Cited by 87Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceAging and Gerontology Research

‘Accelerated aging’: a primrose path to insight?

Open access
Miller, Richard A.·2004·Aging Cell

Abstract

Summary: Organism envy afflicts most researchers who work on aging in mice; how frustrating it is to see the worm and fly biologists nail down milestone after milestone, citation after citation! Surely genetic trickery can produce mice that age in a comparable jiffy? Alas, our near‐total ignorance of what times the aging process makes it hard to guess what genes to tweak, if indeed aging can be mimicked a presto. Building a case that a given short‐lived mutant ages quickly is a steep and thorny path, requiring more than just plucking a symptom here and there from a list of things that sometimes go wrong in old people or old mice. The hallmark of aging is that a lot goes wrong more or less at the same time, in 2‐year‐old mice, 10‐year‐old dogs and 70‐year‐old people. Finding ways to damage one or two systems in a 6‐week or 6‐month‐old mouse is not too hard to do, but the implications of such studies for improved understanding of aging per se are at best indirect and at worst imaginary and distracting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00081.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Premature aging models fail to recapitulate all aspects of aging but are instead "segmental progerias".

    “A related difficulty is that premature aging models fail to recapitulate all aspects of aging but are instead “segmental progerias” (Hasty and Vijg, 2004; Miller, 2004”

    From DNA Repair, Genome Stability, and Aging (2005) · cites this paper as Miller, 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Richard A.
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-22
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
47-51
ISSN
  • 1474-9718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-9726
OpenAlex
W2021587119
Cited by
87
References
25
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG013711, AG13711)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
accelerated aging, mouse models of aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Animals, Humans, Life Style, Longevity, Aging, Premature, Models, Animal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review