Cited by 72Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyProbiotics and Fermented FoodsMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

Selection of tropical lactic acid bacteria for enhancing the quality of maize silage

Open access
Santos, A.O., Ávila, C.L.S., Schwan, R.F.·2013·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The objective of this study was to select lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains isolated from silage and assess their effect on the quality of maize silage. The LAB strains were inoculated into aqueous extract obtained from maize to evaluate their production of metabolites and pH reduction. The ability to inhibit the pathogenic and silage-spoilage microorganisms' growth was evaluated. Nine LAB strains that showed the best results were assessed in polyvinyl chloride experimental silos. The inoculation of the LAB strains influenced the concentration of lactic and acetic acids and the diversity of Listeria. The inoculation of silages with Lactobacillus buchneri (UFLA SLM11 and UFLA SLM103 strains) resulted in silages with greater LAB populations and improvements after aerobic exposure. The UFLA SLM11 and SLM103 strains identified as L. buchneri showed to be promising in the treatment of maize silage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2013-6782

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of lactic acid bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus spp.) are a key cause of rapid pH decline.

    “It has been widely reported that high levels of lactic acid bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus spp.) are a key cause of rapid pH decline [35,47].”

    From Cellulase Interacts with Lactic Acid Bacteria to Affect Fermentation Quality, Microbial Community, and Ruminal Degradability in Mixed Silage of Soybean Residue and Corn Stover (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion says LAB metabolism produces lactic acid and is primarily responsible for the observed pH decrease in maize silage. It does not establish that high LAB levels cause a rapid decline: it reports the largest LAB population in one inoculated silage, while noting smaller pH reductions with that strain. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Corn silage inoculated with one strain of Lb. plantarum originally isolated from sugarcane silage lacked Listeria spp., whereas untreated control and corn silages inoculated with other Lb. plantarum strains had Listeria spp. present.

    “Santos et al. (2013) observed that corn silage inoculated with 1 strain of Lb. plantarum originally isolated from sugarcane silage lacked Listeria spp., whereas the untreated control and corn silages inoculated with other Lb.plantarum strains had Listeria spp.present.”

    From Silage review: Recent advances and future uses of silage additives (2018) · cites this paper as Santos et al., 2013

    The Maize Ensilage in Experimental Silos section reports Listeria spp. in control silage and silages inoculated with L. plantarum strains UFLA SLM41, SLM46, and SLM105. But the Discussion reports no Listeria in silages inoculated with two other L. plantarum strains, UFLA SLM08 and SLM45—not just one. The strain-selection section says the LAB strains originated from sugarcane silage. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lentilactobacillus buchneri is presently the gold standard to promote aerobic stability in corn silage or Napier grass.

    “Lentilactobacillus buchneri is presently the gold standard to promote aerobic stability in corn silage (Santos et al., 2013; Da Silva et al., 2014) or Napier grass (Guan et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [13]13. Czuprynski, C. J., S. Kathariou, and K. Poulsen. 2010. Listeria. Pages 167-187 in Pathogenesis of Bacterial Infections in Animals. 4th ed. C. L. Gyles, J. F. Prescott, G. Songer, and C. O. Thoen, ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, IA.
  2. [28]28. Kung, L., Jr. 2009. Effects of microbial additives in silages: Facts and perspectives. Pages 7-22 in Proc. Int. Symp. Forage Qual. Con- serv., vol.
  3. [34]34. Ministério da Saúde. 2001. Regulamento Técnico Sobre os Padrões Microbiológicos para Alimentos. Pages 1-54 in Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil. Resolução RDC nº 12, de 02/01/2001. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Brasília, Brazil.
  4. [37]37. Nishino, N. 2011. Aerobic stability and instability of silages caused by bacteria. Pages 127-141 in Proc. Int. Symp. Forage Qual. Conserv. J. L. P. Daniel, M. Zopollatto, L. G. Nussio, ed. Fundação de Es- tudos Agrários Luiz de Queiroz, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  5. [46]46. Siqueira, G. R., T. F. Bernardes, and R. A. Reis. 2005. Instabilidade aeróbia de silagens: Efeitos e possibilidades de prevenção. Pages 25-60 in Volumosos na Produção de Ruminantes, 2 ed. R. A. Reis, G. R. Siqueira, and L. M. A. Bertipaglia, ed. Funep, Jaboticabal, Brazil.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santos, A. O., Ávila, C. L. S., & Schwan, R. F.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2013-12
Volume
96
Issue
12
Pages
7777-7789
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012280648
Cited by
72
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, corn silage, silage quality, Lactobacillus buchneri, silage inoculation, silage spoilage, lactic acid production, acetic acid, aerobic exposure, silage pH
MeSH terms
Aerobiosis, Animals, Zea mays, Fermentation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactobacillus, Silage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review