Cited by 98Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

Ten‐Year Rank‐Order Stability of P ersonality Traits and Disorders in a Clinical Sample

Open access
Hopwood, Christopher J., Morey, Leslie C., Donnellan, M. Brent, Samuel, Douglas B., Grilo, Carlos M., McGlashan, Thomas H., Shea, M. Tracie, Zanarini, Mary C. +2 more·2013·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Objective: This study compares the 10‐year retest stability of normal traits, pathological traits, and personality disorder dimensions in a clinical sample. Method: Ten‐year rank‐order stability estimates for the R evised NEO P ersonality I nventory, Schedule for N onadaptive and A daptive P ersonality, and D iagnostic I nterview for DSM‐IV P ersonality Disorders were evaluated before and after correcting for test‐retest dependability and internal consistency in a clinical sample (N = 266). Results: Dependability‐corrected stability estimates were generally in the range of.60–.90 for traits and.25–.65 for personality disorders. Conclusions: The relatively lower stability of personality disorder symptoms may indicate important differences between pathological behaviors and relatively more stable self‐attributed traits and imply that a full understanding of personality and personality pathology needs to take both traits and symptoms into account. The five‐factor theory distinction between basic tendencies and characteristic adaptations provides a theoretical framework for the separation of traits and disorders in terms of stability in which traits reflect basic tendencies that are stable and pervasive across situations, whereas personality disorder symptoms reflect characteristic maladaptations that are a function of both basic tendencies and environmental dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00801.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age is a likely moderator of outcome in NPD, as younger samples have shown slightly more improvement.

    “Age (80–82) is a likely moderator of outcome, as younger samples have shown slightly more improvement (82).”

    From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Results section finds that age moderated narcissistic personality disorder stability, but reports the opposite direction of improvement: older participants had lower narcissistic PD scores at follow-up than younger participants with the same baseline scores. It also says narcissistic symptoms were somewhat more stable among younger individuals. Page numbers are not available in the supplied copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies have documented the persistence of narcissistic pathology, even among patients who improve symptomatically.

    “Overall, studies (Table 2) (76–83) have documented the persistence of narcissistic pathology, even among patients who improve symptomatically.”

    From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Results report ten-year stability of narcissistic personality-disorder symptoms, particularly among younger patients. The paper does not establish that narcissistic pathology persisted specifically among patients who improved symptomatically; it did not analyze that subgroup. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Hopwood et al. (2013), a prospective 10-year study found 24% stability for dimensional diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder.

    “Hopwood et al., 2013 ( 82 ) 18–45 38:62 Prospective/266 10 NPD dimensional diagnosis: 24% stability”

    From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as Hopwood et al., 2013 ( 82 )

    The Method section reports baseline and 10-year follow-up data for 266 participants, and the Results section discusses stability of narcissistic personality disorder symptoms. The passages available from our copy do not give a 24% stability estimate for narcissistic personality disorder, so the claim’s specific figure is not verified. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent studies show that APD symptoms are relatively stable over time.

    “and recent studies show that APD symptoms are relatively stable over time [71, 82, 83].”
  • The influence of the factor time is expected to be limited, since APD is by definition assumed to be persistent and recent studies show APD symptoms are relatively stable over time.

    “The influence of the factor time is, however, expected to be limited, since APD, like other personality disorders, is by definition assumed to be persistent [8], and recent studies show that APD symptoms are relatively stable over time [71, 82, 83].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Clark LA 1993 Manual for the Schedule of Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press
  2. Keller MB Lavori PW Friedman B Nielsen E Endicott J McDonald-Scott P Andreasen NC 1987 The Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation: a comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies Archives of General Psychiatry 44 540 548 3579500

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopwood, C. J., Morey, L. C., Donnellan, M. B., Samuel, D. B., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., Shea, M. T., Zanarini, M. C., Gunderson, J. G., & Skodol, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Hopwood, Christopher J.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-05
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
335-344
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W1513963525
Cited by
98
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH50850, MH 50840, MH-50837, MH 50839, MH 50838, K23MH073708, MH 073708, R10MH050837, R01MH050838, K23MH080221, R01MH050837, R01MH050840, R01MH050839, R01MH050850, MH 080221)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
rank-order stability, personality traits, personality disorders, personality disorder symptoms, characteristic adaptations, test-retest reliability, clinical samples, long-term stability
MeSH terms
Adult, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Personality, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review