The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probabilistic epigenesis
Abstract
The notion that phenotypic traits, including behavior, can be predetermined has slowly given way in biology and psychology over the last two decades. This shift in thinking is due in large part to the growing evidence for the fundamental role of developmental processes in the generation of the stability and variations in phenotype that researchers in developmental and evolutionary sciences seek to understand. Here I review the tenets of a metatheoretical model of development called probabilistic epigenesis (PE) and explore its implications for furthering our understanding of developmental and evolutionary processes. The PE framework emphasizes the reciprocity of influences within and between levels of an organism's developmental manifold (genetic activity, neural activity, behavior, and the physical, social, and cultural influences of the external environment) and the ubiquity of gene–environment interaction in the realization of all phenotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Childhood Adversity, Monoamine Oxidase A Genotype, and Risk for ConductDisorder
Foley, D. L., Eaves, L. J., Wormley, B., Silberg, J. L., Maes, H. H., Kuhn, J., & Riley, B. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.7.738 · Cited by 564 · cited 1×
“If the reaction-range idea were correct and the genes coded for a range of learning ability (brackets on the right side of Gottesman’s Figure 4), when these rat strains were reared under enriched or restricted conditions, the relative difference between them would be preserved. Instead, the experiment shows the genes…”
Child Development and Neuroscience.
Nelson, C. A., & Bloom, F. E. (1997) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01974.x · Cited by 236
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1038/sj.mp.4000949 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1072290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/h0083747 · DOI · Paper page
- Fisher R.A., 1951, Limits to intensive production in animals, British Agricultural Bulletin, 4, 217
- Gottesman I.I., 1963, Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research, 253
- Gottlieb G., 1970, Development and evolution of behavior, 111
- Gottlieb G., 1971, The biopsychology of development, 67
- 10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.792-802 · DOI · Paper page
- Gottlieb G., 2002, Conceptions of development: Lessons from the laboratory, 31
- Gottlieb G., 2002, Individual development and evolution: The genesis of novel behavior
- Gottlieb G., 2002, Handbook of developmental psychology, 3
- 10.1159/000073306 · DOI · Paper page
- Gottlieb G., Neurobehavioral genetics
- 10.1017/S0954579402003024 · DOI · Paper page
- Gottlieb G., 2006, Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method
- 10.1038/22536 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05464.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajmg.b.30176 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-94-011-3961-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511499883.011 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0083678 · doi:10.1037/h0083678
- Johannsen W., 1909, Elemente der Exacten Erblichkeitslehre
- Johnson M.H., 1997, Developmental cognitive neuroscience
- Lerner R.M., 2002, Concepts and theories of human development
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-7142-1_2 · DOI
- 10.1038/35047544 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000111395 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMe020140 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7036.102.3.254 · DOI
- Russell E.S., 1917, Form and function: A contribution to the history of animal morphology
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-4163-9_13 · DOI
- Thelen E., 1990, Individual differences in infancy, 19
- Valsiner J., 2001, Comparative study of human cultural development
- 10.1159/000022654 · DOI
- Waddington C.H., 1957, The strategy of the genes
- 10.1017/S0140525X00077797 · DOI · Paper page
- Wolff C.F., 1764, Theorie von der Generation in zwo abhandlungen
- Woltereck R., 1909, Weitere experimentelle Untersuchungen über Artveränderung, speziell über das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden [Further experimental investigations of species modification, particularly the nature of quantitative species differences in daphnia], Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 19, 110
- 10.1016/S0014-2999(00)00815-3 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Masten, A. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2010) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000222 · Cited by 1,800
Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social–emotional development
Vaish, A., Grossmann, T., & Woodward, A. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383 · Cited by 1,191
Resilience Theory and Research on Children and Families: Past, Present, and Promise
Masten, A. S. (2018) · Journal of Family Theory & Review · doi:10.1111/jftr.12255 · Cited by 1,044
Parenting stress and child behavior problems: a transactional relationship across time
Neece, C. L., Green, S. A., & Baker, B. L. (2012) · American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.48 · Cited by 953
Resilience in Development and Psychopathology: Multisystem Perspectives
Masten, A. S., Lucke, C. M., Nelson, K. M., & Stallworthy, I. C. (2021) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-120307 · Cited by 794
Metadata
- Authors
- Gottlieb, G.
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12-20
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W4248744448
- Cited by
- 690
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 61.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probabilistic epigenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00556.x
- The paper
- Gottlieb, G. (2007). Probabilistic epigenesis. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00556.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.