Cited by 103Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Choking on the money: reward-based performance decrements are associated with midbrain activity

Open access
Mobbs, Dean, Hassabis, Demis, Seymour, Ben, Marchant, Jennifer L., Weiskopf, Nikolaus, Dolan, Raymond J., Frith, Christopher D.·2009·Psychological Science

Abstract

A pernicious paradox in human motivation is the occasional reduced performance associated with tasks and situations that involve larger-than-average rewards. Three broad explanations that might account for such performance decrements are attentional competition (distraction theories), inhibition by conscious processes (explicit-monitoring theories), and excessive drive and arousal (overmotivation theories). Here, we report incentive-dependent performance decrements in humans in a reward-pursuit task; subjects were less successful in capturing a more valuable reward in a computerized maze. Concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed that increased activity in ventral midbrain, a brain area associated with incentive motivation and basic reward responding, correlated with both reduced number of captures and increased number of near-misses associated with imminent high rewards. These data cast light on the neurobiological basis of choking under pressure and are consistent with overmotivation accounts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02399.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jackson R Beilock SL Farrow D Baker J MacMahon C Attention and performance Developing elite sports performers: Lessons from theory and practice 2008 104 118 Routledge New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mobbs, D., Hassabis, D., Seymour, B., Marchant, J. L., Weiskopf, N., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Functional Imaging Laboratory, University College London
Corresponding author
Mobbs, Dean
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2009-08
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
955-962
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2148175602
Cited by
103
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (078865)
  • Brain Research Trust
  • National Research Foundation
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
  • Medical Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
choking under pressure, reward magnitude, incentive motivation, ventral midbrain, performance decrement, attentional competition, arousal, near misses
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adult, Arousal, Attention, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mesencephalon, Motion Perception, Motivation, Orientation, Oxygen, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Maze Learning, Video Games, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review