The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: There is an increasing international interest in patient and public involvement ( PPI ) in research, yet relatively little robust evidence exists about its impact on health and social care research. Objective: To identify the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research. Design: A systematic search of electronic databases and health libraries was undertaken from 1995 to 2009. Data were extracted and quality assessed utilizing the guidelines of the NHS C entre for R eviews and D issemination 2009 and the C ritical A ppraisal S kills P rogramme ( CASP ). Grey literature was assessed using the D ixon‐ W oods et al . (2005) checklist. Inclusion criteria: All study types that reported the impact PPI had on the health and/or social care research study. Main results: A total of 66 studies reporting the impact of PPI on health and social care research were included. The positive impacts identified enhanced the quality and appropriateness of research. Impacts were reported for all stages of research, including the development of user‐focused research objectives, development of user‐relevant research questions, development of user‐friendly information, questionnaires and interview schedules, more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies, consumer‐focused interpretation of data and enhanced implementation and dissemination of study results. Some challenging impacts were also identified. Conclusion: This study provides the first international evidence of PPI impact that has emerged at all key stages of the research process. However, much of the evidence base concerning impact remains weak and needs significant enhancement in the next decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Drawing on the findings of the PIRICOM study, 29 a validated online survey tool (Bristol Online Surveys, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) was designed to collect data to assess how PPI is operationalised and its perceived impact on each study.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“While the original GRIPP checklist represented an important starting point in creating high quality PPI reporting, its development drew on systematic review evidence, without broader input from the international PPI research community [2–4].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“While the patient and public involvement (PPI) evidence base has expanded over the past decade, the quality of reporting within papers is often inconsistent, limiting our understanding of how it works, in what context, for whom, and why.”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“Inadequate reporting can create problems for systematic reviews that attempt to synthesise PPI evidence [2–4].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“While GRIPP2-LF and GRIPP2-SF aim to guide consistent reporting, it is not possible to be prescriptive about the exact content of each item, as the current evidence base is not advanced enough to make this possible [2–4, 21].”
From GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
In the citing paper
“The relatively small amount of empirical evidence on the impact of PPI in research 29 has been criticised as poorly reported 21 and methodologically weak, often failing to fully explore the contextual factors surrounding PPI as a complex intervention.30”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Ninety papers published between 1995 and 2009 were included.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Of the 83 papers, 2 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 52 qualitative studies, 15 case study methodology, 4 cross-sectional studies and 10 structured reviews.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“They did not find any evidence around systematic measurement of PPI outcomes, and furthermore found a lack of clarity on the differences between PPI impact and outcomes.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Providing a more robust evidence base for PPI policy requires moving beyond observational evaluations of PPI.29,30”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Hence, while there appears to be a reasonably robust level of evidence around the 'architecture of PPI', reporting of outcomes continues to be poor.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“What evidence there is tends to be descriptive, largely qualitative, often retrospective case studies, 19,29,106 with only a few exceptional prospective longitudinal case studies, 15 comparative multiproject evaluations 107 or studies employing quantitative designs.108”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Data were extracted from 83 papers (the remaining seven were not written in a format suitable for data extraction but were deemed sufficiently important to include within the conceptualisation of PPI).”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Brett et al. 29 argue that most studies have attempted to conceptualise PPI mainly around context and process and have not sufficiently theoretically grasped the complexities of PPI.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“As in Staley's review, 19 the papers provided more evidence around the processes of PPI rather than impact and outcomes, and found scant evidence of PPI impact on funding decisions.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“Although the PIRICOM study found little evidence of PPI being theoretically conceptualised, there has been some work to develop a consensus on the principles and indicators of successful PPI, 133 and this was used to underpin the survey design.”
From ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care
Tacconelli, E. (2010) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(10)70065-7 · Cited by 3,270
Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E. M., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D. M., Rhodes, S. D., Samuel‐Hodge, C. D., Maty, S. C., Lux, L. J., et al. (2004) · PubMed Central · Cited by 959
Nilsen, E. S., Myrhaug, H. T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S. R., & Oxman, A. D. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004563.pub2 · Cited by 565
Lay perspectives: advantages for health research
Entwistle, V. A., Renfrew, M. J., Yearley, S., Forrester, J. M., & Lamont, T. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.463 · Cited by 376
Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., & Barber, R. (2011) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462311000481 · Cited by 369
Self-citationCashman, S. B., Adeky, S., Allen, A. J., Corburn, J., Israel, B. A., Montaño, J., Rafelito, A., Rhodes, S. D., Swanston, S., Wallerstein, N. B., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2007.113571 · Cited by 347
Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation
Shah, S. G. S., & Robinson, I. (2007) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462307051677 · Cited by 299
From passive subjects to equal partners
Trivedi, P., & Wykes, T. (2002) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.181.6.468 · Cited by 281
Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits
HEWLETT, S. E., de Wit, M. P. T., Richards, P., Quest, E. M., Hughes, R., Heiberg, T., & Kirwan, J. (2006) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.22091 · Cited by 272
Abelson, J., Giacomini, M. K., Lehoux, P., & Gauvin, F. (2006) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009 · Cited by 251
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Dixon P, 1999, A Database of Examples of Consumer Involvement in Research
- Blaxter M, 1995, Consumer Issues Within the NHS: An R & D Contribution to Consumer Involvement in the NHS
- Brett J, 2010, Systematic Review of the Conceptualization, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patient and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research
- Dixon‐Woods M, 2005, Vulnerable Groups and Access, to Health Care: A Critical Interpretative Review
- Popay J, 2005, Developing guidance on conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, A7
- UKCRC & TwoCan Associates, 2009, An Evaluation of the Process and Impact of Patient and Public Involvement in the Advisory Groups of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration
- Faulkner A, 2006, Beyond our Expectations: A Report of the Experiences of Involving Service Users in Forensic Mental Health Research
- Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2008, A Review of Service User Involvement in Prison Mental Health Research
- Kelson M, 1999, National Sentinel Audits Involving Older People: A Guide to Involving Older People in Local Audit Activity
- 10.1080/13561820400011792 · DOI
- Rose D, 2004, Telling different stories: user involvement in mental health research, Research and Policy Planning, 22, 23
- Faulkner A, 2004, Capturing the Experiences of those Involved in the TRUE Project. A Story of Colliding Worlds
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,001
Engaging children and families in pediatric Health Research: a scoping review
Flynn, R., Walton, S., & Scott, S. D. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0168-9 · Cited by 100
Hawke, L. D., Darnay, K., Relihan, J., Khaleghi‐Moghaddam, M., Barbic, S. P., Lachance, L., Ben‐David, S., Brown, M., Iyer, S. N., Chaim, G., et al. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13032 · Cited by 93
Pellicano, E., Lawson, W. B., Hall, G., Mahony, J., Lilley, R., Heyworth, M., Clapham, H., & Yudell, M. (2021) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2021.0039 · Cited by 106
Exploring the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement in a Cancer Research Setting
Thompson, J., Bissell, P., Cooper, C. L., Armitage, C. J., & Barber, R. (2013) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732313514482 · Cited by 93
Facilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research
Maccarthy, J., Guérin, S., Wilson, A. G., & Dorris, E. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216600 · Cited by 91
Patient and Public Involvement in research: A journey to co-production
Price, A., Clarke, M., Staniszewska, S., Chu, L., Tembo, D., Kirkpatrick, M., & Nelken, Y. (2022) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.021 · Cited by 90
Self-citationDawson, S., Ruddock, A., Parmar, V., Morris, R., Cheraghi‐Sohi, S., Giles, S. J., & Campbell, S. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-020-00201-w · Cited by 90
Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation
Evans, D., Coad, J. E., Cottrell, K., Dalrymple, J., Davies, R., Donald, C., Laterza, V., Long, A., Longley, A., Moule, P., et al. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02360 · Cited by 91
Vӧllm, B., Edworthy, R., Holley, J., Talbot, E., Majid, S., Duggan, C. F., Weaver, T. D., & McDonald, R. (2017) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr05110 · Cited by 88
Dewa, L. H., Lawrence‐Jones, A., Crandell, C., Jaques, J., Pickles, K., Lavelle, M., Pappa, S., & Aylin, P. P. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13088 · Cited by 93
Stevenson, M., & Taylor, B. J. (2017) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/1471301217690904 · Cited by 87
Patient and public involvement in designing and conducting doctoral research: the whys and the hows
Tomlinson, J., Medlinskiene, K., Cheong, V., Khan, S., & Fylan, B. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0155-1 · Cited by 87
From tokenism to meaningful engagement: best practices in patient involvement in an EU project
on behalf of the U-BIOPRED PIP group, Supple, D., Roberts, A. D. L., Hudson, V., Masefield, S. C., Fitch, N., Rahmen, M., Flood, B., de Boer, W. I., Powell, P., et al. (2015) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-015-0004-9 · Cited by 86
Mjøsund, N. H., Eriksson, M., Espnes, G. A., Haaland‐Øverby, M., Jensen, S. L., Norheim, I., Kjus, S. H. H., Portaasen, I., & Vinje, H. F. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.13093 · Cited by 84
The Social Ecology of Power in Participatory Health Research
Roura, M. (2020) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732320979187 · Cited by 83
The importance of measuring the impact of patient-oriented research
Aubin, D., Hebert, M., & Eurich, D. T. (2019) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.190237 · Cited by 82
The impact of involvement on researchers: a learning experience
Staley, K., Abbey-Vital, I., & Nolan, C. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-017-0071-1 · Cited by 82
Muller, I., Santer, M., Morrison, L., Morton, K., Roberts, A., Rice, C., Williams, M., & Yardley, L. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0169-8 · Cited by 80
Veldmeijer, L., Terlouw, G., van Os, J., Dijk, O. V., Veer, J. V. ‘., & Boonstra, N. (2023) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/46590 · Cited by 89
How to design high quality acupuncture trials—a consensus informed by evidence
Zhang, Y., Jiao, R., Witt, C. M., Lao, L., Liu, J., Thabane, L., Sherman, K. J., Cummings, M., Richards, D. P., Kim, E.-K. A., et al. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-067476 · Cited by 80
Vanstone, M. G., Canfield, C., Evans, C., Leslie, M., Levasseur, M. A., MacNeil, M., Pahwa, M., Panday, J., Rowland, P., Taneja, S., et al. (2023) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-022-00954-8 · Cited by 79
Haywood, K. L., Brett, J., Salek, S., Marlett, N. J., Penman, C., Shklarov, S., Norris, C. M., Santana, M., & Staniszewska, S. H. (2014) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3 · Cited by 79
Self-citationØksnebjerg, L., Diaz-Ponce, A. M., Gove, D., Moniz-Cook, E. D., Mountain, G. A., Chattat, R., & Woods, B. T. (2018) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12799 · Cited by 81
Public Involvement in Global Genomics Research: A Scoping Review
Nunn, J., Tiller, J. M., Fransquet, P., & Lacaze, P. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00079 · Cited by 78
Birnie, K. A., Dib, K., Ouellette, C., Dib, M. A., Nelson, K., Pahtayken, D., Baerg, K., Chorney, J. M. L., Forgeron, P. A., Lamontagne, C., et al. (2019) · CMAJ Open · doi:10.9778/cmajo.20190060 · Cited by 78
Jones, J., Cowe, M., Marks, S. A., McAllister, T., Mendoza, A., Ponniah, C., Wythe, H., & Mathie, E. (2021) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-021-00295-w · Cited by 78
Witteman, H. O., Dansokho, S. C., Colquhoun, H. L., Fagerlin, A., Giguere, A. M. C., Glouberman, S., Haslett, L., Hoffman, A. S., Ivers, N. M., Légaré, F., et al. (2018) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4269-6 · Cited by 78
Mann, C., Chilcott, S., PLUMB, K. H. M., Brooks, E., & Man, M. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0098-y · Cited by 77
Carlton, J., Peasgood, T., Khan, S., Barber, R., Bostock, J., & Keetharuth, A. D. (2020) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s41687-019-0172-8 · Cited by 75
Lauzon-Schnittka, J., Audette-Chapdelaine, S., Boutin, D., Wilhelmy, C., Auger, A.-M., & Brodeur, M. (2022) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-022-00388-0 · Cited by 75
Developing an Intervention for Suicide Prevention: A Rapid Review of Lived Experience Involvement
Watling, D. P., Preece, M. H. W., Hawgood, J. L., Bloomfield, S., & Kõlves, K. (2020) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2020.1833799 · Cited by 74
Hatch, S., Fitzgibbon, J., Tonks, A. J., & Forty, L. (2023) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13896 · Cited by 74
Recent Advances and New Directions in Measuring Theory of Mind in Autistic Adults
Livingston, L. A., Carr, B. L., & Shah, P. (2018) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3823-3 · Cited by 82
Martineau, J. T., Minyaoui, A., & Boivin, A. (2020) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-020-0460-0 · Cited by 73
de Wit, M. P. T., Cooper, C. C., Tugwell, P., Bere, N., Kirwan, J., Conaghan, P. G., Roberts, C. J., Aujoulat, I., Al‐Daghri, N. M., de Carvalho, I. A., et al. (2019) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-019-01193-8 · Cited by 73
Inside co‐production: Ruling, resistance, and practice
Bevir, M., Needham, C. E., & Waring, J. J. (2019) · Social Policy and Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12483 · Cited by 71
Abayneh, S., Lempp, H. K., Alem, A., Kohrt, B. A., Fekadu, A., & Hanlon, C. (2020) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-020-00383-6 · Cited by 67
Participatory methods in pediatric participatory research: a systematic review
Haijes, H. A., & van Thiel, G. J. M. W. (2015) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/pr.2015.279 · Cited by 71
Beighton, C., Victor, C. R., Carey, I. M., Hosking, F. J., DeWilde, S., Cook, D. G., Manners, P. J., & Harris, T. J. (2017) · Journal of Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1177/1744629517723485 · Cited by 71
Toward recovery in schizophrenia: Current concepts, findings, and future research directions
Onitsuka, T., Hirano, Y., Nakazawa, T., Ichihashi, K., Miura, K., Inada, K., Mitoma, R., Yasui‐Furukori, N., & Hashimoto, R. (2022) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13342 · Cited by 76
van Middendorp, J. J., Allison, H., Ahuja, S., Bracher, D., Dyson, C., Fairbank, J. C. T., Gall, A., Glover, A., Gray, L., Masri, W. E., et al. (2015) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sc.2015.199 · Cited by 70
Involving Patients in Research: Considering Good Practice
Gooberman‐Hill, R., Burston, A., Clark, E., Johnson, E. C., Nolan, S., Wells, V., Betts, L., & PEP‐R (2013) · Musculoskeletal Care · doi:10.1002/msc.1060 · Cited by 70
Davies, B. M., Mowforth, O. D., Sadler, I., Aarabi, B., Kwon, B. K., Kurpad, S. N., Harrop, J. S., Wilson, J. R., Grossman, R. G., Fehlings, M. G., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031486 · Cited by 69
Shé, É. N., Morton, S., Lambert, V., Cheallaigh, C. N., Lacey, V., Dunn, E., Loughnane, C., O'Connor, J., McCann, A. H., Adshead, M. L., et al. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12865 · Cited by 70
Dillon, E. C., Tuzzio, L., Madrid, S., Olden, H. A., & Greenlee, R. T. (2017) · Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · doi:10.17294/2330-0698.1458 · Cited by 68
McConnell, T., Best, P., Davidson, G., McEneaney, T., Cantrell, C., & Tully, M. A. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0116-0 · Cited by 67
Joosten, Y. A., Israel, T. L., Head, A., Vaughn, Y. C., Villalta‐Gil, V., Mouton, C. P., & Wilkins, C. H. (2018) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1017/cts.2018.323 · Cited by 67
Meaningful research for autistic people? Ask autistics!
Poulsen, R. E., Brownlow, C., Lawson, W. B., & Pellicano, E. (2022) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613211064421 · Cited by 76
Merner, B., Schonfeld, L., Virgona, A., Lowe, D. B., Walsh, L., Wardrope, C., Graham‐Wisener, L., Xafis, V., Colombo, C., Refahi, N., et al. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013274.pub2 · Cited by 66
Bailey, K., Allemang, B. A., Vandermorris, A., Munce, S., Cleverley, K., Chisholm, C., Cohen, E., Davidson, C., Galad, A. E., Leibovich, D., et al. (2024) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-024-00607-w · Cited by 66
Hemphill, R. C., Forsythe, L. P., Heckert, A., Amolegbe, A., Maurer, M. E., Carman, K. L., Mangrum, R., Stewart, L., Fearon, N., & Esmail, L. C. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12979 · Cited by 65
A systematic review of parent based programs to prevent or reduce alcohol consumption in adolescents
Hurley, E., Dietrich, T., & Rundle-Thiele, S. R. (2019) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7733-x · Cited by 69
Involving an individual with lived‐experience in a co‐analysis of qualitative data
Hemming, L., Pratt, D., Bhatti, P., Shaw, J. J., & Haddock, G. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13188 · Cited by 63
Brett, J., Staniszewska, S. H., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016948 · Cited by 63
Self-citationWeeks, L., Polisena, J., Scott, A. M., Holtorf, A., Staniszewska, S. H., & Facey, K. M. (2017) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462317000976 · Cited by 62
Self-citationHarris, J., Haltbakk, J., Dunning, T. L., Austrheim, G., Kirkevold, M., Johnson, M., & Graue, M. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12935 · Cited by 62
Friesen, P., Lignou, S., Sheehan, M., & Singh, I. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12988 · Cited by 61
Collins, M., Long, R., Page, A., Popay, J., & Lobban, F. A. (2018) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12688 · Cited by 60
PPI in research: a reflection from early stage researchers
Biggane, A. M., Olsen, M., & Williamson, P. R. (2019) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0170-2 · Cited by 59
Abayneh, S., Lempp, H. K., & Hanlon, C. (2020) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-019-0175-x · Cited by 62
McKeen, D. M., Banfield, J. C., McIsaac, D. I., McVicar, J. A., McGavin, C., Earle, M. A., Ward, C., Burns, K. K., Penner, D., Blaise, G. A., et al. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-020-01607-6 · Cited by 58
Ethics and patient and public involvement with children and young people
Mitchell, S., Slowther, A., Coad, J. E., Akhtar, S., Hyde, E., Khan, D., & Dale, J. R. (2018) · Archives of Disease in Childhood Education & Practice · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2017-313480 · Cited by 58
Patient and public involvement in research: future challenges
Staniszewska, S. H., & Denegri, S. (2013) · Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1136/eb-2013-101406 · Cited by 58
Self-citationO’Dwyer, S., Janssens, A. I. W. A., Sansom, A., Biddle, L., Mars, B., Slater, T., Moran, P., Stallard, P. N., Melluish, J., Reakes, L., et al. (2021) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152261 · Cited by 64
Cluley, V., Ziemann, A., Feeley, C., Olander, E. K., Shamah, S., & Stavropoulou, C. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13437 · Cited by 57
Recruitment rates and strategies in exercise trials in cancer survivorship: a systematic review
Reynolds, S. A., O’Connor, L., McGee, A., Kilcoyne, A. Q., Connolly, A., Mockler, D., Guinan, E. M., & O’Neill, L. M. (2023) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-023-01363-8 · Cited by 56
Thelwall, M. A., Simrick, S., Viney, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04836-w · Cited by 56
The View From the Inside: Positionality and Insider Research
Berkovic, D. E., Ayton, D., Briggs, A. M., & Ackerman, I. N. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919900828 · Cited by 88
Rogers, M., Bethel, A. C., & Boddy, K. (2017) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/hir.12157 · Cited by 55
Kearney, A., Williamson, P. R., Young, B., Bagley, H., Gamble, C. L., Denegri, S., Muir, D., Simon, N. A., Thomas, S., Elliot, J., et al. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12583 · Cited by 55
Searching for the Impact of Participation in Health and Health Research: Challenges and Methods
Harris, J., Cook, T., Gibbs, L. F., OETZEL, J. G., Salsberg, J., Shinn, C., Springett, J., Wallerstein, N. B., & Wright, M. T. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/9427452 · Cited by 55
National Standards for Public Involvement in Research: missing the forest for the trees
McCoy, M. S., Jongsma, K. R., Friesen, P., Dunn, M., Neuhaus, C. P., Rand, L. Z., & Sheehan, M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105088 · Cited by 55
Putri, A. K., Gustriawanto, N., Rahapsari, S., Sholikhah, A. R., Prabaswara, S., Kusumawardhani, A. C., & Kristina, S. A. (2021) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-021-00504-9 · Cited by 65
Understanding the public’s role in reducing low-value care: a scoping review
Sypes, E. E., de Grood, C., Clement, F. M., Leigh, J. P., Whalen-Browne, L., Stelfox, H. T., & Niven, D. J. (2020) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-020-00986-0 · Cited by 54
Ellis, L. E., & KASS, N. E. (2016) · AJOB Empirical Bioethics · doi:10.1080/23294515.2016.1206045 · Cited by 53
Troya, M. I., Chew-Graham, C. A., Babatunde, O. O., Bartlam, B., Higginbottom, A., & Dikomitis, L. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12917 · Cited by 53
Involving service users in trials: developing a standard operating procedure
Evans, B., Bedson, E., Bell, P., Hutchings, H., Lowes, L., Rea, D., Seagrove, A., Siebert, S., Smith, G., Snooks, H., et al. (2013) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-219 · Cited by 52
Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol
Greenhalgh, T., Ovseiko, P. V., Fahy, N., Shaw, S. E., Kerr, P., Rushforth, A., Channon, K. M., & Kiparoglou, V. (2017) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0237-1 · Cited by 57
Mental Health Technologies: Designing With Consumers
Orlowski, S., Matthews, B., Bidargaddi, N. P., Jones, G. M., Lawn, S., Venning, A., & Collin, P. J. (2016) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.4336 · Cited by 52
Patient Centricity and Pharmaceutical Companies: Is It Feasible?
du Plessis, D., Sake, J., Halling, K., Morgan, J., Георгиева, A., & Bertelsen, N. (2017) · Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science · doi:10.1177/2168479017696268 · Cited by 52
Menear, M., Dugas, M., Careau, E., Chouinard, M.-C., Dogba, M. J., Gagnon, M.-P., Gervais, M., Gilbert, M., Houle, J., Kates, N., et al. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.008 · Cited by 52
Chapman, S. J., Grossman, R. C., FitzPatrick, M. E. B., & Brady, R. R. W. (2019) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.11307 · Cited by 51
Women with bipolar disorder and pregnancy: factors influencing their decision-making
Dolman, C., Jones, I. R., & Howard, L. M. (2016) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.003079 · Cited by 56
Determining Research Priorities Through Partnership with Patients: An Overview
Barnieh, L., Jun, M., Laupacis, A., Manns, B., & Hemmelgarn, B. R. (2014) · Seminars in Dialysis · doi:10.1111/sdi.12325 · Cited by 51
Pollock, A., Campbell, P., Struthers, C., Synnot, A., Nunn, J., Hill, S., Goodare, H., Watts, C., & Morley, R. (2017) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-017-0060-4 · Cited by 52
Wan, H. W. Y., Carey, K. A., D’Silva, A., Kasparian, N. A., & Farrar, M. A. (2019) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-019-1052-2 · Cited by 51
Embedding patient and public involvement: Managing tacit and explicit expectations
Poland, F. M., Charlesworth, G. M., Leung, P., & Birt, L. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12952 · Cited by 51
Rehabilitation interventions after traumatic brain injury: a scoping review
Sveen, U., Guldager, R., Soberg, H. L., Andreassen, T. A., Egerod, I., & Poulsen, I. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1773940 · Cited by 50
Finderup, J., Jensen, J. D., & Lomborg, K. E. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029090 · Cited by 50
Researching With Lived Experience: A Shared Critical Reflection Between Co-Researchers
Dembele, L., Nathan, S., Carter, A., Costello, J. E., Hodgins, M., Singh, R., Martin, B., & Cullen, P. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241257945 · Cited by 49
The Possibilities and Limits of “Co-producing” Research
Paylor, J., & McKevitt, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2019.00023 · Cited by 49
McDonald, K., Gibbons, C. M., Conroy, N. E., & Olick, R. S. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.12936 · Cited by 58
Totzeck, C., van der Meer, A. S., Christiansen, H., Durlach, F., Sanchez, K. L., & Schneider, S. (2024) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-024-00470-x · Cited by 48
Gamble, C. L., Dudley, L., Allam, A., Bell, P. A., Buck, D., Goodare, H., Hanley, B., Preston, J., Walker, A., Williamson, P. R., et al. (2015) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr03390 · Cited by 48
Early-career researchers’ views on ethical dimensions of patient engagement in research
Bélisle‐Pipon, J., Rouleau, G., & Birko, S. (2018) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0260-y · Cited by 48
Brighton, L. J., Pask, S., Benalia, H., Bailey, S., Sumerfield, M., Witt, J., de Wolf‐Linder, S., Etkind, S. N., Murtagh, F. E., Koffman, J., et al. (2018) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-018-0097-z · Cited by 48
How to involve children and young people in what is, after all, their research
Preston, J., Stones, S. R., Davies, H. T., & Phillips, B. (2019) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2018-315118 · Cited by 48
Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: Impact, resources and recommendations
Coupe, N., & Mathieson, A. (2019) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12976 · Cited by 48
Finderup, J., Lomborg, K. E., Jensen, J. D., & Stacey, D. (2020) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-020-01956-w · Cited by 48
Elbers, S., van Gessel, C., Renes, R. J., van der Lugt, R., Wittink, H., & Hermsen, S. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18462 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron‐Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Royal College of Nursing Research Institute, School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick Coventry UK
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brett, Jo
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 637-650
- ISSN
- 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-7625
- PMC
- PMC5060910
- OpenAlex
- W2049504028
- Cited by
- 1,598
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 140 · 2025: 167 · 2024: 201 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 133 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Expectations (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration
- University of Warwick
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- patient and public involvement, health research, social care research, research quality, research questions, research recruitment, research dissemination, implementation of research findings, research stages
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Research, Humans, Patient Participation, Social Welfare, Community-Based Participatory Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
