The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: There is an increasing international interest in patient and public involvement ( PPI ) in research, yet relatively little robust evidence exists about its impact on health and social care research. Objective: To identify the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research. Design: A systematic search of electronic databases and health libraries was undertaken from 1995 to 2009. Data were extracted and quality assessed utilizing the guidelines of the NHS C entre for R eviews and D issemination 2009 and the C ritical A ppraisal S kills P rogramme ( CASP ). Grey literature was assessed using the D ixon‐ W oods et al . (2005) checklist. Inclusion criteria: All study types that reported the impact PPI had on the health and/or social care research study. Main results: A total of 66 studies reporting the impact of PPI on health and social care research were included. The positive impacts identified enhanced the quality and appropriateness of research. Impacts were reported for all stages of research, including the development of user‐focused research objectives, development of user‐relevant research questions, development of user‐friendly information, questionnaires and interview schedules, more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies, consumer‐focused interpretation of data and enhanced implementation and dissemination of study results. Some challenging impacts were also identified. Conclusion: This study provides the first international evidence of PPI impact that has emerged at all key stages of the research process. However, much of the evidence base concerning impact remains weak and needs significant enhancement in the next decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Data were extracted from 83 papers (the remaining seven were not written in a format suitable for data extraction but were deemed sufficiently important to include within the conceptualisation of PPI).”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Drawing on the findings of the PIRICOM study, 29 a validated online survey tool (Bristol Online Surveys, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) was designed to collect data to assess how PPI is operationalised and its perceived impact on each study.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“While the original GRIPP checklist represented an important starting point in creating high quality PPI reporting, its development drew on systematic review evidence, without broader input from the international PPI research community [2–4].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“While the patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base has expanded over the past decade, the quality of reporting within papers is often inconsistent, limiting our understanding of how it works, in what context, for whom, and why.”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Inadequate reporting can create problems for systematic reviews that attempt to synthesise PPI evidence [2–4].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“While GRIPP2-LF and GRIPP2-SF aim to guide consistent reporting, it is not possible to be prescriptive about the exact content of each item, as the current evidence base is not advanced enough to make this possible [2–4, 21].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“The relatively small amount of empirical evidence on the impact of PPI in research 29 has been criticised as poorly reported 21 and methodologically weak, often failing to fully explore the contextual factors surrounding PPI as a complex intervention.30”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Ninety papers published between 1995 and 2009 were included.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Of the 83 papers, 2 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 52 qualitative studies, 15 case study methodology, 4 cross-sectional studies and 10 structured reviews.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“They did not find any evidence around systematic measurement of PPI outcomes, and furthermore found a lack of clarity on the differences between PPI impact and outcomes.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Providing a more robust evidence base for PPI policy requires moving beyond observational evaluations of PPI.29,30”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while there appears to be a reasonably robust level of evidence around the 'architecture of PPI', reporting of outcomes continues to be poor.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“What evidence there is tends to be descriptive, largely qualitative, often retrospective case studies, 19,29,106 with only a few exceptional prospective longitudinal case studies, 15 comparative multiproject evaluations 107 or studies employing quantitative designs.108”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Brett et al. 29 argue that most studies have attempted to conceptualise PPI mainly around context and process and have not sufficiently theoretically grasped the complexities of PPI.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“As in Staley's review, 19 the papers provided more evidence around the processes of PPI rather than impact and outcomes, and found scant evidence of PPI impact on funding decisions.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Although the PIRICOM study found little evidence of PPI being theoretically conceptualised, there has been some work to develop a consensus on the principles and indicators of successful PPI, 133 and this was used to underpin the survey design.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
Tacconelli, E. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7 · Cited by 3,270
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E. M., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D. M., Rhodes, S. D., Samuel‐Hodge, C. D., Maty, S. C., Lux, L. J., et al. (2004) · PubMed Central · Cited by 959
Nilsen, E. S., Myrhaug, H. T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S. R., & Oxman, A. D. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004563.pub2 · Cited by 565
Lay perspectives: advantages for health research
Entwistle, V. A., Renfrew, M. J., Yearley, S., Forrester, J. M., & Lamont, T. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.463 · Cited by 376
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., & Barber, R. (2011) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462311000481 · Cited by 369
Self-citationCashman, S. B., Adeky, S., Allen, A. J., Corburn, J., Israel, B. A., Montaño, J., Rafelito, A., Rhodes, S. D., Swanston, S., Wallerstein, N. B., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.113571 · Cited by 347
Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation
Shah, S. G. S., & Robinson, I. (2007) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462307051677 · Cited by 299
From passive subjects to equal partners
Trivedi, P., & Wykes, T. (2002) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.181.6.468 · Cited by 281
Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits
HEWLETT, S. E., de Wit, M. P. T., Richards, P., Quest, E. M., Hughes, R., Heiberg, T., & Kirwan, J. (2006) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.22091 · Cited by 272
Abelson, J., Giacomini, M. K., Lehoux, P., & Gauvin, F. (2006) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009 · Cited by 251
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Dixon P, 1999, A Database of Examples of Consumer Involvement in Research
- Blaxter M, 1995, Consumer Issues Within the NHS: An R & D Contribution to Consumer Involvement in the NHS
- Brett J, 2010, Systematic Review of the Conceptualization, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research
- Dixon‐Woods M, 2005, Vulnerable Groups and Access, to Health Care: A Critical Interpretative Review
- Popay J, 2005, Developing guidance on conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, A7
- UKCRC & TwoCan Associates, 2009, An Evaluation of the Process and Impact of Patient and Public Involvement in the Advisory Groups of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration
- Faulkner A, 2006, Beyond our Expectations: A Report of the Experiences of Involving Service Users in Forensic Mental Health Research
- Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2008, A Review of Service User Involvement in Prison Mental Health Research
- Kelson M, 1999, National Sentinel Audits Involving Older People: A Guide to Involving Older People in Local Audit Activity
- 10.1080/13561820400011792 · DOI
- Rose D, 2004, Telling different stories: user involvement in mental health research, Research and Policy Planning, 22, 23
- Faulkner A, 2004, Capturing the Experiences of those Involved in the TRUE Project. A Story of Colliding Worlds
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,001
Dunkley, A. J., Tyrer, F., Spong, R., Gray, L. J., Gillett, M., Doherty, Y., Martin-Stacey, L., Patel, N., Yates, T. E., Bhaumik, S., et al. (2017) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/pgfar05110 · Cited by 16
Carey, M. (2018) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x18000193 · Cited by 16
Gremyr, I., Elg, M., Smith, F., & Gustavsson, S. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021958 · Cited by 16
Moving beyond the first response phenomenon
Malm, C., Andersson, S. K., Jönson, H., Magnusson, L., & Hanson, E. J. (2019) · International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy · doi:10.1108/ijssp-05-2019-0091 · Cited by 16
Salis, C., Murray, L. L., & Vonk, J. M. J. (2019) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1668485 · Cited by 16
Woodford, J., Wikman, A., Einhorn, K., Cernvall, M., Grönqvist, H., Romppala, A., & von Essén, L. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/10085 · Cited by 16
Conducting research in psoriatic arthritis: the emerging role of patient research partners
Goel, N. (2019) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kez338 · Cited by 16
Tales of treatment and new perspectives for global health research on antimicrobial resistance
Haenssgen, M. J., Charoenboon, N., Thavethanutthanawin, P., & Wibunjak, K. (2020) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2020-011894 · Cited by 16
O’Keeffe, S., Weitkamp, K., Isaacs, D., Target, M., Eatough, V., & Midgley, N. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04857-3 · Cited by 16
Chilman, N., Morant, N. J., Lloyd‐Evans, B., Wackett, J., & Johnson, S. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/25742 · Cited by 16
Fujio, K., Inomata, T., Fujisawa, K., Sung, J., Nakamura, M., Iwagami, M., Muto, K., Ebihara, N., Nakamura, M., Okano, M., et al. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00382-6 · Cited by 16
Dowthwaite, L., Wagner, H. G., Babbage, C. M., Fischer, J. E., Barnard, P., Nichele, E., Vallejos, E. P., Clos, J., Portillo, V., & McAuley, D. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276661 · Cited by 16
Watson, J. M., Toner, P., Day, E., Back, D., Brady, L., Fairhurst, C. M., Renwick, C., Templeton, L. J., Akhtar, S., Lloyd, C., et al. (2017) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta21150 · Cited by 16
Salutogenic service user involvement in nursing research: A case study
Mjøsund, N. H., Vinje, H. F., Eriksson, M., Haaland‐Øverby, M., Jensen, S. L., Kjus, S. H. H., Norheim, I., Portaasen, I., & Espnes, G. A. (2018) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13708 · Cited by 16
Lessard, D., Engler, K., Toupin, I., I‐Score Consulting Team, Routy, J., & Lebouché, B. (2018) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12845 · Cited by 16
Lindsay, M. P., Gierman, N., Harris, J. E., Arthur, G., Teed, M., Mountain, A. D., Gubitz, G. J., Smith, E. E., Dowlatshahi, D. D., de Jong, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Patient Experience · doi:10.1177/2374373520956538 · Cited by 16
Murray, J. E., Lynch, Y., Goldbart, J., Moulam, L., Judge, S., Webb, E., Jayes, M., Meredith, S., Whittle, H. C., Randall, N., et al. (2020) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr08450 · Cited by 16
McNiff, M. M., Hawkins, S., Haase, B., Bullivant, J., McIver, T., Mitelman, O., Emery, N. C., Tasca, G. A., Voermans, N. C., & Díaz‐Manera, J. (2024) · Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases · doi:10.3233/jnd-230171 · Cited by 15
Werner, A., Lauberger, J., Steckelberg, A., & Meyer, G. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-06608-7 · Cited by 15
Elliott, M. J., Goodarzi, Z., Sale, J. E. M., Wilhelm, L., Laupacis, A., Hemmelgarn, B. R., & Straus, S. E. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · doi:10.1177/2054358118807480 · Cited by 15
Mitchell, S., Slowther, A., Coad, J. E., Khan, D., Samani, M., & Dale, J. R. (2021) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/0269216321999301 · Cited by 17
Szép, A., Dantchev, S., Zemp, M., Schwinger, M., Chavanon, M., & Christiansen, H. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212843 · Cited by 15
Fruytier, S. E., Vat, L. E., Camp, R., Houÿez, F., Keyser, H. D., Dunne, D., Marchi, D., McKeaveney, L., Pitt, R. H., Pittens, C. A. C. M., et al. (2022) · Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · doi:10.17294/2330-0698.1859 · Cited by 15
Building consensus in research partnerships: a scoping review of consensus methods
Cary, M. A., Plamondon, K., Banner, D., Oelke, N. D., Sibley, K. M., Baxter, K., Vis‐Dunbar, M., Hoens, A. M., Wick, U., Bigsby, S., et al. (2022) · Evidence & Policy · doi:10.1332/174426421x16645354235140 · Cited by 15
Priority setting for children and young people with chronic conditions and disabilities
Finlay‐jones, A. L., Sampson, R., Parkinson, A., Prentice, K., Bebbington, K. R., Treadgold, C., Frank, B., Bates, A., Freeman, J., Lucas, J. D., et al. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13761 · Cited by 15
Series: Public engagement with research. Part 1: The fundamentals of public engagement with research
Blackburn, S. J., Clinch, M., de Wit, M. P. T., Moser, A., Primdahl, J., van Vliet, E., Walker, C., & Stevenson, F. A. (2023) · European Journal of General Practice · doi:10.1080/13814788.2023.2232111 · Cited by 15
Moult, A., Baker, D., Aries, A., Bailey, P., Blackburn, S. J., Kingstone, T., Lwembe, S., & Paskins, Z. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00517-3 · Cited by 15
Papoulias, C., & Brady, L. (2024) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-024-01197-5 · Cited by 15
Busch, M. D., Jean-Baptiste, E., Person, P., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019) · Gateways International Journal of Community Research and Engagement · doi:10.5130/ijcre.v12i2.6693 · Cited by 15
Sheridan, R., Preston, J., Stones, S. R., Ainsworth, S., Taylor, D. H., Challinor, R., Ainsworth, S., Martin‐Kerry, J., Brady, L., & Knapp, P. (2020) · Research for All · doi:10.18546/rfa.04.1.05 · Cited by 15
McHale, C., Cruickshank, S., Torrens, C., Armes, J., Fenlon, D., Banks, E., Kelsey, T., & Humphris, G. M. (2020) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-020-00610-4 · Cited by 15
Harris, M., Brekke, M., Dinant, G., Esteva, M., Hoffman, R., Marzo‐Castillejo, M., Murchie, P., Neves, A. L., Smyrnakis, Ε., Vedsted, P., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035678 · Cited by 15
Opportunities for public involvement in big data research in palliative and end-of-life care
Johnson, H., Davies, J. M., Léniz, J., Chukwusa, E., Markham, S., & Sleeman, K. E. (2021) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163211002101 · Cited by 15
Shoop-Worrall, S. J. W., Cresswell, K., Bolger, I., Dillon, B., Hyrich, K. L., Geifman, N., Ralph, E., Dekaj, F., Jebson, B. R., Wanstall, Z., et al. (2021) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220454 · Cited by 15
Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Chadwick, C., Beck, C. D., Edmonds, M., Sundström, C., Edwards, W., Ouellette, D., Waldrop, J., Adlam, K., Bourgeault, L., et al. (2021) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100474 · Cited by 15
Kowe, A., Köhler, S., Göerß, D., & Teipel, S. J. (2021) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2021.2020378 · Cited by 19
Mind the gap in clinical trials: A participatory action analysis with citizen collaborators
Price, A. I., Liew, S. M., Kirkpatrick, M., Price, J., Lopreto, T. E., & Nelken, Y. (2016) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12678 · Cited by 15
Shé, É. N., Davies, C., Blake, C. M., Crowley, R. K., McCann, A. H., Fullen, B. M., O’Donnell, D., O'Connor, J., Kelly, S., Darcy, M., et al. (2018) · HRB Open Research · doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.12790.1 · Cited by 15
Involving the Public in Rare Cancer Care and Research
Nunn, J., Scott, C. L., Stubbs, J. W., Cherry, S. F., & Bismark, M. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119196235.ch3 · Cited by 15
Gesell, S. B., Coleman, S. W., Mettam, L. H., Johnson, A. M., Sissine, M. E., & Duncan, P. W. (2020) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2020.552 · Cited by 16
Hinton, E. C., Fenwick, C., Hall, M., Bell, M., Hamilton-Shield, J. P., & Gibson, A. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13731 · Cited by 14
Marshall, D. A., Suryaprakash, N., Bryan, S., Barker, K. L., MacKean, G., Zelinsky, S., McCarron, T. L., Santana, M., Moayyedi, P., & Lavallee, D. C. (2023) · Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad045 · Cited by 14
Skovlund, P. C., Finderup, J., Aabo, S., Jensen, F., Søndergaard, H., & Rodkjær, L. Ø. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00533-3 · Cited by 14
Bourke, J., Bragge, P., River, J., Sinnott, K. A., Arora, M., & Middleton, J. W. (2024) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2024.1386746 · Cited by 14
Hanrahan, M., Wilson, C., Keogh, A., Barker, S. B., Rochester, L., Brittain, K., Lumsdon, J., & Ardle, R. M. (2024) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2024.2410245 · Cited by 14
A research agenda for bipolar disorder developed from a patients’ perspective
Maassen, E. F., Regeer, B. J., Bunders, J., Regeer, E. J., & Kupka, R. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.061 · Cited by 14
Pons‐Vigués, M., Ribera, E. P., Berenguera, A., Violán, C., & Mahtani‐Chugani, V. (2018) · Gaceta Sanitaria · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.05.011 · Cited by 14
Jensen, I. B., Brämberg, E. B., Wåhlin, C., Björklund, C., Hermansson, U., Lohela-Karlsson, M., Elinder, L. S., af Rosenschöld, P. M., Nevala, T., Carter, N., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17155283 · Cited by 14
Cantwell, M., Walsh, D. M. J., Furlong, B., Moyna, N. M., McCaffrey, N., & Woods, C. B. (2020) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/1073274820906124 · Cited by 17
D’Souza, R., Ryan, M., Hawkes, E., Baker, C., Davies, Y., Reed-Screen, J., Price, J. R., Pryce, R., & D’Souza, N. (2021) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001337 · Cited by 14
Goodwin, L., Skrybant, M., & Kenyon, S. L. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00332-8 · Cited by 14
Oswald, L. B., Arredondo, B., Geiss, C., Vigoureux, T. F. D., Hoogland, A. I., Chung, C. H., Muzaffar, J., Patel, K., Gonzalez, B. D., Jim, H., et al. (2022) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5985 · Cited by 14
Shrestha, A., Tamrakar, D., Shrestha, B., Karmacharya, B. M., Shrestha, A., Pyakurel, P., & Spiegelman, D. L. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276478 · Cited by 14
Koniotou, M., Evans, B. A., Chatters, R., Fothergill, R. T., Garnsworthy, C., Gaze, S., Halter, M., Mason, S. M., Peconi, J., Porter, A. M., et al. (2015) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0821-z · Cited by 14
Rooney, J. M., Unwin, P. F., & Osborne, N. (2016) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2016.1227314 · Cited by 14
Gordon, L., Dickinson, A. M., Offredy, M., & Smiddy, J. (2017) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2017.02.004 · Cited by 14
Pelletier, C., Pousette, A., Fox, G., Keahey, R., Ward, K., Faulkner, G., Rasali, D. P., & Allison, S. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0167-x · Cited by 14
Walsh, K. A., Timmons, S., Byrne, S., Browne, J. P., & McSharry, J. (2020) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/ibaa053 · Cited by 14
Baba, A., Smith, M. A., Preston, J., Nafría, B., Gaillard, S., Dicks, P., Prebeg, M., Doherty-Kirby, A. L., Courtney, K., Mendonza, L., et al. (2025) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-025-00751-x · Cited by 13
Involving service users to identify research priorities in a UK forensic mental health service
Aboaja, A. M., Forsyth, B., Bates, H., & Wood, R. (2020) · BJPsych Bulletin · doi:10.1192/bjb.2020.131 · Cited by 13
Nichols, V. P., Pearce, G., Ellard, D. R., Evans, S., Haywood, K., Norman, C., Potter, R., Sandhu, H. K., Stewart, K., Underwood, M. R., et al. (2021) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423621000670 · Cited by 13
Yamaguchi, S., Abe, M., Kawaguchi, T., Igarashi, M., Shiozawa, T., Ogawa, M., Yasuma, N., Sato, S., Miyamoto, Y., & Fujii, C. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13529 · Cited by 13
Swami, V., Todd, J., & Tylka, T. L. (2022) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.09.007 · Cited by 13
Establishing ranked priorities for future hydrocephalus research
Jakopin, N. E., Myong, E., Bogucki, T., Gray, D. D., Gross, P. H., McComb, J. G., Shannon, C. N., Tamber, M. S., Toyama, M., van der Willigen, T., et al. (2022) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2022.10.jns22753 · Cited by 13
Moult, A., McGrath, C., Lippiett, K. A., Coope, C., Chilcott, S., Mann, C., Evans, N., Turner, A. J., Dziedzic, K., Portillo, M. C., et al. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00440-7 · Cited by 13
Warran, K., Greenwood, F., Ashworth, R., Robertson, M., & Brown, P. (2023) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.5998 · Cited by 14
Pierce, M., Foley, L., Kiely, B. T., Croke, A., Larkin, J., Smith, S. M., Clyne, B., & Murphy, E. (2023) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-023-00516-4 · Cited by 13
Liu, H., Topping, A. E., & Guo, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1422134 · Cited by 13
Communication change in ALS: engaging people living with ALS and their partners in future research
Judge, S., Bloch, S., & McDermott, C. J. (2018) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1498924 · Cited by 13
Involving consumers with palliative care needs and their families in research: A case study
Virdun, C., Luckett, T., Gilmore, I., Brassil, M., Lilian, R., Lorenz, K., & Phillips, J. L. (2019) · Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia · doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2019.08.002 · Cited by 13
Expert by Experience: Valuing Patient Engagement in Healthcare
Cam, Y. L., & Bolz-Johnson, M. (2019) · Organizational behaviour in health care · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14101-1_9 · Cited by 13
Matheson, C., & Weightman, E. (2020) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2020.1803229 · Cited by 13
Benet, M., Escuriet, R., Palomar‐Ruiz, L., Ruiz‐Berdún, D., & León-Larios, F. (2020) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12505 · Cited by 13
Hunt, A., Brown, E., Coad, J. E., Staniszewska, S. H., Hacking, S., Chesworth, B. M., & Chambers, L. (2013) · Journal of Child Health Care · doi:10.1177/1367493513510630 · Cited by 13
Self-citationSaunders, T. S., Mackie, T. I., Shah, S., Gooding, H. C., de Ferranti, S. D., & Leslie, L. K. (2016) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2016-0025 · Cited by 13
Engaging patients as partners in health research: Lessons from BC, Canada
Holmes, B. J., Bryan, S., Ho, K., & McGavin, C. (2018) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/0840470417741712 · Cited by 13
Research agenda for life-threatening cancer
Piil, K., Jarden, M., & Pii, K. H. (2018) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.12935 · Cited by 13
Miah, J., Dawes, P., Leroi, I., Parsons, S., & Starling, B. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0128-9 · Cited by 13
Dunn, B. D., O’Mahen, H., Wright, K. A., & Brown, G. P. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.103417 · Cited by 15
Moses, C. K., Flegg, K., & Dimaras, H. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13043 · Cited by 13
The Challenge of Demandingness in Citizen Science and Participatory Research
Jongsma, K. R., & Friesen, P. (2019) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1619867 · Cited by 13
Pinfold, V., Burgess, A., Couperthwaite, L. M. Z., Garavini, E., Gibson, J., Kamvar, R., Kenny, A., Mackay, T., Naughton, G., & Temple, R. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07120-8 · Cited by 12
D’Cruz, K., Antonopoulos, S., Rothman, R., Douglas, J. M., Winkler, D., & Oliver, S. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064921 · Cited by 12
Graphical Abstract in Scientific Research
Jeyaraman, M., Ratna, H. V. K., Jeyaraman, N., Maffulli, N., Migliorini, F., Nallakumarasamy, A., & Yadav, S. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.45762 · Cited by 12
Gordon, B., Griend, K. M. V. D., Scharp, V. L., Ellis, H., & Nies, M. A. (2023) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/01632787231203346 · Cited by 12
Abbott, S., Denton, A., Wong, S. H., Mollan, S. P., & Bul, K. (2023) · BMJ Neurology Open · doi:10.1136/bmjno-2023-000527 · Cited by 12
Goh, S. P., Ong, S. C., & Chan, J. E. (2024) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-024-12038-7 · Cited by 12
Wilkinson, C. E., Gibson, A., Biddle, M., & Hobbs, L. (2024) · PEC Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100281 · Cited by 12
Carroll, P., Dervan, A. G., McCarthy, C., Woods, I., Beirne, C., Harte, G., O’Flynn, D., O’Connor, C., McGuire, T. K., Leahy, L. M., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0301626 · Cited by 12
Engelaar, M., Bos, N., van Schelven, F., Sunyer, N. L. I., Couespel, N., Apolone, G., Brunelli, C., Caraceni, A. T., Ferrer, M., Grøenvold, M., et al. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00597-9 · Cited by 12
Coyne, E., Corones‐Watkins, K., Dhar, A., MITCHELL, L. J., Mongta, H., Wardrop, R., & Hughes, L. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106601 · Cited by 12
Evaluation Tools for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Health Research: A Scoping Review
Nissen, S., Karlsson, A. W., & Nørgaard, B. (2025) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-025-00765-3 · Cited by 12
O'Regan, M., Gethin, G., O’Loughlin, A., O’Connor, G. M., Dineen, S. F., Pandit, A. S., Tawfick, W. A., McIntosh, C. D., Cahill‐Collins, M., Hanley, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Tissue Viability · doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2019.10.007 · Cited by 12
Realist evaluation of public engagement and involvement in data-intensive health research
Hobbs, G., & Tully, M. P. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00215-4 · Cited by 12
Solvang, P. K., Sveen, U., & Søberg, H. L. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13281 · Cited by 12
Foley, L., Kiely, B. T., Croke, A., Larkin, J., Smith, S. M., Clyne, B., Pierce, M., Murphy, E., & on behalf of the Collaborative Doctoral Award in Multimorbidity (CDA-MM) Team (2021) · Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity · doi:10.1177/26335565211024793 · Cited by 13
Davies, B. M., Mowforth, O. D., Khan, D. Z., Yang, X., Stacpoole, S., Hazenbiller, O., Gronlund, T. A., Tetreault, L. A., Kalsi‐Ryan, S., Starkey, M. L., et al. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05349-8 · Cited by 12
Bavelaar, L., van Tol, L. S., Caljouw, M. A. A., & van der Steen, J. T. (2021) · TSG - Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · doi:10.1007/s12508-021-00316-9 · Cited by 12
Romero‐Collado, À., Martínez-Esparza, E. H., Zabaleta‐del‐Olmo, E., Urpí‐Fernández, A., & Santesmases‐Masana, R. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1737 · Cited by 15
Learnings from user feedback of a novel digital mental health assessment
Funnell, E. L., Spadaro, B., Benáček, J., Martin-Key, N. A., Metcalfe, T., Olmert, T., Barton‐Owen, G., & Bahn, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1018095 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Royal College of Nursing Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick Coventry UK
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brett, Jo
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 637-650
- ISSN
- 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-7625
- PMC
- PMC5060910
- OpenAlex
- W2049504028
- Cited by
- 1,598
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 140 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Expectations (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
- University of Warwick
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- patient and public involvement, health research, social care research, research quality, research questions, research recruitment, research dissemination, implementation of research findings, research stages
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Research, Humans, Patient Participation, Social Welfare, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
