Cited by 210Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDietary Effects on HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Meal patterns and obesity in Swedish women-a simple instrument describing usual meal types, frequency and temporal distribution

Bertéus Forslund, H, Lindroos, AK, Sjöström, L, Lissner, L·2002·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To characterize meal patterns in relation to obesity in Swedish women using a simple instrument describing meal frequency, meal types and temporal distribution.Design Cross-sectional parallel group design.Subjects Eighty-three obese women from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study were compared with 94 reference women, randomly recruited from the population.Method A new, simplified and self-instructing questionnaire was used to assess meal patterns. Usual meal pattern was reported as time and meal type for each intake episode during a typical day.Results The obese women consumed 6.1 meals/day compared with 5.2 meals/day among the reference women (P<0.0001). All types of meals except 'drink meals' were significantly more frequently consumed in the obese group. The obese women also displayed a different meal pattern across the day, consuming a larger number of meals later in the day. As a result a larger fraction of each obese woman's total meals were consumed in the afternoon and in the evening/night. There was no difference in the number of obese vs reference women consuming breakfast. Snack meals were positively associated with total energy intake in both groups.Conclusions A new simplified method assessing meal pattern revealed that the number of reported intake occasions across a usual day was higher in obese women compared with controls and the timing was shifted to later in the day. These findings should be considered in the treatment of obesity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601387

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertéus Forslund, H., Lindroos, A., Sjöström, L., & Lissner, L.
Affiliations
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Nordic School of Public Health (SE)
Corresponding author
Lindroos, AK
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2002-07-19
Volume
56
Issue
8
Pages
740-747
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2028274580
Cited by
210
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
meal patterns, obesity, women, meal frequency, meal type, breakfast, total energy intake, questionnaire development, Swedish Obese Subjects study
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet Surveys, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sweden, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review