Cited by 334Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Configural processing in autism and its relationship to face processing

Open access
Behrmann, Marlene, Avidan, Galia, Leonard, Grace Lee, Kimchi, Rutie, Luna, Beatriz, Humphreys, Kate, Minshew, Nancy·2006·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Studies of the perceptual performance of individuals with autism have focused, to a large extent, on two domains of visual behavior, one associated with face processing and the other associated with global or holistic processing. Whether autistic individuals differ from neurotypical individuals in these domains is debatable and, moreover, the relationship between the behaviors in these two domains remains unclear. We first compared the face processing ability of 14 adult individuals with autism with that of neurotypical controls and showed that the autistic individuals were slowed in their speed of face discrimination. We then showed that the two groups differed in their ability to derive the global whole in two different tasks, one using hierarchical compound letters and the other using a microgenetic primed matching task with geometric shapes, with the autistic group showing a bias in favor of local information. A significant correlation was also observed between performance on the face task and the configural tasks. We then confirmed the prediction that the ability to derive the global whole is not only critical for faces but also for other objects as well, as the autistic individuals performed more slowly than the control group in discriminating between objects. Taken together, the results suggest that the bias for local processing seen in autistic individuals might have an adverse impact on their ability to process faces and objects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.04.002

Cites

124 of 124 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behrmann, M., Avidan, G., Leonard, G. L., Kimchi, R., Luna, B., Humphreys, K., & Minshew, N.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Behrmann, Marlene
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
110-129
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122204760
Cited by
334
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, configural processing, face processing, face discrimination, global processing, local processing bias, holistic processing, object discrimination, visual perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Autistic Disorder, Discrimination, Psychological, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review