CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 272Diabetes Management and ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acute high‐intensity interval exercise reduces the postprandial glucose response and prevalence of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes

Gillen, J. B., Little, J. P., Punthakee, Z., Tarnopolsky, M. A., Riddell, M. C., Gibala, M. J.·2012·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01564.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

High‐volume endurance exercise (END) improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D) but many individuals cite ‘lack of time’ as a barrier to regular participation. High‐intensity interval training (HIT) is a time‐efficient method to induce physiological adaptations similar to END, but little is known regarding the effect of HIT in T2D. Using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), we examined the 24‐h blood glucose response to one session of HIT consisting of 10 × 60 s cycling efforts at ∼90% maximal heart rate, interspersed with 60 s rest. Seven adults with T2D underwent CGM for 24‐h on two occasions under standard dietary conditions: following acute HIT and on a non‐exercise control day (CTL). HIT reduced hyperglycaemia measured as proportion of time spent above 10 mmol/l (HIT: 4.5 ± 4.4 vs. CTL: 15.2 ± 12.3%, p = 0.04). Postprandial hyperglycaemia, measured as the sum of post‐meal areas under the glucose curve, was also lower after HIT vs. CTL (728 ± 331 vs. 1142 ± 556 mmol/l·9 h, p = 0.01). These findings highlight the potential for HIT to improve glycaemic control in T2D.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01564.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–270 of 270

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gillen, J. B., Little, J. P., Punthakee, Z., Tarnopolsky, M. A., Riddell, M. C., & Gibala, M. J.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Gibala, M. J.
ORCID
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-20
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
575-577
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
DOI
10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01564.x
OpenAlex
W1987329229
Cited by
272
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 6
FWCI
21.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Diabetes Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
high-intensity interval training, type 2 diabetes, postprandial blood glucose, hyperglycemia, glycemic control, acute exercise, continuous glucose monitoring, time-efficient exercise, endurance exercise
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Exercise, Prevalence, Postprandial Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review