefore, have a potential to inhibit detrimental micro-organisms in the silage or in the rumen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02504.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gollop, N., Zakin, V., & Weinberg, Z. G.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Organization (IL)
Corresponding author
Gollop, N.
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2005-03
Volume
98
Issue
3
Pages
662-666
ISSN
  • 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2672
OpenAlex
W2091477174
Cited by
102
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, silage inoculants, antibacterial activity, wheat silage, corn silage, Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, silage spoilage, rumen microbiota, ruminant performance
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteriological Techniques, Fermentation, Food Microbiology, Food Preservation, Lactobacillus, Silage, Lactic Acid, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review