Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 591

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Perceived Organizational Performance in Organizational Identification, Adjustment and Job Performance*

Carmeli, Abraham, Gilat, Gershon, Waldman, David A.·2007·Journal of Management Studies
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00691.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

abstract Favourable organizational status and prestige has a substantial role in shaping constituents' attitudes and actions. The status and prestige of an organization is often a reflection of its achievements or performance. In the present study, we investigate the role of organizational performance or achievement (as assessed by organizational members) in evoking employees' identification, adjustment, and job performance. The results of this study indicate that two forms of organizational performance (labelled as perceived social responsibility and development and perceived market and financial performance) are associated with organizational identification. However, when compared to perceived market and financial performance, perceived social responsibility and development had a larger effect on organizational identification, which in turn resulted in enhanced employees' work outcomes – adjustment and job performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00691.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Abrams D., 1992, Social Psychology of Identity and the Self‐Concept, 57
  2. Abrams D., 1990, Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances
  3. 10.1177/01461672982410001 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/256973 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Albert S., 1985, Research in Organizational Behavior, 263
  6. Arbuckle J. L., 2003, Amos 5.0 Update to the Amos User's Guide
  7. 10.2307/258189 · DOI
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1348/014466600164633 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/9781118619179 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2307/271084 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Brislin R. W., 1986, Field Methods in Cross‐Cultural Research, 137
  13. Byrne B. M., 2001, Structural Equation Modeling with Amos
  14. 10.1177/0170840605050875 · DOI
  15. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550014 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00607.x · DOI
  18. 10.2307/256718 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/258887 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.2307/3094849 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2307/256405 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Dutton J. E., 2003, Positive Organizational Scholarship, 263
  23. 10.2307/2393235 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.617 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.5465/amr.2004.13670967 · DOI
  28. Elsbach K. D., 1999, An expanded model of organizational identification, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 163
  29. 10.1057/bm.2000.10 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.2307/259263 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Hair J. F., 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis
  32. Haslam S. A., 2001, Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach
  33. 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  34. 10.2307/256977 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.2307/258852 · DOI
  36. Joreskog K. G., 1993, LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language
  37. Katz D., 1978, The Social Psychology of Organizations
  38. Kline R. B., 1998, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
  39. Kramer R. M., 1991, Research in Organizational Behavior, 191
  40. Kramer R. M., 1993, Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research, 244
  41. 10.1002/job.234 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00072-8 · DOI
  43. Lord R. G., 2004, Leadership Processes and Follower Self‐Identity
  44. MacKinnon D. P., 2000, Multivariate Applications in Substance Use Research: New Methods for New Questions, 141
  45. 10.1002/job.4030130202 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01759.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199924)38:4<303::AID-HRM3>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  49. 10.2307/259398 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.2307/259247 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory
  53. Oakes P. J., 1994, Stereotyping and Social Reality, 80
  54. 10.4135/9781452231495.n6 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0090-5720(90)90023-Z · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.06.001 · DOI
  58. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.836 · DOI
  59. 10.5465/amj.2005.19573107 · DOI
  60. 10.1287/orsc.4.4.577 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/BF00382954 · DOI
  62. Tajfel H., 1985, The Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 7
  63. Turner J. C., 1982, Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, 15
  64. Tyler T. R., 1999, Why people cooperate with organizations: an identity‐based perspective, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201
  65. Tyler T. R., 2000, Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity and Behavioral Engagement
  66. 10.1002/0470013311.ch6 · DOI
  67. Van Dick R., 2004, The utility of the broader conceptualization of organizational identification: which of its aspects really matter?, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171, 10.1348/096317904774202135 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-23
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
972-992
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00691.x
OpenAlex
W1982177180
Cited by
591
References
4
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.