CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 218Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceEmployee Performance and LeadershipJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leader Self‐Reported Emotional Intelligence and Perceived Employee Creativity: An Exploratory Study

Rego, Arménio, Sousa, Filipa, Pina e Cunha, Miguel, Correia, Anabela, Saur‐Amaral, Irina·2007·Creativity and Innovation Management
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00435.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research studies the relationship between six dimensions of leaders' emotional intelligence and two dimensions of employee creativity. A sample of 138 managers from 66 organizations reported on their own emotional intelligence and the creativity of their teams. Our results point out two main findings: (a) leaders' emotional intelligence explains significant variance of both creativity dimensions; (b) emotional intelligence dimensions with higher predictive power are self‐control against criticism and empathy. The findings suggest that emotionally intelligent leaders behave in ways that stimulate the creativity of their teams.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00435.x

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Boyatzis R., 1999, Emotional Competence Inventory
  2. Bushell S., 1998, Putting your Emotions to Work, Journal for Quality and Participation, 21, 49
  3. Cherniss C., 2000, Promoting Emotional Intelligence in Organizations
  4. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.5465/amr.1998.926625 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Mayer J., 1997, The Emotional IQ Test
  7. Rego A., 2005, Inteligência emocional: Contributos adicionais para a validação de um instrumento de medida [Emotional Intelligence: Further Contributions for Validating a Measurement Instrument, Psicologia, 139

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 218

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Pina e Cunha, M., Correia, A., & Saur‐Amaral, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • Universidade de Leiria e Oeste (PT)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Setúbal (PT)
ORCID
Venue
Creativity and Innovation Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-07-19
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
250-264
ISSN
  • 0963-1690 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8691
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00435.x
OpenAlex
W1966621377
Cited by
218
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Creativity and Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
leader emotional intelligence, employee creativity, self-control, empathy, team creativity, leadership

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review