Cited by 81Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Effects of methylphenidate on working memory components: influence of measurement

Bedard, Anne‐Claude, Jain, Umesh, Johnson, Sheilah Hogg, Tannock, Rosemary·2007·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: To investigate the effects of methylphenidate (MPH) on components of working memory (WM) in attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and determine the responsiveness of WM measures to MPH. Methods: Participants were a clinical sample of 50 children and adolescents with ADHD, aged 6 to 16 years old, who participated in an acute randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover trial with single challenges of three MPH doses. Four components of WM were investigated, which varied in processing demands (storage versus manipulation of information) and modality (auditory‐verbal; visual‐spatial), each of which was indexed by a minimum of two separate measures. Results: MPH improved the ability to store visual‐spatial information irrespective of instrument used, but had no effects on the storage of auditory‐verbal information. By contrast, MPH enhanced the ability to manipulate both auditory‐verbal and visual‐spatial information, although effects were instrument specific in both cases. Conclusions: MPH effects on WM are selective: they vary as a function of WM component and measurement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01760.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychostimulant medications appear to improve basic non-executive cognitive processes such as attention and response speed, but their effect on tasks with a prominent executive component, such as central executive working memory, is much more limited.

    “psychostimulant medications appear to improve basic (non-executive) cognitive processes such as attention and response speed, whereas their impact on tasks with a prominent executive component, such as central executive working memory, is considerably more limited”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bedard, A., Jain, U., Johnson, S. H., & Tannock, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Tannock, Rosemary
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-09
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
872-880
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1538570794
Cited by
81
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
methylphenidate, working memory, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children and adolescents, visuospatial working memory, auditory-verbal working memory, information storage, information manipulation, measurement sensitivity, stimulant medication effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Methylphenidate, Severity of Illness Index, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review