Cited by 134Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementReproductive System and Pregnancy

Pregnancy outcome in women with peritoneal, ovarian and rectovaginal endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study

Open access
Vercellini, P, Parazzini, F, Pietropaolo, G, Cipriani, S, Frattaruolo, MP, Fedele, L·2012·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: Vercellini P, Parazzini F, Pietropaolo G, Cipriani S, Frattaruolo M, Fedele L. Pregnancy outcome in women with peritoneal, ovarian and rectovaginal endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG 2012;119:1538–1543. We retrospectively assessed pregnancy outcome in 419 women who achieved a first spontaneous singleton pregnancy after surgery for endometriosis. A miscarriage was observed in 87 of 419 women (20.8%) and an ectopic pregnancy in eight (1.9%). Among the remaining 324 women, 14 (4.3%) experienced gestational hypertension/pre‐eclampsia, 38 (11.7%) had a preterm delivery, five (1.5%) had placental abruption and 12 (3.7%) had placenta praevia. The incidence of placenta praevia was 7.6% in 150 women with rectovaginal lesions, 2.1% in 69 with ovarian endometriomas plus peritoneal implants, and 2.4% in 100 women with peritoneal implants only, whereas no case was observed in 100 women with ovarian endometriomas only.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03466.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vercellini, P., Parazzini, F., Pietropaolo, G., Cipriani, S., Frattaruolo, M., & Fedele, L.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Vercellini, P
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-20
Volume
119
Issue
12
Pages
1538-1543
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W1493411262
Cited by
134
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Milano
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
endometriosis, pregnancy outcomes, peritoneal endometriosis, endometrioma, rectovaginal endometriosis, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, preterm birth, placenta previa, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, placental abruption, endometriosis surgery
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Laparoscopy, Placenta Previa, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Rectal Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Vaginal Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review