The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: There is an increasing international interest in patient and public involvement ( PPI ) in research, yet relatively little robust evidence exists about its impact on health and social care research. Objective: To identify the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research. Design: A systematic search of electronic databases and health libraries was undertaken from 1995 to 2009. Data were extracted and quality assessed utilizing the guidelines of the NHS C entre for R eviews and D issemination 2009 and the C ritical A ppraisal S kills P rogramme ( CASP ). Grey literature was assessed using the D ixon‐ W oods et al . (2005) checklist. Inclusion criteria: All study types that reported the impact PPI had on the health and/or social care research study. Main results: A total of 66 studies reporting the impact of PPI on health and social care research were included. The positive impacts identified enhanced the quality and appropriateness of research. Impacts were reported for all stages of research, including the development of user‐focused research objectives, development of user‐relevant research questions, development of user‐friendly information, questionnaires and interview schedules, more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies, consumer‐focused interpretation of data and enhanced implementation and dissemination of study results. Some challenging impacts were also identified. Conclusion: This study provides the first international evidence of PPI impact that has emerged at all key stages of the research process. However, much of the evidence base concerning impact remains weak and needs significant enhancement in the next decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Data were extracted from 83 papers (the remaining seven were not written in a format suitable for data extraction but were deemed sufficiently important to include within the conceptualisation of PPI).”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Drawing on the findings of the PIRICOM study, 29 a validated online survey tool (Bristol Online Surveys, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) was designed to collect data to assess how PPI is operationalised and its perceived impact on each study.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“While the original GRIPP checklist represented an important starting point in creating high quality PPI reporting, its development drew on systematic review evidence, without broader input from the international PPI research community [2–4].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“While the patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base has expanded over the past decade, the quality of reporting within papers is often inconsistent, limiting our understanding of how it works, in what context, for whom, and why.”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Inadequate reporting can create problems for systematic reviews that attempt to synthesise PPI evidence [2–4].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“While GRIPP2-LF and GRIPP2-SF aim to guide consistent reporting, it is not possible to be prescriptive about the exact content of each item, as the current evidence base is not advanced enough to make this possible [2–4, 21].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“The relatively small amount of empirical evidence on the impact of PPI in research 29 has been criticised as poorly reported 21 and methodologically weak, often failing to fully explore the contextual factors surrounding PPI as a complex intervention.30”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Ninety papers published between 1995 and 2009 were included.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Of the 83 papers, 2 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 52 qualitative studies, 15 case study methodology, 4 cross-sectional studies and 10 structured reviews.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“They did not find any evidence around systematic measurement of PPI outcomes, and furthermore found a lack of clarity on the differences between PPI impact and outcomes.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Providing a more robust evidence base for PPI policy requires moving beyond observational evaluations of PPI.29,30”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while there appears to be a reasonably robust level of evidence around the 'architecture of PPI', reporting of outcomes continues to be poor.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“What evidence there is tends to be descriptive, largely qualitative, often retrospective case studies, 19,29,106 with only a few exceptional prospective longitudinal case studies, 15 comparative multiproject evaluations 107 or studies employing quantitative designs.108”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Brett et al. 29 argue that most studies have attempted to conceptualise PPI mainly around context and process and have not sufficiently theoretically grasped the complexities of PPI.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“As in Staley's review, 19 the papers provided more evidence around the processes of PPI rather than impact and outcomes, and found scant evidence of PPI impact on funding decisions.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Although the PIRICOM study found little evidence of PPI being theoretically conceptualised, there has been some work to develop a consensus on the principles and indicators of successful PPI, 133 and this was used to underpin the survey design.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
Tacconelli, E. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7 · Cited by 3,270
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E. M., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D. M., Rhodes, S. D., Samuel‐Hodge, C. D., Maty, S. C., Lux, L. J., et al. (2004) · PubMed Central · Cited by 959
Nilsen, E. S., Myrhaug, H. T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S. R., & Oxman, A. D. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004563.pub2 · Cited by 565
Lay perspectives: advantages for health research
Entwistle, V. A., Renfrew, M. J., Yearley, S., Forrester, J. M., & Lamont, T. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.463 · Cited by 376
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., & Barber, R. (2011) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462311000481 · Cited by 369
Self-citationCashman, S. B., Adeky, S., Allen, A. J., Corburn, J., Israel, B. A., Montaño, J., Rafelito, A., Rhodes, S. D., Swanston, S., Wallerstein, N. B., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.113571 · Cited by 347
Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation
Shah, S. G. S., & Robinson, I. (2007) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462307051677 · Cited by 299
From passive subjects to equal partners
Trivedi, P., & Wykes, T. (2002) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.181.6.468 · Cited by 281
Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits
HEWLETT, S. E., de Wit, M. P. T., Richards, P., Quest, E. M., Hughes, R., Heiberg, T., & Kirwan, J. (2006) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.22091 · Cited by 272
Abelson, J., Giacomini, M. K., Lehoux, P., & Gauvin, F. (2006) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009 · Cited by 251
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Dixon P, 1999, A Database of Examples of Consumer Involvement in Research
- Blaxter M, 1995, Consumer Issues Within the NHS: An R & D Contribution to Consumer Involvement in the NHS
- Brett J, 2010, Systematic Review of the Conceptualization, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research
- Dixon‐Woods M, 2005, Vulnerable Groups and Access, to Health Care: A Critical Interpretative Review
- Popay J, 2005, Developing guidance on conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, A7
- UKCRC & TwoCan Associates, 2009, An Evaluation of the Process and Impact of Patient and Public Involvement in the Advisory Groups of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration
- Faulkner A, 2006, Beyond our Expectations: A Report of the Experiences of Involving Service Users in Forensic Mental Health Research
- Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2008, A Review of Service User Involvement in Prison Mental Health Research
- Kelson M, 1999, National Sentinel Audits Involving Older People: A Guide to Involving Older People in Local Audit Activity
- 10.1080/13561820400011792 · DOI
- Rose D, 2004, Telling different stories: user involvement in mental health research, Research and Policy Planning, 22, 23
- Faulkner A, 2004, Capturing the Experiences of those Involved in the TRUE Project. A Story of Colliding Worlds
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
Thal, S. B., Graham, C., Ntoumanis, N., MYERS, B. J., Bright, S. J., Jones, J., & Quested, E. (2024) · Mental health and physical activity · doi:10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100650 · Cited by 11
Bufton, K., Bates, M. T., Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, M., Hamid, J., & Westrupp, E. M. (2025) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.70385 · Cited by 9
Small talk matters! Creating allyship in mental health research
Lambley, R. (2020) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769239 · Cited by 9
Patient*innen gestalten Forschung in der Palliativmedizin mit
Heckel, M., Meesters, S., Schildmann, E. K., & Ostgathe, C. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2020.10.002 · Cited by 9
Taylor, F., Ogidi, J., Chauhan, R., Ladva, Z. R., Brearley, S. A., & Drennan, V. M. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13149 · Cited by 9
Coulter, R. W. S., Mitchell, S. R., Prangley, K., Smallwood, S., Bonanno, L., Foster, E. N., Wilson, A., Miller, E. P., & Chugani, C. D. (2021) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/26554 · Cited by 9
de Forcrand, C., Flannery, M., Cho, J., Pidatala, N. R., Batra, R., Booker‐Vaughns, J., Chan, G. K., Dunn, P. J., Galvin, R., Hopkins, E., et al. (2021) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001583 · Cited by 9
Aase, I., Ree, E., Johannessen, T., Holen-Rabbersvik, E., Thomsen, L. H., Strømme, T., Ullebust, B., Schibevaag, L., Lyng, H. B., O'Hara, J. K., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Health Governance · doi:10.1108/ijhg-05-2021-0044 · Cited by 9
A framework for involving coproduction partners in research about young people with type 1 diabetes
Desborough, J., Parkinson, A., Lewis, F., Ebbeck, H., Banfield, M., & Phillips, C. B. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13403 · Cited by 11
Williamson, R., Atkin, H., Wood, O., Thomson, L., & Whitehead, P. J. (2023) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/03080226231165374 · Cited by 9
[Patient and Public Involvement in Family Medicine Research].
Engler, J., Kuschick, D., Tillmann, J., Kretzschmann, C., Wallacher, S., & Kersting, C. (2022) · PubMed Central · doi:10.53180/zfa.2022.0178-0183 · Cited by 9
Mitforschen, aber wie? Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Forschungstrainings für Psychiatrieerfahrene
Brütt, A. L., Bernges, T., Magaard, J. L., Sielaff, G., & EX-IN-Pilots (2015) · Psychiatrische Praxis · doi:10.1055/s-0041-108968 · Cited by 9
Patient engagement in pharmacy practice research
Olufemi-Yusuf, D., & Guirguis, L. M. (2017) · Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · doi:10.1177/1715163517690539 · Cited by 9
Giebel, C. M., Hassan, S. M., McIntyre, J. C., Corcoran, R., Barr, B., Gabbay, M., Downing, J., Comerford, T., & Alfirevic, A. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12940 · Cited by 9
Antunes, A., Frasquilho, D., Zózimo, J., Silva, M., Cardoso, G., Ferrão, J., & Caldas‐de‐Almeida, J. M. (2019) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.10.003 · Cited by 9
Ingegnoli, F., Schioppo, T., Ubiali, T., Bollati, V., Ostuzzi, S., Buoli, M., & Caporali, R. F. (2020) · International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1111/1756-185x.13932 · Cited by 9
Developing a patient-driven chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research agenda in the U.S.
Gruß, I., McCreary, G. M., Ivlev, I., Houlihan, M. E., Yawn, B. P., Pasquale, C. B., Clark, W., & Mularski, R. A. (2021) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s41687-021-00399-7 · Cited by 9
Patient and public involvement in research reporting
Staniszewska, S. H., Hopewell, S., Richards, D. P., & Chidebe, R. C. W. (2025) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.r647 · Cited by 9
Self-citationTromans, S. J., Marten, R., Jaggi, P. S., Lewin, G., Robinson, C., Janickyj, A., Joshi, K., Clarke, D., Kiani, R., & Gangadharan, S. K. (2023) · Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s40737-023-00369-w · Cited by 8
Nelson, H. J., Bally, J. M. G., Spurr, S., Foulds, H. J. A., & de Padua, A. (2023) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069231218657 · Cited by 8
Gehrmann, J., Eck, S., Schneider, A., Fischer, F., Bruhn, I., & Teusen, C. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.003 · Cited by 8
Sides, T. L., Jensen, A., Argust, M. M., Amundson, E. C., Thomas, G. R., Keller, R., Mahaffey, M., & Krebs, E. E. (2024) · Learning Health Systems · doi:10.1002/lrh2.10421 · Cited by 8
Evaluating qualitative data analysis workshops from the perspective of public contributors
Moult, A., McGrath, C., Lippiett, K. A., Coope, C., Turner, A. J., Chilcott, S., Parton, L., Holloway, P., Dace, S., Gibson, A., et al. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00628-5 · Cited by 8
Stakeholder-centric participation in large language models enhanced health systems
Wang, Z., Yan, R., Francis, S., Diaz, C., Flickinger, T., Lin, Y., Xiao, H., Barnes, L. E., & LeBaron, V. T. (2025) · npj Health Systems · doi:10.1038/s44401-025-00024-5 · Cited by 9
Lu, W., Li, M., Evans, C., Currow, D. C., Bayuo, J., Zheng, T., Lu, Z., Li, M., Wray, J., & Yorke, J. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70140 · Cited by 8
Lambert, S., Coumoundouros, C., Hulbert-Williams, N. J., Shaw, J., & Schaffler, J. L. (2020) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research and Practice · doi:10.1097/or9.0000000000000023 · Cited by 8
Service users and academics: collaborators not competitors in welfare research
Askheim, O. P. (2020) · Nordic Social Work Research · doi:10.1080/2156857x.2020.1852954 · Cited by 8
Madsen, K., Wibe, T., Bye, A., Debesay, J., & Bergland, A. (2021) · Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning · doi:10.18261/issn.2387-5984-2021-02-05 · Cited by 8
Ramdharry, G. M., Buscemi, V., Boaz, A., Dawes, H., Jaki, T., Jones, F., Marsden, J. F., Paul, L., Playle, R., Randell, E., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2021.705474 · Cited by 8
Haribhai-Thompson, J., Dalbeth, N., Stewart, S., Clark, J., Hosie, G., Horgan, B., & Darlow, B. J. S. (2022) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10986 · Cited by 8
Hickling, A., Mah, K., Al-Hakeem, H., & Scratch, S. E. (2022) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2022.2137482 · Cited by 8
Wan, R., Shi, J., Hu, K., Wang, Y., Jiang, X., Yan, W., Cao, M., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06909-2 · Cited by 9
Fouladi, N., Tchangalova, N., Ajayi, D., Millwee, E., Lovett, C., Sordi, A. D., Liggett, S., Silva, M. D., Bonilla, L., Nkwonta, A., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20064887 · Cited by 8
Wannheden, C., Riggare, S. S., Luckhaus, J. L., Jansson, H., Sjunnestrand, M., Stenfors, T., Savage, C., Reinius, M., & Hasson, H. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13790 · Cited by 8
Matheson, L., Greaves, C. J., Duda, J. L., Wells, M., Secher, D., Rhodes, P., Lorenc, A., Jepson, M., Özakinci, G., Watson, E. K., et al. (2023) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.108033 · Cited by 8
Self-citationHosie, A., Firdaus, M., Clarkson, J., Gupta, E., Laidlaw, L., Lamont, T., Mooney, M., Nevin, G., Ramsay, C. R., Rutherford, S., et al. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13921 · Cited by 8
Smith, C. A., Baillie, J., & Gill, P. (2024) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.2024.e1919 · Cited by 8
Translational Research in Kidney Transplantation and the Role of Patient Engagement
Farragher, J. F., Elliott, M. J., Silver, S. A., Lichner, Z., & Tsampalieros, A. K. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/s40697-015-0077-2 · Cited by 8
Introducing a People’s Academy into Higher Education
Hardy, S., Malby, R., Hallett, N., Farooq, A., Chamley, C., Young, G., White, X. H., & Turner, W. A. (2017) · Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning · doi:10.1108/heswbl-10-2017-0075 · Cited by 8
Fredriksson, M., & Tritter, J. Q. (2019) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s174413311900015x · Cited by 8
On personal epiphanies and collective knowledge in survivor research and action
Rose, D. S. (2019) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/s41285-019-00087-z · Cited by 8
Mapping Stakeholder Perspectives on Engagement in Concussion Research to Theory
Hunt, C., de Saint-Rome, M., Salle, C. D., Michalak, A., Wilcock, R., & BAKER, A. J. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · doi:10.1017/cjn.2019.324 · Cited by 8
The Impact Areas Questionnaire (IAQ): A Music Therapy Service Evaluation Tool
Tsiris, G., Spiro, N., Coggins, O., & Zubala, A. (2020) · Voices A World Forum for Music Therapy · doi:10.15845/voices.v20i2.2816 · Cited by 8
Miah, J., Dawes, P., Leroi, I., Starling, B., Lovell, K., Price, O., Grundy, A. C., & Parsons, S. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13096 · Cited by 8
Dahl, M., Søndergaard, S. F., Diederichsen, A. C. P., Søndergaard, J., Thilsing, T., & Lindholt, J. S. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13228 · Cited by 8
TARAS, H. L., KALICHMAN, M. W., Schulteis, G., Dumbauld, J., Bell, Y., Seligman, F. F., & West, K. D. (2014) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12249 · Cited by 8
The Bluebirds: World War I Soldiers’ Experiences of Occupational Therapy
Pettigrew, J., Robinson, K., & Moloney, S. (2016) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2017.023812 · Cited by 8
Hubbard, G., Munro, J., O’Carroll, R. E., Mutrie, N., Kidd, L., Haw, S. J., Adams, R., Watson, A. J. M., Leslie, S. J., Rauchhaus, P., et al. (2016) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr04240 · Cited by 8
User involvement in adolescents’ mental healthcare: protocol for a systematic review
Viksveen, P., Bjønness, S. E., Berg, S. H., Cardenas, N. E., Game, J. R., Aase, K., & Storm, M. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018800 · Cited by 8
Elliott, M. J., Sale, J. E. M., Goodarzi, Z., Wilhelm, L., Laupacis, A., Hemmelgarn, B. R., & Straus, S. E. (2018) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12818 · Cited by 8
Whom to Engage in Patient‐Engaged Research? Reflection on Selection
Morain, S. R. (2018) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.899 · Cited by 8
Bishop, F. L., Greville-Harris, M., Bostock, J., Din, A., Graham, C. A., Lewith, G. T., Liossi, C., O’Riordan, T., White, P., & Yardley, L. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9955 · Cited by 8
Tao, L., Fedoruk, C., Turner, K. A., Cumin, J., Carrier, M., Carboni-Jiménez, A., Pépin, M., Kwakkenbos, L., Thombs, B. D., & SPIN Patient Advisory Board (2019) · Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders · doi:10.1177/2397198319842969 · Cited by 8
Bazzano, A. N., Monnette, A., Wharton, M. K., Price‐Haywood, E. G., Nauman, E., Dominick, P., Glover, C., Hu, G., & Shi, L. (2019) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s201072 · Cited by 8
The Therapeutic Use of Digital Technologies in Psychosis
Bell, I., Lim, M. H., & Thomas, N. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815012-2.00027-4 · Cited by 8
Samir, N., Diaz, A. M., Hodgins, M., Matic, S., Bawden, S., Khoury, J., Eapen, V., & Lingam, R. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18115808 · Cited by 9
Perros, P., Dayan, C. M., Dickinson, A. J., Ezra, D. G., Hickey, J. L., Hintschisch, C., Kahaly, G. J., Lazarus, J. H., Ludgate, M. E., Bartès, B., et al. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0222 · Cited by 8
Gautam, S., Chandra, M., De, A., Chakravorti, T., Malik, G., & De Choudhury, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.06849 · Cited by 7
Ansell, M. E., Finlay‐jones, A. L., Bayliss, D. M., & Ohan, J. L. (2024) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-024-02877-0 · Cited by 8
Involvement of family caregivers in dementia care research: a scoping review protocol
Jagoda, F. A., Hirt, J., Mueller, C., & Halek, M. (2024) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-024-02696-w · Cited by 7
Shire, K. A., Newsham, A., Rahman, A., Mason, D., Ryan, D., Lawlor, D. A., Opio-Te, G., Nutting, H., Ojewande, I., Steward, I. P., et al. (2025) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23534.1 · Cited by 7
Systematic Review of Patient and Caregiver Involvement in CKD Research
Gutman, T., Coghlan, D., Craig, J. C., Guha, C., Jauré, A., Jesudason, S., Levin, A., White, D. M., Silva, J. R., van Zwieten, A., et al. (2025) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2025.03.018 · Cited by 7
Boamah, S. A., Sedzro, M. T., Kabir, H., Vrkljan, B. H., Mitchell, S., Pérez, L. D. L. T., & Santero, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1535017 · Cited by 7
Radaković, R., Copsey, H., Moore, C. S., & Mioshi, E. (2020) · Neurodegenerative Disease Management · doi:10.2217/nmt-2019-0035 · Cited by 7
The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research
Puerta, L. L., & Smith, H. E. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00205-6 · Cited by 7
Talk to us! Communication is a key factor in improving the comfort of MRI research participants
Dewey, R. S., Ward, C., Junor, A., & Horobin, A. J. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13217 · Cited by 9
Collinson, A., Brennan, M. L., Dean, R. S., & Stavisky, J. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11082250 · Cited by 7
Stewart, H., Ali‐Knight, J., Smith, S., & Kerr, G. W. (2021) · Event Management · doi:10.3727/152599521x16192004803683 · Cited by 7
Walsh, C. M., Jones, N. L., McCreath, G. A., Connan, V., Pires, L., Chen, A. Q. H., Karoly, A., & Macarthur, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2022.849959 · Cited by 7
Bergerum, C., Petersson, C., Thor, J., & Wolmesjö, M. (2022) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001850 · Cited by 7
Shaw, A. R., Key, M. N., Fikru, S., Lofton, S., Sullivan, D. K., Berkley‐Patton, J., Glover, C. M., Burns, J. M., & Vidoni, E. D. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20176705 · Cited by 7
Neves, A. L., Esteva, M., Hoffman, R., & Harris, M. (2023) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09891-w · Cited by 7
Systematic scoping review protocol of Stroke Patient and Stakeholder Engagement (SPSE)
Roudini, J., Weschke, S., Rackoll, T., Dirnagl, U., Guyatt, G. H., & Khankeh, H. R. (2023) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-023-02347-6 · Cited by 7
Lithander, F. E., Tenison, E., Jones, D. A., Stocker, S., Hopewell‐Kelly, N., Gibson, A., & McGrath, C. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13914 · Cited by 7
Ayre, M. J., Lewis, P. J., Phipps, D. L., & Keers, R. N. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1241445 · Cited by 7
Tutelman, P. R., MacKenzie, N. E., Chambers, C. T., Coffman, S., Cornelissen, L., Cormier, B., Higgins, K. S., Phinney, J., Blankenburg, M. R., & Walker, S. M. (2024) · PAIN Reports · doi:10.1097/pr9.0000000000001151 · Cited by 7
Bloska, J., Crabtree, S., Wollersberger, N., Mitchell, O., Coles, J., Halsey, C., Parry, G., Stewart, R. J., Thacker, S., Thacker, M., et al. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00574-2 · Cited by 7
Denton, H., Robertson, S., Ciccognani, S., Meddings, S., White, P., Elsby-Pearson, C., Jhans, A., Burlingham, A., Cunningham, R., Harper, C. M., et al. (2024) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2024.103312 · Cited by 7
Transforming Alcohol and Other Drug Education Through Co‐Design
Goodhew, M., Matiuk, S., Axisa, C., Gough, C. M., & River, J. (2025) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.70009 · Cited by 7
Gerido, L. H., Tang, X. D., Ernst, B. A., Langford, A. T., & He, Z. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/15035 · Cited by 7
Daniels, N., Gillen, P. A., & Casson, K. (2020) · Research and theory for nursing practice · doi:10.1891/rtnp-d-18-00125 · Cited by 7
Zakrisson, A., Arne, M., Lisspers, K., Lundh, L., Sandelowsky, H., Ställberg, B., Adolfsson, E. T., & Theander, K. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15253 · Cited by 7
Bhoombla, N., Preston, J., Ainsworth, J., Bird, H., Jadeja, M., King, C., & Hawcutt, D. B. (2020) · Pediatric Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40272-020-00391-6 · Cited by 7
Moore, L., Eggleton, P., Smerdon, G. R., Newcombe, J., Holley, J. E., Gutowski, N. J., & Smallwood, M. J. (2020) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2020.102084 · Cited by 7
Schöpf-Lazzarino, A. C., Böhm, P., Garske, U., Schlöffel, M., Stoye, A., Lamprecht, J., Mau, W., & Farin, E. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie · doi:10.1007/s00393-020-00839-7 · Cited by 7
Zibrowski, E. M., McDonald, S., Thiessen, H., VanDusen, R., Boden, C., Carr, T., Goodridge, D. M., Haver, C., Marciniuk, D. D., Stobart, C., et al. (2020) · CMAJ Open · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20190181 · Cited by 7
Importance of involving patients and public in health research in Bangladesh and Nepal
Simkhada, B., van Teijlingen, E., Naheed, A., Warren, A., & Green, S. M. (2020) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462320000811 · Cited by 7
Enhancing patient research partner engagement: Research in psoriatic arthritis
Goel, N. (2021) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2021.101685 · Cited by 7
Principles to guide spinal cord injury research partnerships: a Delphi consensus study
Gainforth, H. L., McKay, R. C., Hoekstra, F., Maffin, J., Sibley, K. M., Jung, M. E., & Panel, S. G. P. C. (2021) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.1985635 · Cited by 7
McGrane, N., Dunbar, P., & Keyes, L. M. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00416-7 · Cited by 7
Hicks, S., Abuna, F., Odhiambo, B. O., Dettinger, J. C., Ngumbau, N. M., Gómez, L., Sila, J., Oketch, G., Sifuna, E., Weiner, B. J., et al. (2023) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-023-00457-9 · Cited by 7
Haemochromatosis patients' research priorities: Towards an improved quality of life
Romero‐Cortadellas, L., Venturi, V., Martín‐Sánchez, J. C., Toska, K., Prince, D., Butzeck, B., Porto, G., Milman, N. T., & Sánchez, M. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13830 · Cited by 7
Inclusion of Children With Refugee Backgrounds in Research
Korhonen, L., & Mattelin, E. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80455-526-220231008 · Cited by 7
Ríos‐León, M., Onal, B., Arango‐Lasprilla, J. C., Augutis, M., Graham, A., Kelly, E. H., Kontaxakis, A., López‐Dolado, E., Scheel‐Sailer, A., Valiullina, S., et al. (2023) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.11.010 · Cited by 7
How do trial teams plan for retention during the design stage of the trial? A scoping review
Murphy, E., Gillies, K., & Shiely, F. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07775-2 · Cited by 7
Lytvyn, L., Petkovic, J., Khabsa, J., Magwood, O., Campbell, P., Graham, I. D., Pottie, K. C., Bidonde, J., Limburg, H., Pollock, D., et al. (2024) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.1444 · Cited by 7
Ethical challenges in conducting clinical research in lung cancer
Allmark, P., & Tod, A. (2016) · Translational Lung Cancer Research · doi:10.21037/tlcr.2016.03.04 · Cited by 7
Wazny, K., Ravenscroft, J., Chan, K. Y., Bassani, D. G., Anderson, N., & Rudan, I. (2019) · Journal of Global Health · doi:10.7189/jogh.09.010702 · Cited by 7
Mixed methods study exploring parent engagement in child health research in British Columbia
Smith, J. L., Pike, I., BRUSSONI, M. J., Tucker, L., Mâsse, L. C., Mah, J. W. T., Boudreau, A. M., Mount, D., Bonaguro, R. J., Glegg, S., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025404 · Cited by 7
Liu, X., Willis, K. F., Wu, C.-J. J., Fulbrook, P., Shi, Y., & Johnson, M. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029816 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Royal College of Nursing Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick Coventry UK
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brett, Jo
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 637-650
- ISSN
- 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-7625
- PMC
- PMC5060910
- OpenAlex
- W2049504028
- Cited by
- 1,598
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 140 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Expectations (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
- University of Warwick
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- patient and public involvement, health research, social care research, research quality, research questions, research recruitment, research dissemination, implementation of research findings, research stages
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Research, Humans, Patient Participation, Social Welfare, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
