Cited by 1,222Personality Traits and PsychologyAging and Gerontology ResearchPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Personality Trait Change in Adulthood

Open access
Roberts, Brent W., Mroczek, Daniel·2008·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Recent longitudinal and cross-sectional aging research has shown that personality traits continue to change in adulthood. In this article, we review the evidence for mean-level change in personality traits, as well as for individual differences in change across the life span. In terms of mean-level change, people show increased self-confidence, warmth, self-control, and emotional stability with age. These changes predominate in young adulthood (age 20–40). Moreover, mean-level change in personality traits occurs in middle and old age, showing that personality traits can change at any age. In terms of individual differences in personality change, people demonstrate unique patterns of development at all stages of the life course, and these patterns appear to be the result of specific life experiences that pertain to a person's stage of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of people experience medium-sized to large changes in their Big Five personality traits as they traverse adulthood.

    “In addition, the majority of people experience medium-sized to large changes in their Big Five personality traits (agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness; Table 1) as they traverse adulthood”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Roberts & Mroczek, 2008

  • Mounting evidence suggests that the personality-as-plaster view is not correct.

    “mounting evidence suggests that the personality-as-plaster view is not correct (Roberts, Walton and Viechtbauer [2006], Roberts and Mroczek [2008]).”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Roberts and Mroczek [2008]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, B. W., & Mroczek, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Brent W.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2008-02
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
31-35
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2143117643
Cited by
1,222
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 142 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 53
FWCI
36.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG018436, R01AG021178)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
personality trait change, aging, personality development, self-confidence, emotional stability, self-control, warmth, individual differences, life course, middle-aged and older adults, early adulthood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review