The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: There is an increasing international interest in patient and public involvement ( PPI ) in research, yet relatively little robust evidence exists about its impact on health and social care research. Objective: To identify the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research. Design: A systematic search of electronic databases and health libraries was undertaken from 1995 to 2009. Data were extracted and quality assessed utilizing the guidelines of the NHS C entre for R eviews and D issemination 2009 and the C ritical A ppraisal S kills P rogramme ( CASP ). Grey literature was assessed using the D ixon‐ W oods et al . (2005) checklist. Inclusion criteria: All study types that reported the impact PPI had on the health and/or social care research study. Main results: A total of 66 studies reporting the impact of PPI on health and social care research were included. The positive impacts identified enhanced the quality and appropriateness of research. Impacts were reported for all stages of research, including the development of user‐focused research objectives, development of user‐relevant research questions, development of user‐friendly information, questionnaires and interview schedules, more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies, consumer‐focused interpretation of data and enhanced implementation and dissemination of study results. Some challenging impacts were also identified. Conclusion: This study provides the first international evidence of PPI impact that has emerged at all key stages of the research process. However, much of the evidence base concerning impact remains weak and needs significant enhancement in the next decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Data were extracted from 83 papers (the remaining seven were not written in a format suitable for data extraction but were deemed sufficiently important to include within the conceptualisation of PPI).”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Drawing on the findings of the PIRICOM study, 29 a validated online survey tool (Bristol Online Surveys, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) was designed to collect data to assess how PPI is operationalised and its perceived impact on each study.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“While the original GRIPP checklist represented an important starting point in creating high quality PPI reporting, its development drew on systematic review evidence, without broader input from the international PPI research community [2–4].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“While the patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base has expanded over the past decade, the quality of reporting within papers is often inconsistent, limiting our understanding of how it works, in what context, for whom, and why.”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Inadequate reporting can create problems for systematic reviews that attempt to synthesise PPI evidence [2–4].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“While GRIPP2-LF and GRIPP2-SF aim to guide consistent reporting, it is not possible to be prescriptive about the exact content of each item, as the current evidence base is not advanced enough to make this possible [2–4, 21].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“The relatively small amount of empirical evidence on the impact of PPI in research 29 has been criticised as poorly reported 21 and methodologically weak, often failing to fully explore the contextual factors surrounding PPI as a complex intervention.30”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Ninety papers published between 1995 and 2009 were included.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Of the 83 papers, 2 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 52 qualitative studies, 15 case study methodology, 4 cross-sectional studies and 10 structured reviews.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“They did not find any evidence around systematic measurement of PPI outcomes, and furthermore found a lack of clarity on the differences between PPI impact and outcomes.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Providing a more robust evidence base for PPI policy requires moving beyond observational evaluations of PPI.29,30”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while there appears to be a reasonably robust level of evidence around the 'architecture of PPI', reporting of outcomes continues to be poor.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“What evidence there is tends to be descriptive, largely qualitative, often retrospective case studies, 19,29,106 with only a few exceptional prospective longitudinal case studies, 15 comparative multiproject evaluations 107 or studies employing quantitative designs.108”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Brett et al. 29 argue that most studies have attempted to conceptualise PPI mainly around context and process and have not sufficiently theoretically grasped the complexities of PPI.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“As in Staley's review, 19 the papers provided more evidence around the processes of PPI rather than impact and outcomes, and found scant evidence of PPI impact on funding decisions.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Although the PIRICOM study found little evidence of PPI being theoretically conceptualised, there has been some work to develop a consensus on the principles and indicators of successful PPI, 133 and this was used to underpin the survey design.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
Tacconelli, E. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7 · Cited by 3,270
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E. M., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D. M., Rhodes, S. D., Samuel‐Hodge, C. D., Maty, S. C., Lux, L. J., et al. (2004) · PubMed Central · Cited by 959
Nilsen, E. S., Myrhaug, H. T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S. R., & Oxman, A. D. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004563.pub2 · Cited by 565
Lay perspectives: advantages for health research
Entwistle, V. A., Renfrew, M. J., Yearley, S., Forrester, J. M., & Lamont, T. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.463 · Cited by 376
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., & Barber, R. (2011) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462311000481 · Cited by 369
Self-citationCashman, S. B., Adeky, S., Allen, A. J., Corburn, J., Israel, B. A., Montaño, J., Rafelito, A., Rhodes, S. D., Swanston, S., Wallerstein, N. B., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.113571 · Cited by 347
Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation
Shah, S. G. S., & Robinson, I. (2007) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462307051677 · Cited by 299
From passive subjects to equal partners
Trivedi, P., & Wykes, T. (2002) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.181.6.468 · Cited by 281
Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits
HEWLETT, S. E., de Wit, M. P. T., Richards, P., Quest, E. M., Hughes, R., Heiberg, T., & Kirwan, J. (2006) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.22091 · Cited by 272
Abelson, J., Giacomini, M. K., Lehoux, P., & Gauvin, F. (2006) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009 · Cited by 251
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Dixon P, 1999, A Database of Examples of Consumer Involvement in Research
- Blaxter M, 1995, Consumer Issues Within the NHS: An R & D Contribution to Consumer Involvement in the NHS
- Brett J, 2010, Systematic Review of the Conceptualization, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research
- Dixon‐Woods M, 2005, Vulnerable Groups and Access, to Health Care: A Critical Interpretative Review
- Popay J, 2005, Developing guidance on conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, A7
- UKCRC & TwoCan Associates, 2009, An Evaluation of the Process and Impact of Patient and Public Involvement in the Advisory Groups of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration
- Faulkner A, 2006, Beyond our Expectations: A Report of the Experiences of Involving Service Users in Forensic Mental Health Research
- Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2008, A Review of Service User Involvement in Prison Mental Health Research
- Kelson M, 1999, National Sentinel Audits Involving Older People: A Guide to Involving Older People in Local Audit Activity
- 10.1080/13561820400011792 · DOI
- Rose D, 2004, Telling different stories: user involvement in mental health research, Research and Policy Planning, 22, 23
- Faulkner A, 2004, Capturing the Experiences of those Involved in the TRUE Project. A Story of Colliding Worlds
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Wang, H., Blake, H., & Chattopadhyay, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.610245 · Cited by 21
Development of the patient-oriented research curriculum in child health (PORCCH)
Macarthur, C., Walsh, C. M., Buchanan, F., Karoly, A., Pires, L., McCreath, G. A., & Jones, N. L. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00276-z · Cited by 21
O'Brien, J. T., Taylor, J., Thomas, A. J., Bamford, C. H., Vale, L. D., Hill, S., Allan, L. M., Finch, T. L., McNally, R., Hayes, L., et al. (2021) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/pgfar09070 · Cited by 21
Evans, B. A., Khanom, A., Edwards, A., Edwards, B. M., Farr, A., Foster, T., Fothergill, R. T., Gripper, P., Gunson, I. M., Porter, A. M., et al. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13856 · Cited by 21
Hughes-Morley, A., Hann, M., Fraser, C., Meade, O., Lovell, K., Young, B., Roberts, C., Cree, L., More, D., O’Leary, N., et al. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1718-1 · Cited by 23
Early career researchers’ perspectives and roles in patient-oriented research
Rouleau, G., Bélisle‐Pipon, J., Birko, S., Karazivan, P., Fernández, N., Bilodeau, K., Chao, Y., de Pokomandy, A., Foley, V., Gagnon, B., et al. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0117-z · Cited by 22
Zakrisson, A., Arne, M., Hasselgren, M., Lisspers, K., Ställberg, B., & Theander, K. (2018) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13899 · Cited by 21
A mixed‐methods exploration of non‐attendance at diabetes appointments using peer researchers
Eades, C. E., & Alexander, H. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12959 · Cited by 21
Schilling, I., Behrens, H., Bleidorn, J., Gágyor, I., Hugenschmidt, C., Jilani, H. S., Schmiemann, G., & Gerhardus, A. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0172-0 · Cited by 21
Darlow, B. J. S., Abbott, J. H., Bennell, K. L., Briggs, A. M., Brown, M., Clark, J., Dean, S. G., French, S., Hinman, R. S., Krägeloh, C., et al. (2021) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open · doi:10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100160 · Cited by 21
Husson, M., Dechartres, A., Ramdjee, B., Diverres, M., Zejli, T., L'Hénaff, M., Jehanno, E., Tubach, F., & Caille, A. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.012 · Cited by 20
Feyi, K., Klinger, S., Pharro, G., Mcnally, L., James, A., Gretton, K., & Almond, M. K. (2013) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000165 · Cited by 20
Diaz, A., Gove, D., Nelson, M., Smith, M., Tochel, C., Bintener, C., Ly, A., Bexelius, C., Gustavsson, A., Georges, J., et al. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13246 · Cited by 20
Parent engagement in co-design of clinical trials: the PARENT trial
Vanderloo, L. M., Vanderhout, S. M., Tavares, E. S., Maguire, J. L., Straus, S. E., & Birken, C. S. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05305-6 · Cited by 20
Owen, E., Massazza, A., Roberts, B., Lokot, M., & Fuhr, D. C. (2022) · Journal of Migration and Health · doi:10.1016/j.jmh.2022.100087 · Cited by 20
Blair, C., Best, P., Burns, P., Campbell, A., Davidson, G., Duffy, J., Johnston, A., Kelly, B., Killick, C., Dermott, D. M., et al. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00353-x · Cited by 20
Capobianco, L., Faija, C., Cooper, B. G., Brown, L., McPhillips, R., Shields, G., & Adrian Wells, A. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13676 · Cited by 20
Weiler‐Wichtl, L., Leiss, U., Gojo, J., Kienesberger, A., Hansl, R., Hopfgartner, M., & Schneider, C. (2023) · Cancer Reports · doi:10.1002/cnr2.1835 · Cited by 20
Parents' and young people's involvement in designing a trial of ventilator weaning
Tume, L. N., Preston, J., & Blackwood, B. (2015) · Nursing in Critical Care · doi:10.1111/nicc.12221 · Cited by 20
Public involvement in research within care homes: benefits and challenges in the APPROACH study
Froggatt, K. A., Goodman, C. M., Morbey, H., Davies, S. L., Masey, H., Dickinson, A. M., Martin, W. E., & Victor, C. R. (2015) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12431 · Cited by 20
Singh, S., Burns, K. K., Rees, J., Picklyk, D., Spence, J. D., & Marlett, N. J. (2018) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/0840470417747003 · Cited by 20
User involvement in digital health: Working together to design smart home health technology
Burrows, A., Meller, B., Craddock, I. J., Hyland, F., & Gooberman‐Hill, R. (2018) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12831 · Cited by 20
Gregory, S., Wells, K., Forsyth, K., Latto, C., Szyra, H., Saunders, S., Ritchie, C. W., & Milne, R. (2018) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301218789307 · Cited by 20
True, G., Davidson, L., Facundo, R., Meyer, D. V., Urbina, S., & Ono, S. S. (2019) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022167819853344 · Cited by 20
“UNIFIED”: Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide in Mind, Brain, and Education
Hobbiss, M. H., Massonnié, J., Tokuhama‐Espinosa, T., Gittner, A., Lemos, M. A. D. S., Tovazzi, A., Hindley, C., Baker, S., Sumeracki, M. A., Wassenaar, T. M., et al. (2019) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12223 · Cited by 20
What Is Missing from “Patient Oriented Research”? A View from Public Health Systems and Services
Pauly, B., Urbanoski, K. A., Hartney, E., Shahram, S., Marcellus, L., Wallace, B. B., MacDonald, M., & Hancock, T. (2019) · Healthcare policy · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2019.26075 · Cited by 20
Noblet, T., Marriott, J. F., Hensman-Crook, A., O’Shea, S., Friel, S., & Rushton, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229792 · Cited by 22
Simulation-Based Research: A Scoping Review
Vemuri, S., Hynson, J. L., Gillam, L. H., & Williams, K. J. (2020) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732320946893 · Cited by 23
McCarron, T. L., Clement, F. M., Rasiah, J., Moffat, K., Wasylak, T., & Santana, M. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00272-3 · Cited by 20
The Experience of Older People in the Shared Decision-Making Process in Advanced Kidney Care
Thomas, N., Jenkins, K., McManus, B., & Gracey, B. (2016) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2016/7859725 · Cited by 20
Galvin, H. K., Petersen, C. C., Subbian, V., & Solomonides, A. E. (2019) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1700536 · Cited by 20
Testicular Awareness: The What, the Why, and the How
Saab, M. M., Hegarty, J. M., & Landers, M. G. (2019) · International Journal of Men s Social and Community Health · doi:10.22374/ijmsch.v2i1.16 · Cited by 20
13. Forskning med nye aktører – forskningskvalitetog nytteverdi
Østensjø, S., & Askheim, O. P. (2019) · Universitetsforlaget eBooks · doi:10.18261/9788215031675-2019-14 · Cited by 20
Zhou, Q. X., He, H., Li, Q., Zhao, J., Wang, L., Luo, Z., Wang, X., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111356 · Cited by 19
Sheikhan, N. Y., Kuluski, K., Hiebert, M., Munro, C., Cappe, V., van Kesteren, M. R., Kidd, S. A., & Hawke, L. D. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70198 · Cited by 19
Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement
Forsythe, L. P., Frank, L. B., Workman, T. A., Borsky, A. E., Hilliard, T. S., Harwell, D., & Fayish, L. (2017) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0063 · Cited by 19
Patient and public involvement in oesophageal cancer survivorship research
Schandl, A. R., Mälberg, K., Haglund, L., Arnberg, L., & Lagergren, P. (2021) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2021.2016950 · Cited by 19
McKay, A. M., Parekh, R. S., & Noone, D. G. (2022) · Pediatric Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s00467-022-05520-6 · Cited by 19
Fedorowicz, S. E., Riley, V., Cowap, L., Ellis, N., Chambers, R. M., Grogan, S., Crone, D., Cottrell, E., Clark-Carter, D. D., Roberts, L. M., et al. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13515 · Cited by 19
Hatzikiriakidis, K., Ayton, D., O’Connor, A., Callaway, L., Carmody, S., Skouteris, H., & Green, R. (2023) · Disability and health journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101442 · Cited by 19
Plamondon, K., Banner, D., Cary, M. A., Faulkner, M., Gainforth, H. L., Ghag, K., Hoens, A. M., Huisken, A., Kandola, D. K., Khan, S., et al. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13865 · Cited by 19
Alsaeed, D., Davies, N., Gilmartin‐Thomas, J., Jamieson, E., Kharicha, K., Liljas, A. E. M., Raimi‐Abraham, B. T., Aldridge, J., Smith, F. J., Walters, K. R., et al. (2016) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0016-0 · Cited by 19
Improving participation outcomes and interventions in neurodisability: co‐designing future research
McAnuff, J., Brooks, R., Duff, C., Quinn, M., Marshall, J., & Kolehmainen, N. (2016) · Child Care Health and Development · doi:10.1111/cch.12414 · Cited by 19
Nissen, E. R., Bregnballe, V., Mehlsen, M. Y., Muldbjerg, A. K. Ø., O’Connor, M., & Lomborg, K. E. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0106-2 · Cited by 19
Patient involvement in surgical wound care research: A scoping review
Muir, R., Carlini, J., Harbeck, E., Gillespie, B. M., Tuffaha, H., Walker, R., McInnes, E., Latimer, S. L., Lin, F. F., Pearcy, J., et al. (2020) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.13395 · Cited by 19
Dada, S., May, A. A., Bastable, K., Samuels, A. E., Tönsing, K. M., Wilder, J., Casey, M., Ntuli, C., & Reddy, V. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13445 · Cited by 19
van Bekkum, J. E., Fergie, G., & Hilton, S. (2016) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0093-4 · Cited by 19
Rethinking measurement of health outcomes in Long COVID: complexities, challenges and considerations
Bhéreur, A., McDuff, K., Naye, F., Lemay, L., Grenier, A., O’Hara, M. E., Nathanson, J., Lavoie, K., Sasseville, M., Kadakia, Z., et al. (2026) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-025-02453-0 · Cited by 18
Walsh, L., Hill, S., Wluka, A. E., Brooks, P., Buchbinder, R., Cahill, A., Dans, L. F., Lowe, D. B., Taylor, M. J., & Tugwell, P. (2016) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2016.09.004 · Cited by 18
#SoMe4Surgery: from inception to impact
Grossman, R. C., Mackenzie, G., Keller, D. S., Dames, N. B., Grewal, P., Maldonado, A. A., Ioannidis, A., AlHasan, A. J. M. S., Søreide, K., Teoh, J. Y., et al. (2020) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000356 · Cited by 18
Thomas, F., Hansford, L., Wyatt, K. M., Byng, R., Coombes, K., Finch, J., Finnerty, K., Ford, J., Guppy, K., Guppy, R., et al. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13065 · Cited by 18
Scobbie, L., Thomson, K., Pollock, A., & Evans, J. J. (2020) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2020.1774397 · Cited by 18
What is ‘sensitive’ about sensitive research? The sensitive researchers’ perspective
Mallon, S. D., & Elliott, I. (2020) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1857966 · Cited by 18
Cavens, C., Imms, C., Drake, G., Garrity, N., & Wallen, M. A. (2021) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.1900927 · Cited by 18
Long‐term consumer involvement in cancer research: Working towards partnership
Milley, K. M., Chima, S., McIntosh, J., Ackland, E., & Emery, J. D. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13258 · Cited by 18
Reconsidering Diagnosis, Treatment, and Postoperative Care in Children with Cloacal Malformations
Versteegh, H. P., Gardner, D. S., Scriven, L., Martens, L., Kluivers, K. B., Hewitt, G. D., de Blaauw, I., Wood, R. J., Williams, A., & Sutcliffe, J. R. (2021) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2021.08.009 · Cited by 18
Garety, P. A., Ward, T., Emsley, R., Greenwood, K., Freeman, D. H., Fowler, D. G., Kuipers, E., Bebbington, P., Dunn, G., & Hardy, A. (2021) · Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation · doi:10.3310/eme08110 · Cited by 19
What is ‘sensitive’ about sensitive research? The sensitive researchers’ perspective
Mallon, S. D., & Elliott, I. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003252320-3 · Cited by 18
Manikandan, M., Foley, K. T., Gough, J., Harrington, S., Wall, É., Weldon, F., Ryan, J. M., Kerr, C., Walsh, A., & Fortune, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.874012 · Cited by 18
Pinho‐Gomes, A., Stone, J., Shaw, T., Heath, A., Cowl, J., Norburn, L., Thomas, V., & Scott, S. (2022) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462322000289 · Cited by 18
Lonnie, M., Hunter, E., Stone, R. A., Dineva, M., Aggreh, M., Greatwood, H. C., Johnstone, A. M., & the FIO Food team (2023) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/nbu.12626 · Cited by 19
Tugwell, P., Welch, V. A., Magwood, O., Todhunter‐Brown, A., Akl, E. A., Concannon, T. W., Khabsa, J., Morley, R., Schünemann, H. J., Lytvyn, L., et al. (2023) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-023-02279-1 · Cited by 18
Amann, J., Brach, M., & Rubinelli, S. (2018) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.011 · Cited by 18
What does patient engagement mean for Canadian National Transplant Research Program Researchers?
Allard, J., Ballesteros, F., Anthony, S. J., Dumez, V., Hartell, D. P., Knoll, G. A., Wright, L., & Fortin, M. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0096-0 · Cited by 18
Forsyth, F., Saunders, C., Elmer, A., & Badger, S. J. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0148-0 · Cited by 18
Garcı́a-Martı́n, M., Amezcua‐Prieto, C., Wattar, B. H. A., Jørgensen, J. S., Bueno‐Cavanillas, A., & Khan, K. S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17218048 · Cited by 18
Dainty, K. N., Seaton, M. B., Cowan, K., Laupacis, A., Dorian, P., Douma, M. J., Garner, J., Goldstein, J., Shire, D., Sinclair, D., et al. (2021) · Resuscitation Plus · doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100148 · Cited by 18
Singleton, A. C., Raeside, R., Partridge, S. R., Tat-Ko, J., Sum, S. C. M., Hyun, K. K., Hayes, M., Chow, C. K., Thiagalingam, A., Maka, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-021-01106-7 · Cited by 18
How are patient partners involved in health service research? A scoping review of reviews
Tscherning, S. C., Jensen, A. L., Bekker, H., Vedelø, T. W., Finderup, J., Rasmussen, G. S., Østergaard, J. A., Jensen, F. O., & Rodkjær, L. Ø. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00755-7 · Cited by 17
Jayes, M., Moulam, L., Meredith, S., Whittle, H. C., Lynch, Y., Goldbart, J., Judge, S., Webb, E., Meads, D. M., Hemsley, B., et al. (2021) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732321994791 · Cited by 17
Treacy, S., Martin, S. A., Samarutilake, N., & Bortel, T. V. V. (2021) · Health & Justice · doi:10.1186/s40352-021-00154-6 · Cited by 20
Sales, C. M. D., Martins, F. F., Alves, M. M., Carletto, S., Cerón, S. C., da Silva, L. C., Čuš, A., Edridge, C., Ferreira, N. B., Hancheva, C., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.703624 · Cited by 17
Clennon, E. K., Martin, L. H., Fadich, S. K., Zeigen, L., Blasdel, G., Sineath, R. C., & Dy, G. W. (2022) · Current Sexual Health Reports · doi:10.1007/s11930-021-00323-6 · Cited by 17
Evolution of a research team: the patient partner perspective
Madison, S., Colon-Moya, A. D., Morales-Cosme, W., Lorenzi, M., Diaz, A., HICKSON, B., Monteiro, K., Ruiz, A. M., Perez, A., Redondo, R., et al. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00377-3 · Cited by 17
Convergence, transdisciplinarity, and team science: an interepistemic approach
Morgan, M., Lin, Y. C., Walsh‐Dilley, M., Webster, A., Stone, A. B., Chief, K., Estrada, N., Ayers, K., Love, H., Townsend, P. A., et al. (2025) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-15492-300103 · Cited by 21
Lu, W., Li, Y., Montayre, J., Li, M., Ho, K. Y., Li, J., & Yorke, J. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13030305 · Cited by 18
Bissell, P., Thompson, J., & Gibson, B. (2018) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038517749781 · Cited by 17
Research campaigns in the UK National Health Service: patient recruitment and questions of valuation
Wienroth, M., Pearce, C., & McKevitt, C. (2019) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12957 · Cited by 17
Kayes, N. M., Martin, R., Bright, F. A. S., Kersten, P., & Pollock, A. (2019) · European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.23736/s1973-9087.19.05793-9 · Cited by 17
Jongsma, K. R., van Seventer, J., Verwoerd, A., & van Rensen, A. J. M. L. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00240-3 · Cited by 17
Hoekstra, F., Schaefer, L., Athanasopoulos, P., & Gainforth, H. L. (2021) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.35 · Cited by 17
Standardised data on initiatives—STARDIT: Beta version
Nunn, J., Shafee, T. M. A., Chang, S., Stephens, R., Elliott, J., Oliver, S. R., John, D., Smith, M. P., Orr, N., Preston, J., et al. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00363-9 · Cited by 17
Thiblin, E., Woodford, J., Reuther, C., Lundgren, J., Lutvica, N., & von Essén, L. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.5377 · Cited by 18
Involving patients and the public in research
Darling, E., & Parra, M. A. (2013) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr2013.07.20.6.21.e341 · Cited by 17
Haarsma, F. A., Moser, A., Beckers, M., van Rijswijk, H., Stoffers, E., & Beurskens, A. J. H. M. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12308 · Cited by 17
Engaging rural residents in patient-centered health care research
Levy, M. M., Holmes, C. L., Mendenhall, A. N., & Grube, W. A. (2017) · Patient Experience Journal · doi:10.35680/2372-0247.1164 · Cited by 17
Participatory action research (PAR) research: critical methodological considerations
Livingston, W., & Perkins, A. (2018) · Drugs and Alcohol Today · doi:10.1108/dat-08-2017-0035 · Cited by 17
Stuhlfauth, S., Knutsen, I. R., & Foss, C. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12875 · Cited by 17
Holm, K. E., Casaburi, R. H., Cerreta, S., Gussin, H. A., Husbands, J. M., Pórszász, J., Prieto-Centurion, V., Sandhaus, R. A., Sullivan, J. L., Walsh, L. J., et al. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0150-z · Cited by 17
Standardised Data on Initiatives - STARDIT: Alpha VersionPreprint
Nunn, J., Shafee, T. M. A., Chang, S., Stephens, R., Elliott, J., Oliver, S. R., John, D., Smith, M., & Orr, N. (2019) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/5q47h · Cited by 18
McKay, F., Williams, B. J., Prestwich, G., Treanor, D., & Hallowell, N. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00357-7 · Cited by 16
Wearn, A., Brennan‐Tovey, K., Adams, E. A., Alderson, H., Baariu, J., Cheetham, M., Bartle, V., Palfreyman, L., Rook, V., Shenton, F., et al. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70160 · Cited by 16
Fitzgerald, A., Curry, J., Meierink, A. O., & Cully, A. (2019) · Australian Journal on Ageing · doi:10.1111/ajag.12691 · Cited by 16
Involvement of patients with chronic kidney disease in research: A case study
Finderup, J., Crowley, A. P., Søndergaard, H., & Lomborg, K. E. (2020) · Journal of Renal Care · doi:10.1111/jorc.12346 · Cited by 16
Spillane, A., Belton, S., McDermott, C. M., Issartel, J., Osborne, R. H., Elmer, S., & Murrin, C. M. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039920 · Cited by 16
Sheikh, A., Jacob, J., Vostanis, P., Ruby, F. J. M., Spuerck, I., Stankovic, M., Morgan, N., Mota, C. P., Ferreira, R., Eruyar, Ş., et al. (2024) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-024-01382-2 · Cited by 18
Hanson, J., Majnemer, A., Pietrangelo, F., Dickson, L., Shikako‐Thomas, K., Dahan‐Oliel, N., Steven, E., Iliopoulos, G., & Ogourtsova, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2024.1413240 · Cited by 16
Hunter, E., Stone, R. A., Brown, A. C., Hardman, C. A., Johnstone, A. M., Greatwood, H. C., Dineva, M., & Douglas, F. (2024) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107794 · Cited by 19
Home Care Technology Through an Ability Expectation Lens
Wolbring, G., & Lashewicz, B. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3135 · Cited by 16
Tyrer, F., Dunkley, A. J., Spong, R., Gangadharan, S. K., Bhaumik, S., & Khunti, K. K. (2016) · Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jppi.12176 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Royal College of Nursing Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick Coventry UK
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brett, Jo
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 637-650
- ISSN
- 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-7625
- PMC
- PMC5060910
- OpenAlex
- W2049504028
- Cited by
- 1,598
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 140 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Expectations (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
- University of Warwick
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- patient and public involvement, health research, social care research, research quality, research questions, research recruitment, research dissemination, implementation of research findings, research stages
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Research, Humans, Patient Participation, Social Welfare, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
